Project Management and Risk Management Report - Analysis

This report provides a comprehensive overview of project management and risk assessment. It delves into the core concepts of project management, including the five distinct levels: initiation, organization and development, project implementation, project organization, project control, and project closure. The report explains the importance of the project life cycle, its characteristics, and how the Critical Path Method (CPM) is used to model and manage project timelines. Furthermore, it explores different approaches to project appraisal, such as the bottom-up, iterative, flexible, and human-centered approaches, highlighting their significance in ensuring project success. The report emphasizes the importance of adaptability, stakeholder involvement, and continuous evaluation throughout the project lifecycle.

Project Management
and Risk
1 | P a g e

Table of Contents
TASK 1............................................................................................................................................3
Task 2...............................................................................................................................................6
Part 3..............................................................................................................................................15
References......................................................................................................................................19
2 | P a g e

TASK 1
Critical path simply involves dealing with a task from start to finish. It is about how a person
with power sets up and manages accessible resources to perform a task they have performed. The
person who runs the entire campaign is called the Project management. Project Managers use a
variety of strategies, philosophies, skills and have the necessary knowledge to help the Project
reach the management level in accordance with the rule established by each meeting (Bishnoi,
2018).
The scope of basic Project Management is folded into five distinct levels. In particular, this
includes initiation, organization and development, project implementation, project organization,
project control and finally project closure. To effectively deliver on the promised commitment,
an executive leader must have a balanced understanding of these five key project milestones.
1. Start of the project
The main focus of the campaign, as the name suggests, is the introduction of the project. A
business case is introduced, such as the benefits or reasons for carrying out the task, and then the
Project is identified on a large scale. The leader of the campaign will initially focus on the ability
to know if the goal of the campaign is achievable and therefore whether it can be taken forward.
Individuals who have concerns about the Project are required to carry out the necessary work and
to make the recommendation to the Project. The campaign administrator then prepares a
complete archive outlining the aim of the Project on which the company director will specify the
different needs, the business case submitted and the need for this project in the industry (Vujović
et al, 2020).
• Planning and Development of the Project
After the Project stretches a go-beyond, and it is started, the task administrator moves to the
subsequent stage known as the undertaking arranging period of the venture the board. In this
stage, the task supervisor readies a guide which centers on accomplishing the target of the
venture in an efficient manner. The task arranging helps in smooth out the cycle of the Project.
Arranging helps in the smooth running of the Project as each part of the undertaking is thought
about, and the necessary arrangement is additionally given in the venture arranging stage.
• Project Execution
The genuine work on the venture occurs in this stage. There are numerous obligations which
complete in this stage. In this stage, a group is produced for the Project; assets are allotted, the
3 | P a g e

execution of the subsequent stage is done at this point. The undertaking chief deals with the
execution, global positioning framework for the advancement of the venture is set up, the status
gatherings are done routinely, the undertaking plan is refreshed as and when the arranged
assignment is done just as the task arranging is altered according to the prerequisite of the
circumstance during the execution (San Cristóbal, 2017).
• Project Monitoring
The third and the fourth period of the undertaking the board go connected at the hip during the
time spent venture the executives. During this stage the Project is checked proactively to know
whether the venture is going according to the arranging, it will likewise assist with knowing
whether the Project isn't going over financial plan and whether the nature of the Project executed
till now is sufficient. These are a portion of the things that the undertaking director would know
about if the Project is ceaselessly checked and will help the Project administrator choose the
further game-plan.
• Closing the project
This is the platform for reaching the pinnacle of the campaign and the goal of the work has been
achieved. Colleagues are recognized for their efforts on the project. Learning and at the same
time completing the project is for all to refer to in the future. Up-to-date files, any reports or
other relevant documentation are provided to the team who may be working on the project on a
regular basis (Jo, Lee and Pyo, 2018).
Deliverables
The term expectations of action are the term of advice that is most commonly used to describe
measurable goods or administrations that should be delivered at the time of fulfilling a promise.
Expectations can be vast or theoretical in nature (Okereke, 2017). For example, in a business that
is looking to develop a company’s technology, a deliverable may refer to the acquisition of a
dozen new computers (Varajão et al, 2018).
Project life cycle
The life cycle of a company is the continuity of stages that activity derives from its introduction
to decision making. The number and continuity of the ring depends on the administration and
with various components such as the needs of the society involved in the company, the idea of
4 | P a g e

