PPMP20011 Project Claims and Damages Report: A Detailed Analysis
VerifiedAdded on  2021/06/17
|23
|8179
|26
Report
AI Summary
This report, prepared for the Queensland Health Payroll Program (PPMP20011), addresses project claims and damages, focusing on two key projects: a forward strategy for the payroll system and governance and decision-making. It analyzes the effectiveness of different procurement methods, specifically fixed price contracts, and identifies key strategies and Knowledge, Skills, Abilities, and Experiences (KSAEs) to mitigate risks and reduce claims. The report is structured around elements such as platform foundation, behavioural factors, and processes, routines, and means, providing detailed KSAEs for each to maximize effectiveness. It explores technical, project management, business solution, and relational aspects, offering insights into how to optimize these elements. The report highlights the importance of authentic leadership, trust-control balance, commitment to innovation, and a no-blame culture, as well as the significance of consensus decisions, learning and continuous improvement, and incentive arrangements. The report provides a comprehensive analysis of project management strategies to minimize project claims and damages.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.

PROJECT CLAIMS AND DAMAGES REPORT
NAME OF PROJECT
PPMP20011 Project Claims and
Damages Report
1 PROGRAM INFORMATION
Program Name: Queensland Health Payroll Program
Date: 06/06/18
Project Ownership: Australian Government
Prepared by: <Name of the Student>, Project Manager
Distribution List: <Name of group member>
<Name of group member>
<Name of group member>
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 1
NAME OF PROJECT
PPMP20011 Project Claims and
Damages Report
1 PROGRAM INFORMATION
Program Name: Queensland Health Payroll Program
Date: 06/06/18
Project Ownership: Australian Government
Prepared by: <Name of the Student>, Project Manager
Distribution List: <Name of group member>
<Name of group member>
<Name of group member>
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 1
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

PROJECT CLAIMS AND DAMAGES REPORT
NAME OF PROJECT
2 PROJECT 1: FORWARD STRATEGY FOR PAYROLL SYSTEM
The preferred form of procurement as an outcome from the negotiation process for Project 1
proposed in the PPMP20011 Projects Negotiation and Conflict Report was fixed price type as
it would fix the overall cost of the project to a certain amount acceptable by both the project
company and the client.
The subthemes and KSAE’s that will best mitigate and reduce project claims and damages
are itemized in the following tables.
2.1 Platform Foundation (p. 117-118)
Elements KSAE’s to maximize the effectiveness (pp. 123-133)
1. Motivation and
Context
Technical KSAE: High Level of Experimental- motivation for
platform foundation in terms of motivation and context
Project Management KSAE: Medium Level of best value for
platform foundation in terms of motivation and context
Business Solution KSAE: Medium Level of Experimental-
motivation for platform foundation in terms of motivation and
context
Relational KSAE: Low Level of Relational rationale for platform
foundation in terms of motivation and context
2. Joint Governance
structure
Technical KSAE: Low Level of Governance Processes for platform
foundation in terms of joint governance structure
Project Management KSAE: Medium Level of Governance
Processes for platform foundation in terms of joint governance
structure
Business Solution KSAE: High Level of Governance best value
strategy for platform foundation in terms of joint governance
structure
Relational KSAE: Low level of Governance Structure for platform
foundation in terms of joint governance structure
3. Integrated Risk
Mitigation
Strategy
Technical KSAE: Medium Level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
Project Management KSAE: High Level of risk mitigation action for
platform foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
Business Solution KSAE: Low Level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 2
NAME OF PROJECT
2 PROJECT 1: FORWARD STRATEGY FOR PAYROLL SYSTEM
The preferred form of procurement as an outcome from the negotiation process for Project 1
proposed in the PPMP20011 Projects Negotiation and Conflict Report was fixed price type as
it would fix the overall cost of the project to a certain amount acceptable by both the project
company and the client.
The subthemes and KSAE’s that will best mitigate and reduce project claims and damages
are itemized in the following tables.
2.1 Platform Foundation (p. 117-118)
Elements KSAE’s to maximize the effectiveness (pp. 123-133)
1. Motivation and
Context
Technical KSAE: High Level of Experimental- motivation for
platform foundation in terms of motivation and context
Project Management KSAE: Medium Level of best value for
platform foundation in terms of motivation and context
Business Solution KSAE: Medium Level of Experimental-
motivation for platform foundation in terms of motivation and
context
Relational KSAE: Low Level of Relational rationale for platform
foundation in terms of motivation and context
2. Joint Governance
structure
Technical KSAE: Low Level of Governance Processes for platform
foundation in terms of joint governance structure
Project Management KSAE: Medium Level of Governance
Processes for platform foundation in terms of joint governance
structure
Business Solution KSAE: High Level of Governance best value
strategy for platform foundation in terms of joint governance
structure
Relational KSAE: Low level of Governance Structure for platform
foundation in terms of joint governance structure
3. Integrated Risk
Mitigation
Strategy
Technical KSAE: Medium Level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
Project Management KSAE: High Level of risk mitigation action for
platform foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
Business Solution KSAE: Low Level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 2

PROJECT CLAIMS AND DAMAGES REPORT
NAME OF PROJECT
Relational KSAE: Low Level of Risk Sharing conversation for
platform foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
4. Join
Communication
Strategy
Technical KSAE: Medium level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
Project Management KSAE: High level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
Relational KSAE: Low level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
5. Co-location
Strategy
Technical KSAE: Low level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
Project Management KSAE: High level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
Business Solution KSAE: High level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
Relational KSAE: Medium level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
2.2 Behavioural Factors (p. 119-120)
Elements KSAE’s to maximize the effectiveness (pp. 123-133)
6. Authentic
Leadership
Technical KSAE: Medium level of Resilience for behavioural
factors in terms of authentic leadership
Project Management KSAE: Low level of Appreciativeness for
behavioural factors in terms of authentic leadership
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of Authenticity for
behavioural factors in terms of authentic leadership
Relational KSAE: High level of Spirit for behavioural factors in
terms of authentic leadership
7. Trust-Control
Balance
Technical KSAE: Medium level of forms of trust for behavioural
factors in terms of Trust Control
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 3
NAME OF PROJECT
Relational KSAE: Low Level of Risk Sharing conversation for
platform foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
4. Join
Communication
Strategy
Technical KSAE: Medium level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
Project Management KSAE: High level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
Relational KSAE: Low level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
5. Co-location
Strategy
Technical KSAE: Low level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
Project Management KSAE: High level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
Business Solution KSAE: High level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
Relational KSAE: Medium level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
2.2 Behavioural Factors (p. 119-120)
Elements KSAE’s to maximize the effectiveness (pp. 123-133)
6. Authentic
Leadership
Technical KSAE: Medium level of Resilience for behavioural
factors in terms of authentic leadership
Project Management KSAE: Low level of Appreciativeness for
behavioural factors in terms of authentic leadership
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of Authenticity for
behavioural factors in terms of authentic leadership
Relational KSAE: High level of Spirit for behavioural factors in
terms of authentic leadership
7. Trust-Control
Balance
Technical KSAE: Medium level of forms of trust for behavioural
factors in terms of Trust Control
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 3

