University Project Management Peer Post Review and Analysis

This report provides a review of a peer's project management post, focusing on the concept of Enterprise Environmental Factors (EEF) and its influence on project success. The review highlights the importance of considering both internal and external factors, such as political situations, market conditions, and governmental regulations. The reviewer agrees with the post's emphasis on the significance of human resources and their skills in project management, using the University of Western Australia Library as an example. The report also mentions the use of qualitative and quantitative analysis tools like SWOT, PESTLE, McKinsey 7s, and Fishbone diagrams for identifying EEFs. However, the reviewer suggests that a more in-depth analysis of these tools, including their application and benefits, would enhance the post. The report concludes by acknowledging the value of the post in introducing these concepts while recommending further elaboration on the analysis tools for a more comprehensive understanding. References to relevant literature are included to support the analysis.

Running head: REVIEW PEER POST
Review Peer Post
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:

1REVIEW PEER POST
Post Review
Based on the post, I agree with some of the information provided. I agreed that
enterprise environmental factors (EEF) are either the internal or external factor of the project
which can influence on success of the project. It includes the political situation, conditions of
the market and weather, governmental regulations and culture (Wu, 2020). The major factors
are human resource and lack of their skills and knowledge. As the example of university of
Western Australia Library is taken in consideration, it is better for me to understand that the
members of the library are having minimal knowledge to handle large scale of projects. It is
also properly mentioned about the qualitative or quantitative analysis tool used to identify
internal or external EEF as SWOT, PERSLE, Mckinsey 7s or Fishbone.
Based on analysis of the mentioned qualitative or quantitative tools, in my point of
view, an in-depth analysis should require for better understanding of those tools in EEF. It is
mentioned that PESTLE analysis is used for identifying the external EEF but how it is used
for identifying of the external factors is not mentioned, therefore it would be difficult for the
reader to understand benefits of PESTLE analysis (Li et al., 2018). In similar way, Mckinsey
7s, Fishbone, and SWOT analysis are mentioned based on its internal or external EEF
identification, but its benefits and identification steps are not mentioned.
Finally, I agree with the paper as internal and external factors identification tools are
mentioned in brief, so that the reader can know about it. I would like the post more if some
more analysis of the tools would be provided.

2REVIEW PEER POST
References
Li, M., Tian, A., Li, S., & Qi, X. (2018). Evaluating the quality of enterprise environmental
accounting information disclosure. Sustainability, 10(7), 2136.
Wu, H. (2020). Management Shareholding Incentives and Enterprise Environmental
Investment—Evidence from A-Share Heavily Polluting Industry Listed
Companies. Modern Economy, 11(1), 37-50.