Post-Brexit Legal Autonomy: UK's Transition Period and Lawmaking

This report discusses the implications of Brexit on the UK's legal system, focusing on the period after the transition. It examines the statement that the UK is now free to make its own laws, referencing court decisions such as Factortame and the High Court's judgment on royal prerogative. The report considers both positive and negative impacts of Brexit, including potential economic slowdown, effects on trade, and the situation in Scotland. It highlights the challenges and opportunities for the UK and the EU, emphasizing the importance of independent growth and regulatory frameworks. The analysis concludes that while Brexit presents opportunities for independent development, it also poses challenges related to economic stability and international relations. Desklib provides resources for students seeking similar reports and solved assignments.

INDIVIDUAL REPORT

Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3
TASK...............................................................................................................................................3
Discussion based on statement that is “UK has left the EU and will once again be free to make
its own laws, post the Brexit Transition period”..........................................................................3
CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................6
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................7

INTRODUCTION
Individual report is a kind of essential document based on specific topic or subject that
provide overall information that a person read and use to response. The current assignment will
be based on specific statement that will be discussed referring to appropriate court decisions that
support argument based on Brexit.
TASK
Discussion based on statement that is “UK has left the EU and will once again be free to make its
own laws, post the Brexit Transition period”.
The privilege to do jobs and staying in Britain and EU is come to the finish. United
Kingdom national from now will require the approval for visiting to the EU for staying in the
state for more than 90 days in the time period of about 180 days. Now they are not part of the
European Union. The Great Britain is now allowed to have its own trade policy can arrange deals
with new nation. The Great Britain will departure from the European Union on the day of 31st
January 2020, following the full and final confirmation of the removal consent. UK will then get
in the transition period. This small-time period is given as the concern of the Removal agreement
and its last day will be 31 December 2020. Till then, everything intent to be the usual enterprise
for the nationals, customers, organisations, financiers, students, and researchers in some place
European Union and UK. There was always tension and complication between the UK and the
EU from the beginning of the relation. It ended when the Prime Minister David Cameron's
declaration in the Feb 2016 there will be no vote to take decision whether the UK will be the part
of the EU or leaves it. The votes were practised on June 23, 2016. There were 52% of votes that
chose to leave the EU. Formal communication about how will this be preprocessed in Feb 2017
(Oxford 2018). Later on when legislative assembly approved the governance to start the
procedure. Brexit changed the description of the formal state connecting the UK and the EU and
puts London's spot as a world economic centre into the doubt. It forms new trade limitation
linking the UK and the all over the EU. This is the few of the important effects of Brexit. Brexit
was backed up by a very small amount of peoples in the 2016 votes. Simply influence is
continuing to increase from that time. It is most commonly supported by the traditional or
democrat voters but it also had a huge back up from the people who have low salary and less
talented voters that feels left out from the European Community ever-changing economic
system. The UK is already troubled from the Brexit. The economic system is slowed, and several

business organisation have moved their headquarter to the EU. There is some effect the
development and jobs (Joe,2018). Consequences are also there specifically to British capital and
Scotland. Brexit's largest drawback is harm to the Great Britain economic development. Most of
it because of the unpredictability surrounding the concluding result. The uncertainty because of
the Brexit has decreased down the development of the United Kingdom economic growth from
about 2.4% in 2015 to 1.6% in 2019. The UK authorities have calculation that Brexit will take
down the growth of UK by 6.7% over 15 years (Lee, 2021). It is forecasted that the present-day
terms of free trade but closed immigration. The British Sterling Pound rate has lowered from
$1048 on the day of the vote to $1.36 the next twenty-four hours. Brexit weakened Britain's
young workers. Germany is proposed to have a working class shortage of 3 million proficient
workers by 2030. This occupation will not be readily accessible to the UK's workers after the
Brexit. Employers are finding difficulty in hiring the employees. The reason is that the EU born
workers has left the UK. This affecting the low-skilled and medium-skilled occupation the most.
The United kingdom essential negotiate new trade agreements with nations outside the EU. That
have more than 45 trades consent with more than 70 state already in the spot.
Scotland picking opposition Brexit. The Scotch governance thinks that the residing in the
EU is the good for the Scotland and as well as for UK. Scotland is forcing the United kingdom's
authorities to give one more chance to vote. If UK does not hold the second referendum than the
Scotland will itself announce a referendum on independence. After that Scotland can give
application for EU association on its own. Brexit is already have caused a slow growth on the
United kingdom's financial centre of London. It has saw till now is only about approximately
1.4% in the year of 2018 and roughly near the zero in the year 2019. Brexit also has weakened
commercial enterprise assets of about nearly 11% in the 2016 and again in 2019. Multinational
organisation is fewer interested in using the London's English-speaking debut into the European
Union system. Companies like Barclay's has shifted over more than 5,000 of its public to the
Irish branches whereas people like Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan and Morgan Stanley changed
their clientele of about 10%. The Bank of America moved around 100 of its bankers to Dublin
bureau and around 400 agent deals unit in Paris.
Brexit is considered as one of those supportive external political factors that may put
positive impact on United Kingdom and European Union, in term of driving the attention of both
countries toward developing nations independently, without depending on each other (Leruth,