PROJECT CLAIMS AND DAMAGES REPORT
NAME OF PROJECT
Project Management KSAE: Medium level of autonomy for
behavioural factors in terms of Trust Control
Business Solution KSAE: High level of Safe work cultures for
behavioural factors in terms of Trust Control
Relational KSAE: Medium level of trust relationship building for
behavioural factors in terms of Trust Control
8. Commitment to
be Innovative
Technical KSAE: Medium level of testing, prototyping, and
experimenting for behavioural factors in terms of Commitment to
be Innovative
Project Management KSAE: Low level of innovation for
behavioural factors in terms of Commitment to be Innovative
Business Solution KSAE: High level of commitment to continuous
for behavioural factors in terms of innovation Commitment to be
Innovative
Relational KSAE: Low level of commitment to continuous
innovation for behavioural factors in terms of Commitment to be
Innovative
9. Common best-
for-project
Mindset and
Culture
Technical KSAE: Medium level of outcomes and performance
levels for behavioural factors in terms of Common best-for-project
Mindset and Culture
Project Management KSAE: High level of alignment of common for
behavioural factors in terms of goals Common best-for-project
Mindset and Culture
Business Solution KSAE: Low level of value for money reporting
for behavioural factors in terms of Common best-for-project
Mindset and Culture
Relational KSAE: Medium level of challenge for excellence for
behavioural factors in terms of Common best-for-project Mindset
and Culture
10. No-blame Culture Technical KSAE: High level of facilitating mechanism for No-blame
Culture for behavioural factors in terms of No-blame Culture
Project Management KSAE: Low level of rationale No-blame
Culture for behavioural factors in terms of No-blame Culture
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 4
NAME OF PROJECT
Project Management KSAE: Medium level of autonomy for
behavioural factors in terms of Trust Control
Business Solution KSAE: High level of Safe work cultures for
behavioural factors in terms of Trust Control
Relational KSAE: Medium level of trust relationship building for
behavioural factors in terms of Trust Control
8. Commitment to
be Innovative
Technical KSAE: Medium level of testing, prototyping, and
experimenting for behavioural factors in terms of Commitment to
be Innovative
Project Management KSAE: Low level of innovation for
behavioural factors in terms of Commitment to be Innovative
Business Solution KSAE: High level of commitment to continuous
for behavioural factors in terms of innovation Commitment to be
Innovative
Relational KSAE: Low level of commitment to continuous
innovation for behavioural factors in terms of Commitment to be
Innovative
9. Common best-
for-project
Mindset and
Culture
Technical KSAE: Medium level of outcomes and performance
levels for behavioural factors in terms of Common best-for-project
Mindset and Culture
Project Management KSAE: High level of alignment of common for
behavioural factors in terms of goals Common best-for-project
Mindset and Culture
Business Solution KSAE: Low level of value for money reporting
for behavioural factors in terms of Common best-for-project
Mindset and Culture
Relational KSAE: Medium level of challenge for excellence for
behavioural factors in terms of Common best-for-project Mindset
and Culture
10. No-blame Culture Technical KSAE: High level of facilitating mechanism for No-blame
Culture for behavioural factors in terms of No-blame Culture
Project Management KSAE: Low level of rationale No-blame
Culture for behavioural factors in terms of No-blame Culture
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 4
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

PROJECT CLAIMS AND DAMAGES REPORT
NAME OF PROJECT
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of facilitating mechanism
for No-blame Culture for behavioural factors in terms of No-blame
Culture
Relational KSAE: Medium level of rationale No-blame Culture for
behavioural factors in terms of No-blame Culture
2.3 Processes, routines, and means (p. 121-122)
Elements KSAE’s to maximize the effectiveness (pp. 123-133)
11. Consensus
Decisions
Technical KSAE: Medium level of Cultural drivers for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Consensus Decisions
Project Management KSAE: Low level of enablers of consensus
for Processes, routines, and means in terms of Consensus
Decisions
Business Solution KSAE: High level of inhibitors of consensus for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Consensus Decisions
Relational KSAE: High level of enablers of consensus for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Consensus Decisions
12. Learning and
Continuous
Improvement
Technical KSAE: Medium level of capacity of new ideas for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Learning and
Continuous Improvement
Project Management KSAE: Medium level of lessons learnt
knowledge transfer for Processes, routines, and means in terms of
Learning and Continuous Improvement
Business Solution KSAE: High level of lessons learnt knowledge
transfer for Processes, routines, and means in terms of Learning
and Continuous Improvement
Relational KSAE: High level of capacity of new ideas for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Learning and
Continuous Improvement
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 5
NAME OF PROJECT
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of facilitating mechanism
for No-blame Culture for behavioural factors in terms of No-blame
Culture
Relational KSAE: Medium level of rationale No-blame Culture for
behavioural factors in terms of No-blame Culture
2.3 Processes, routines, and means (p. 121-122)
Elements KSAE’s to maximize the effectiveness (pp. 123-133)
11. Consensus
Decisions
Technical KSAE: Medium level of Cultural drivers for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Consensus Decisions
Project Management KSAE: Low level of enablers of consensus
for Processes, routines, and means in terms of Consensus
Decisions
Business Solution KSAE: High level of inhibitors of consensus for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Consensus Decisions
Relational KSAE: High level of enablers of consensus for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Consensus Decisions
12. Learning and
Continuous
Improvement
Technical KSAE: Medium level of capacity of new ideas for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Learning and
Continuous Improvement
Project Management KSAE: Medium level of lessons learnt
knowledge transfer for Processes, routines, and means in terms of
Learning and Continuous Improvement
Business Solution KSAE: High level of lessons learnt knowledge
transfer for Processes, routines, and means in terms of Learning
and Continuous Improvement
Relational KSAE: High level of capacity of new ideas for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Learning and
Continuous Improvement
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 5

PROJECT CLAIMS AND DAMAGES REPORT
NAME OF PROJECT
13. Incentive
Arrangements
Technical KSAE: Low level of managing tension between
innovation and incentivisation for Processes, routines, and means
in terms of Incentive Arrangements
Project Management KSAE: Medium level of innovation and
incentivisation for Processes, routines, and means in terms of
Incentive Arrangements
Business Solution KSAE: High level of incentive arrangements for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Incentive
Arrangements
Relational KSAE: Low level of incentive arrangements for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Incentive
Arrangements
14. Pragmatic
Learning-in-
Action
Technical KSAE: Low level of action learning for Processes,
routines, and means of Pragmatic Learning-in-Action
Project Management KSAE: High level of action learning for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Pragmatic Learning-
in-Action
Business Solution KSAE: Low level of coaching and mentoring for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Pragmatic Learning-
in-Action
Relational KSAE: Medium level of coaching and mentoring for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Pragmatic Learning-
in-Action
15. Transparency Technical KSAE: High level of accountability for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Transparency
Project Management KSAE: Low level of transparency for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Transparency
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of accountability for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Transparency
Relational KSAE: Medium level of transparency for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Transparency
16. Mutual
Dependence and
Accountability
Technical KSAE: Low level of enhancing enablers of mutual for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of dependency Mutual
Dependence and Accountability
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 6
NAME OF PROJECT
13. Incentive
Arrangements
Technical KSAE: Low level of managing tension between
innovation and incentivisation for Processes, routines, and means
in terms of Incentive Arrangements
Project Management KSAE: Medium level of innovation and
incentivisation for Processes, routines, and means in terms of
Incentive Arrangements
Business Solution KSAE: High level of incentive arrangements for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Incentive
Arrangements
Relational KSAE: Low level of incentive arrangements for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Incentive
Arrangements
14. Pragmatic
Learning-in-
Action
Technical KSAE: Low level of action learning for Processes,
routines, and means of Pragmatic Learning-in-Action
Project Management KSAE: High level of action learning for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Pragmatic Learning-
in-Action
Business Solution KSAE: Low level of coaching and mentoring for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Pragmatic Learning-
in-Action
Relational KSAE: Medium level of coaching and mentoring for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Pragmatic Learning-
in-Action
15. Transparency Technical KSAE: High level of accountability for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Transparency
Project Management KSAE: Low level of transparency for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Transparency
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of accountability for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Transparency
Relational KSAE: Medium level of transparency for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Transparency
16. Mutual
Dependence and
Accountability
Technical KSAE: Low level of enhancing enablers of mutual for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of dependency Mutual
Dependence and Accountability
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 6