the work and the field of practice. The levels have a unique beginning, end and control point and
are time-bound. The life cycle of the campaign can be identified and adapted to the needs and
interests of the society. Despite each campaign having a clear beginning and end, specific goals,
expectations and exercises vary widely. The life cycle provides a basic explanation of the actions
that need to be taken in the campaign, regardless of the specific task involved (San Cristóbal,
2017).
Business life cycles can range from reliable or plan-based approaches to multifunctional or
change-oriented approaches. In the prescient life cycle, points of interest are marked near the
beginning of the work, and any changes are somehow deliberate. In a multifunctional life cycle,
the object is formed on a number of weights and detailed scope is defined for iteration only as
the iteration begins (Kivilä, Martinsuo and Vuorinen, 2017).
Characteristics of the project life cycle
Despite their specific and unique flight commitments, their standard system includes the same
standard lifecycle structure, which includes the following standards:
1. Getting started: the start of the campaign
2. The design phase: organization and preparation
3. Level of Performance: Getting the job done
4. Completion phase: closing the campaign (Eleftheriadis, Mumovic and Greening, 2017)
For this, a Critical Path Method will be used.
Critical Path Method (CPM)
What it is: in CPM, the campaign is modeled, incorporating all the exercises recorded in the
structure of a work break, the termination of these errors, we think of a situation in which there
are conditions of assignment and segregation of the results at times greater than the company or
focus on expected result (Takakura et al, 2019).
The basic invention was invented in the latter part of the 1950s by Morgan R. Walker of DuPont
and James E. Kelley, Jr., of Remington Rand. At that time DuPont was using a CPM precursor as
early as the 1940s and was involved in the Manhattan Project (Bishnoi, 2018).
5 | P a g e

The approach begins with an overview, all that is considered, or the structure of a work break,
the length of each company, the conditions that exist and then the design of results and
expectations.
The basic method involves the longest sequence of exercises from the beginning to the end of the
project that should be completed to ensure that the promise is fulfilled within a certain time. The
exercises in the basic pathway should be carefully controlled. In the event that the posts in the
default path do not go down, make a quick move to get the activity back on time. Another thing,
the whole business can be put off (Kerzner, 2017).
The basic way in critical path the project management may contain all the significant exercises
related with an undertaking, or it may not. Indeed, the exercises on the basic way are not
generally the main pieces of the venture. Simultaneously, there will be assignments that are not
on the basic way, but rather that actually decide your undertaking's prosperity.
Task 2
There are a number of theoretical and general reasons behind project appraisal, including
investigative disputes that come with ever clearer information about campaign completion, just
like dispute management, lead to the development of ordered models for success. Despite the
need for a project, on-board systems of work and the frustration of battle projects, and auditing
strategies that can conduct thorough scrutiny engage operators and procedures, much like a
subjective study of the reality of initiatives such as project and methods of managers. it is poor.
Each of the four approaches in the system provides a unique assessment that reflects insights into
particular problems, leaving the others unattended (Corejova, Bielik and Genzorova, 2020).
Bottom-up approach
Numerous water projects have failed due to a lack of custodians and neighborhood networks in
the settlement cycle. Water conservators retain water in non-industrialized countries. This way,
no water plan can be effectively executed without their support or assistance.
A few different methods can be used to bring breeders into the organizational cycle. For
example, existing breeding societies may be remembered for the research and organization
6 | P a g e

