Quality and Scope in Project Context: A Comprehensive Analysis Report

This report provides a detailed analysis of quality and scope within a project context, emphasizing their critical roles in project management. It explores the characteristics of quality, including reliability, suitability, and performance, alongside the importance of project scope, which involves documenting deadlines, tasks, features, deliverables, and costs. By evaluating peer-reviewed journals, the report highlights the similarities and differences between project quality and scope, such as their roles in monitoring and control, deliverable reviews, and defect prevention. It also addresses the impact of scope on project resources, costs, and timelines, and underscores the necessity of aligning quality control and scope validation to ensure project success and customer satisfaction. The document is available on Desklib, a platform offering a wide range of study resources including past papers and solved assignments.

Running head: QUALITY AND SCOPE IN PROJECT CONTEXT
Quality and scope in project context
Name of the student:
Name of the university:
Author Note

1QUALITY AND SCOPE IN PROJECT CONTEXT
Executive summary
The quality characteristics include reliability, suitability, performances, comprise and so on. The
project scopes us another factor of the planning and involves the documenting and finding of specific
project deadlines, features, tasks, features, deliverables and ultimate costs. In this report, different
quality features and scopes to conduct the effective project is analyzed. All of these are understood by
examining different types of journals that are peer-reviewed that are related to this sector.

2QUALITY AND SCOPE IN PROJECT CONTEXT
Table of Contents
1. Introduction:......................................................................................................................................3
2. Evaluating the literatures:..................................................................................................................3
3. Conclusion:........................................................................................................................................8
4. References:......................................................................................................................................10

3QUALITY AND SCOPE IN PROJECT CONTEXT
1. Introduction:
In the case of project management, some of the common characteristics of quality are
consistency, reliability, suitability, functionality, performance and so on. Here, various types of the
levels of quality is measured according to the standards of different project and organization.
Moreover, from initiation and process to the delivery phase, all the above elements are calculated as
per quality standards.
On the other hand, the project scope is another part of planning a project. This includes the
plan of documenting and then determining of project deadlines, tasks, functions, features, deliverables
and ultimate expenses. This is required to be gained and the tasks must be completed for effective
project delivery.
In the following study, various scopes and quality features of conducting an efficient project is
demonstrated. This is understood by analyzing various peer-reviewed journals related to this area.
2. Evaluating the literatures:
Sylvester, Rani and Shaikh (2011) shows that the quality as the immediate association with
the user or customer and quality has been indicating to the products and the instructions of use,
installation service and marketing. For this, it is seen that a holistic approach is highly needed in this
case. Furthermore, the idea of quality along with its parameters has been depending on different
aspects that are related to quality. Every aspect has quality and it is surprising that managing quality
has been superior and embracing every other type of management. Schwalbe (2015) argues that one
of the functions of management is the quality management which is performed at the same time with
additional functions of management. Moreover, the study of Sylvester, Rani and Shaikh (2011) also

4QUALITY AND SCOPE IN PROJECT CONTEXT
helps in understanding that quality depends on individuals. This includes the preferences and attitudes
of the clients governing the demanded project quality. The skills of the performers, knowledge and
attitudes are the vital elements to determine the quality. Further, quality can be seen as meeting the
established requirements. This is gained as the project completed conforms to various stated
requirements of the owners, designers and contractors as per Hornstein (2015).
Further, the journal by Sylvester, Rani and Shaikh (2011) shows the entire scope that has been
tied to the efficient deliverable of the produced item, various specifications, different type of data
sheets, drawings along with numerous material requisition and various equipments. Besides, in other
words by Todorović et al. (2015) the scope constraint can be viewed as what must be done for
producing the outcome of the project. The techniques and guidelines contributing to the success
include the guideline and checklist notes used for inspection to assure the scope of service and a wide
range of tasks done by the discipline of project control. The extent and scope of the scheduling and
planning services are provided by the contractors is defined in a clear way and is been examined
according to Aga, Noorderhaven and Vallejo (2016). Moreover, on the other hand, Haq et al. (2018)
investigates that the project control needs the techniques of project management like the procedures
of work authorization, sign off for the users and work breakdown structure. This also includes the
particular analysis of project close-out and reporting of scope status. Thus it is understood that there
are some similarities between project scopes and quality processes
Some of the similarities between project quality and scope that is understood from the studies
are as follows.
 Here, both of them belong to the control and monitoring process group.
 Further, both of them includes the reviewing and inspection of the deliverables.