PROJECT CLAIMS AND DAMAGES REPORT
NAME OF PROJECT
Project Management KSAE: High level of mutual dependency for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Mutual Dependence
and Accountability
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of enhancing enablers of
mutual dependency for Processes, routines, and means in terms
of Mutual Dependence and Accountability
Relational KSAE: Low level of mutual dependency for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Mutual Dependence and
Accountability
3 PROJECT 2: GOVERNANCE AND DECISION-MAKING
The preferred form of procurement as an outcome from the negotiation process for Project 2
proposed in the PPMP20011 Projects Negotiation and Conflict Report was Fixed Price
Procurement Contract type as it would help in utilizing the human labours to possibly best
level.
The subthemes and KSAE’s that will best mitigate and reduce project claims and damages
are itemized in the following tables.
3.1 Platform Foundation (p. 117-118)
Elements KSAE’s to maximize the effectiveness (pp. 123-133)
1. Motivation and
Context
Technical KSAE: High Level of Experimental- motivation for
platform foundation in terms of motivation and context
Project Management KSAE: Medium Level of best value for
platform foundation in terms of motivation and context
Business Solution KSAE: Medium Level of Experimental-
motivation for platform foundation in terms of motivation and
context
Relational KSAE: Low Level of Relational rationale for platform
foundation in terms of motivation and context
2. Joint
Governance
structure
Technical KSAE: Low Level of Governance Processes for platform
foundation in terms of joint governance structure
Project Management KSAE: Medium Level of Governance
Processes for platform foundation in terms of joint governance
structure
Business Solution KSAE: High Level of Governance best value
strategy for platform foundation in terms of joint governance
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 7
NAME OF PROJECT
Project Management KSAE: High level of mutual dependency for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Mutual Dependence
and Accountability
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of enhancing enablers of
mutual dependency for Processes, routines, and means in terms
of Mutual Dependence and Accountability
Relational KSAE: Low level of mutual dependency for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Mutual Dependence and
Accountability
3 PROJECT 2: GOVERNANCE AND DECISION-MAKING
The preferred form of procurement as an outcome from the negotiation process for Project 2
proposed in the PPMP20011 Projects Negotiation and Conflict Report was Fixed Price
Procurement Contract type as it would help in utilizing the human labours to possibly best
level.
The subthemes and KSAE’s that will best mitigate and reduce project claims and damages
are itemized in the following tables.
3.1 Platform Foundation (p. 117-118)
Elements KSAE’s to maximize the effectiveness (pp. 123-133)
1. Motivation and
Context
Technical KSAE: High Level of Experimental- motivation for
platform foundation in terms of motivation and context
Project Management KSAE: Medium Level of best value for
platform foundation in terms of motivation and context
Business Solution KSAE: Medium Level of Experimental-
motivation for platform foundation in terms of motivation and
context
Relational KSAE: Low Level of Relational rationale for platform
foundation in terms of motivation and context
2. Joint
Governance
structure
Technical KSAE: Low Level of Governance Processes for platform
foundation in terms of joint governance structure
Project Management KSAE: Medium Level of Governance
Processes for platform foundation in terms of joint governance
structure
Business Solution KSAE: High Level of Governance best value
strategy for platform foundation in terms of joint governance
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 7
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

PROJECT CLAIMS AND DAMAGES REPORT
NAME OF PROJECT
structure
Relational KSAE: Low level of Governance Structure for platform
foundation in terms of joint governance structure
3. Integrated Risk
Mitigation
Strategy
Technical KSAE: Medium Level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
Project Management KSAE: High Level of risk mitigation action for
platform foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
Business Solution KSAE: Low Level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
Relational KSAE: Low Level of Risk Sharing conversation for
platform foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
4. Join
Communication
Strategy
Technical KSAE: Medium level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
Project Management KSAE: High level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
Relational KSAE: Low level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
5. Co-location
Strategy
Technical KSAE: Low level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
Project Management KSAE: High level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
Business Solution KSAE: High level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
Relational KSAE: Medium level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
3.2 Behavioural Factors (p. 119-120)
Elements KSAE’s to maximize the effectiveness (pp. 123-133)
6. Authentic Technical KSAE: Medium level of Resilience for behavioural
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 8
NAME OF PROJECT
structure
Relational KSAE: Low level of Governance Structure for platform
foundation in terms of joint governance structure
3. Integrated Risk
Mitigation
Strategy
Technical KSAE: Medium Level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
Project Management KSAE: High Level of risk mitigation action for
platform foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
Business Solution KSAE: Low Level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
Relational KSAE: Low Level of Risk Sharing conversation for
platform foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
4. Join
Communication
Strategy
Technical KSAE: Medium level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
Project Management KSAE: High level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
Relational KSAE: Low level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
5. Co-location
Strategy
Technical KSAE: Low level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
Project Management KSAE: High level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
Business Solution KSAE: High level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
Relational KSAE: Medium level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
3.2 Behavioural Factors (p. 119-120)
Elements KSAE’s to maximize the effectiveness (pp. 123-133)
6. Authentic Technical KSAE: Medium level of Resilience for behavioural
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 8

PROJECT CLAIMS AND DAMAGES REPORT
NAME OF PROJECT
Leadership factors in terms of authentic leadership
Project Management KSAE: Low level of Appreciativeness for
behavioural factors in terms of authentic leadership
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of Authenticity for
behavioural factors in terms of authentic leadership
Relational KSAE: High level of Spirit for behavioural factors in
terms of authentic leadership
7. Trust-Control
Balance
Technical KSAE: Medium level of forms of trust for behavioural
factors in terms of Trust Control
Project Management KSAE: Medium level of autonomy for
behavioural factors in terms of Trust Control
Business Solution KSAE: High level of Safe work cultures for
behavioural factors in terms of Trust Control
Relational KSAE: Medium level of trust relationship building for
behavioural factors in terms of Trust Control
8. Commitment to
be Innovative
Technical KSAE: Medium level of testing, prototyping, and
experimenting for behavioural factors in terms of Commitment to
be Innovative
Project Management KSAE: Low level of innovation for
behavioural factors in terms of Commitment to be Innovative
Business Solution KSAE: High level of commitment to
continuous for behavioural factors in terms of innovation
Commitment to be Innovative
Relational KSAE: Low level of commitment to continuous
innovation for behavioural factors in terms of Commitment to be
Innovative
9. Common best-
for-project
Mindset and
Culture
Technical KSAE: Medium level of outcomes and performance
levels for behavioural factors in terms of Common best-for-
project Mindset and Culture
Project Management KSAE: High level of alignment of common
for behavioural factors in terms of goals Common best-for-
project Mindset and Culture
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 9
NAME OF PROJECT
Leadership factors in terms of authentic leadership
Project Management KSAE: Low level of Appreciativeness for
behavioural factors in terms of authentic leadership
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of Authenticity for
behavioural factors in terms of authentic leadership
Relational KSAE: High level of Spirit for behavioural factors in
terms of authentic leadership
7. Trust-Control
Balance
Technical KSAE: Medium level of forms of trust for behavioural
factors in terms of Trust Control
Project Management KSAE: Medium level of autonomy for
behavioural factors in terms of Trust Control
Business Solution KSAE: High level of Safe work cultures for
behavioural factors in terms of Trust Control
Relational KSAE: Medium level of trust relationship building for
behavioural factors in terms of Trust Control
8. Commitment to
be Innovative
Technical KSAE: Medium level of testing, prototyping, and
experimenting for behavioural factors in terms of Commitment to
be Innovative
Project Management KSAE: Low level of innovation for
behavioural factors in terms of Commitment to be Innovative
Business Solution KSAE: High level of commitment to
continuous for behavioural factors in terms of innovation
Commitment to be Innovative
Relational KSAE: Low level of commitment to continuous
innovation for behavioural factors in terms of Commitment to be
Innovative
9. Common best-
for-project
Mindset and
Culture
Technical KSAE: Medium level of outcomes and performance
levels for behavioural factors in terms of Common best-for-
project Mindset and Culture
Project Management KSAE: High level of alignment of common
for behavioural factors in terms of goals Common best-for-
project Mindset and Culture
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 9

