An Analysis of the Pros and Cons of Smoking Bans on Society

This essay examines the multifaceted impacts of smoking bans on public health. It begins with an introduction highlighting the global efforts to minimize smoking rates and the subsequent benefits, such as reduced heart attack risks, especially among non-smokers. The essay delves into the pros of smoking bans, emphasizing their role in improving cardiovascular health, addressing respiratory problems, and mitigating conditions like acid reflux. Conversely, it acknowledges the cons, such as potential links to knee-replacement surgery and Parkinson's disease, as well as possible effects on cognitive performance. The conclusion synthesizes these points, reinforcing the effectiveness of smoking bans in reducing heart attacks, lung cancer, and emphysema, while also advocating for careful consideration of ban types and scopes. The essay references key studies to support its arguments, providing a balanced perspective on this public health issue.

Communication

Communication 1
Contents
Introduction...........................................................................................................................................2
Pros........................................................................................................................................................2
Cons......................................................................................................................................................2
Conclusion.............................................................................................................................................3
References.............................................................................................................................................4

Communication 2
Introduction
Smoking is the deadly habit of human civilization. Most of the nations are making
efforts in minimizing smoking rates. It has been found that the ban on smoking reduces the
menace of heart attacks majorly among younger persons and non-smokers. Breathing in low
dosages of cigarette smoke can enhance the peril of the heart attack. the ban on smoking
increases awareness among people concerning the health effects of smoking. The smoking
behavior changes before and after the restriction placed on consuming cigarettes. The ban on
smoking can decrease the contrary effects of health. The ban on smoking will comprise
education efforts contributing to the non-smoking decree. The smoking bans can be
implemented in establishments such as hotels, schools, restaurants even before the
implementation of the legislation (Read, 2017). A state not having a ban on smoking can be
ineffective in reflecting the fact that the average smoker could spend a considerable amount
of time in the occupational framework which proscribes smoking in and outside the
establishment.
Pros
 It is totally fine to ban smoking as smoking is likely to increase the likelihood of heart
disease. Stroke and coronary heart disease instigated by smoking are among the
foremost reasons of death worldwide.
 People who smoke regularly, struggle in breathing properly. Banning on smoking can
improve the breathing problems of the individuals along with other problems.
 Smoking also leads to regular nagging cough. The cough is instigated by body
clearing out the chemicals entered through smoking. When the cough lasts over 3
weeks then it is recognized to be a smoker’s cough.
 Smoking can also lead to painful heartburn as people smoking regularly are likely to
have acid reflux (Wielogorska, et al. 2016). It is a condition in which acid is leaked
from the stomach to upward into the esophagus.
Cons
 It has been found that smoking is effective in lowering the risk of knee-replacement
surgery. In this case, the ban on smoking should be given a thought.
 Smoking has been an effective role in lowering the Parkinson’s disease. Smoking has
a protective effect against Parkinson’s disease (Kim, et l. 2018).

Communication 3
 Ban on smoking can affect cognitive performance. The nicotine contained by the
cigarettes inspires immediate and sustained improvements in the working memory.
 Ban on smoking can stop people from concentrating as the people habitual to smoking
are likely to be less depressed and tend to cognitive problems (Chaiton, et al. 2018).
Conclusion
The smoking bans appear to be extremely operative in minimizing chances of heart
attack along with preventing lung cancer and emphysema. The cardiac benefits can be
attained with the ban on smoking. Before the smoking ban, it is required to consider the type
and range of different bans. Moreover, the ban is not amassed with the variations in the health
effects would not be anticipated. The ban on smoking is not only helpful for the smokers but
also help in offering insight to the non-smokers.

Communication 4
References
Chaiton, M., Schwartz, R., Cohen, J. E., Soule, E., & Eissenberg, T. (2018). Association of
Ontario’s ban on menthol cigarettes with smoking behavior 1 month after
implementation. JAMA internal medicine, 178(5), 710-711.
Kim, E. Y., Seo, H. G., Kim, Y., Choi, Y. J., Fong, G. T., Yan, M., & Driezen, P. (2018).
Change of support for smoke-free area and perception of effectiveness of smoking
ban policy among Korean smokers: findings from the 2010, 2016 International
Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey in Korea. Journal of the Korean Society
for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 9, 39-50.
Read, M. (2017). The Republic of Ireland's ban on smoking in the workplace: reframing the
smoking issue. In Reform in Europe (pp. 87-105). Routledge.
Wielogorska, N. L., Harries, V., Gearon, D., & Dheansa, B. (2016). A ban on smoking in
psychiatric hospitals would reduce self burn injuries. BMJ: British Medical Journal
(Online), 352.