Public Health Strategy 2011: Review and Recommendations Report

This report provides a comprehensive analysis of the 2011 Public Health Strategy, focusing on its goals, policies, and approaches to promote health and prevent disease. It examines the strategy's key components, including the promotion of human-centered healthcare, effective policies, and health in all policies. The report reviews new policies and approaches designed to address past public health failures, emphasizing the importance of community engagement and lifestyle changes. It also explores recommendations for improving public health provision, such as promoting child health, ensuring safe services, and creating frameworks for job creation to safeguard and improve health. The report highlights the importance of measuring health outcomes beyond traditional metrics and emphasizes the role of public health professionals in implementing evidence-based approaches to deliver high-quality care.

SHOW HOW THE 2011 PUBLIC
HEALTH STRATEGY

Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3
MAIN BODY...................................................................................................................................3
What is Public health strategy 2011.............................................................................................3
New policies and approaches will address the past public health failure....................................4
Recommend how Public health provision be improved with help of better service...................6
CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................7
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................1

INTRODUCTION
Public health strategies defined as to promote and protect health and prevent disease ,
injury (Wagner and Lam, 2019). This guides the communities to build the strong public health
system and also aids to undertake course of action that improves and maintains the health of
people.
The present report is based on the public health strategy, 2011. Furthermore, following
steps will be taken as to critically understanding the public health theory, review the
effectiveness of public health policies and strategies. Additionally, study will gather about public
health provision to offer the best service.
MAIN BODY
What is Public health strategy 2011.
The main aim of public health strategy is to promote and prevent disease and injury. It is
plan of action that aids to outlines the vision, priorities and course of actions that deals with the
disabilities of the individual by providing the effective course of actions (Davis, Gaudino and Al-
Delaimy, 2018). In this, it can be stated that the public health policy is the global concern and
this is the prime responsibility of the Department of the health in UL to take steps that can aids to
bring more effective measures that helps to undertake better course of actions and Thus, main
aim of this policy is to have equal access to promote the good health, disease prevention and
health care services. Effective public health actions is mainly underpinned by the number of the
core factors and possible intervention that followed by action to secure the effective execution of
the public health strategy (Harris, Friel and Wilson, 2015). Henceforth, the basis principles of
public health polices are as-
 Human centred health care- It is defined as policy that implemented by making the
individual put their focus on various terms as prevention, diagnostic rehabilitation and
also this aids to motivates the employees to undergo with better strategies of health
(McKinnell and et.al., 2019).
 Human rights- Each individual has right to have the highest level of physical and
psychosocial health within the journey of his life.
 Effective policy and good governance- Healthy policy is founded upon the evidence
based knowledge and cost effectiveness.

 Health in all policies- The other sectors, organisation and institution should be involved
and must be co-responsible for improving and maintaining the public health.
New policies and approaches will address the past public health failure.
The main aim of the new policies and approaches is to bring improvement in the health
status of the health status of individual that mainly considers the aspects of quality such as health
and social security of inhabitants. It is the new era of the public health with higher priority and
dedicated resources (Wakerman, 2018). Thus, main goal of the public health strategies is to
achieve the excellent result, liberating the professional leadership and unleashing the innovation.
The new policies as Medical approach has provided the number of opportunities for better health
and to take initiatives to have reduction within the inequities in health of individuals. This is one
of the effective approach as this reflects the core value of freedom, fairness and responsibilities
by enhancing the self esteem, confidence and personal responsibilities (Baum, 2018). It is the
approach that will also aids to address the root cause of the poor health and well being in order or
reaching out the families and individuals who their support in the effective manner. This public
health policies needs to be framed out in order to prevent spreading of communicable disease.
Additionally, it can be stated that the New Public Health policy is defined as integrative
approach that protects and promotes the individuals and society health status. The fundamental
policy of the New public health is mainly based on the responsibility and accountability of the
regional, local authorities for setting out effective health and well being within the society (Gakh,
2015). The new approach of public health strategies is also inclusive of voluntary sector sand
private sectors such as private sectors, medical equipments and vaccine manufactures etc.
The main motive of the New public health policy is takes the initiative to seeks to bring
improvement in health of population with the application of cumulative evidence in terms to
published and other factor such as social, biological and physical components that impacts the
health of the society (Stickley and Hogan, 2017). Thus, new polices of the Public health has
announced number of strategies that aids to bring the effective actions by looking over the health
status of the people within the UK. In addition to it, by promoting the wider application of these
kind of tools and greater awareness of achievement and failures in health of public leads to
improve the capacity and to bring out the greater change in the population of the health in the
future (McDermott, 2018).