PROJECT CLAIMS AND DAMAGES REPORT
NAME OF PROJECT
Business Solution KSAE: Low level of value for money reporting
for behavioural factors in terms of Common best-for-project
Mindset and Culture
Relational KSAE: Medium level of challenge for excellence for
behavioural factors in terms of Common best-for-project Mindset
and Culture
10. No-blame
Culture
Technical KSAE: High level of facilitating mechanism for No-
blame Culture for behavioural factors in terms of No-blame
Culture
Project Management KSAE: Low level of rationale No-blame
Culture for behavioural factors in terms of No-blame Culture
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of facilitating mechanism
for No-blame Culture for behavioural factors in terms of No-
blame Culture
Relational KSAE: Medium level of rationale No-blame Culture
for behavioural factors in terms of No-blame Culture
3.3 Processes, routines, and means (p. 121-122)
Elements KSAE’s to maximize the effectiveness (pp. 123-133)
11. Consensus
Decisions
Technical KSAE: Medium level of Cultural drivers for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Consensus
Decisions
Project Management KSAE: Low level of enablers of
consensus for Processes, routines, and means in terms of
Consensus Decisions
Business Solution KSAE: High level of inhibitors of consensus
for Processes, routines, and means in terms of Consensus
Decisions
Relational KSAE: High level of enablers of consensus for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Consensus
Decisions
12. Learning and
Continuous
Improvement
Technical KSAE: Medium level of capacity of new ideas for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Learning and
Continuous Improvement
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 10
NAME OF PROJECT
Business Solution KSAE: Low level of value for money reporting
for behavioural factors in terms of Common best-for-project
Mindset and Culture
Relational KSAE: Medium level of challenge for excellence for
behavioural factors in terms of Common best-for-project Mindset
and Culture
10. No-blame
Culture
Technical KSAE: High level of facilitating mechanism for No-
blame Culture for behavioural factors in terms of No-blame
Culture
Project Management KSAE: Low level of rationale No-blame
Culture for behavioural factors in terms of No-blame Culture
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of facilitating mechanism
for No-blame Culture for behavioural factors in terms of No-
blame Culture
Relational KSAE: Medium level of rationale No-blame Culture
for behavioural factors in terms of No-blame Culture
3.3 Processes, routines, and means (p. 121-122)
Elements KSAE’s to maximize the effectiveness (pp. 123-133)
11. Consensus
Decisions
Technical KSAE: Medium level of Cultural drivers for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Consensus
Decisions
Project Management KSAE: Low level of enablers of
consensus for Processes, routines, and means in terms of
Consensus Decisions
Business Solution KSAE: High level of inhibitors of consensus
for Processes, routines, and means in terms of Consensus
Decisions
Relational KSAE: High level of enablers of consensus for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Consensus
Decisions
12. Learning and
Continuous
Improvement
Technical KSAE: Medium level of capacity of new ideas for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Learning and
Continuous Improvement
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 10
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

PROJECT CLAIMS AND DAMAGES REPORT
NAME OF PROJECT
Project Management KSAE: Medium level of lessons learnt
knowledge transfer for Processes, routines, and means in
terms of Learning and Continuous Improvement
Business Solution KSAE: High level of lessons learnt
knowledge transfer for Processes, routines, and means in
terms of Learning and Continuous Improvement
Relational KSAE: High level of capacity of new ideas for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Learning and
Continuous Improvement
13. Incentive
Arrangements
Technical KSAE: Low level of managing tension between
innovation and incentivisation for Processes, routines, and
means in terms of Incentive Arrangements
Project Management KSAE: Medium level of innovation and
incentivisation for Processes, routines, and means in terms of
Incentive Arrangements
Business Solution KSAE: High level of incentive arrangements
for Processes, routines, and means in terms of Incentive
Arrangements
Relational KSAE: Low level of incentive arrangements for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Incentive
Arrangements
14. Pragmatic
Learning-in-
Action
Technical KSAE: Low level of action learning for Processes,
routines, and means of Pragmatic Learning-in-Action
Project Management KSAE: High level of action learning for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Pragmatic
Learning-in-Action
Business Solution KSAE: Low level of coaching and mentoring
for Processes, routines, and means in terms of Pragmatic
Learning-in-Action
Relational KSAE: Medium level of coaching and mentoring for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Pragmatic
Learning-in-Action
15. Transparency Technical KSAE: High level of accountability for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Transparency
Project Management KSAE: Low level of transparency for
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 11
NAME OF PROJECT
Project Management KSAE: Medium level of lessons learnt
knowledge transfer for Processes, routines, and means in
terms of Learning and Continuous Improvement
Business Solution KSAE: High level of lessons learnt
knowledge transfer for Processes, routines, and means in
terms of Learning and Continuous Improvement
Relational KSAE: High level of capacity of new ideas for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Learning and
Continuous Improvement
13. Incentive
Arrangements
Technical KSAE: Low level of managing tension between
innovation and incentivisation for Processes, routines, and
means in terms of Incentive Arrangements
Project Management KSAE: Medium level of innovation and
incentivisation for Processes, routines, and means in terms of
Incentive Arrangements
Business Solution KSAE: High level of incentive arrangements
for Processes, routines, and means in terms of Incentive
Arrangements
Relational KSAE: Low level of incentive arrangements for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Incentive
Arrangements
14. Pragmatic
Learning-in-
Action
Technical KSAE: Low level of action learning for Processes,
routines, and means of Pragmatic Learning-in-Action
Project Management KSAE: High level of action learning for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Pragmatic
Learning-in-Action
Business Solution KSAE: Low level of coaching and mentoring
for Processes, routines, and means in terms of Pragmatic
Learning-in-Action
Relational KSAE: Medium level of coaching and mentoring for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Pragmatic
Learning-in-Action
15. Transparency Technical KSAE: High level of accountability for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Transparency
Project Management KSAE: Low level of transparency for
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 11

PROJECT CLAIMS AND DAMAGES REPORT
NAME OF PROJECT
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Transparency
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of accountability for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Transparency
Relational KSAE: Medium level of transparency for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Transparency
16. Mutual
Dependence
and
Accountability
Technical KSAE: Low level of enhancing enablers of mutual for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of dependency
Mutual Dependence and Accountability
Project Management KSAE: High level of mutual dependency
for Processes, routines, and means in terms of Mutual
Dependence and Accountability
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of enhancing enablers
of mutual dependency for Processes, routines, and means in
terms of Mutual Dependence and Accountability
Relational KSAE: Low level of mutual dependency for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Mutual
Dependence and Accountability
4 PROJECT 3: PEOPLE AND CHANGE
The preferred form of procurement as an outcome from the negotiation process for Project 2
proposed in the PPMP20011 Projects Negotiation and Conflict Report was Fixed Price
Procurement Contract type as it would help in utilizing the human labours to possibly best
level.
The subthemes and KSAE’s that will best mitigate and reduce project claims and damages
are itemized in the following tables.
4.1 Platform Foundation (p. 117-118)
Elements KSAE’s to maximize the effectiveness (pp. 123-133)
1. Motivation and
Context
Technical KSAE: High Level of Experimental- motivation for
platform foundation in terms of motivation and context
Project Management KSAE: Medium Level of best value for
platform foundation in terms of motivation and context
Business Solution KSAE: Medium Level of Experimental-
motivation for platform foundation in terms of motivation and
context
Relational KSAE: Low Level of Relational rationale for platform
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 12
NAME OF PROJECT
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Transparency
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of accountability for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Transparency
Relational KSAE: Medium level of transparency for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Transparency
16. Mutual
Dependence
and
Accountability
Technical KSAE: Low level of enhancing enablers of mutual for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of dependency
Mutual Dependence and Accountability
Project Management KSAE: High level of mutual dependency
for Processes, routines, and means in terms of Mutual
Dependence and Accountability
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of enhancing enablers
of mutual dependency for Processes, routines, and means in
terms of Mutual Dependence and Accountability
Relational KSAE: Low level of mutual dependency for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Mutual
Dependence and Accountability
4 PROJECT 3: PEOPLE AND CHANGE
The preferred form of procurement as an outcome from the negotiation process for Project 2
proposed in the PPMP20011 Projects Negotiation and Conflict Report was Fixed Price
Procurement Contract type as it would help in utilizing the human labours to possibly best
level.
The subthemes and KSAE’s that will best mitigate and reduce project claims and damages
are itemized in the following tables.
4.1 Platform Foundation (p. 117-118)
Elements KSAE’s to maximize the effectiveness (pp. 123-133)
1. Motivation and
Context
Technical KSAE: High Level of Experimental- motivation for
platform foundation in terms of motivation and context
Project Management KSAE: Medium Level of best value for
platform foundation in terms of motivation and context
Business Solution KSAE: Medium Level of Experimental-
motivation for platform foundation in terms of motivation and
context
Relational KSAE: Low Level of Relational rationale for platform
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 12