group. Nearby river basin councils can be coordinated for organizational and practical purposes.
Running a single farm that organizes or collects the ranks that agree with the wardens will get
subtleties on how conservators use, create and consolidate their fields. Involving citizens and
networks for forests, fields, roads and other infrastructural needs in the local area is also an
extension of the basic approach. Through these organizational measures one can fully discuss
government strategy and the needs of farmers. The practical and useful use of rainwater should
be known and recognized at a grassroots level (Radujković and Sjekavica, 2017).
Iterative approach
Organization is a winged approach. Before a final agreement could be prepared, a number of
tests, assessments, selective deliberations and modifications were required. In general, a main
report or breakdown report should be made according to social time on the results and reports of
each group (see the templates provided in Fig. 3). After receiving comments from all related
sources, a trial and correction period begins. The cycle can be repeated a few times to find the
best results (Vishnevskaya, Petrova and Varentsova, 2019).
Flexible approach
A final water plan does not take care of the framework of the scaffold. A water plan should be
seen as a starting point and should be kept under constant review and change. There are several
reasons. Initially, the life of the project can span 10 years or somewhere nearby, and a number of
unusual, commonly or artificially made things can happen over time. New problems require new
arrangements and procedures to accommodate them. Second, activist irrigation is a complex task
that governs the social, effective, social, legal, institutional and real issues of waterfowl. During
use, problems can arise and the first methods and objectives should generally be reconsidered.
Therefore, learning to move is a key for such arrangements should be kept flexible (Garling,
2018).
Eligibility means leaving room for changes, modifications or renewals in the future. Therefore, a
cycle of observation and evaluation should be included in the provision for this purpose. This
also means that organized goals should be regenerative - for example, more proactive at first and
slowly expanding with additional knowledge (Munene and Kinoti, 2020).
7 | P a g e

A human-centered approach
Some partnership methods have been developed to assist in project setup and delivery. The
project is to take better and more rational actions that apply zero rights strategies to real
problems, especially from the point of view of recipients or rights holders in rights based
initiatives. Such approaches also help to focus observation and evaluation in the resolution phase
of an action. Some approaches are outlined below (Garling, 2018).
The common liberty approach relies on agreed global standards and norms on fundamental
freedoms and draws from them. The rights-based approach sees the rightful custodians and
responsibility bearers, respectively. The commitments and projects of civil society organizations
aim to improve the capabilities and probabilities of rights holders, especially the most vulnerable
collections, in order to access their benefits with experts, for example the neighborhood group
Grateful Search: expands the attributes, resources and outcomes of a local area. The aim is to
develop the trust and activity of the area and its individuals, possibly strengthening its ability to
shape itself further. This approach involves four stages: interpretation, profitability, plan and
foresight used to set up a business. These levels are called "4D".
Outcome design: is a participatory approach implemented for organization, observation and
evaluation, where the outcome is identified as the progress of behaviors and actions of
individuals and societies. This approach emphasizes learning, for example, through controlling
and evaluating both progress and the methods chosen for the company (Munene and Kinoti,
2020).
Valid Framework Approach: focuses on identifying problems and examining their situation and
the logical connections of the results. It involves studying the basics and matrix of the logical
framework.
8 | P a g e

Plan of Key tasks and resources
Outcomes
What will happen as a result
of your project?
Indicators
How will you know that
the project is achieving its
objectives and outcomes?
Sources/methods
What proposed source/method will be used to gather
the information?
Source of
Information Tool/instrument used
Frequency of
collection
Phase 1
An expanded local area of
local neighborhood members
will try to reduce its wildness
in terms of the number of
members it meets.
Number of attendees
attending meetings
Number of volunteers /
non-volunteers spent on
community efforts
Project records Minutes taken at meetings
Activity cards maintained
by participants
Monthly
Ongoing record-
keeping
Increased commitment from
key partners to a
comprehensive, evidence-
based agreement for the
brutality of local behavior
Number of participants
who “supported” the
activity
To what extent the plan
reveals information on
"what works" to overcome
savings among young
people (DiMaggio et al,
2017)
Letters of
commitment
Project Plan
Literature
A commitment correlation
is intended to identify best
practices in writing
End of project
Phase 2
Expand access to law
enforcement facilities that
respond to best practice in
writing and meet the needs of
the local area
The extent to which an
education plan reflects
what is considered "what
works"
The extent to which an
educational plan is
appropriate to the
immediate situation
The extent to which the
educational program is
accessible to the wider
local area
Project Plan
Literature
Stakeholders
Project records
Linking activities aims to
identify best practices in
writing key source
interviews with participants
and tutors
End of project
End of project
Ongoing record-
keeping
Phase 3 Raise members
’awareness of the factors that
contribute to the brutality of
high school dates
A wealth of information
on the variables that
inspire youthful
enthusiasm
Participants Testing a member's
awareness of variables
promotes backward savings
Before project
sessions start
and again when
they are finished
Improved communication Level of interpersonal Participants Analysis of video-taped Start and end of
9 | P a g e

Outcomes
What will happen as a result
of your project?
Indicators
How will you know that
the project is achieving its
objectives and outcomes?
Sources/methods
What proposed source/method will be used to gather
the information?
Source of
Information Tool/instrument used
Frequency of
collection
skills skills among young people
in career
role play exercises project
Extended extension by
members of the peaceful
resolution
Level of compromise
among young people in
enterprise
Participants Video-taped role play
exercises
Start and end of
project
Level of data night
attendees reporting that
they are more aware of the
strength of post-night
appointments than before
Attendees at
information
night
One-page review of an
anomalous example of
people attending a public
awareness evening
End of the event
Night time data
Participants reporting a
more accurate view of the
benefits of post-night
expectancy exercises than
before
Attendees at
information
night
One page overview of an
inconsistent example of
people going to a public
awareness evening
End of the event
10 | P a g e

Risk register
No. Risk Probability
(L,M,H)
Impact
(L,M,H)
Effect on Project Risk Reduction
Actions
Proposed & Actual
If it happens: Triggers &
Actions
Proposed & Actual
1 Loss to project of key
staff.
Low High Unable to complete key
tasks
Emphasize importance
of project within and
outside the University.
Trigger
Reports of absenteeism or
redirection of staff to other
work
Actions
Distinguish on selected assets
should they occur suddenly.
Investigate the feasibility of
obtaining additional funding or
following the individual work of
an employee. Ensure that
complete documentation of the
work will be available at all
times.
2 Significant changes in
user requirements
Low High Time-quality-cost Ensure that the user
requirements are fully
investigated and
agreed before
specification
Trigger
Request for changes
specifically approved
Actions
Discuss the impact of
progress on schedules or
plans and agree if details
keep changing.
Implement the design change
once approved.
11 | P a g e

No. Risk Probability
(L,M,H)
Impact
(L,M,H)
Effect on Project Risk Reduction
Actions
Proposed & Actual
If it happens: Triggers &
Actions
Proposed & Actual
3 Major changes to User
Department
structure/procedures
Low High Changes to system,
processes, training,
rollout
None Trigger
Data from assessment staff.
Actions
Make sure executives are
aware of the requirements for
messenger contributions from
people with different
responsibilities. Planning the
job application to put off
parties along the way well
under the influence of a
fundamental change
Check first with each piece of
plan that you identify with future
business use if this is going to
change.
4 Volume of change
requests following
testing extending work
on each phase (Leva et
al, 2017).
High High Delays. Agree specification.
Agree priorities.
Reasonable
consultation on format.
Trigger
Overcoming the change.
Delay in closing things.
Actions
Choice of the management of
meaning, obviously of the
performances and of the
recognition of the required
times.
12 | P a g e

No. Risk Probability
(L,M,H)
Impact
(L,M,H)
Effect on Project Risk Reduction
Actions
Proposed & Actual
If it happens: Triggers &
Actions
Proposed & Actual
5 Changes in priorities of
senior management.
Medium High Removal of resource,
lack of commitment,
change in strategy or
closure of project.
Make sure that senior
management are aware
of the project, its
relative importance,
and its progress.
Trigger
Publications in university
publications, collections and
so on
Actions
Clarify senior management
on the impact of their options.
Keep all the pieces of
craftsmanship with the
campaign that could be
valuable in any future turn of
events.
Make sure the action is well
documented so far.
Trigger
Personnel review, monitoring
benefit recognition
6 Lack of Academic and
Departmental buy-in
High High Failure to achieve
business benefits.
Ineffective work
practices. More
fragmented processes.
Poor Communication.
Ensure User
Requirements are
properly assessed.
Executive leadership
and ongoing
involvement.
Communications and
planning focus.
Appoint Comms
Manager.
Actions
Expectations of audit
Trigger
There is no obligation to
evaluate and test existing circles
in the action.
7 Lack of commitment or
ability to change current
business processes
High Medium Failure to achieve
business benefits.
Extended duration.
Scope creep to copy
today’s processes.
Requires additional
business process
analyst resource.
Actions
Strive to connect to
messenger departments.
More. Enter senior
management.
Trigger
Activity Sponsor / Feedback
from User Representatives.
13 | P a g e

No. Risk Probability
(L,M,H)
Impact
(L,M,H)
Effect on Project Risk Reduction
Actions
Proposed & Actual
If it happens: Triggers &
Actions
Proposed & Actual
8 Poor capture of full
User requirements.
High High Failure to meet
minimum requirements.
Failure to achieve
business benefits.
Need to rework
solution after rollout.
Failed delivery.
Focus on User
Requirements capture
at start of project.
+ Best people with
appropriate knowledge
and authority to decide
and time to be
involved.
Accountable process
owners.
+ Executive leadership
and ongoing
involvement.
Actions
Responsibility for the
framework included in the
instructions for actions and
documentation. Screen
through workshops, enter
from the pilots.
Trigger
Comments from education
meetings / Director of training
9 Inadequate training –
too little too late
High High Users unable to use
system properly.
Ensure training staff
are involved from start
of project.
Actions
Systems preparation
inspection, update.
Trigger
Information users / without
power
10 Poor data quality High Medium User will find system
difficult to use unless
data quality has been
addressed – poor user
acceptance of system.
Data clean up -
correction and removal
of duplicates
Actions
Only use records that have a
high quality default set
11 Poor business
processes
High High A system based on
over-complicated,
badly engineered
business processes will
itself be over-
complicated and badly
engineered.
Revised business
processes before
constructing user spec.
Triggers
Business Process Analysis /
Master User Report.
Actions
If the development of the
framework is hindered in
complex circles, check out the
project. It may be important to
go back to business circles and
start over.
14 | P a g e

No. Risk Probability
(L,M,H)
Impact
(L,M,H)
Effect on Project Risk Reduction
Actions
Proposed & Actual
If it happens: Triggers &
Actions
Proposed & Actual
12 No suitable solution found
that meets all the
objectives
Low High Customer
dissatisfaction may be
greater for some users
than others depending
upon their reliance on
the system. .
Triggers
Actions
Part 3
The execution of any campaign is significantly influenced by the corporate agency that is
responsible for the implementation. Indeed, even the best-organized actions may neglect to
achieve their goals if the task force is not performing to their full potential. A strong turnaround
of events and business group involvement is a key in the activities, as the engagement group will
be responsible for delivering the degree through the job lifecycle. The five levels involved in a
group will inspire effective action (Davis, 2017).
The task force is made up of the chief of operations and a group of people who work together on
action to achieve its goals. It is made up of the campaign administrator, council employees and
other colleagues who are not directly involved with the executives but who carry out the activity
related to its operation. This group is made up of people from different organizations with
detailed knowledge of a topic or range of skills required to participate in the campaign. The
design and attributes of a corporate group generally change, but the director's role as group
leader remains stable. However, the amount and nature of a campaign administrator's power over
individuals can vary.
Stage ONE - Establish the team
The first step is to set up the executive management team. The best business organizations bring
in partners at all levels, from chiefs to advanced people. These individuals have knowledge that
will be crucial in reaching out to specific experts from outside societies.
The key part of having a team is to have a co-operative. Collaborative effort and interpersonal
skills are two of the most basic individual skills required, and all things being equal. It is
15 | P a g e

