Presentation on Qualitative Research in Healthcare: PUBH6013

Verified

Added on  2022/09/24

|10
|447
|21
Presentation
AI Summary
This presentation provides an overview of qualitative research methods applied in healthcare settings. It begins with an introduction highlighting the significance of support functions in healthcare, followed by a discussion on the nature of data used, including primary and secondary research. The presentation outlines the data collection methods, emphasizing the use of interpretivism as the research philosophy. It also addresses ethical and cultural considerations, underscoring the importance of informed consent and avoiding plagiarism. The presentation details data sources such as scholarly articles, interviews, focus groups, and observations, along with sampling techniques. The content is supported by references to relevant academic sources. The presentation is designed to fulfill the assessment criteria, which includes demonstrating the ability to apply qualitative research methods, appreciate ethical and cultural considerations, and understand sampling techniques.
Document Page
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH
IN HEALTHCARE
Name of the Student
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
The presentation will present;
Background of the research
The data collection methods
The research Philosophy
Ethical and cultural considerations
INTRODUCTION
2
Document Page
Research has been carried out to provide the significance of
support functions in Healthcare.
Nature of data used; 1. Primary 2. Secondary
RESEARCH
UNDERTAKEN
3
Document Page
Qualitative analysis could have been carried out with the help of
secondary research.
DATA
COLLECTION
4
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
The research will be carried out with reference to a research
philosophy that is known as interpretivism
RESEARCH
PHILOSOPHY
5
Document Page
There are various ethical and cultural
considerations that are to be taken into
consideration
Information will be sourced from the latter
with the help of interviews, focus groups
and observations.
Consent has been focussed on and
plagiarism has been avoided.
ETHICAL
CONSIDERATION
6
Document Page
People from different cultural
backgrounds will be taking part in the
research
People from different cultural
backgrounds will be subject to read the
findings.
No statements in the research that
demean people on the basis of culture,
values, religion, age or gender.
CULTURAL
CONSIDERATION
7
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
Data will be sourced from;
Scholarly sourced,
Interviews
Focus groups
Observations
SAMPLING
TECHNIQUES
8
Document Page
THANK
YOU
Document Page
REFERENCES
Fisher, M., Baum, F. E., MacDougall, C., Newman, L., & McDermott, D. (2016). To what extent do Australian health
policy documents address social determinants of health and health equity?. Journal of Social Policy, 45(3), 545-564.
Holloway, I., & Galvin, K. (2016). Qualitative research in nursing and healthcare. Retrieved from
http://ebookcentral.proquest.com Created from think on 2020-04-15 16:54:43.
John, W., & Johnson, P. (2000). The Pros and Cons of Data Analysis Software for Qualitative Research. Journal Of
Nursing Scholarship, 32(4), 393-397. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2000.00393.x
Ross, T. (2012). A survival guide for health research methods. McGraw-Hill.
Senot, C., Chandrasekaran, A., & Ward, P. T. (2016). Collaboration between service professionals during the delivery of
health care: Evidence from a multiple-case study in US hospitals. Journal of Operations Management, 42, 62-79.
Sweeney, A., Greenwood, K., Williams, S., Wykes, T., & Rose, D. (2012). Hearing the voices of service user researchers
in collaborative qualitative data analysis: the case for multiple coding. Health Expectations, 16(4), e89-e99.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00810.x
10
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 10
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]