Gänzle and Trondal, 2022). The separation of EU and UK, will provide each nation opportunity
to form their own laws and regulatory concepts that in turn support to increase GDP and
economic growth, even better than last few years or months. The parliamentary sovereignty
stolen by the nation at high extent, since the Britain's initial application to become a part the EU
community in 1961, and future with legislation of European communities Act 1972,
parliamentary sovereignty may aim of passionate argument, especially after a landmark action of
the House of Lords In Factortame (Bickerton, 2019). The high court in case of Brexit rendered a
controversial judgement on 3rd November, 2016 in which they consider that royal prerogative can
utilize with respect to the obligations and right that might be created as a matter of global law.
According to this statement, they tend to provide fair growth opportunity to both countries,
which is essential and beneficial for EU and UK. As they seek to progress without any support
from each other, excluding venture relation that a company establish in both nations were work
together. However, according to judiciary, individual rights that protect by national law, were to
be impacted, Parliament may to intervene, especially in case of event where certain individual
rights that might not replicate in the United Kingdom (“Let’s take back control”: Brexit and the
Debate on Sovereignty, 2017). The decision taken by the governmental bodies are appropriate
and suitable for each country, but on the other side it may affect negatively, in term of decreasing
their growth for some time. It is fact that UK is all set of leave the EU on 31 January 2020 at
Brussels time. Therefore, they will no longer be a part of Member State of EU, which may be the
best decision that government taken in favour of both countries.
On the other hand, the decision that judges has been taken is not good in case of
European Union, as they regret but respect the same, which is important for them to do so
(Prescott, Pilato and Bellia, 2020). This division or separation is good for UK as it may get
chance to take decision independently, but EU may affect negatively in term of feeling the
pressure of starting new journey from beginning to establish individual person or whole nation
independently with consideration of economic growth that influence individuals living standard.
This freedom will pay more from EU, in form of struggle that people who came from UK and
left out their jobs. Withdrawal Agreement is the base of this decision, that establish concept of
UK withdrawal from European Union. It may assure that this separation will happen in peaceful
way & offer some legal certainty once the EU and Treaties law may cease to apply to the UK.
Along with some growth factors, there are certain negative aspects included in the decision of

Brexit that impact the way individual person would live in the world. In HS2 case discuss in
2014, the high court say in how much influence and credit give to European law in case of issue
with major United Kingdom constitutional norms.
The decision affect sovereignty as it become a main issue for UK citizen and under
pressure from own Eurosceptic MPs, in term of taking early stages to identify will to prevent
nation from perceive battle in the future. The government bodies engagement in Brexit decision
may favour it for each member either UK or EU.
CONCLUSION
On the basis of above discussion, it has been concluded that separation of European
Union and United Kingdom has impacted positively. It has provided each nation chance to grow
independently and productively. Furthermore, by summing up above analysis, it has been
summarized that governmental laws and judicature decisions has supported in development of
countries.

REFERENCES
Books and Journals
“Let’s take back control”: Brexit and the Debate on Sovereignty. 2017. [Online]. Available
Through: <https://journals.openedition.org/rfcb/1319#ftn14>
Bickerton, C., 2019. ‘Parliamentary’,‘popular’and ‘pooled’: conflicts of sovereignty in the
United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union. Journal of European Integration.
41(7). pp.887-902.
Expert Briefings, (oxan-es).
Joe, D.H., 2018. The Brexit Transition Period and the EU's Existing FTA Partners.
Lee, Y.H., 2021. United Kingdom Copyright Decisions and Post-Brexit Copyright
Developments 2020.IIC-International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition
Law.52(3). pp.319-328.
Leruth, B., Gänzle, S. and Trondal, J., 2022. Differentiation in the European Union as a Field of
Study. The Routledge Handbook of Differentiation in the European Union. London:
Routledge. pp.1-51.
Online.
Oxford Analytica, 2018. Longer post-Brexit transition may see EU-UK resistance. Emerald
Expert Briefings, (oxan-es).
Prescott, C., Pilato, M. and Bellia, C., 2020. Geographical indications in the UK after Brexit: An
uncertain future?. Food Policy. 90. p.101808.

8