Psychology Report: SPSS Analysis on Workplace Psychology and Behavior

Verified

Added on  2020/01/07

|7
|1403
|325
Report
AI Summary
This report presents a psychology study that investigates the relationship between various psychological factors and job-related perceptions and behaviors. The methodology employed involves regression analysis using SPSS, with a focus on analyzing independent and dependent variables related to workplace dynamics. The research utilizes Chronbach alpha to assess the reliability of scales and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to check for data normality. The results section presents findings related to three hypotheses, examining the relationships between self-perception, confrontation avoidance, feelings of uselessness, peer support, and the relationship between potential for success and goal achievement. The discussion section interprets these results, highlighting significant mean differences between variables, the strength of relationships, and the implications of the findings. The study concludes by emphasizing the importance of hard work over merely having a positive attitude. The report includes references to relevant academic sources.
Document Page
PSYCOLOGY SPSS
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3
Method.............................................................................................................................................3
Results..............................................................................................................................................3
Hypothesis 1................................................................................................................................3
Hypothesis 2................................................................................................................................4
Discussion........................................................................................................................................5
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................7
Document Page
INTRODUCTION
Psychology is the one of the main discipline that is used to study and understand the
thinking of normal human being. Mentioned discipline help one in identifying the impact that
specific situation have on the human brain and play an important role in formation of perception
towards specific thing. It can be said that psychology is the one of the most important subject and
today it is used in number of areas like marketing and human resource management etc (Ziping,
2011). In the current report detail study is done in respect to psychology that people have
towards job, career and office environment etc. In this regard regression analysis is done and
under this some independent and dependent variables are taken in to consideration. Chronbach
alpha is also used to measure the reliability of scale. Finally, discussion section is prepared in the
report.
Method
In the statistics there are number of tools and methods that are often employed by the
researchers to analyze the data and reliability of scales. In the current report, regression analysis
is done and under this six variables are analyzed. The coefficient and significant difference
among variables is identified by using these tools (Choobforush Zadeh, Kalantari & Molavi,
2010). Chronbach alpha is also computed to measure reliability of scales and to ensure that data
can be taken in to consideration for analysis purpose. In order to check normality of data
Kolmogorov and Smirnov test is used in the current research study.
Results
Hypothesis 1
H0: There is no significant difference between the behavior under which one abstain from
confronting others and negative feelings that one have towards oneself (Q20 and Q22).
H1: There is significant difference between the behavior under which one abstain from
confronting others and negative feelings that one have towards oneself (Q20 and Q22).
Chronbach alpha
Chronbach alpha is revealing that data is reliable in nature and appropriate scales are
taken in the present research. Value of statistical tool is 0.564 and validity percentage is 95.6%.
Out of all questions only question “I have potential to succeed in life” can be removed. This is
Document Page
because if same will be deleted then in that case value of Chronbach alpha will not decline at fast
rate.
Normality
Results reflects that in case of most of variables value of level of significant is >0.05
which reflects that in case of most of categorical variables data is normally distributed.
Regression
Results reflects that value of R is 0.524 followed by R square 0.274. Adjusted R square
value is 0.258 and this means that with slight modification in the model value can be changed to
0.258 from 0.274. Level of significance is 0.00<0.05 which means dependent and independent
variable significantly different from each other.
Hypothesis 2
H0: There is no significant difference between the condition under which one feel useless and
negative feeling when other colleagues does not support self-actions (Q1 and Q3).
H1: There is significant difference between the condition under which one feel useless and
negative feeling when other colleagues does not support self-actions.
Normality
Value of level of significance is higher than 0.05 which is standard value and it can be
said that data for the both variables is normally distributed.
Regression
Results depicted that R value is 0.622 and R square is equivalent to 0.387. Adjusted R
square is 0.373 followed by the value of level of significance is 0.714 which mean that there is
no significant difference between dependent and independent variable.
Hypothesis 3
H0: There is no significant difference between the perception that people have in respect to them
in terms of potential about achieving success in life and achievement of goals (Q84 and Q85).
H1: There is no significant difference between the perception that people have in respect to them
in terms of potential about achieving success in life and achievement of goals.
Normality
Results are revealing that data is not normally distributed and this is verified from the
low value of level of significance which is less than 0.05.
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
Regression
Level of significant difference is 0.328>0.05 and this means that there is significant
difference between mean values of the variables. Apart from this, value of R and R square is
0.153 and 0.023 and adjusted R square valued at -0.01. This reflects that there is no significant
difference between dependent and independent variables.
Discussion
Results are reflecting that there is a significant mean difference between the dependent and
independent variables. It can be observed from the table that value of level of significance is
0.00<0.05 and it can be said that independent and dependent variables are different from each
other in terms of rate of change. This means that there is large difference the rate of change that
is observed between the negative feelings that people have towards themselves and confrontation
that they avoid due to negative perception that they have about themselves. R value is 0.524 and
this means that there is moderate relationship between dependent and independent variable. With
change in the independent variable 27% variation comes in the dependent variable. This means
that moderate variation comes in the dependent due to change in the independent variable. It can
be said that there is a moderate relationship and significant rate of change between both variables
and on this basis it can be said that when individual have negative feelings about himself then in
that case to great extent same person try to avoid confrontation from others. This happened
because confidence level of person become very low due to negative feelings that is in the brain.
Results in respect to second hypothesis is reflecting that there is significant difference
between dependent and independent variable. Results are indicating that when actions taken by
the individual are not approved by the peers in respect to work then in that case one feel useless
to great extent. This is further supported from the fact that value of R is 0.622 which reflects that
there is moderate relationship between the dependent and independent variable. R square is
indicating that 38% variation comes in the extent to which one feel useless when someone show
less confidence on actions of same person.
In respect to third hypothesis it can be seen that value of level of significance is 0.328 and its
value is higher than 0.05 which means that there is no significant mean difference between
dependent and independent variable. Means that if one assume that same have huge potential to
become a successful person then it is not necessary that chances of achievement of goals will
increase to great extent. This is proved from the fact that R value is 0.153 which reflects that
Document Page
there is low degree of relationship between the dependent and independent variable. Moreover,
value of R square is 0.023 which means that 2% variation comes in the dependent variable with
change in the independent variable. Overall it can be said that achievement of goals and
perception that one have huge potential to get success in the life are different. Positive perception
that one can do anything does not lead to achievement of determined goals to great extent.
Hence, one must focus on hard work instead of focusing on merely positive attitude towards
oneself.
Document Page
REFERENCES
Books and journals
Ziping, G. A. O. (2011). From Job Burning to Job Identity: Paradigm Alternativeof Working
Psycology of Liabrary and Information Talents [J]. Journal of Intelligence. 11. 021.
Choobforush Zadeh, A., Kalantari, M., & Molavi, H. (2010). The effectivness of Cognitive
Behavioral Stress Management on Subjective Well-Being in Intertile Women. Journal of
Clinical Psycology. 1(4). 1-9.
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 7
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]