fundamental to the ability and ability to see and appreciate the different roles and commitments
of colleagues. Each group needs critical practices, impact, cycling and consistency and quality in
case it is ineffective. People with these prerequisites have completely different habits for the
success of an organization, and their communication can lead to conflict. Organizational
development at the outset should be a reminder of preparation for interpersonal skills and the
recognition and appreciation of the various individual practices, attributes and skills required for
group performance (Ika and Donnelly, 2017).
Step TWO - Help communicate effectively
Accurate, helpful, resourceful and robust communication is essential to maintain a strong sense
of organization and to promote the project. All business-related data should be reliably
transferred at all levels of the cycle so that all colleagues receive a similar education. Open data
sharing should be encouraged and a seamless arrangement should be established to establish trust
in the workplace. Similarly a variety of communication methods should be used. Colleagues deal
specifically with matching strategies (email, text, memo and so on), verbal (telephone, radio, eye
to eye, and so on).
Busy hours and multiple businesses can be a barrier to legitimate communication. Repeat face-
to-face meetings should be scheduled to support ongoing discussions and ensure expectations are
met within challenging times (Wu, Zhao and Zuo, 2017).
Step THREE - Encourage collaboration
Concentrations on collective mediation are usually more productive, so project pioneers should
understand the importance of community-based reconciliation and goal setting. This common
goal setting allows colleagues to achieve individual goals while contributing to common business
goals (Lacerenza et al, 2018).
Vehicle cooperation is:
• Generate the most innovative configurations
• Get the best registration support
• Optimization of self-awareness
16 | P a g e

By coordinating each colleague's motivation towards common goals, the entire organization is
urged to make progress. It is also the responsibility of the campaign leader to address the
organization's progress to ensure that a coordinated and sustainable organization is established.
Step FOUR - Accept and manage problems
It should be noted that a group of individuals does not include a group, especially not a working
group. Perhaps the most important move made by the project administrators does not see this as
a fact and after that they expect their action group to get to work from the first moment.
The project managers are tested to encourage networks between individuals of completely
different backgrounds. Either way, they all serve the common goal of the promise. Conflict
within businesses can manifest from multiple perspectives, but a reasonable campaign leader
catches and moves when conflict arises. Regardless of the factors that can contribute to the
expansion of problems, by openly and successfully communicating the goals and opinions of an
organization, these boundaries can be maintained (Sanchez and Terlizzi, 2017).
Level FIVE - Recognition and Award
A reward and reward plan will help to reinforce the main aims of the work and clarify the
organization on the key parts of the campaign. Completing tasks and transport may compensate
colleagues. Promoting these effects seems to be particularly encouraging to the group. As project
results are achieved, they should be communicated to project colleagues and partners. The
awards can arrive in a variety of structures. They should be established and delivered at the start
of the business, as they can affect different areas of the business, for example, costs and time.
The campaign management team must have a clear understanding of the resources and
expectations of the job as well as overseeing the overall approach, aims and drivers of the
association. Equally, it is essential that the organization in charge of an organization understands
and accepts the organizational, capable and moral prerequisites and ensures that the work is
adhered to (Rahmanniyay, 2017).
17 | P a g e