PROJECT CLAIMS AND DAMAGES REPORT
NAME OF PROJECT
foundation in terms of motivation and context
2. Joint Governance
structure
Technical KSAE: Low Level of Governance Processes for platform
foundation in terms of joint governance structure
Project Management KSAE: Medium Level of Governance
Processes for platform foundation in terms of joint governance
structure
Business Solution KSAE: High Level of Governance best value
strategy for platform foundation in terms of joint governance
structure
Relational KSAE: Low level of Governance Structure for platform
foundation in terms of joint governance structure
3. Integrated Risk
Mitigation
Strategy
Technical KSAE: Medium Level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
Project Management KSAE: High Level of risk mitigation action for
platform foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
Business Solution KSAE: Low Level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
Relational KSAE: Low Level of Risk Sharing conversation for
platform foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
4. Join
Communication
Strategy
Technical KSAE: Medium level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
Project Management KSAE: High level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
Relational KSAE: Low level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
5. Co-location
Strategy
Technical KSAE: Low level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
Project Management KSAE: High level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 13
NAME OF PROJECT
foundation in terms of motivation and context
2. Joint Governance
structure
Technical KSAE: Low Level of Governance Processes for platform
foundation in terms of joint governance structure
Project Management KSAE: Medium Level of Governance
Processes for platform foundation in terms of joint governance
structure
Business Solution KSAE: High Level of Governance best value
strategy for platform foundation in terms of joint governance
structure
Relational KSAE: Low level of Governance Structure for platform
foundation in terms of joint governance structure
3. Integrated Risk
Mitigation
Strategy
Technical KSAE: Medium Level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
Project Management KSAE: High Level of risk mitigation action for
platform foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
Business Solution KSAE: Low Level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
Relational KSAE: Low Level of Risk Sharing conversation for
platform foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
4. Join
Communication
Strategy
Technical KSAE: Medium level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
Project Management KSAE: High level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
Relational KSAE: Low level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
5. Co-location
Strategy
Technical KSAE: Low level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
Project Management KSAE: High level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 13
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

PROJECT CLAIMS AND DAMAGES REPORT
NAME OF PROJECT
Business Solution KSAE: High level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
Relational KSAE: Medium level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
4.2 Behavioural Factors (p. 119-120)
Elements KSAE’s to maximize the effectiveness (pp. 123-133)
6. Authentic
Leadership
Technical KSAE: Medium level of Resilience for behavioural
factors in terms of authentic leadership
Project Management KSAE: Low level of Appreciativeness for
behavioural factors in terms of authentic leadership
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of Authenticity for
behavioural factors in terms of authentic leadership
Relational KSAE: High level of Spirit for behavioural factors in
terms of authentic leadership
7. Trust-Control
Balance
Technical KSAE: Medium level of forms of trust for behavioural
factors in terms of Trust Control
Project Management KSAE: Medium level of autonomy for
behavioural factors in terms of Trust Control
Business Solution KSAE: High level of Safe work cultures for
behavioural factors in terms of Trust Control
Relational KSAE: Medium level of trust relationship building for
behavioural factors in terms of Trust Control
8. Commitment to
be Innovative
Technical KSAE: Medium level of testing, prototyping, and
experimenting for behavioural factors in terms of Commitment to
be Innovative
Project Management KSAE: Low level of innovation for
behavioural factors in terms of Commitment to be Innovative
Business Solution KSAE: High level of commitment to continuous
for behavioural factors in terms of innovation Commitment to be
Innovative
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 14
NAME OF PROJECT
Business Solution KSAE: High level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
Relational KSAE: Medium level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
4.2 Behavioural Factors (p. 119-120)
Elements KSAE’s to maximize the effectiveness (pp. 123-133)
6. Authentic
Leadership
Technical KSAE: Medium level of Resilience for behavioural
factors in terms of authentic leadership
Project Management KSAE: Low level of Appreciativeness for
behavioural factors in terms of authentic leadership
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of Authenticity for
behavioural factors in terms of authentic leadership
Relational KSAE: High level of Spirit for behavioural factors in
terms of authentic leadership
7. Trust-Control
Balance
Technical KSAE: Medium level of forms of trust for behavioural
factors in terms of Trust Control
Project Management KSAE: Medium level of autonomy for
behavioural factors in terms of Trust Control
Business Solution KSAE: High level of Safe work cultures for
behavioural factors in terms of Trust Control
Relational KSAE: Medium level of trust relationship building for
behavioural factors in terms of Trust Control
8. Commitment to
be Innovative
Technical KSAE: Medium level of testing, prototyping, and
experimenting for behavioural factors in terms of Commitment to
be Innovative
Project Management KSAE: Low level of innovation for
behavioural factors in terms of Commitment to be Innovative
Business Solution KSAE: High level of commitment to continuous
for behavioural factors in terms of innovation Commitment to be
Innovative
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 14

PROJECT CLAIMS AND DAMAGES REPORT
NAME OF PROJECT
Relational KSAE: Low level of commitment to continuous
innovation for behavioural factors in terms of Commitment to be
Innovative
9. Common best-
for-project
Mindset and
Culture
Technical KSAE: Medium level of outcomes and performance
levels for behavioural factors in terms of Common best-for-project
Mindset and Culture
Project Management KSAE: High level of alignment of common for
behavioural factors in terms of goals Common best-for-project
Mindset and Culture
Business Solution KSAE: Low level of value for money reporting
for behavioural factors in terms of Common best-for-project
Mindset and Culture
Relational KSAE: Medium level of challenge for excellence for
behavioural factors in terms of Common best-for-project Mindset
and Culture
10. No-blame Culture Technical KSAE: High level of facilitating mechanism for No-blame
Culture for behavioural factors in terms of No-blame Culture
Project Management KSAE: Low level of rationale No-blame
Culture for behavioural factors in terms of No-blame Culture
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of facilitating mechanism
for No-blame Culture for behavioural factors in terms of No-blame
Culture
Relational KSAE: Medium level of rationale No-blame Culture for
behavioural factors in terms of No-blame Culture
4.3 Processes, routines, and means (p. 121-122)
Elements KSAE’s to maximize the effectiveness (pp. 123-133)
11. Consensus
Decisions
Technical KSAE: Medium level of Cultural drivers for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Consensus Decisions
Project Management KSAE: Low level of enablers of consensus
for Processes, routines, and means in terms of Consensus
Decisions
Business Solution KSAE: High level of inhibitors of consensus for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Consensus Decisions
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 15
NAME OF PROJECT
Relational KSAE: Low level of commitment to continuous
innovation for behavioural factors in terms of Commitment to be
Innovative
9. Common best-
for-project
Mindset and
Culture
Technical KSAE: Medium level of outcomes and performance
levels for behavioural factors in terms of Common best-for-project
Mindset and Culture
Project Management KSAE: High level of alignment of common for
behavioural factors in terms of goals Common best-for-project
Mindset and Culture
Business Solution KSAE: Low level of value for money reporting
for behavioural factors in terms of Common best-for-project
Mindset and Culture
Relational KSAE: Medium level of challenge for excellence for
behavioural factors in terms of Common best-for-project Mindset
and Culture
10. No-blame Culture Technical KSAE: High level of facilitating mechanism for No-blame
Culture for behavioural factors in terms of No-blame Culture
Project Management KSAE: Low level of rationale No-blame
Culture for behavioural factors in terms of No-blame Culture
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of facilitating mechanism
for No-blame Culture for behavioural factors in terms of No-blame
Culture
Relational KSAE: Medium level of rationale No-blame Culture for
behavioural factors in terms of No-blame Culture
4.3 Processes, routines, and means (p. 121-122)
Elements KSAE’s to maximize the effectiveness (pp. 123-133)
11. Consensus
Decisions
Technical KSAE: Medium level of Cultural drivers for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Consensus Decisions
Project Management KSAE: Low level of enablers of consensus
for Processes, routines, and means in terms of Consensus
Decisions
Business Solution KSAE: High level of inhibitors of consensus for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Consensus Decisions
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 15

