Final Project Report: Team Management, Communication and Quality

Verified

Added on  2023/04/03

|4
|506
|168
Report
AI Summary
This report provides an in-depth analysis of project management, team organization, and communication strategies within a project context. The team implemented a quality management plan with clear objectives. The team structure was hierarchical with defined roles, including a team principal to oversee duties, equipment, and data management. Communication was planned and monitored, utilizing a hierarchical model with team leaders and supervisors. Meetings, electronic mail, and other methods ensured information flow. The project also addressed quality management, project risk, and stakeholder communication, including risk identification and mitigation strategies. References to relevant literature are included to support the findings and the strategies used to ensure the project's success. The report also includes plans for project schedule, and risk management.
Document Page
Running head: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
1
Project Management
Name
Institution
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
2
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Team Management Report
To achieve a high-quality outcome, the project team came up with a quality management
plan with clear and realistic objectives spanning over the project’s development phase.
Team Organization
The management subdivided and allocated different roles according to their place in the
management tree. The team picked the team principal, who is the highest rank in the
management team. This personnel ensured that other team members played their allocated duties,
well management of project’s equipment and data, team members attendance and ensured
working toward a clear direction as planned by the team (Zulch, 2018).
Team Structure and Roles
The team chose to operate on a hieratical team structure with some members having some
elevated roles while everyone had their allocated tasks. Going down the management structure,
members had other periodical roles like a timekeeper and notes taker in meetings.
Team Management
The team management was done following some good practice strategy. However, these
strategies affected some aspects of the project and impacted positively to the overall performance
of the project (Yeh, 2019). The used hieratical structure ensured easily monitored progress and
documentation of the entire project.
Document Page
3
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Communication Report
Throughout the project, communication was well planned and monitored. This was to
ensure timekeeping and proper security on the project information. The good link among team
members involved in the project provided smooth diffusion of ideas and necessary information
towards the success of the project( Blair, 2017). For an effective communication plan, the team
subdivided the communication activities in a hierarchical model with project team leader and
project supervisor who had some elevated duties.
Team members used to have meetings to discuss project progress, introduction, and
discussion of new ideas and review the agenda of the previous meeting. During these meetings, a
selected timekeeper ensured that the group adhered to the time allocated for a specific topic and
notes taken to be distributed to the participants at the end of the meeting ( Karnwal, 2016).
Although this was not the most appropriate method of communication, live-streamed conference,
WhatsApp messaging, phone text being time convenient, team leaders contacted other members
using electronic mails. Electronic mails ensured that the project was professional, error-free and
brief communication is used where necessary.
Along with the project progress space, some members used to come up with different
ideas and documents. While some were ruled unnecessary many contributed positively towards
the development of an all rounded, convenient and innovative approach while designing and
developing the project.
Document Page
4
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
References
Blair, M. M., (2017).A team production theory of corporate law. In Corporate Governance (pp.
169-250). Gower.
Karnwal, A., (2016). Theatre team contracts multiple syndromes as a result of bone cement.
British journal of anaesthesia, 116(2), 303.
Yeh, R. S., (2019). Team personality composition, affective ties and knowledge sharing: A team-
level analysis. International Journal of Technology Management, 53(2-4), 331-351.
Zulch, B., (2018). A construction project management knowledge model: The type and level of
knowledge required. ActaStructilia, 25(1), 98-125
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 4
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
logo.png

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.

Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email

[object Object]