Requirement Analysis Report on Parramatta Car Park System Case Study
VerifiedAdded on 2022/09/15
|8
|1557
|18
Report
AI Summary
This report presents a requirement analysis of the Parramatta City Council car park system, addressing the need for a new system to manage its seven car parks. The report begins by initiating the project, defining the problem of increasing urban populations and parking demand, and outlining the project's scope and vision to create a sustainable and liveable city. It identifies key stakeholders, including government, land use, and customers. The analysis then delves into functional requirements, such as entrance, payment, and exit procedures, and non-functional requirements like fault recording, security, and seasonal ticket management. The report explores elicitation techniques, specifically focusing on seasonal tickets, and proposes tools like split tickets to optimize their use. The conclusion highlights the benefits of the elicitation technique in addressing parking issues and ensuring city sustainability. The report provides a structured approach to understanding and improving the car park system.

Parramatta case study report 1
PARRAMATTA CASE STUDY REPORT
By name
Name of the professor
Name of the school
The city
Date
PARRAMATTA CASE STUDY REPORT
By name
Name of the professor
Name of the school
The city
Date
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

Parramatta case study report 2
Abstract
Parramatta is the city council that operates the seven carparks in paramatta. The company
needs another system to control the carpark. Many people have moved to urban areas increasing
the population in the city. The high population has resulted in the high demand for the carparks
which are not available. The company is envisioned to make the city an excellent place to live by
reducing congestion and provide space for working. The company has grouped the stakeholder
into three major groups. Government, land use, and customers. The company has a functional
requirement and a non-functional requirement. The report explains the elicitation technique and
the tools used in the elicitation technique.
Abstract
Parramatta is the city council that operates the seven carparks in paramatta. The company
needs another system to control the carpark. Many people have moved to urban areas increasing
the population in the city. The high population has resulted in the high demand for the carparks
which are not available. The company is envisioned to make the city an excellent place to live by
reducing congestion and provide space for working. The company has grouped the stakeholder
into three major groups. Government, land use, and customers. The company has a functional
requirement and a non-functional requirement. The report explains the elicitation technique and
the tools used in the elicitation technique.

Parramatta case study report 3
Contents
Initiating the Project....................................................................................................................................4
Problem definition...................................................................................................................................4
Project scope & vision.............................................................................................................................5
Stakeholders of the project.....................................................................................................................5
2 FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS.............................................................................................................5
Entrance to the park................................................................................................................................5
Payment..................................................................................................................................................6
Departing the park...................................................................................................................................6
NON-FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS............................................................................................................6
Fault recording........................................................................................................................................6
Security SLA.............................................................................................................................................6
Seasonal ticket.........................................................................................................................................6
3 Elicitation techniques...............................................................................................................................7
Seasonal ticket.........................................................................................................................................7
Tool for elicitation technique..................................................................................................................7
Split ticket............................................................................................................................................7
Conclusion...................................................................................................................................................7
Bibliography................................................................................................................................................8
Contents
Initiating the Project....................................................................................................................................4
Problem definition...................................................................................................................................4
Project scope & vision.............................................................................................................................5
Stakeholders of the project.....................................................................................................................5
2 FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS.............................................................................................................5
Entrance to the park................................................................................................................................5
Payment..................................................................................................................................................6
Departing the park...................................................................................................................................6
NON-FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS............................................................................................................6
Fault recording........................................................................................................................................6
Security SLA.............................................................................................................................................6
Seasonal ticket.........................................................................................................................................6
3 Elicitation techniques...............................................................................................................................7
Seasonal ticket.........................................................................................................................................7
Tool for elicitation technique..................................................................................................................7
Split ticket............................................................................................................................................7
Conclusion...................................................................................................................................................7
Bibliography................................................................................................................................................8
⊘ This is a preview!⊘
Do you want full access?
Subscribe today to unlock all pages.

Trusted by 1+ million students worldwide

Parramatta case study report 4
Initiating the Project
system definition
Parramatta urban council is functioning in seven-car grounds in paramatta. The
commission does require a new system that aims at controlling its car park. This structure helps
in ticket issuing, handling of the payments, car park management, and controlling payments
(Nadesan, 2016). Also, recording of the problem's insurance of seasonal tickets as well as
monitoring services agreed by the guard of the car park who provides security.
The operational system of the car park does control the entry. Also, the exit and the
payment of the parking for every car is controlled by the system. There are two users of the
vehicles park regular and periodic user. Regular user makes their payment each time they make
usage of the car grounds. Annual user makes their fee before three months, six months, or 12
months for a specific car. The parking area for seasonal users is not available for regular use for
one week. During the weekend, space is available for all the users, which means for annual
users, space is only available for weekdays.
Problem definition
Half of the humankind has shifted from rural areas to the urban areas, which amount to
about 4,000 million. By the end of vision 2030, the number will increase by 60%. The cities will
have a high population, which will result in pollution problems leading to a low-quality life.
About 35% of the people do travel at the time of rash hour looking for free parking, which is
very hard to get. There it is very to regulate parking to avoid atmospheric pollution (Zhang,
Huang, and Zhang, 2018).
Initiating the Project
system definition
Parramatta urban council is functioning in seven-car grounds in paramatta. The
commission does require a new system that aims at controlling its car park. This structure helps
in ticket issuing, handling of the payments, car park management, and controlling payments
(Nadesan, 2016). Also, recording of the problem's insurance of seasonal tickets as well as
monitoring services agreed by the guard of the car park who provides security.
The operational system of the car park does control the entry. Also, the exit and the
payment of the parking for every car is controlled by the system. There are two users of the
vehicles park regular and periodic user. Regular user makes their payment each time they make
usage of the car grounds. Annual user makes their fee before three months, six months, or 12
months for a specific car. The parking area for seasonal users is not available for regular use for
one week. During the weekend, space is available for all the users, which means for annual
users, space is only available for weekdays.
Problem definition
Half of the humankind has shifted from rural areas to the urban areas, which amount to
about 4,000 million. By the end of vision 2030, the number will increase by 60%. The cities will
have a high population, which will result in pollution problems leading to a low-quality life.
About 35% of the people do travel at the time of rash hour looking for free parking, which is
very hard to get. There it is very to regulate parking to avoid atmospheric pollution (Zhang,
Huang, and Zhang, 2018).
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