PROJECT CLAIMS AND DAMAGES REPORT
NAME OF PROJECT
Relational KSAE: High level of enablers of consensus for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Consensus Decisions
12. Learning and
Continuous
Improvement
Technical KSAE: Medium level of capacity of new ideas for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Learning and
Continuous Improvement
Project Management KSAE: Medium level of lessons learnt
knowledge transfer for Processes, routines, and means in terms of
Learning and Continuous Improvement
Business Solution KSAE: High level of lessons learnt knowledge
transfer for Processes, routines, and means in terms of Learning
and Continuous Improvement
Relational KSAE: High level of capacity of new ideas for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Learning and
Continuous Improvement
13. Incentive
Arrangements
Technical KSAE: Low level of managing tension between
innovation and incentivisation for Processes, routines, and means
in terms of Incentive Arrangements
Project Management KSAE: Medium level of innovation and
incentivisation for Processes, routines, and means in terms of
Incentive Arrangements
Business Solution KSAE: High level of incentive arrangements for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Incentive
Arrangements
Relational KSAE: Low level of incentive arrangements for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Incentive
Arrangements
14. Pragmatic
Learning-in-
Action
Technical KSAE: Low level of action learning for Processes,
routines, and means of Pragmatic Learning-in-Action
Project Management KSAE: High level of action learning for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Pragmatic Learning-
in-Action
Business Solution KSAE: Low level of coaching and mentoring for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Pragmatic Learning-
in-Action
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 16
NAME OF PROJECT
Relational KSAE: High level of enablers of consensus for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Consensus Decisions
12. Learning and
Continuous
Improvement
Technical KSAE: Medium level of capacity of new ideas for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Learning and
Continuous Improvement
Project Management KSAE: Medium level of lessons learnt
knowledge transfer for Processes, routines, and means in terms of
Learning and Continuous Improvement
Business Solution KSAE: High level of lessons learnt knowledge
transfer for Processes, routines, and means in terms of Learning
and Continuous Improvement
Relational KSAE: High level of capacity of new ideas for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Learning and
Continuous Improvement
13. Incentive
Arrangements
Technical KSAE: Low level of managing tension between
innovation and incentivisation for Processes, routines, and means
in terms of Incentive Arrangements
Project Management KSAE: Medium level of innovation and
incentivisation for Processes, routines, and means in terms of
Incentive Arrangements
Business Solution KSAE: High level of incentive arrangements for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Incentive
Arrangements
Relational KSAE: Low level of incentive arrangements for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Incentive
Arrangements
14. Pragmatic
Learning-in-
Action
Technical KSAE: Low level of action learning for Processes,
routines, and means of Pragmatic Learning-in-Action
Project Management KSAE: High level of action learning for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Pragmatic Learning-
in-Action
Business Solution KSAE: Low level of coaching and mentoring for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Pragmatic Learning-
in-Action
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 16
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

PROJECT CLAIMS AND DAMAGES REPORT
NAME OF PROJECT
Relational KSAE: Medium level of coaching and mentoring for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Pragmatic Learning-
in-Action
15. Transparency Technical KSAE: High level of accountability for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Transparency
Project Management KSAE: Low level of transparency for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Transparency
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of accountability for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Transparency
Relational KSAE: Medium level of transparency for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Transparency
16. Mutual
Dependence and
Accountability
Technical KSAE: Low level of enhancing enablers of mutual for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of dependency Mutual
Dependence and Accountability
Project Management KSAE: High level of mutual dependency for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Mutual Dependence
and Accountability
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of enhancing enablers of
mutual dependency for Processes, routines, and means in terms
of Mutual Dependence and Accountability
Relational KSAE: Low level of mutual dependency for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Mutual Dependence and
Accountability
5 PROJECT 4: FUNDING
The preferred form of procurement as an outcome from the negotiation process for Project 2
proposed in the PPMP20011 Projects Negotiation and Conflict Report was Fixed Price
Procurement Contract type as it would help in utilizing the human labours to possibly best
level.
The subthemes and KSAE’s that will best mitigate and reduce project claims and damages
are itemized in the following tables.
5.1 Platform Foundation (p. 117-118)
Elements KSAE’s to maximize the effectiveness (pp. 123-133)
1. Motivation and
Context
Technical KSAE: High Level of Experimental- motivation for
platform foundation in terms of motivation and context
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 17
NAME OF PROJECT
Relational KSAE: Medium level of coaching and mentoring for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Pragmatic Learning-
in-Action
15. Transparency Technical KSAE: High level of accountability for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Transparency
Project Management KSAE: Low level of transparency for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Transparency
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of accountability for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Transparency
Relational KSAE: Medium level of transparency for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Transparency
16. Mutual
Dependence and
Accountability
Technical KSAE: Low level of enhancing enablers of mutual for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of dependency Mutual
Dependence and Accountability
Project Management KSAE: High level of mutual dependency for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Mutual Dependence
and Accountability
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of enhancing enablers of
mutual dependency for Processes, routines, and means in terms
of Mutual Dependence and Accountability
Relational KSAE: Low level of mutual dependency for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Mutual Dependence and
Accountability
5 PROJECT 4: FUNDING
The preferred form of procurement as an outcome from the negotiation process for Project 2
proposed in the PPMP20011 Projects Negotiation and Conflict Report was Fixed Price
Procurement Contract type as it would help in utilizing the human labours to possibly best
level.
The subthemes and KSAE’s that will best mitigate and reduce project claims and damages
are itemized in the following tables.
5.1 Platform Foundation (p. 117-118)
Elements KSAE’s to maximize the effectiveness (pp. 123-133)
1. Motivation and
Context
Technical KSAE: High Level of Experimental- motivation for
platform foundation in terms of motivation and context
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 17

PROJECT CLAIMS AND DAMAGES REPORT
NAME OF PROJECT
Project Management KSAE: Medium Level of best value for
platform foundation in terms of motivation and context
Business Solution KSAE: Medium Level of Experimental-
motivation for platform foundation in terms of motivation and
context
Relational KSAE: Low Level of Relational rationale for platform
foundation in terms of motivation and context
2. Joint Governance
structure
Technical KSAE: Low Level of Governance Processes for platform
foundation in terms of joint governance structure
Project Management KSAE: Medium Level of Governance
Processes for platform foundation in terms of joint governance
structure
Business Solution KSAE: High Level of Governance best value
strategy for platform foundation in terms of joint governance
structure
Relational KSAE: Low level of Governance Structure for platform
foundation in terms of joint governance structure
3. Integrated Risk
Mitigation
Strategy
Technical KSAE: Medium Level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
Project Management KSAE: High Level of risk mitigation action for
platform foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
Business Solution KSAE: Low Level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
Relational KSAE: Low Level of Risk Sharing conversation for
platform foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
4. Join
Communication
Strategy
Technical KSAE: Medium level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
Project Management KSAE: High level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
Relational KSAE: Low level of System Integration for platform
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 18
NAME OF PROJECT
Project Management KSAE: Medium Level of best value for
platform foundation in terms of motivation and context
Business Solution KSAE: Medium Level of Experimental-
motivation for platform foundation in terms of motivation and
context
Relational KSAE: Low Level of Relational rationale for platform
foundation in terms of motivation and context
2. Joint Governance
structure
Technical KSAE: Low Level of Governance Processes for platform
foundation in terms of joint governance structure
Project Management KSAE: Medium Level of Governance
Processes for platform foundation in terms of joint governance
structure
Business Solution KSAE: High Level of Governance best value
strategy for platform foundation in terms of joint governance
structure
Relational KSAE: Low level of Governance Structure for platform
foundation in terms of joint governance structure
3. Integrated Risk
Mitigation
Strategy
Technical KSAE: Medium Level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
Project Management KSAE: High Level of risk mitigation action for
platform foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
Business Solution KSAE: Low Level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
Relational KSAE: Low Level of Risk Sharing conversation for
platform foundation in terms of integrated risk migration strategy
4. Join
Communication
Strategy
Technical KSAE: Medium level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
Project Management KSAE: High level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
Relational KSAE: Low level of System Integration for platform
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 18

