Overpopulation Report: Causes, Solutions, and Global Health Analysis

This report delves into the critical issue of overpopulation, examining its causes, such as resource scarcity and the increasing global population, and proposes various solutions. The report focuses on a detailed analysis of the problem-solving process, including idea generation and solution finding, with a specific focus on the role of sexuality education as a potential intervention. The methodology incorporates tools like PERT and GANTT charts for evaluation and implementation strategies. It outlines a phased approach to sexuality education across primary, secondary, and tertiary education levels. The report references various academic sources to support its findings and conclusions, offering a comprehensive overview of the challenges and potential strategies related to overpopulation and its impact on public health.

Human overpopulation of the planet
From:
Student Name

Introduction
• But as this world is moving forward the complexity of the over
population is increasing. Increase in population means over use of all
available resources like food, energy, water and many other things
• As per current survey total human population of our world is 7.6 billion
in which 61% contribution is from developing countries.

Osborn-Parnes Problem solving process steps
• Mess-Finding
• Fact-Finding
• Problem-finding
• Idea-finding
• Solution-finding
• Accepting-finding

• Idea-finding:
Over population
worldwide access to
operative contraceptive
Provide suitable
sexuality
teaching
End policies that prize
parents with
economics on the
criteria of number of
offspring
Increase
pricing for
ecological cost
Adjust population in
low populated countries

Idea finding and solution finding
• Idea finding Solution finding

Selection of option
• Evaluation of all alternatives with the help of PERT and GANT
charts .
• Chosen option- “Provide suitable sexuality teaching”

Strategy
• Sexuality teaching- mixture of knowledge
• We will conduct this program in three phases
• Primary school
• Secondary schools
• College and University levels.
• Tools
• Social media mix

References
• Abi‐El‐Mona, I., & Adb‐El‐Khalick, F. (2008). The influence of mind mapping on
eighth graders’ science achievement. School Science and mathematics, 108(7), 298-312.
• Buijs, J., Smulders, F., & Van Der Meer, H. (2009). Towards a more realistic creative
problem solving approach. Creativity and innovation management, 18(4), 286-298.
• Çelikler, D., & Harman, G. (2015). The Effect of the SCAMPER Technique in Raising
Awareness Regarding the Collection and Utilization of Solid Waste. Journal of
Education and Practice, 6(10), 149-159.
• Chen, Y. F., & Cheng, K. W. (2009). Integrating computer-supported cooperative
learning and creative problem solving into a single teaching strategy. Social Behavior
and Personality: an international journal, 37(9), 1283-1296.
• Davies, M. (2011). Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: what are
the differences and do they matter? Higher education, 62(3), 279-301.
• Kokotovich, V. (2008). Problem analysis and thinking tools: an empirical study of non-
hierarchical mind mapping. Design studies, 29(1), 49-69.

Thanks!