Qualitative and Quantitative Research: Report Analysis

This report provides an analysis of qualitative and quantitative research methods, particularly focusing on survey analysis and data interpretation. It discusses the implementation of a qualitative research design in a survey process conducted in Texas, highlighting the use of the ECI program, IFSP review system, and NCSEAM for data collection and analysis. The report emphasizes the importance of the survey system in establishing services and rights, and the significance of quantitative research in understanding mass determination and consequences. It explores the strengths and weaknesses of the qualitative research and its impact on the development of national aspects, referencing relevant literature such as Brannen (2017) and Paquot & Plonsky (2017) to support the findings.

Running head: QUALITY QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
QUALITY QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

1QUALITY QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
Quantitative research is a pragmatic investigation that involved with mathematical,
statistical and computational data and techniques. Most of the cases polling, questionnaires and
survey process are the way to understand the review over qualitative research process. In the
given scenario, qualitative research design has been implemented in the survey process in Texas
and the survey was done to diagnose the clinical judgment of that place (Brannen, 2017). The
accumulating data has taken from the four categories. Participating families are the sample for
that research and demographical intervention also maintain the child, family ratio, and
participation. The selection policy that has chosen as the procedures is very convincing. IFSP
review system has been used and that created a path in between the participants and data
collectors. For the community-based survey process, ECI program has used and this has been
coordinated in mid-June. For the family center service procedure NCSEAM has been introduced
in the cognitive protocol to interpret the survey language program and the polling system analyze
the rating or measure to linguistic people in that particular place (Paquot & Plonsky, 2017). This
has been a quality process to make a survey and mixing of data for the qualitative research also
encourage the ability of distribution to this qualitative analysis. In the probable outcome
strengths and weakness of this qualitative research has enhanced. The services and rights have
been established from the survey system which is essential for developing the national aspect.
Quantitative research method is imperative to understand such circumstance when mass
determination and consequence needed to be highlighted.

2QUALITY QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH
References
Brannen, J. (Ed.). (2017). Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research. Routledge.
Paquot, M., & Plonsky, L. (2017). Quantitative research methods and study quality in learner
corpus research. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 3(1), 61-94.