PROJECT CLAIMS AND DAMAGES REPORT
NAME OF PROJECT
foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
5. Co-location
Strategy
Technical KSAE: Low level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
Project Management KSAE: High level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
Business Solution KSAE: High level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
Relational KSAE: Medium level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
5.2 Behavioural Factors (p. 119-120)
Elements KSAE’s to maximize the effectiveness (pp. 123-133)
6. Authentic
Leadership
Technical KSAE: Medium level of Resilience for behavioural
factors in terms of authentic leadership
Project Management KSAE: Low level of Appreciativeness for
behavioural factors in terms of authentic leadership
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of Authenticity for
behavioural factors in terms of authentic leadership
Relational KSAE: High level of Spirit for behavioural factors in
terms of authentic leadership
7. Trust-Control
Balance
Technical KSAE: Medium level of forms of trust for behavioural
factors in terms of Trust Control
Project Management KSAE: Medium level of autonomy for
behavioural factors in terms of Trust Control
Business Solution KSAE: High level of Safe work cultures for
behavioural factors in terms of Trust Control
Relational KSAE: Medium level of trust relationship building for
behavioural factors in terms of Trust Control
8. Commitment to
be Innovative
Technical KSAE: Medium level of testing, prototyping, and
experimenting for behavioural factors in terms of Commitment to
be Innovative
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 19
NAME OF PROJECT
foundation in terms of joint communication strategy
5. Co-location
Strategy
Technical KSAE: Low level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
Project Management KSAE: High level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
Business Solution KSAE: High level of System Integration for
platform foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
Relational KSAE: Medium level of System Integration for platform
foundation in terms of Co-location strategy
5.2 Behavioural Factors (p. 119-120)
Elements KSAE’s to maximize the effectiveness (pp. 123-133)
6. Authentic
Leadership
Technical KSAE: Medium level of Resilience for behavioural
factors in terms of authentic leadership
Project Management KSAE: Low level of Appreciativeness for
behavioural factors in terms of authentic leadership
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of Authenticity for
behavioural factors in terms of authentic leadership
Relational KSAE: High level of Spirit for behavioural factors in
terms of authentic leadership
7. Trust-Control
Balance
Technical KSAE: Medium level of forms of trust for behavioural
factors in terms of Trust Control
Project Management KSAE: Medium level of autonomy for
behavioural factors in terms of Trust Control
Business Solution KSAE: High level of Safe work cultures for
behavioural factors in terms of Trust Control
Relational KSAE: Medium level of trust relationship building for
behavioural factors in terms of Trust Control
8. Commitment to
be Innovative
Technical KSAE: Medium level of testing, prototyping, and
experimenting for behavioural factors in terms of Commitment to
be Innovative
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 19
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

PROJECT CLAIMS AND DAMAGES REPORT
NAME OF PROJECT
Project Management KSAE: Low level of innovation for
behavioural factors in terms of Commitment to be Innovative
Business Solution KSAE: High level of commitment to continuous
for behavioural factors in terms of innovation Commitment to be
Innovative
Relational KSAE: Low level of commitment to continuous
innovation for behavioural factors in terms of Commitment to be
Innovative
9. Common best-
for-project
Mindset and
Culture
Technical KSAE: Medium level of outcomes and performance
levels for behavioural factors in terms of Common best-for-project
Mindset and Culture
Project Management KSAE: High level of alignment of common for
behavioural factors in terms of goals Common best-for-project
Mindset and Culture
Business Solution KSAE: Low level of value for money reporting
for behavioural factors in terms of Common best-for-project
Mindset and Culture
Relational KSAE: Medium level of challenge for excellence for
behavioural factors in terms of Common best-for-project Mindset
and Culture
10. No-blame Culture Technical KSAE: High level of facilitating mechanism for No-blame
Culture for behavioural factors in terms of No-blame Culture
Project Management KSAE: Low level of rationale No-blame
Culture for behavioural factors in terms of No-blame Culture
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of facilitating mechanism
for No-blame Culture for behavioural factors in terms of No-blame
Culture
Relational KSAE: Medium level of rationale No-blame Culture for
behavioural factors in terms of No-blame Culture
5.3 Processes, routines, and means (p. 121-122)
Elements KSAE’s to maximize the effectiveness (pp. 123-133)
11. Consensus
Decisions
Technical KSAE: Medium level of Cultural drivers for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Consensus Decisions
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 20
NAME OF PROJECT
Project Management KSAE: Low level of innovation for
behavioural factors in terms of Commitment to be Innovative
Business Solution KSAE: High level of commitment to continuous
for behavioural factors in terms of innovation Commitment to be
Innovative
Relational KSAE: Low level of commitment to continuous
innovation for behavioural factors in terms of Commitment to be
Innovative
9. Common best-
for-project
Mindset and
Culture
Technical KSAE: Medium level of outcomes and performance
levels for behavioural factors in terms of Common best-for-project
Mindset and Culture
Project Management KSAE: High level of alignment of common for
behavioural factors in terms of goals Common best-for-project
Mindset and Culture
Business Solution KSAE: Low level of value for money reporting
for behavioural factors in terms of Common best-for-project
Mindset and Culture
Relational KSAE: Medium level of challenge for excellence for
behavioural factors in terms of Common best-for-project Mindset
and Culture
10. No-blame Culture Technical KSAE: High level of facilitating mechanism for No-blame
Culture for behavioural factors in terms of No-blame Culture
Project Management KSAE: Low level of rationale No-blame
Culture for behavioural factors in terms of No-blame Culture
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of facilitating mechanism
for No-blame Culture for behavioural factors in terms of No-blame
Culture
Relational KSAE: Medium level of rationale No-blame Culture for
behavioural factors in terms of No-blame Culture
5.3 Processes, routines, and means (p. 121-122)
Elements KSAE’s to maximize the effectiveness (pp. 123-133)
11. Consensus
Decisions
Technical KSAE: Medium level of Cultural drivers for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Consensus Decisions
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 20