Furthermore, the one of the main mission of the New public health is to taken initiative
towards to maximise the effective health to the human and well being that assist to redress the
inequality at the global level. The one of the core issue in terms to promoting health to the
individual is the social inequalities. Thus, the challenges of social inequalities have been
highlighted with the public health thinkers since the 19th century. In order to mitigate this kind of
the issues New public health is defined as comprehensive approach that allows to protect and
promote the health status of the individual and society with social equity and also allows to have
the efficient use of the resource (Lee, Bartsch and Huang, 2019). In order to deal with this kind
of the issues the firm needs to incorporates the programmatic approach to the health services
with the different intervention that aids to have the reduction in the burden of the disease and
also allows to take continue reduction within the morbidity, mortality and also leads to improve
the quality of life.
Review of previous policies
In the past, British health care policies has recognised the great different in the health
status within the different regions of the country and social classes of the individuals. After
implementation of the New Public health strategies the primary focus is need to be given on
coordination and balance between the varied regions of the country and social class (Douglas,
Ramsdale and Csikar, 2016). Contrary to the previous policies new policies are also aiming at
promoting the awareness among people so that apart from the management of health issues
diseases can also be prevented. The increasing awareness among people will assist in preparing
communities from preventing diseases. Another distinguish element of current health policies
which makes them different and more effective from the earlier policies is that existing policies
emphasis on community engagement. The change in life style can bring significant difference in
lives and health status that programs such as Healthy lives healthy people guide people to
perform activities such as diet changes or exercises or change in life style to improve their
health.
The New public health policies also helps to have reduction in the smoking and tobacco
through the use of health promotion that includes the restrictive legislation such as are burden of
the heart disease, chronic conditions such as respiratory disease and also aids to have reduction
in the length of the hospitalization. Hence, the companies that produce and promote the
production of tobacco mainly lacks the adequate awareness of the public health and

infrastructure to prevent leading cause of premature disability and health. Reduction in the
smoke is one of the major focus for the public health (Ordunez, and Hoy, 2018). In this, the new
public health promotion has effective health care access as this aids to make integration of trans-
disciplinary and multi-organization work. The legal authorities needs to make the health care
management more effective in order to maintain and promote better health to the individuals.
The one of the major beneficial aspect of New Public Health is to make the health of
public more healthier by reducing the differences between the heath of different groups with
promoting the healthier lifestyle and to take supportive actions by the local governments. The
main aim of this strategies is to protect the nations from the hazards of the public health. In the
current scenario, the legal authorities needs to take right frameworks for enterprise and creation
of jobs. Central and local government has also taken the number of the strategies that aids to
support the economic growth of the county by working well (David, Thomas and Balandin,
2019). The main aim of New public health strategies is to prevention of the disease and
disabilities that aids to bring out the relief the suffering and one of the economic benefits to this
is can be to individuals, communities and health system in the general.
From the findings, it has been found out that another area for the public health success is
the continued reduction in the suicide rates. Therefore, New public health policy of 2011 has also
introduced the restriction on the sales of paracetamol and use of the blister packaging that mainly
connected with the reduction in admission to hospital and death from the poisoning of
paracetamol (Lowe, Whitzman and Giles-Corti, 2018). This could be possible only with the
support of public health professionals within UK and they are highly involved in the key
initiative that have developed systematic evidence based approaches in terms to provide the
equitable delivery of the high quality care within the UK. Thus, it can be stated that the mission
of the New public health is to have maximisation in the human health and well being and assist
to redress the societal and global inequalities (da Fonseca, 2018).
Recommend how Public health provision be improved with help of better service.
The report is based on suggestive measures for bringing more advancement in the public
health provision in order to render the better services. Therefore, these are define in the
following manner as are-
 In order to bring effective services, the public health strategies the initiative sis needed to
be taken to to promote the child health, improving pregnancy and enhancing the

knowledge among the pregnant women about the negative impact of the addiction
inducing substances (Tebes and et.al., 2018).
 The legal authorities of the UK should implement the effective surveillance of the market
for the good and service to ensure the good and safe services that are accessible to to the
consumer (Breda, Jewell and Keller, 2019).
 Government should take the steps to educate the society in general in terms to promote
the wellness to the public so that effective action can be taken by providing the effective
well-being to the individual.
 Public health care agencies need to take more initiative in terms to have reduction in the
tackling the violence, abuse and use of Tobacco. This helps to bring effective
improvement in the health status of the people and this also leads to have control on death
rates.
 The legal authorities of the UK should take the initiatives to create right framework for
the enterprise by job creation (Williams, 2018). This enables people to work, safeguard
and improve the health of people at work by promoting effective strategies to health.
 The pubic authorities needs to take the steps that seek to the improve the health of
population with help of application of the commutative evidence so that the overall things
can be done effectively.
 Health outcomes must not be measured solely on basis of emergency services, hospital
admission of patients and mortality rates. Instead other parameters such as work style,
nutritional needs and diet practices of vulnerable groups must also be taken into account
for evaluating health outcomes.
 The publich health outcomes must be measured in four key domains namely health
improvement, health protection, wider health determinants and prevention of premature
mortality.
CONCLUSION
From the above report it can be summarized that public health strategies defined as
course of action that mainly framed out to protecting the safety and also leads to improve the
health of communities through education, policies making for disease and injury prevention.

The present report is based on the public health strategy, 2011. Henceforth, study will
has covered the following things as new policies and approach that helps to handle the past
issues relates with the health provision service service and this also leads to render the better and
effective services.

REFERENCES
Books and journals
Wagner, J.M. and Lam, K., 2019. Effective Public Health Response in Carbapenemase-
Producing Carbapenem Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CP-CRE) Outbreak in a Georgia
Long Term Care Facility (LTCF), 2018. American Journal of Infection Control. 47(6).
p.S33.
Davis, A.B., Gaudino, J.A. and Al-Delaimy, W.K., 2018. The role of epidemiology in firearm
violence prevention: a Policy Brief. International journal of epidemiology.
McKinnell, J.A. And et.al., and Butler-Wu, S., 2019. Public health efforts can impact adoption of
current susceptibility breakpoints, but closer attention from regulatory bodies is
needed. Journal of clinical microbiology. 57(3). pp.e01488-18.
Wakerman, J., 2018. Access & equity in the provision of primary health care services in rural
and remote Australia.
Baum, F., 2018. Governing for Health. Oxford University Press, USA.
McDermott, G.V., 2018. Essays in the Social Determinants of Health and Public Health Policy.
Lee, B.Y., Bartsch, S.M. and Huang, S.S., 2019. Tracking the spread of carbapenem-resistant
Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) through clinical cultures alone underestimates the spread of
CRE even more than anticipated. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology. 40(6).
pp.731-734.
Ordunez, P. and Hoy, W.E., 2018. Case definitions and approaches for surveillance of chronic
kidney disease in agricultural communities in Central America: policy
implications. Kidney international. 93(2). pp.284-287.
David, J.L., Thomas, S.L. and Balandin, S., 2019. The role of public health advocacy in
preventing and reducing gambling related harm: challenges, facilitators, and opportunities
for change. Addiction Research & Theory. 27(3). pp.210-219.
Lowe, M., Whitzman, C. and Giles-Corti, B., 2018. Health-promoting spatial planning:
Approaches for strengthening urban policy integration. Planning theory & practice. 19(2).
pp.180-197.
da Fonseca, E.M., 2018. How can a policy foster local pharmaceutical production and still
protect public health? Lessons from the health–industry complex in Brazil. Global public
health. 13(4). pp.489-502.
Tebes, J.K., Champine, R.B., Matlin, S.L. and Strambler, M.J., 2019. Population health and
trauma‐informed practice: Implications for programs, systems, and policies. American
journal of community psychology.
Burris, S.C., Berman, M.L. and Holiday, T.R., 2018. The new public health law: a
transdisciplinary approach to practice and advocacy. Oxford University Press.
Breda, J., Jewell, J. and Keller, A., 2019. The importance of the World Health Organization
sugar guidelines for dental health and obesity prevention. Caries research. 53(2). pp.149-
152.
Williams, J., 2018. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) Case Definition Change: A
Comparative Study of the Georgia Emerging Infections Program, 2011-2015 and 2016.
Walsh, K. and Phillipson, C., 2018. SUSTAINABLE AGEING OR SYMBOLIC EXCLUSION?
NEW PERSPECTIVES ON OLDER ADULT CIVIC PARTICIPATION AND PUBLIC
POLICY. Innovation in Aging. 2(suppl_1). pp.820-820.
1

Harris, P., Friel, S. and Wilson, A., 2015. ‘Including health in systems responsible for urban
planning’: a realist policy analysis research programme. BMJ open. 5(7).p.e008822.
Gakh, M., 2015. Law, the health in all policies approach, and cross-sector collaboration. Public
Health Reports. 130(1). pp.96-100.
Stickley, T. and et.al., 2017. Arts, health & wellbeing: reflections on a national seminar series
and building a UK research network. Arts & Health. 9(1). pp.14-25.
Douglas, G.V., Ramsdale, M.P., Vinall-Collier, K. and Csikar, J.I., 2016. Using high fluoride
concentration products in public policy: a rapid review of current guidelines for high
fluoride concentration products. Caries research. 50(Suppl. 1). pp.50-60.
2