Article Review on the Dichotomy of Politics and Administration

This report is an article review that delves into the central theme of the relationship between politics and public administration. The reviewed article examines the myth of the dichotomy between these two concepts, highlighting examples from the US and other regions to illustrate how the rise of public administrative states doesn't align with democratic societies. The author challenges the perceived separation, arguing for a complementary relationship between politicians and administrators, conceptualizing their roles through various typologies. The article argues for the simultaneous emphasis on separation and interaction, using theoretical perspectives like structural and policy-making theories. It discusses the potential consequences of overlapping functions, such as political dominance or bureaucratic autonomy, and advocates for complementarities to ensure healthy interaction and mutual influence. The review also points out the strengths of the article, such as its analytical design and well-placed descriptions of concepts, while acknowledging a potential bias towards the idea of complementarity. The author concludes that the article's ideas align with the pluralistic approach, emphasizing the need to remove the compartmentalization of chambers.

RUNNING HEAD: ARTICLE REVIEW
Article Review
Name of Student:
Name of University;
Author Note:

1ARTICLE REVIEW
Central Theme:
Raising various examples that has occurred in US and also in other regions, the author of the
article has examined the myth of dichotomy between the politics and the public administration.
The author put forth few examples in the US how the rise of the public administrative states are
not in a synchronised position with the democratic society. In view of this dichotomised
understanding of the administration with politics, the author questions the perceived dichotomy
and aimed at establishing how the two concepts are complementary to each other.
Assumption of the author:
The central theme of the article is that it aims at showing that the clear separation f the
administration from politics is a myth and he conceptualises the real roles of the relationship
between the politicians and the top officials. In doing this, the author have also argued how these
relations are posed in front by terms of bargains or different “role and relation” typologies.
Keeping in par with the analysis of the workings of the local government all over the western
world, the author tries to develop a complementary relationship between these apparently
perceived as opposite views (Ayee, 2013).
Main Arguments and findings:
In the present essay, the author argues that there has been I the past as well as in the present a
simultaneous emphasis on separation and insulation of administrators from political interference,
on one hand, and interaction and incorporation of administrative contributions in the design and
the implementation of public policy, on the other hand. In arguing this, he put forth various
theoretical propositions including the structural perspectives, the neo organizational theories and
the Policy making theories. According to the author, the concept of dichotomy was put forth in

2ARTICLE REVIEW
order to make convenience for the elected officials to encompass and delegate some of the
unpopular rules to the administrators. He is also of the opinion that this idea of dichotomy has
been persisting since the early history of US and has been able to be continued for long because
of the absence of any further alternatives. There were however, in the initial stage, requirement
for this separation in order to have a clear image. People in present time have took the cue from
such previous practices and now utilizes this which the author called as a contrived dichotomy
(Wamsley, Goodsell, Rohr, Stivers, et al. 2016). The author further puts stress on the need of the
interdependence between the political chair holders and the administrations; however, the roles
have to be distinct. According to him, this will bring in the harmony of governance.
Contribution to administration:
Despite the author’s putting forward of the arguments why the interdependence between politics
and administrations are required, he also admits that there is reasons for the establishment of
such separation. The various countries seek by various means of legislation to maintain the
political neutrality in administration (Overeem, 2017).. He argues that there are tendencies of
having the following situations if the functions overlap.
The first type of condition that the author thinks to have happened is the political dominance,
where there are more control of the political power and less control of the administrative
interdependence. Various scholars have criticized this condition since the progressive era. In the
Bureaucratic autonomy condition, the administrators tend to become self-controlling and thus
cares less for public interest (Uwizeyimana, 2013). In addition, the mutual respect between the
political leaders and the administrators are lost.

3ARTICLE REVIEW
The author is of the view that the idealized concept would be the complementarities
which will ensures a healthy interaction, mutual deference and a reciprocal influence upon each
other where the administration will help in shaping the policies and give necessary content in the
process of implementing those policies. The duty of the political officials would be to oversee
those implementations and give necessary feedbacks.
By analyzing the different phases about what will happen in the different power holding
scenarios of the political officials and the administrators, the author, in this article gave a brief
overview of the possible reasons of conflicts and distrust. In putting forth the idea of
complementarities, the article gives the administration process a new dimension. The public
administrators will have the idea of exercising their rights and duties with having a peaceful
coordination between themselves and the political officials. In this manner, they can also get rid
of the situations where the officials generally tend to delegate unpopular issues upon them.
Moreover, a correct situation and sharing of power will make the administration system more
strong and transparent. The step by step process of the implementation of a particular context and
each if their roles in this implementation can be understood thoroughly with a proper insight
from this article.
Strengths and weakness:
The author , in the discussion of the article has taken the approach of a review of the literature
and a qualitative approach by reviewing the existing experimentations and theories put forth by
the former philosophers. He has taken an analytical design in identifying the cause of the sense
of dichotomy between the two variables and why it has been so deep rooted in the minds of the
people. Moreover, by analyzing the social constructs, he put forth the necessities of the

4ARTICLE REVIEW
complementarity. The article is quite well placed and has the necessary descriptions of the
concepts and literatures about the myth as well as the necessity of the realities. The author by
providing various scenarios that will happen because of the strained relationship of the two
variables brilliantly concludes the necessity of the overlapping of them. However, the article
seems to have written on a pre determined bias and thus do not focus how much the societal
conditions of the early years have caused the formation of the myth of dichotomy rather hits on
the fact that it is a myth that has been implanted in the mind of the people.
Personal opinion:
The article is a very compact one that has taken its ideas from the secondary source of
information and qualitative data analysis, the article also resembles the thought line of the
pluralistic approach of political science that advocates that no machinery or pillar of the
government can work alone independently without the aid of the other. It is to a great extent
desirable to remove the compartmentalization of chambers.

5ARTICLE REVIEW
Reference List:
Uwizeyimana, D. E. (2013). The Politics–Administration Dichotomy: Was Woodrow Wilson
Misunderstood or Misquoted. Journal of US–China Public Administration, 10(2), 165-173.
Overeem, P. (2017). The politics-administration dichotomy: Toward a constitutional perspective.
Routledge.
Wamsley, G. L., Goodsell, C. T., Rohr, J. A., Stivers, C. M., White, O. F., & Wolf, J. F. (2016).
Public administration and the governance process. The Constitutional School of American Public
Administration, 98.
Ayee, J. (2013). Public administrators under democratic governance in Ghana. International
Journal of Public Administration, 36(6), 440-452.

6ARTICLE REVIEW