Principles of Practice - Assessment Report Analysis and Review

Verified

Added on  2023/01/13

|3
|405
|76
Report
AI Summary
This report delves into the principles of practice, specifically focusing on assessment methods and the importance of evidence. It discusses the significance of valid, current, sufficient, and authentic evidence in the assessment process. The report explores how these principles are applied to ensure that assessments accurately reflect a student's knowledge and skills, aligning with established competency standards. It emphasizes the need for comprehensive and reliable evidence to support assessment decisions, ensuring the integrity and effectiveness of the learning process. The report also touches upon the role of verification and the importance of internal reviews to maintain the accuracy and reliability of assessments. The provided references support the concepts and principles discussed, offering a detailed understanding of the subject matter.
Document Page
Understanding the principles a practice – 5
1
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
INTRODUCTION
The principle practices is a process of performing different action and doing something. It is
based on the principles in terms of reason, behind the practice under circumstances. The report is
based on the principles a practice where how to judge the evidence basis of valid, current,
sufficient and authentic. Furthermore, it will analyse the assessment decision.
MAIN BODY
The practice principles articulate that can deliver the curriculum and engage with other
people. It is the most effective term in terms of learning program where it is directly linked with
documentation and outline what is to be taught, which help for learner to identify student
learning capabilities and also demonstrate with understanding (Morton and et.al., 2020).
The information gathered to support the judgement of other competence against the
relevant specifications. Evidence will be taking in different forms and gathered through multiple
sources. It can be divided into different types: direct, supplementary and indirect evidence. But it
is not enough to collect any type of evidence. There are different types of rules based on the
evidence.
Valid: it helps for address the overall performance criteria and element. It also reflecting
on the knowledge, skills and competency standards.
Current: It also demonstrates the current knowledge and skills of people. it complies with
specific standards.
Sufficient: It will be demonstrating the competence over period of time. Afterwards, it can
be repeated in proper manner.
Authenticate: it is able to verifying as genuine and complete the task effectively.
It is a crucial part to ensure that all criteria related to the relevant information which mainly
specified the requirements. Once regular conducting meeting with team and internally verifying
decisions made by assessors. If it can achieve the similar method to easily test the validate the
information and also measure overall performance. To gain the validity which makes sure that
handle the criteria and achieve the assessment decision take place.
2
Document Page
REFERENCES
Book and Journals
Morton, M. and et.al., 2020. Principles in Practice: Supporting the Development of Critical
Community-Engaged Scholars. In Preparing Students for Community-Engaged
Scholarship in Higher Education (pp. 322-346). IGI Global.
3
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 3
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]