Detailed Analysis of Myers-Briggs Test in Psychology Course

This report analyzes the Myers-Briggs personality test, discussing its key aspects and limitations. The report begins by summarizing the conclusions of the Myers-Briggs test, highlighting its role in identifying individual personality traits and guiding life decisions, while acknowledging the limitations of its multi-dimensional typology. The report further explores the advantages of the test, such as its ability to identify core traits and assist in career and team selections. Finally, the report presents criticisms of the test, including concerns about accurately representing individual traits and its failure to encompass the diversity of individual needs. The report references various studies to support the claims made in the analysis, providing a comprehensive overview of the Myers-Briggs test's strengths and weaknesses. The report is designed to help students understand personality assessments and their implications.

RUNNING HEAD: PSYCHOLOGY 0
Myers Briggs personaility test

PSYCHOLOGY 1
Q.1
The conclusions of McCrae to this article is that Myers Briggs indicator suggests the
personality type of an individual where an individual is able to understand his primary
characteristics and traits in an effective manner. it is quite helpful in measuring the individual
traits thus counselling them to various life decisions. The article has been concluded with the
importance of using the five different factors as it would be easier to simplify the assessment
process of the individuals.
Moreover, the multidimensional typology used by the Myer Briggs test will result in issues
or confusions in claiming things in an effective manner (Vedel, 2016). For example, types of
intuitive are disproportionately classified into various ways of doing things. The article
concludes that the personality indicators of Myers Briggs are essential in analyzing the right
personality types of a layman but it is not always helpful in taking the big decisions of life.
Q.2
Yes, there are advantages that are provided in the multi-dimensional typology approach to
Myers Briggs beyond the information provided by single scales. Some of the advantages
included are that it is highly useful in identifying the core traits of an individual personality as
they are helpful in doing things in the right manner (Giluk, 2015). Secondly, it is helpful to
the individuals in taking the right decisions for their life as they can be counselled in the most
appropriate manner. For example, an individual wants a suggestion about whether he wants
to follow the social service as a career or career in IT. Individuals can be counselled in an
effective manner (Giluk, 2015).
Thirdly, it is highly useful in team selection where the individuals can be categorized under
various traits thus leading to the formation of an effective team (Vedel, 2016). These
advantages provided by the Myer Briggs test are helpful in initiating the broader studies
among the people. The multidimensional approach is also helpful for the social scientists to
research on various behaviors of the people to arrive at the specific organizational theory.
Q.3
There have been various criticism and support of Myers Briggs. Some of the criticism
includes that it is not possible to correctly claim the right attitudes and frameworks of an
individual regarding the things (Borghuis, 2016). For example, an individual whose
innermost desire is to do the social service but the test claims her to be appropriate the IT

PSYCHOLOGY 2
jobs. The other criticism included that five factors test and other typology of the test are not
capable of covering the diversity of traits in an individual.
As there are individuals with different needs and varieties thus leading to a high variety of
things on the best possible manner. There has been a support of a theory that is Myer Briggs
test is helpful in researching about various primary characteristics that cannot be changed in
an individual but an individual can become better or evolve around various stated things
(Borghuis, 2016).

PSYCHOLOGY 3
Bibliography
Borghuis, J. (2016). Big Five personality stability, change, and codevelopment across
adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,
55(2), 55-65.
Giluk, T. (2015). Big Five personality and academic dishonesty: A meta-analytic review.
Personality and Individual Differences, 72(1), .59-67.
Vedel, A. (2016). . Big Five personality group differences across academic majors.
Personality and individual differences, 90(1), 1-10.