Transport for London Project Management: Methodologies & Analysis

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of project management methodologies applied to Transport for London (TFL). It covers key aspects such as stakeholder analysis, risk management, and quality control measures. The report examines different project management approaches, including Agile and Waterfall, and their suitability for TFL's projects. A network diagram is presented to visualize project workflows, along with a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) to detail project tasks. The stakeholder analysis identifies key stakeholders and their influence, while the risk register outlines potential risks and mitigation strategies. Furthermore, the report discusses quality expectations, specifications, and acceptance criteria, providing a holistic view of project management practices within TFL. Desklib offers this and many other solved assignments to aid students.

Project Management

Contents
Introduction................................................................................................................................3
Main Body..................................................................................................................................3
Task 1.........................................................................................................................................3
Methodologies........................................................................................................................3
Task 2.........................................................................................................................................4
Network Diagram...................................................................................................................4
Task 3.........................................................................................................................................5
Stakeholder analysis...............................................................................................................5
Task 4.........................................................................................................................................7
WBS.......................................................................................................................................7
Task 5.........................................................................................................................................7
Risk register...........................................................................................................................7
Task 6.........................................................................................................................................9
Quality expectation, quality specification, acceptance criteria as well as measures to
control the event.....................................................................................................................9
Conclusion................................................................................................................................10
References................................................................................................................................11

Introduction
Project management is defined as the use of skills, processes, talents, and expertise in
order to achieve the project's unique objectives. Project management is a strategy that
contains final outputs that are restricted by a budget and timeframe. Information is provided
in the project documentation, which is generated in the early stages of the development
process and contains time, scope, and budget, under the idea of project management (Allen
and et. al., 2019). A business project is broken down into phases, each of which describes the
criteria for completing the project. This paper is focused on a scenario analysis of Transport
for London, and it addresses the business case, network diagram, stakeholder analysis, Work
Break Down Structure, and risk register that will be developed with the goal of increasing the
company's productivity (Börjesson and Kristoffersson, 2018).
Main Body
Task 1
Methodologies
Staff working in a profession employ methods, which are a set of approaches,
concepts, and processes. The current project is focused on Transport for London, which is
developing land along with Bollo Lane in terms of building around 800 additional residences.
The major goal of this initiative is to produce greener, safer, and more beautiful streets while
also enhancing the overall bus network in London. Transport for London is helping to
organise an event to commemorate the G&S Society's 40th anniversary (Letnik and et. al.,
2018). Operations are documented and linked with the process inside the planned project,
which aids in the achievement of the organization's goals and objectives. The goal was to
increase brand value by building residences with a well-planned and organised layout.
Several approaches are controlled by software inside this project management in order to
enhance productivity, and the following is a description of each methodology:
 Agile Approach: Such methodology is based on the concept of continuous
development, in which solutions and objectives emerge from cooperation among
cross-functional and self-organizing teams. Such an approach encourages project
management discipline in order to adjust leadership ideology and stimulate
examination in order to improve collaboration. In terms of TFL, suppliers are
reducing waste by focusing on improving efforts on high-value features. Development

work is enjoyable for team members since their efforts are recognised. Stakeholder
collaboration was consistent, and improvements were made at each level (Li and et.
al., 2018).
 Waterfall Approach: The Waterfall Approach is a sequential software development
technique in which a project is broken down into a sequence of tasks. It is carried out
in phases and progressed step by step in order to achieve market share. Groups are
obliged to complete each phase of the project before moving on to the next stage with
this technique. In terms of TFL, it helps with early project requirements as well as
allowing the team to define the complete scope of the project, develop detailed
timelines, and design the entire application. Whenever tasks are divided into groups or
executed in parallel, resource utilisation improves. This technique is used by TFL
because it comprises phases like as requirements, implementation designs,
verification, and maintenance.
Task 2
Network Diagram
A network diagram is a visual representation of the project workflow process used in
project management. It's a type of chart that's filled with boxes that represent duties and
activities, followed by arrows that assist map out timelines and the order in which things
should be completed. In terms of TFL, it helps project managers track project components
and share status with others fast. It's a diagram that depicts the many project operations and
events. It specifies the link between project activities, activity order, and the obligation to
work ahead of others (Osorio-Lird and et. al., 2018). The operations of TFL in project
management are depicted in the project network diagram.

With the help of this table, the diagram is being prepared:
Early Start Activity Number Early finish
Slack
time
ACTIVITY NAME
Late Start Duration Late Finish
The critical route assists in project completion by following the above-mentioned
actions that take time to complete on time. According to this evaluation, the maximum time
to finish a project is more than a week, and the maximum feasible time to complete TFL
project tasks is 1, 2, 4, 5, 9, 10, 21, and 22. In addition, all of the project's duties will be
completed in 116 days.

Task 3
Stakeholder analysis
In project management, stakeholder analysis aids in discovering, prioritising, and
comprehending the company's many stakeholders. This is a method of gathering and
analysing statistical data over the course of a project's execution to aid in the improvement of
overall organisational performance. Participants are assessed and classified at the start of a
project based on their participation, impact, and interest in the project (Richards and Grinsted,
2020). Stakeholder analysis, according to TFL, includes all internal human resources as well
as teams that are impacted by the project. Such an analysis is undertaken within the relevant
firm and receives a lot of power and attention. The following is the stakeholder analysis for
TFL:
 High power and high interest: Stakeholders who are expected to be valued by being
delighted with positive project performance fall under this category. Such
stakeholders have a strong desire to obey norms and rules, as well as a lot of
authority. In the case of TFL, the Town Hall Committee collaborates with the
government to create a matrix that establishes norms and guidelines for the project's
smooth operation.
 High power and little interest: They have influence inside TFL, which they must
appease, but due of their minimal interest, they may have an impact on the project if
they interact too much with them. Organisers and participants are important in
carrying out project activities, but they have a lot of authority and show little

