HI6005 - Organisational Structure and Culture Analysis Report

Verified

Added on  2022/12/15

|10
|613
|218
Report
AI Summary
This report delves into the complexities of organizational structure and culture, examining six key elements and prominent management theorists, including Adam Smith, Fayol, and others. It explores departmentalization, chain of command, span of control, and formalization. The paper investigates the impact of the organizational environment, considering overall tactics and size, as well as technical developments and environmental uncertainty. The report provides case studies of companies like Toyota, Nestle, Coca-Cola, and Unilever, analyzing their organizational structures for a deeper understanding. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of adapting organizational structures to meet current needs and sizes for optimal performance and profitability. The report includes references to relevant academic sources.
Document Page
ORGANIZATIONAL
STRUCTURE
Organisational culture
Organizational environment
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
Six key elements and management theorist
1. Work Specialization (Adam Smith)
2. Departmentalization (Gulick and Urwick)
3. Chain of Command (Fayol)
4. Span of Control (V.A. Graicunas)
5. Centralization Vs Decentralization (Maurice
Block)
6. Formalization (Lawrence B. Mohr)
Document Page
Contingencies for the organizational environment
Overall tactics of the organization
Size of organization
Document Page
Contingencies for the
organizational environment
Technical developments
Level of environmental uncertainty
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
Coca-Cola
Document Page
Unilever
Document Page
Nestle
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
Toyota
Document Page
Conclusion
This paper has presented a deep knowledge of the
organizational structure and the organizational culture for
the overall working of the company. In this given paper
different companies like Toyota, Nestle, Coca-Cola, and
Unilever are discussed and the organizational structure of
these companies are explained for the core
understanding. It is recommended for every organization
that they must reframe their organizational structure as
per the need of time and size of the company. It will help
the organization to perform perfectly and gain more
profits in the coming future.
Document Page
ReferencesAl-Qatawneh, M., 2014. The Impact of Organizational Structure on Organizational Commitment: A Comparison between Public and Private Sector
Firms in Jordan. European Journal of Business and Management , 6(12), pp. 1-9, Available at:
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4da5/1db29a692cf866b58a9c701663b1c6b0607c.pdf
Andersson, J. & Zbirenko, A., 2014. Effect of organizational structure, leadership and communication on efficiency and productivity, Available at:
https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:735889/fulltext01.pdf
Cheyenne, O., 2018. Types of Internal Organizational Change: Structural, Strategic, People, and Process, Available at:
https://study.com/academy/lesson/organizational-change-causes-types-challenges-for-managers.html
Clawson, J. & Pitts, T., 2008. Organizational Structure, Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=910385
Dedahanov, A., Rhee, C. & Yoon, J., 2017. Organizational structure and innovation performance: Is employee innovative behavior a missing link?.
22(4), Available at:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318382310_Organizational_structure_and_innovation_performance_Is_employee_innovative_behavior_a
_missing_link
Fadeyi, O., Oke, A. & Ajagbe, A., 2015. Impact of Organizational Structure on Organizational Performance, Available at:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291336611_Impact_of_Organizational_Structure_on_Organizational_Performance
Goic, S., 2014. Organizational structure, organizational dynamics, and organizational culture: a research from croatian enterprises, Available at:
http://www.toknowpress.net/ISBN/978-961-6914-02-4/papers/ML13-284.pdf
Lam, A., 2011. Innovative Organizations: Structure, Learning and Adaptation, Available at:
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/40f9/6a8deddd30315b40d4dce9fd01ba0ba170c1.pdf
Lista, P., 2014. Organization Decision-Making and the Market Environment:Examining Contingency in Organizational Behavior, Available at:
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5258/1e799c51d36addfb40a96b51ff32e2638e74.pdf
Maduenyi, S. & Ajagbe, M., 2015. Impact of organizational structure on organizational performance, Available at:
http://eprints.covenantuniversity.edu.ng/5296/1/Paper%20140.pdf
Maletic, D., Al-Najjar, B. & Gotzamani, K., 2017. Contingency Factors Influencing Implementation of Physical Asset Management Practices,
Available at: http://organizacija.fov.uni-mb.si/index.php/organizacija/article/viewFile/736/1139
McKinsey, 2015. Organization Agility and organization design, Available at: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Business
%20Functions/Organization/Our%20Insights/McKinsey%20on%20Organization/McKinsey%20on%20Organization%20Agility%20and
%20organization%20design.ashx
Quain, S., 2018. Factors Affecting Organizational Structure, Available at: https://smallbusiness.chron.com/factors-affecting-organizational-
structure-2778.html
Samson, D., 2001. Developing innovation capability in organisations: a dynamic capabilities approach. International Journal of Innovation
Management, 5(3), p. 377400, Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ab85/1aee60231752a31721f727ab1fd3f74b39a1.pdf
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 10
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]