Parramatta case study report 5
Project scope & vision
The city paramatta has implemented the idea as well as priorities to direct council
strategic and planning of operations. Parramatta's image is "Sydney's central city, sustainable
liveable and productive inspired by our community." This kind of public parking is strategized
to respond to the priorities identified to create a strong economy centers that are strong and can
manage transport and growth (Jamie 2015). Parramatta aims to support high residential density
and to support commercial activities in a way that will make the area more attractive and liveable
by all kinds of users. This goal is aimed at controlling transport and avoiding congestion and
traffic.
Stakeholders of the project
the stakeholder of the paramatta city council is grouped into three main groups, namely
the land use, government, and the consumers.
2 FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Entrance to the park
The moment a car approaches the entry blockade, it is detected, and the button is pressed
to control the pillar. The users who ordinally have to press the control pillar for their ticket to be
printed. The printing of the card should last for 5 minutes. In case the parking is fully occupied,
the ticket is not published (Lambert, and Boons. 2012). For the seasonal users, there is no
printing of cards; they insert the ticket I a slot that is in the regulator pillar.
Project scope & vision
The city paramatta has implemented the idea as well as priorities to direct council
strategic and planning of operations. Parramatta's image is "Sydney's central city, sustainable
liveable and productive inspired by our community." This kind of public parking is strategized
to respond to the priorities identified to create a strong economy centers that are strong and can
manage transport and growth (Jamie 2015). Parramatta aims to support high residential density
and to support commercial activities in a way that will make the area more attractive and liveable
by all kinds of users. This goal is aimed at controlling transport and avoiding congestion and
traffic.
Stakeholders of the project
the stakeholder of the paramatta city council is grouped into three main groups, namely
the land use, government, and the consumers.
2 FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Entrance to the park
The moment a car approaches the entry blockade, it is detected, and the button is pressed
to control the pillar. The users who ordinally have to press the control pillar for their ticket to be
printed. The printing of the card should last for 5 minutes. In case the parking is fully occupied,
the ticket is not published (Lambert, and Boons. 2012). For the seasonal users, there is no
printing of cards; they insert the ticket I a slot that is in the regulator pillar.

Parramatta case study report 6
Payment
When the ordinal user is leaving, he supposed to go to the office a make some
payment. The ticked is put in the slot, and the recording of the code is done. Therefore, the
information on the ticket is compared (Lambert, and Boons, 2012). If the dates are not the same,
the customer is told to go to the office through the LDC.
Departing the park
When the client reaches the departure barrier, he or she inserts the ticket to the slot, and
he leaves the park. The card must be flashed within the 15minutes failure to which the customer
has to talk to the attendant, and the ticket is reviewed in the control room.
NON-FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Fault recording
There is required a fault system that is used to record any problem available in the
carpark. Many of the faults need to have some of the types of equipment, such as card readers,
safety cameras, together with barriers. Also some mistake such as smashed car window needs to
be reported so that it is repaired. The reports are produced monthly about all the faults the
organization was allocated and the time taken to fix them.
Security SLA
There is another requirement that is related to the service agreement level and security
firms. Every month, there is required a report regarding the time when the number of visits for
parking was below the expectation and when the parking lasted below the estimated time.
Seasonal ticket
There is a subsystem that is essential for marketing receipts. Key information such as
registration and expiry date are documented for access and validation.
Payment
When the ordinal user is leaving, he supposed to go to the office a make some
payment. The ticked is put in the slot, and the recording of the code is done. Therefore, the
information on the ticket is compared (Lambert, and Boons, 2012). If the dates are not the same,
the customer is told to go to the office through the LDC.
Departing the park
When the client reaches the departure barrier, he or she inserts the ticket to the slot, and
he leaves the park. The card must be flashed within the 15minutes failure to which the customer
has to talk to the attendant, and the ticket is reviewed in the control room.
NON-FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Fault recording
There is required a fault system that is used to record any problem available in the
carpark. Many of the faults need to have some of the types of equipment, such as card readers,
safety cameras, together with barriers. Also some mistake such as smashed car window needs to
be reported so that it is repaired. The reports are produced monthly about all the faults the
organization was allocated and the time taken to fix them.
Security SLA
There is another requirement that is related to the service agreement level and security
firms. Every month, there is required a report regarding the time when the number of visits for
parking was below the expectation and when the parking lasted below the estimated time.
Seasonal ticket
There is a subsystem that is essential for marketing receipts. Key information such as
registration and expiry date are documented for access and validation.
⊘ This is a preview!⊘
Do you want full access?
Subscribe today to unlock all pages.

