Presentation Evaluation for Risk Assessment at Awesome Landscape

This document comprises a presentation evaluation and a presentation production plan related to a risk assessment for Awesome Landscape Pvt. Ltd. The evaluation, conducted by a supervisor, assesses the presentation's effectiveness across various criteria, including its ability to satisfy its purpose, clarity of information, presentation materials, and the speaker's delivery. Feedback highlights both strengths, such as clear language and appropriate cultural sensitivity, and weaknesses, such as the absence of stepwise hazard control procedures. The presentation production plan outlines the purpose, format, software, target audience, and intended outcomes of the presentation, along with references to relevant WHS legislation and organizational resources. It aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the presentation process, from planning to execution, ensuring that it meets the needs of the target audience and achieves its objectives.

Evaluation of Presentation
Evaluation
conducted
by:
supervisor
Role of
evaluator:
(Supervisor,
presentation
audience
member, etc.)
Supervisor
Title of
presentation: Risk assessment of Awesome Landscape Pvt. Limited
Date: 16th January 2019
Criteria
Yes
No
Comments
1. The
presentationsatisfie
d the document
purpose.
Yes, all details about outcome of risk
assessment provided
2. Desired outcomes/
objectives of the
presentation have
been discussed
before the
presentation.
Yes, objective well defined
3. The content is
sequenced
appropriately.
No, it follows a sequence, however some
points missing
4. The language used is
appropriate for the
audience:
 Words used are
easily
understood by
audience
 Correct
grammar has
been used
Yes, easy and simple language used
5. Language used is
culturally
appropriate –
offensive remarks
were avoided.
Yes, culturally appropriate language was
used.

6. The skills used in the
presentation
sustained your
interest.
Yes
7. You were
appropriately briefed
on your role in
evaluating the
presentation.
Yes
8. You understood the
objectives of the
presentation.
Yes
9. The aids, materials
and examples used in
the presentation
were suitable to the
target audience,
without being
distracting.
Yes
10. The aids and
materials used are
helpful even after the
presentation.
No, some points could not be followed
11. The
presentation
communicated the
safety requirements
of individuals and
parties in your
organisation.
Yes
12. The speaker
uses eye contact
from time to time.
yes
13. The speaker has
a well-modulated
voice and used voice
emphasis to stress
important points.
Yes
14. Your interest
was secured by the
persuasive
communication
techniques used in
the presentation.
Yes
15. The speaker
recognised when the
audience did not
completely
understand the topic
being discussed (e.g.
Yes, speaker was paying attention to this

through eye contact,
noticed when the
audience looked
distracted or
uninterested, etc.)
16. You had the
opportunity during
or after the
presentation to ask
questions to seek
clarification where
needed.
Yes, I got this chance
17.The speaker
adequately answers
your questions or
provide
clarifications.
Yes
18. Key points of the
presentation are
summarised or
outlined after every
main topic.
Yes
Please rate overall effectiveness of presentation in terms of:
a) Accuracy and clarity of information presented(Check one)
5 – Very Satisfactory
4 –Satisfactory
3 – Fair
2 – Poor
1 – Needs Improvement
b) Presentation materials/presentation aids (Check one)
5 – Very Satisfactory
4 –Satisfactory
3 – Fair
2 – Poor
1 – Needs Improvement
c) Speaker’s delivery of presentation (Check one)
5 – Very Satisfactory
4 –Satisfactory
3 – Fair
2 – Poor
1 – Needs Improvement
Please provide additional feedback on aspects which are not indicated on the checklist:
The presentation missed out on providing stepwise steps to control

hazards as some steps could not be practically applied. Hence, realistic
feedback was needed
Evaluated by:
Name: ____
Date: 16th January 2019