PROJECT CLAIMS AND DAMAGES REPORT
NAME OF PROJECT
Project Management KSAE: Low level of enablers of consensus
for Processes, routines, and means in terms of Consensus
Decisions
Business Solution KSAE: High level of inhibitors of consensus for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Consensus Decisions
Relational KSAE: High level of enablers of consensus for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Consensus Decisions
12. Learning and
Continuous
Improvement
Technical KSAE: Medium level of capacity of new ideas for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Learning and
Continuous Improvement
Project Management KSAE: Medium level of lessons learnt
knowledge transfer for Processes, routines, and means in terms of
Learning and Continuous Improvement
Business Solution KSAE: High level of lessons learnt knowledge
transfer for Processes, routines, and means in terms of Learning
and Continuous Improvement
Relational KSAE: High level of capacity of new ideas for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Learning and
Continuous Improvement
13. Incentive
Arrangements
Technical KSAE: Low level of managing tension between
innovation and incentivisation for Processes, routines, and means
in terms of Incentive Arrangements
Project Management KSAE: Medium level of innovation and
incentivisation for Processes, routines, and means in terms of
Incentive Arrangements
Business Solution KSAE: High level of incentive arrangements for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Incentive
Arrangements
Relational KSAE: Low level of incentive arrangements for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Incentive
Arrangements
14. Pragmatic
Learning-in-
Action
Technical KSAE: Low level of action learning for Processes,
routines, and means of Pragmatic Learning-in-Action
Project Management KSAE: High level of action learning for
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 21
NAME OF PROJECT
Project Management KSAE: Low level of enablers of consensus
for Processes, routines, and means in terms of Consensus
Decisions
Business Solution KSAE: High level of inhibitors of consensus for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Consensus Decisions
Relational KSAE: High level of enablers of consensus for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Consensus Decisions
12. Learning and
Continuous
Improvement
Technical KSAE: Medium level of capacity of new ideas for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Learning and
Continuous Improvement
Project Management KSAE: Medium level of lessons learnt
knowledge transfer for Processes, routines, and means in terms of
Learning and Continuous Improvement
Business Solution KSAE: High level of lessons learnt knowledge
transfer for Processes, routines, and means in terms of Learning
and Continuous Improvement
Relational KSAE: High level of capacity of new ideas for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Learning and
Continuous Improvement
13. Incentive
Arrangements
Technical KSAE: Low level of managing tension between
innovation and incentivisation for Processes, routines, and means
in terms of Incentive Arrangements
Project Management KSAE: Medium level of innovation and
incentivisation for Processes, routines, and means in terms of
Incentive Arrangements
Business Solution KSAE: High level of incentive arrangements for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Incentive
Arrangements
Relational KSAE: Low level of incentive arrangements for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Incentive
Arrangements
14. Pragmatic
Learning-in-
Action
Technical KSAE: Low level of action learning for Processes,
routines, and means of Pragmatic Learning-in-Action
Project Management KSAE: High level of action learning for
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 21

PROJECT CLAIMS AND DAMAGES REPORT
NAME OF PROJECT
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Pragmatic Learning-
in-Action
Business Solution KSAE: Low level of coaching and mentoring for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Pragmatic Learning-
in-Action
Relational KSAE: Medium level of coaching and mentoring for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Pragmatic Learning-
in-Action
15. Transparency Technical KSAE: High level of accountability for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Transparency
Project Management KSAE: Low level of transparency for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Transparency
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of accountability for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Transparency
Relational KSAE: Medium level of transparency for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Transparency
16. Mutual
Dependence and
Accountability
Technical KSAE: Low level of enhancing enablers of mutual for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of dependency Mutual
Dependence and Accountability
Project Management KSAE: High level of mutual dependency for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Mutual Dependence
and Accountability
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of enhancing enablers of
mutual dependency for Processes, routines, and means in terms
of Mutual Dependence and Accountability
Relational KSAE: Low level of mutual dependency for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Mutual Dependence and
Accountability
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 22
NAME OF PROJECT
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Pragmatic Learning-
in-Action
Business Solution KSAE: Low level of coaching and mentoring for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Pragmatic Learning-
in-Action
Relational KSAE: Medium level of coaching and mentoring for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Pragmatic Learning-
in-Action
15. Transparency Technical KSAE: High level of accountability for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Transparency
Project Management KSAE: Low level of transparency for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Transparency
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of accountability for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Transparency
Relational KSAE: Medium level of transparency for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Transparency
16. Mutual
Dependence and
Accountability
Technical KSAE: Low level of enhancing enablers of mutual for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of dependency Mutual
Dependence and Accountability
Project Management KSAE: High level of mutual dependency for
Processes, routines, and means in terms of Mutual Dependence
and Accountability
Business Solution KSAE: Medium level of enhancing enablers of
mutual dependency for Processes, routines, and means in terms
of Mutual Dependence and Accountability
Relational KSAE: Low level of mutual dependency for Processes,
routines, and means in terms of Mutual Dependence and
Accountability
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 22
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

PROJECT CLAIMS AND DAMAGES REPORT
NAME OF PROJECT
6 BIBLIOGRAPHY
Lloyd-walker, B.M., Mills, A.J. and Walker, D.H., 2014. Enabling construction
innovation: the role of a no-blame culture as a collaboration behavioural driver in
project alliances. Construction Management and Economics, 32(3), pp.229-245.
Walker, D.H., Davis, P.R. and Stevenson, A., 2017. Coping with uncertainty and
ambiguity through team collaboration in infrastructure projects. International
Journal of Project Management, 35(2), pp.180-190.
Touboulic, A. and Walker, H., 2015. Love me, love me not: A nuanced view on
collaboration in sustainable supply chains. Journal of Purchasing and Supply
Management, 21(3), pp.178-191.
Walker, D.H. and Rahmani, F., 2016. Delivering a water treatment plant project
using a collaborative project procurement approach. Construction Innovation,
16(2), pp.158-184.
Touboulic, A. and Walker, H., 2016. A relational, transformative and engaged
approach to sustainable supply chain management: The potential of action
research. human relations, 69(2), pp.301-343.
Che Ibrahim, C.K.I., Costello, S.B., Wilkinson, S. and Walker, D., 2017.
Innovation in alliancing for improved delivery of road infrastructure projects.
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 10(4), pp.700-720.
Walker, D. and Lloyd-Walker, B., 2016. Understanding collaboration in integrated
forms of project delivery by taking a risk-uncertainty based perspective.
Administrative Sciences, 6(3), p.10.
Walker, D. and Jacobsson, M., 2014. A rationale for alliancing within a public-
private partnership. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management,
21(6), pp.648-673.
Ibrahim, K., Costello, S., Wilkinson, S. and Walker, D., 2016, September. Project
Alliancing: The case of road infrastructure projects in New Zealand. In
Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ARCOM Conference, Manchester (pp. 5-7).
Lloyd-Walker, B. and Walker, D., 2015, April. Collaborative project procurement
arrangements. Project Management Institute.
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 23
NAME OF PROJECT
6 BIBLIOGRAPHY
Lloyd-walker, B.M., Mills, A.J. and Walker, D.H., 2014. Enabling construction
innovation: the role of a no-blame culture as a collaboration behavioural driver in
project alliances. Construction Management and Economics, 32(3), pp.229-245.
Walker, D.H., Davis, P.R. and Stevenson, A., 2017. Coping with uncertainty and
ambiguity through team collaboration in infrastructure projects. International
Journal of Project Management, 35(2), pp.180-190.
Touboulic, A. and Walker, H., 2015. Love me, love me not: A nuanced view on
collaboration in sustainable supply chains. Journal of Purchasing and Supply
Management, 21(3), pp.178-191.
Walker, D.H. and Rahmani, F., 2016. Delivering a water treatment plant project
using a collaborative project procurement approach. Construction Innovation,
16(2), pp.158-184.
Touboulic, A. and Walker, H., 2016. A relational, transformative and engaged
approach to sustainable supply chain management: The potential of action
research. human relations, 69(2), pp.301-343.
Che Ibrahim, C.K.I., Costello, S.B., Wilkinson, S. and Walker, D., 2017.
Innovation in alliancing for improved delivery of road infrastructure projects.
International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 10(4), pp.700-720.
Walker, D. and Lloyd-Walker, B., 2016. Understanding collaboration in integrated
forms of project delivery by taking a risk-uncertainty based perspective.
Administrative Sciences, 6(3), p.10.
Walker, D. and Jacobsson, M., 2014. A rationale for alliancing within a public-
private partnership. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management,
21(6), pp.648-673.
Ibrahim, K., Costello, S., Wilkinson, S. and Walker, D., 2016, September. Project
Alliancing: The case of road infrastructure projects in New Zealand. In
Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ARCOM Conference, Manchester (pp. 5-7).
Lloyd-Walker, B. and Walker, D., 2015, April. Collaborative project procurement
arrangements. Project Management Institute.
ENTER YOUR NAME WITH STUDENT ID PAGE 23
1 out of 23
Related Documents

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
 +13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
© 2024  |  Zucol Services PVT LTD  |  All rights reserved.