QAHE Campus Redevelopment: Stakeholder Analysis and WBS Report

This report analyzes a project for the redevelopment of space for business students at QAHE, a UK-based private higher education provider. It begins with a Project Initiation Document (PID), outlining the project's objectives, budget, and timelines. The report then conducts a stakeholder analysis, identifying and assessing the interests and influence of various stakeholders, including students, faculty, and administration. The core of the report focuses on the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS), breaking down project activities into manageable sub-tasks. The WBS includes tasks for project initiation, planning, implementation, monitoring and control, and project completion. A critical path analysis (CPA) is also included. Finally, the report concludes with a list of references.

Stakeholder analysis and
WBS
1

Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................3
PROJECT 1......................................................................................................................................3
PART A ..........................................................................................................................................3
Project Initiation Document (PID) and Stakeholder analysis.....................................................3
PART B...........................................................................................................................................5
Work breakdown Structure.........................................................................................................5
REFERENCES ...............................................................................................................................8
2

INTRODUCTION
Project management is basically a process that involves organisation and planning of
resources in order to move a particular task, duty or an event towards closure (Al-Hunaiyyan,
Alhajri and Al-Sharhan, 2018). The following report is based on QAHE which is a private higher
education provider established in United Kingdom. Organisation wishes to enhance space that is
available for business students and require redevelopment of London campus. The report will
cover stakeholders analysis and work breakdown structure.
PROJECT 1
PART A
Project Initiation Document (PID) and Stakeholder analysis
Project Initiation document is one of the most important aspect of project management
and defines scope of the project, management as well as overall success criteria where a team
can go back to the project. It contains some general information regarding the project such as
scope, context, collaboration and team. It is created by project manger for acquiring set
outcomes. PID for the given proposal is designed here.
Title of the project Development of space for Business students
Budgetary Information £100k
Timescales Start date: 14th February 2020
Finish date: 17th march 2020
Objectives  Developing space for business students.
 Redevelopment of space available.
 Allocation of space for activities.
Approach  Creation of effective as well as
designed strategy.
 Implementation of strategies in
organisation.
Key Staff  Administration
 Students
3

 Faculties
Stakeholders analysis can be define as a process to individuals before initiating a project.
It consist of owners, employees, suppliers, students, alumni, sponsors and many others. They are
responsible for providing assistance for attaining goals and objectives in an effective way.
Stakeholders Why are they involve
in the project
Why they are not
interested to invest in
the project
Factors that make
them to involve in the
project
Students They are the
stakeholders who lies
in the category of
studying in the
university. They are
needed in the project
for generating space
for acoustic panel
which is very small for
current students. It is
needed by students for
better understanding of
topics as space is very
limited.
Students who area
already studying in the
university will remain
in the place for their
education. It is not
possible for them to
invest in such high
amount for
redevelopment of
classes. This is the
reason they do not
want to be a part of
project.
Development and
redesigning of space
will enable students to
gain practical
knowledge about the
topic which is difficult
to learn at less space.
Students who are link
with the project will
provide assistance for
their professional and
personal development
of career and growth.
Faculty Faculty of the
university are
interested in the
project assigned by the
college to invest and
contribute in bright t
future of the students
so they they can make
Faculties who are
teaching in University
show some less
interest as they think
that they would not get
benefited from such
huge investment. If
there is any benefit
Faculties srae linked
with the project as
they would like to
educate their students
regarding acoustic
panels by clearing
their doubts and
queries so that they
4

their career. It will
develop a positive
image of the
university. However,
investment is optional
to all faculties.
they will show some
interest.
would not face any
problems in future.
PART B
Work breakdown Structure
Work breakdown structure is mainly seen as the break down of all activities in sub parts.
The main motive of using this structure is to simplify project activities and make it easier for
project manager to execute project activities in rightful manner (Chali, Yonah and Kalegele,
2018). Usage of this structure ensures that project will be easily completed within the provided
time frame. Along with this, it also organises all activities in the rightful manner. With reference
to the present project, its respective project manager will make use of WBS in which various
activities are involved. All of them are stated as below:
Main task Sub activities
1 Start of project
Discussion
Development of idea
Submission of idea .
Further discussion with project sponsors
Approval of idea
2 Planning
Creation of Primary Scope
Selection of Project Team members
Meetings with project team members
Creation of Project Plan
5

Submission of Project Plan
Approval of project plan
3 Implementation Meeting for project discussion
formulation of design
Selection of equipments required for project
Final checking of every project activity.
4 Monitoring and control Meeting with project manager
Inclusions of add ons in project
Risk Management
Development of final project management plan after up
gradation
5 Completion of project Formulation of closure documents
Up gradation of records
Take approval from superiors
6

7

Critical Path Analysis
CPA is determined as the effective technique which helps project operator in checking
that their activities are completed in the projected time or not (Pandey, Litoriya and Pandey,
2018). It also supports in effective resource management and provides equivalent contribution in
better planning of team.
8

REFERENCES
Books and Journals
Al-Hunaiyyan, A., Alhajri, R. A. and Al-Sharhan, S., 2018. Perceptions and challenges of mobile
learning in Kuwait. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information
Sciences. 30(2). pp.279-289.
Barnett, S., Avazpour, I., Vasa, R. and Grundy, J., 2019. Supporting multi-view development for
mobile applications. Journal of Computer Languages, 51, pp.88-96.
Chali, F., Yonah, Z. O. and Kalegele, K., 2018. Data exchange architecture for the development
of mobile applications that support eHealth systems interoperability: a case of
Tanzania. International Journal of Advanced Computer Research. 8(34). pp.1-10.
Flora, H. K., 2018. Adopting an agile approach for the development of mobile applications.
Kim, D. K., 2018. Development of Mobile Cloud Applications using UML. International
Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering. 8(1). p.596.
Pandey, M., Litoriya, R. and Pandey, P., 2018. An ISM approach for modeling the issues and
factors of mobile app development. International Journal of Software Engineering and
Knowledge Engineering. 28(07). pp.937-953.
9