University Program Evaluation Assignment: Analysis and Approaches

This assignment solution provides a comprehensive overview of program evaluation, addressing key concepts and approaches. It begins by defining program evaluation and its systematic nature, emphasizing its role in assessing program functionality and outcomes. The solution then explores different evaluation approaches, including formative, summative, and ongoing methods, highlighting their objectives and applications, particularly in the context of public administration and the education sector. Furthermore, the assignment differentiates program evaluation from other types of analysis, emphasizing its systematic approach and the need to evaluate the underlying logic of project development. The solution also discusses the validity of program evaluation, defining its importance in ensuring the reliability and authenticity of evaluation results, along with the significance of internal, external, and statistical conclusion validity in drawing reasonable conclusions. This resource, contributed by a student, is available on Desklib, a platform offering AI-based study tools for students.

Running head: PROGRAM EVALUATION
PROGRAM EVALUATION
Name of the student:
Name of the University:
Author Note:

1PROGRAM EVALUATION
Answer to the question no 1:
Program evaluation is a process which is systematic in nature. The main objective of the
program evaluation is to evaluation the functionalities and the operations of the program along
with its outcome. Certain kind of tools are provided through the program evaluation those will be
helpful to address all the important questions regarding the performance of the programs
(Newcomer, Hatry & Wholey, 2015). The evaluation of the program can be considered as
learning process or knowledge gaining process regarding the logic used in the compilation of the
programs and practices. In order to define the program evaluation the term practical program
evaluation is used as the practices in the program evaluation are done in a reasonable cost and
time. In order to understand the significance of the program evaluation the example of its
application on the public administration can be used. One of the example of the public sector
administration is administration of the education sector. The fruitfulness of the application of the
program evolution will indicate the effectiveness of the implemented plans in the education
sector.
Answer to the question no 2:
There are various program evaluation approaches. Three types of program evaluation
approaches are formative approach, summative approach and ongoing approach. The selection
of the evaluation approach is based on the type of the program or the project (("What is
PROGRAM EVALUATION? What does PROGRAM EVALUATION mean? PROGRAM EVALUATION
meaning", 2018). The main objective of the formative approach is to improve the quality of the
delivery of the outcome of the program. The application of the gained knowledge can be done
through the application of the formative approach. In case of the summative evaluation the
outcome of the programs are evaluated along with their impacts and the significance of the

2PROGRAM EVALUATION
ongoing operations. The ongoing evaluation is the series of the evaluating processes. The main
attribute of the ongoing evaluation is the flexibility in the whole process. In case of the
administration of the education sector can be achieved through the formative approach.
Answer to the question no 3:
The difference between the program evaluation and other type of analysis is based on the
technique of the analysis or the evaluation. In the process. However, in case of the project
evaluation process , the whole technique follows a systematic approach. The program evaluation
needs the evaluation of the logic underlying the development of the project. The management of
the administrative process in the education sector can be achieved through the program
evaluation.
Answer to the question no 4:
The validity of the program evaluation indicates the persons who can evaluate the
associated functions in the program. Validity of the program evaluation is the parameter of the
reliability of the evaluation. In case, if the right researchers or the people are involved in the
program evaluation it can be said that the outcome of the evaluation result will be authentic
(Larson, 2018). The planning design and the implementation can be done in a proper way
through the validity of the program evaluation. The plans for the improvement of the education
plans can be evaluated through the validity of its effectiveness.
Answer to the question no 5:
The internal validity indicates that the program has achieved the desired outcome to a
certain degree along with the relevant alternative explanations. The external validity draws the

3PROGRAM EVALUATION
possible conclusions regarding the future scope of the project or the outcome of the project in
different conditions (Belloni et al.,2017). Statistical conclusion validity are defined by the factors
those are responsible as the parameter to make the conclusion relational in the evaluation of the
program. The reasonable conclusion contains qualitative, quantitative and statistical data. This
type of validity is concerned about the quality of the validation of the program and the mitigation
and the identification of the error.
References
Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V., Fernández‐Val, I., & Hansen, C. (2017). Program evaluation and
causal inference with high‐dimensional data. Econometrica, 85(1), 233-298.
Larson, A. (2018). Evaluation amidst complexity: Eight evaluation questions to explain how
complex adaptive systems affect program impact. Evaluation, 1356389018781357.
Newcomer, K. E., Hatry, H. P., & Wholey, J. S. (2015). Handbook of practical program
evaluation. John Wiley & Sons.
What is PROGRAM EVALUATION? What does PROGRAM EVALUATION mean?
PROGRAM EVALUATION meaning. (2018). Retrieved from
https://youtu.be/uH6GmXZzu3g