Self-Assessment Homework: Introversion, Extroversion, and Intuition

Verified

Added on  2021/06/18

|4
|720
|24
Homework Assignment
AI Summary
This homework assignment presents a self-assessment exploring the student's preferences regarding introversion, extroversion, intuition, and sensing. The assignment addresses two key questions: the student's personal evaluation of introversion versus extroversion, and their preference between intuition and sensing. The student provides a detailed analysis of their choices, citing relevant research and providing examples to support their viewpoints. The response includes a discussion of how the student's choices reflect their personality traits and how these traits influence their decision-making processes. The assignment references academic sources to support the claims made about personality types and their impact on individual behavior and interactions, demonstrating an understanding of psychological concepts.
Document Page
Running Head: SELF-ASSESSMENT 1
SELF-ASSESSMENT IN CHAPTER 2
Name
Institution
Date
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
SELF-ASSESSMENT 2
Question # 1
Personal evaluation on each side determines the decision of taking the risk on either
introversion or extroversion. Based on personal interest I believe it is good to consider features
like neutrality, characteristic, uncharacteristic degree of accepting results (Correa, Hinsley, & De
Zuniga, 2010). The research study on a preference of introversion shows that one can engage a
different feature that makes one comfortable. I feel my individual choice to pick introversion
category of evaluating personal thoughts forms some better test on self-assessment. In the second
case, statements influence sensing thoughts; I can develop the conversation about making the
visible spectrum. My preferred choice is extroversion category. I believe an extraversion
decision helps many people to have positivity, energy and full of life when interacting with
people (Correa, Hinsley, & De Zuniga, 2010). These opportunities are stimulated in group
extraversion decision to provide reserved and quite social situations. My preference on
extraversion categories is asserted by different conversations of measuring personal characters.
Extraversion behaviors are measured based on individual engagement and occupations.
These behaviors involve assertiveness, energy, talkativeness, and high sociability (Myers, &
Myers, 2010). A group requires extraverts' attitude of managing cases of intimidation, low
reserve, and enthusiasm. Three examples that demonstrate instances of extraversion involve
intelligent dialogues to stream up essential thoughts infrequent reports. Firstly, an individual
tends to much excited and seek novelty when disusing casual topics with friends. These traits are
fueled by social stimulation to inspire positive moods. Secondly, many people tend to have
behaviours of action-oriented that increase social interactions. In many cases, such trait
motivates and makes a person to feel energized while performing daily tasks. Thirdly, the
behavior of engaging different people with diverse attitude enables one to seek fair attention to
Document Page
SELF-ASSESSMENT 3
discuss important topics with friends. Individual confidence is improved when one can create
more time of interactions and engaging central attention.
Question #2
My preference between intuition and sensing generates new thoughts on the personality
test. I prefer working on intuition since it forms a strong feeling on personal development. The
comparison of my result with the content in the textbook provides more sensing personal
qualities in making important decisions (O'Brien, Bernold, & Akroyd, 1998). Results are not
same based on personality theory to mistype notice on sensory organs. The intuition generates
three different examples in practical applications. The first example based on intuition preference
enables innovative possibilities. Intuition helps one to have better ways focusing on a projective
in an interactive procedure. Secondly, the example of what we picture out as fascinating
outcomes enables us to generate vital information on my preference (Felder, & Dietz, 2002). The
intuition of enabling comfortable personalities skills are created through the preferred accurate
indicator. Thirdly, intuition helps one to develop unique patterns on abstract theories. The first
impression of engaging reality helps an individual to solve leaping problems.
Document Page
SELF-ASSESSMENT 4
References
Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & De Zuniga, H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The
intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human
Behavior, 26(2), 247-253.
Myers, I., & Myers, P. (2010). Gifts differing: Understanding personality type. Nicholas Brealey
Publishing.
O'Brien, T. P., Bernold, L. E., & Akroyd, D. (1998). Myers-Briggs type indicator and academic
achievement in engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 14(5),
311-315.
Felder, R. M., Felder, G. N., & Dietz, E. J. (2002). The effects of personality type on engineering
student performance and attitudes. Journal of engineering education, 91(1), 3-17.
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 4
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon