This case study analyzes the legal issues in the matter of Pure Nature Sydney Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 914. The primary issue revolves around determining which party engaged in oppressive acts, violating Section 232 of the Corporations Act (2001) (Cth). The analysis examines the arguments of both the plaintiffs and defendants, each claiming the other's actions were oppressive and seeking to purchase shares. The court, presided over by Black, J, refused to allow any share purchases, instead ordering the company to be wound up. The decision was grounded in the provisions of sections 232, 233, and 461 of the Act, highlighting the judge's assessment that both parties engaged in equally oppressive conduct. The case study applies the principles from the Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2018] case. The conclusion underscores the court's decision to wind up the company due to the parties' contradictory conduct, which was deemed detrimental to the organization's welfare.
![[object Object]](/_next/static/media/star-bottom.7253800d.svg)
![Business Law Case Study: Pure Nature Sydney Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 914](/_next/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdesklib.com%2Fmedia%2Fimages%2Fqc%2F49a21ba8dfd3454690f3a6c3e7bd227c.jpg&w=256&q=75)
![Case Study Analysis: Pure Nature Sydney Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 914](/_next/image/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdesklib.com%2Fmedia%2Fimages%2Fft%2F774f15a31ea24760bdd22a18ac9048e5.jpg&w=256&q=75)