References
Bishnoi, N., 2018. Critical path method (CPM): a coordinating tool. International Research
Journal of Management Science & Technology, 9(1).
Bishnoi, N., 2018. Critical path method (CPM): a coordinating tool. International Research
Journal of Management Science & Technology, 9(1).
Corejova, T., Bielik, P. and Genzorova, T., 2020. Approaches to Project Management in the
Process of Digital Transformation in the Company. In Proceedings of the ENTRENOVA-
ENTerprise REsearch InNOVAtion Conference (Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 531-541).
Davis, K., 2017. An empirical investigation into different stakeholder groups perception of
project success. International Journal of Project Management, 35(4), pp.604-617.
DiMaggio, J.P. and Stone, E.N., Mcs2 LLC, 2017. Methods and systems for managing
compliance plans. U.S. Patent Application 15/330,967.
Eleftheriadis, S., Mumovic, D. and Greening, P., 2017. Life cycle energy efficiency in building
structures: A review of current developments and future outlooks based on BIM
capabilities. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67, pp.811-825.
Garling, R., 2018. Does an Open Source Development Environment Facilitate Conventional
Project Management Approaches and Collaborative Work?. In Information Technology as a
Facilitator of Social Processes in Project Management and Collaborative Work (pp. 99-123).
IGI Global.
Ika, L.A. and Donnelly, J., 2017. Success conditions for international development capacity
building projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(1), pp.44-63.
Jo, S.H., Lee, E.B. and Pyo, K.Y., 2018. Integrating a procurement management process into
critical chain project management (CCPM): A case-study on oil and gas projects, the piping
process. Sustainability, 10(6), p.1817.
Kerzner, H., 2017. Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and
controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
Kivilä, J., Martinsuo, M. and Vuorinen, L., 2017. Sustainable project management through
project control in infrastructure projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6),
pp.1167-1183.
Lacerenza, C.N., Marlow, S.L., Tannenbaum, S.I. and Salas, E., 2018. Team development
interventions: Evidence-based approaches for improving teamwork. American
Psychologist, 73(4), p.517.
Leva, M.C., Balfe, N., McAleer, B. and Rocke, M., 2017. Risk registers: Structuring data
collection to develop risk intelligence. Safety science, 100, pp.143-156.
Munene, H.W. and Kinoti, K., 2020. Monitoring and evaluation approaches and performance of
galana kulalu maize irrigation project, Kenya. International Academic Journal of Information
Sciences and Project Management, 3(6), pp.293-311.
18 | P a g e

Okereke, O.C., 2017. Causes of failure and abandonment of projects and project deliverables in
Africa. PM World Journal, 6(1), pp.1-16.
Radujković, M. and Sjekavica, M., 2017. Project management success factors. Procedia
engineering, 196, pp.607-615.
Rahmanniyay, F., 2017. Two Multi-objective Stochastic Models for Project Team Formation
Under Uncertainty in Time Requirements.
San Cristóbal, J.R., 2017. Complexity in project management. Procedia Computer Science, 121,
pp.762-766.
San Cristóbal, J.R., 2017. Complexity in project management. Procedia Computer Science, 121,
pp.762-766.
Sanchez, O.P. and Terlizzi, M.A., 2017. Cost and time project management success factors for
information systems development projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(8),
pp.1608-1626.
Takakura, Y., Yajima, T., Kawajiri, Y. and Hashizume, S., 2019. Application of critical path
method to stochastic processes with historical operation data. Chemical Engineering Research
and Design, 149, pp.195-208.
Varajão, J., Magalhães, L., Freitas, L., Ribeiro, P. and Ramos, J., 2018. Implementing Success
Management in an IT project. Procedia computer science, 138, pp.891-898.
Vishnevskaya, E., Petrova, V. and Varentsova, T., 2019, October. Leading approaches to project
management in steering creative projects. In 4th International Conference on Social, Business,
and Academic Leadership (ICSBAL 2019) (pp. 3-8). Atlantis Press.
Vujović, V., Denić, N., Stevanović, V., Stevanović, M., Stojanović, J., Cao, Y., Alhammadi, Y.,
Jermsittiparsert, K., Van Le, H., Wakil, K. and Radojkovic, I., 2020. Project planning and risk
management as a success factor for IT projects in agricultural schools in Serbia. Technology in
Society, 63, p.101371.
Wu, G., Zhao, X. and Zuo, J., 2017. Relationship between project’s added value and the trust–
conflict interaction among project teams. Journal of management in Engineering, 33(4),
p.04017011.
19 | P a g e