enthusiasm in making necessary adjustments to the project plan in exchange for a set
payment.
 Low power and high interest: This is critical for keeping folks informed as well as
ensuring that the project is running well. People with little interest but a lot of
influence are involved in running the project. Investors are appropriate in the
stakeholders’ analysis for the TFL category.
 Low power and low interest: Such stakeholders are kept up to date on what
consumers and employees are doing at work in order to satisfy them and meet their
needs. In the case of TFL, if they do not keep their consumers pleased, they risk
losing market share.
Task 4
WBS
Various tasks of a project are broken down into smaller jobs in project management,
which forms a full framework. It is a more usual approach of controlling and accessing each
project activity. In the context of TFL, the work break down structure is a strategy that
incorporates cost, scope, and schedule baselines to ensure that the project plan stays on track
(Silva and et. al., 2019). This is a large project that must be completed and organises the
project's business activities. All projects' paths are specified in organisational charts, which
serve as a critical foundation for planning and scheduling project management. The following
is a TFL work breakdown structure developed by the project manager:

Task 5
Risk register
No. Risk Effect Possibility Mitigation
1 Power failure Low High The usage of high-quality
machinery will help to mitigate
this danger.
2 Safety and security Low Moderate Maintaining workplace safety
norms and rules, as well as
privacy legislation.
3 Low human
resources
High High In order to control risk, the best
and most effective personnel, as
well as work management, must
be chosen.
4 Negative influence
on environment
Low Moderate Putting emphasis on
environmental safety and
security
5 Lack of medical
assistance
Low Moderate Medical support for both the
audience and the workers should
be well organised.
6 Advancements in
the technology
Low Moderate Market research is carried out
concurrently with the
implementation of new
technology.
7 Market
uncertainties
High Low Conducting market research and,
in tandem, managing functions.
8 Ineffective time
management
Low High Creating a good timetable and
carrying out the actions in
accordance with it.

9 Impact of
government
Low Low Understanding government
regulations will aid in the
resolution of issues.
10 Low morale Moderate Low Manpower issues have been
identified, and benefits have
been provided to boost morale.
11 Loss of finance Low Low Budgets have been chosen and
are being created to allocate
funding to a variety of
initiatives.
12 Lack of parking Low Low To address the issues, the best
location for a parking lot should
be identified.
Task 6
Quality expectation, quality specification, acceptance criteria as well as measures to control
the event
Particulars Quality
expectation
Acceptance
criteria
Quality
specification
Controlling
techniques
Advertising Best 35 percent
increase in
visitors
Using cutting-
edge technology
to aid with quality
assurance.
Organizing
training and
development
workshops.
Methodologies Best For a 45 percent
increase in
productivity
(Yucelgazi and
Yitmen, 2019).
Risk registers are
properly kept in
both the Agile
and Waterfall
approaches.
Following the
techniques'
principals.
Risk assessment Best 75 percent of
concerns relating
Gantt Chart with
work breakdown
Risk analysis and
management are

to business and
project
management have
been resolved.
structure carried out in a
proper manner.
Performance Best To enhance sales
operations by a
certain percentage
Work break down
structure and
Gantt Chart
By utilising a
performance
analyzer.
Conclusion
It has been concluded from the aforementioned explanation of the report that project
management is a crucial phrase for analysing principles and applications that are based on
project completion. It is critical for enterprises, such as events, to make decisions based on
project methodology in order to achieve effective outcomes. It aids in the incorporation of a
network diagram in order to execute a project as a team. Furthermore, a stakeholder analysis
was carried out to determine their power and interest in the event. Different aspects play a
critical part in risk analysis, allowing the organisation to analyse the risk and try to mitigate it
through training and development sessions.

References
Books and Journals
Allen, J., Harris, R., Jago, L., Tantrai, A., Jonson, P. and D'Arcy, E., 2019. Festival and
special event management. John Wiley & Sons.
Börjesson, M. and Kristoffersson, I., 2018. The Swedish congestion charges: Ten years
on. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 107, pp.35-51.
Letnik, T., Marksel, M., Luppino, G., Bardi, A. and Božičnik, S., 2018. Review of policies
and measures for sustainable and energy efficient urban transport. Energy, 163,
pp.245-257.
Li, Y., Lu, Y., Taylor, J.E. and Han, Y., 2018. Bibliographic and comparative analyses to
explore emerging classic texts in megaproject management. International Journal of
Project Management, 36(2), pp.342-361.
Osorio-Lird, A., Chamorro, A., Videla, C., Tighe, S. and Torres-Machi, C., 2018. Application
of Markov chains and Monte Carlo simulations for developing pavement
performance models for urban network management. Structure and Infrastructure
Engineering, 14(9), pp.1169-1181.
Richards, G. and Grinsted, S., 2020. The Logistics and Supply Chain Toolkit: Over 100 Tools
for Transport, Warehousing and Inventory Management. Kogan Page Publishers.
Silva, C., Teixeira, J., Proença, A., Bicalho, T., Cunha, I. and Aguiar, A., 2019. Revealing the
cycling potential of starter cycling cities: Usefulness for planning
practice. Transport policy, 81, pp.138-147.
Yucelgazi, F. and Yitmen, I., 2019. An ANP model for risk assessment in large-scale
transport infrastructure projects. Arabian Journal for Science and
Engineering, 44(5), pp.4257-4275.