PPMP20013 Unit Portfolio Week 10: Critically Analyse Safety Impacts

This PPMP20013 unit portfolio focuses on a critical analysis of the implications and impacts of safety within project management contexts. It leverages readings from Smith Chapters 3, 11 to 3.13, 4801-2001, 4804-2001, Smith Chapters 16 & 17, and Smith Chapters 18, 19, 20 & 21, alongside optional readings from Safe Work Australia, AS 1470-1986, Australian Constructors Association, Civil Contractors, Department of the Environment, BHP, and AS/NZS 5911:2013. The portfolio explores the significant relationships between safety systems and accident rates, emphasizing the importance of safety management systems and worker engagement. It analyzes project functions and processes used by operators of larger assets, interprets relevant policies and information, and examines management strategies and operational activities to ensure safety and quality. The portfolio also highlights the development of communicational skills and professional teamwork.

(Insert Student Name) / (Insert Student Number) - PPMP20013Unit Portfolio for Week 10
Week 10: Critically analyse the implications and impacts of safety.
Reading samples Learning
outcomes of the
unit
Learnings from your weekly study, experience, this and
prior unit readings and assignments
Supporting
documentation
including any
prior learning
Mandatory Readings
 Smith Chapters 3,
11 to 3.13;
 4801-2001;
 4804-2001;
 Smith Chapters 16
& 17;
 Smith Chapters 18,
19, 20 & 21.
Optional Readings
 Safe Work
Australia;
 AS 1470-1986;
 Australian
Constructors
Association;
 Civil Contractors;
 Department of the
Environment;
 BHP;
 AS/NZS
5911:2013.
1. To critically
analysed the
implications and
impacts of safety
There are significant relationships which are existed between safety systems
along with accident rates. The safety management system is predicted of worker
engagement levels. Into each of the organization, there should be proper safety
of employees which are highest priority of the workers those are involved into
the organization. It determines relative effectiveness of various methods which
are related to worker’s safety as well as health related training aim to improve
safety knowledge, performance and reduction of negative outcomes.
Thomson, S., Figueras, J.,
Evetovits, T., Jowett, M.,
Mladovsky, P., Maresso,
A., ... & Kluge, H.
(2015). Economic crisis,
health systems and
health in Europe: impact
and implications for
policy. World Health
Organization, Regional
Office for Europe.
Optional Readings
 Safe Work
Australia;
 AS 1470-1986;
2. To analyse
functions as well as
processes of the
project
This unit is provided of the functions as well as processes of the project
management which are used by the operators of larger assets.
Bowie, P., Ferguson, J.,
MacLeod, M., Kennedy,
S., de Wet, C., McNab, D.,
... & Atkinson, S. (2015).
1 of 4

(Insert Student Name) / (Insert Student Number) - PPMP20013Unit Portfolio for Week 10
Reading samples Learning
outcomes of the
unit
Learnings from your weekly study, experience, this and
prior unit readings and assignments
Supporting
documentation
including any
prior learning
 Australian
Constructors
Association;
 Civil Contractors;
 Department of the
Environment;
 BHP;
 AS/NZS
5911:2013.
management Participatory design of a
preliminary safety
checklist for general
practice. Br J Gen
Pract, 65(634), e330-
e343.
Mandatory Readings
 Smith Chapters 3,
11 to 3.13;
 4801-2001;
 4804-2001;
 Smith Chapters 16
& 17;
 Smith Chapters 18,
19, 20 & 21.
3. To interpret of
policy, information,
There is measurement equivalence of organizational level safety which is
supported for the employees as well as supervisors. The perceptions of
employees are predicted of safety behaviour as well as outcomes of injuries. The
perceptions of employees are based on safety climate along with prediction of
safety behaviour as well as injuries outcomes.
Carayon, P., Hancock, P.,
Leveson, N., Noy, I.,
Sznelwar, L., & Van
Hootegem, G. (2015).
Advancing a
sociotechnical systems
approach to workplace
safety–developing the
conceptual
framework. Ergonomics,
58(4), 548-564.
Optional Readings
 Safe Work
Australia;
 AS 1470-1986;
 Australian
Constructors
Association;
 Civil Contractors;
 Department of the
Environment;
4. To analyse
management
strategies and
operational
activities to ensure
safety and quality
In order to improve safety climate of the company, there are relied of employee,
rather than the supervisor, based on safety climate. At this project stage, the
contractor are undertaken of identification of safety as well as health objectives
which are accomplished by the system to relevant industrial under the safety
regulations.
Chen, D., Heyer, S.,
Ibbotson, S., Salonitis, K.,
Steingrímsson, J. G., &
Thiede, S. (2015). Direct
digital manufacturing:
definition, evolution, and
sustainability
implications. Journal of
Cleaner Production, 107,
615-625.
2 of 4

(Insert Student Name) / (Insert Student Number) - PPMP20013Unit Portfolio for Week 10
Reading samples Learning
outcomes of the
unit
Learnings from your weekly study, experience, this and
prior unit readings and assignments
Supporting
documentation
including any
prior learning
 BHP;
 AS/NZS
5911:2013.
Mandatory Readings
 Smith Chapters 3,
11 to 3.13;
 4801-2001;
 4804-2001;
 Smith Chapters 16
& 17;
 Smith Chapters 18,
19, 20 & 21.
5. To analyse
professional level
of teamwork
Small groups are teaching to develop of the communicational skills with higher
levels of the application, analysis as well as synthesis.
Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T.
E. (2017). Reframing
organizations: Artistry,
choice, and leadership.
John Wiley & Sons.
3 of 4

(Insert Student Name) / (Insert Student Number) - PPMP20013Unit Portfolio for Week 10
References
Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2017). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership. John Wiley & Sons.
Bowie, P., Ferguson, J., MacLeod, M., Kennedy, S., de Wet, C., McNab, D., ... & Atkinson, S. (2015). Participatory design of a preliminary safety checklist for
general practice. Br J Gen Pract, 65(634), e330-e343.
Carayon, P., Hancock, P., Leveson, N., Noy, I., Sznelwar, L., & Van Hootegem, G. (2015). Advancing a sociotechnical systems approach to workplace safety–
developing the conceptual framework. Ergonomics, 58(4), 548-564.
Chen, D., Heyer, S., Ibbotson, S., Salonitis, K., Steingrímsson, J. G., & Thiede, S. (2015). Direct digital manufacturing: definition, evolution, and sustainability
implications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 107, 615-625.
Di Cesare, S., Silveri, F., Sala, S., & Petti, L. (2018). Positive impacts in social life cycle assessment: state of the art and the way forward. The International
Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23(3), 406-421.
Sullivan, R. (2017). Valuing corporate responsibility: How do investors really use corporate responsibility information?. Routledge.
Thomson, S., Figueras, J., Evetovits, T., Jowett, M., Mladovsky, P., Maresso, A., ... & Kluge, H. (2015). Economic crisis, health systems and health in Europe:
impact and implications for policy. World Health Organization, Regional Office for Europe.
van den Hoek, R. E., Brugnach, M., Mulder, J. P., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2014). Analysing the cascades of uncertainty in flood defence projects: How “not
knowing enough” is related to “knowing differently”. Global environmental change, 24, 373-388.
4 of 4