Trusted by 1+ million students worldwide

Parramatta case study report 7
3 Elicitation techniques
Seasonal ticket
The seasonal ticket is used to validate and elicit access to the car parks. It paid and issued
to annual users of the parking where their parking is reserved for the weekend (Nevens et al.
2013).. The card contains the name of the company, registration and the expiry date, address, and
phone number of the user. A parking record for users are reviewed annually to make critical
decision
Tool for elicitation technique
Split ticket
Holders of the seasonal cards invest the emotionally as well as financially in the team.
The seasonal fare needs to have a tool that helps to get more out of the ticket. A split card is one
of the tools that can be used to get manager partners as well as the map, hosting of the ticket
draft. Split ticket tools help in managing the partners with the ticket (Mottee 2016). The tools
help to know which customer has which ticket. This tool also helps in sharing the card. Not
every seasonal user of the cards making use of all the season. Most of the holders need to have
partners so that there can be an effective use of the map (Birch et al, 2016). Spirit ticket helps the
team to know how their partners make use of their ticket. The members of the group may decide
which card they want to track.
Conclusion
Introduction of elicitation technique will address the parking issue with the city. The project
defines cost, duration and cost of implementing program. The city will receive befits which
ensure sustainability is achieved in the city.
3 Elicitation techniques
Seasonal ticket
The seasonal ticket is used to validate and elicit access to the car parks. It paid and issued
to annual users of the parking where their parking is reserved for the weekend (Nevens et al.
2013).. The card contains the name of the company, registration and the expiry date, address, and
phone number of the user. A parking record for users are reviewed annually to make critical
decision
Tool for elicitation technique
Split ticket
Holders of the seasonal cards invest the emotionally as well as financially in the team.
The seasonal fare needs to have a tool that helps to get more out of the ticket. A split card is one
of the tools that can be used to get manager partners as well as the map, hosting of the ticket
draft. Split ticket tools help in managing the partners with the ticket (Mottee 2016). The tools
help to know which customer has which ticket. This tool also helps in sharing the card. Not
every seasonal user of the cards making use of all the season. Most of the holders need to have
partners so that there can be an effective use of the map (Birch et al, 2016). Spirit ticket helps the
team to know how their partners make use of their ticket. The members of the group may decide
which card they want to track.
Conclusion
Introduction of elicitation technique will address the parking issue with the city. The project
defines cost, duration and cost of implementing program. The city will receive befits which
ensure sustainability is achieved in the city.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

Parramatta case study report 8
Bibliography
Birch, G.F., Gunns, T.J., Chapman, D. and Harrison, D., 2016. Development of an estuarine
assessment scheme for the management of a highly urbanised catchment/estuary system, Sydney
estuary, Australia. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 188(5), p.294.
Lambert, A.J.D. and Boons, F.A., 2012. Eco-industrial parks: stimulating sustainable
development in mixed industrial parks. Technovation, 22(8), pp.471-484.
Mottee, L.K., 2016. Social impact assessment and managing urban transport-infrastructure
projects: towards a framework to evaluate post-facto effectiveness.
Nevens, F., Frantzeskaki, N., Gorissen, L. and Loorbach, D., 2013. Urban Transition Labs: co-
creating transformative action for sustainable cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, pp.111-
122.
Zhang, X., Huang, H.J. and Zhang, H.M., 2018. Integrated daily commuting patterns and optimal
road tolls and parking fees in a linear city. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological,
42(1), pp.38-56.
Bibliography
Birch, G.F., Gunns, T.J., Chapman, D. and Harrison, D., 2016. Development of an estuarine
assessment scheme for the management of a highly urbanised catchment/estuary system, Sydney
estuary, Australia. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 188(5), p.294.
Lambert, A.J.D. and Boons, F.A., 2012. Eco-industrial parks: stimulating sustainable
development in mixed industrial parks. Technovation, 22(8), pp.471-484.
Mottee, L.K., 2016. Social impact assessment and managing urban transport-infrastructure
projects: towards a framework to evaluate post-facto effectiveness.
Nevens, F., Frantzeskaki, N., Gorissen, L. and Loorbach, D., 2013. Urban Transition Labs: co-
creating transformative action for sustainable cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 50, pp.111-
122.
Zhang, X., Huang, H.J. and Zhang, H.M., 2018. Integrated daily commuting patterns and optimal
road tolls and parking fees in a linear city. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological,
42(1), pp.38-56.
1 out of 8