Project Initiation Document: BSBPMG522 Undertake Project Work

This document presents a project initiation document (PID) and project plan, fulfilling the requirements of BSBPMG522, an 'Undertake project work' unit. The PID outlines the project's context, purpose, and specific SMART objectives, establishing a clear framework for project execution. It includes a detailed project scope, deliverables, assumptions, constraints, and exclusions. The project plan encompasses time management elements such as a work breakdown structure and Gantt chart, alongside cost management, human resource management, and communication strategies. The document also addresses risk management, change management, and records management, ensuring a comprehensive approach to project initiation and planning. The document is created to demonstrate the ability to use skills and apply knowledge required to initiate and plan for a straightforward project or a section of a larger project. The document also includes file naming conventions and a risk assessment matrix, contributing to a well-structured and organized project approach.

Bibliography
Burga, R. and Rezania, D., 2017. Project accountability: An exploratory case study using actor–
network theory. International journal of project management, 35(6), pp.1024-1036.
Buser, M. and Carlsson, V., 2017. What you see is not what you get: single-family house
renovation and energy retrofit seen through the lens of sociomateriality. Construction
Management and Economics, 35(5), pp.276-287.
Butt, A., Naaranoja, M. and Savolainen, J., 2016. Project change stakeholder
communication. International Journal of Project Management, 34(8), pp.1579-1595.
De los Ríos-Carmenado, I.G.N.A.C.I.O., Lopez, F.R. and Garcia, C.P., 2015. Promoting
professional project management skills in engineering higher education: Project-based learning
(PBL) strategy. International journal of engineering education, 31(1), pp.184-198.
Dykstra, A., 2018. Construction project management: A complete introduction. Kirshner
Publishing Company.
Gökgür, A., 2015. Current and future use of BIM in renovation projects. Chalmers University of
Technology.
Jensen, P.A. and Maslesa, E., 2015. Value based building renovation–A tool for decision-making
and evaluation. Building and Environment, 92, pp.1-9.
Jensen, P.A., Maslesa, E., Berg, J.B. and Thuesen, C., 2018. 10 questions concerning sustainable
building renovation. Building and Environment, 143, pp.130-137.
Liu, Y., 2017. Renovation of a mechanical engineering senior design class to an industry-tied
and team-oriented course. European Journal of Engineering Education, 42(6), pp.800-811.

Paiho, S., Abdurafikov, R., Hoang, H. and Kuusisto, J., 2015. An analysis of different business
models for energy efficient renovation of residential districts in Russian cold
regions. Sustainable cities and society, 14, pp.31-42.
Singh, Y., Abdelhamid, T., Mrozowski, T. and El-Gafy, M.A., 2014. Investigation of
contemporary performance measurement systems for production management of renovation
projects. Journal of Construction Engineering, 2014.
Skibniewski, M.J., 2015. Research trends in information technology applications in construction
safety engineering and management. Frontiers of engineering management, 1(3), pp.246-259.
Toledo, M., González, V.A., Villegas, A. and Mourgues, C., 2014. Using 4D models for tracking
project progress and visualizing the owner's constraints in fast-track retail renovation projects.
In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of International Group for Lean
Construction (pp. 969-980).
Vatin, N., Nemova, D., Khazieva, L. and Chernik, D., 2014. Distant learning course “Energy
efficient refurbishment management”. In Applied Mechanics and Materials (Vol. 635, pp. 2057-
2062). Trans Tech Publications.
Vrijhoef, R., 2016, July. Effects of Lean Work Organization and Industrialization on Workflow
and Productive Time in Housing Renovation Projects. In Proc. 24 th Ann. Conf. of the Int’l.
Group for Lean Construction, Boston, MA, USA, sect (Vol. 2, pp. 63-72).
Zhang, Y., 2016. Selecting risk response strategies considering project risk
interdependence. International Journal of Project Management, 34(5), pp.819-830.