5QUALITY AND SCOPE IN PROJECT CONTEXT
The article by Suma and LakshmiMadhuri (2013), shows that the software has been a huge
effect on every kind of domains of applications. This is because of the inception of software
technology in all kind of industries. Since, the evolution of the process of software engineering as a
notable domain of the production cycle, this is imperative to create software of high quality. This
comprises of a high quality of software through developing product under various constraints like
standards, policies, technologies, time and costs. Apart from this, Khorasani, Movahed and Alipour
(2015) reacted by stating that quality is also dependent on the kind of project, the complexity and
mode to develop the project. As per the complicated influencing elements regarding the success of the
project is divided into three categories like technical related factors, process-related factors and
people related factors as shown by Alvarez-Dionisi, Turner and Mittra (2016). Here, different people
related factors have been including people from a team of project management, top management,
clients and technical teams. Further, Kuthyola, Liu and Klein (2017) highlights that various factors
such as technical ability, size and complexity of the project and so are included here. Thus the
opportunities have been seen as the valid element for the success of the project.
Besides, the scope creep has been influencing the project’s success as per Suma and
LakshmiMadhuri (2013). As per the study by Pheng (2018), the state that issues with project
management that is solved is an important factor for the success of the project. According to the
authors, the state has been a tendency of mounting during maintenance and execution phase of the
project. This is because of the changes in external and internal changes and many more as researched
by Mirza, Pourzolfaghar and Shahnazari (2013). Thus the modifications in the scope impacts
resources, cost and time of the project. Next, the development of huge quality products is a
rudimentary necessity of the day of the software sector. Further, high generation of huge quality
software is been influencing through various elements that involve the process of efficient project
management. Additionally, as per the investigation by Whitaker (2016) it must be kept in mind that

6QUALITY AND SCOPE IN PROJECT CONTEXT
various parameters like personnel, cost time and scope consists of their function points and
experience levels and so on.
Hence, it can be inferred that the controlling quality is done internally with the help of project
managers having the quality management group. This is done through validating the scope to be done
by the client with the support of project manager. Besides, the managing of quality is helpful to check
whether the product is generated in the proper way. On the other hand, validating the scope has been
related with the smart production of the appropriate product. Apart from this, the different process of
controlling quality assures that the product becomes ready to get delivered. The validating of scope
on the other hand is the process to get the formal acceptance from client’s side as the product gets
delivered.
Clark (1989) explains that the scope consists of two elements. The first one is the choice of
distinct versus various off-the-shelf parts. Utilizing the distinct parts has been adding costs and
activities to the project has been affecting the time needed to finish that. Next, the second element has
been the choice of the involvement of a supplier.
Scope and man-hours:
There have been decisions regarding the scope as the direct effect on the observed man-hours
in the project. As one utilizes the various parts that are use-off the shelf. Moreover, Newton (2015)
indicates that the various kinds of decisions of scope comprises of a direct effect over different man-
hours that are observed in the project. As one utilized the off-the-shelf parts like it is the hours seen in
the project that has been less as one is to engineer new par that has been in-house.
Scope and lead time:

7QUALITY AND SCOPE IN PROJECT CONTEXT
The scope has direct effects on different man-hours. However, the effect in the lead time has
not been straightforward. The vital challenge is product quality. Here, the author has heightened
proves leading to man-hours and time. However, Lampa et al. (2017) demonstrates that there has
been no assessment of the effect of the scope on the quality of the design. The preliminary analysis
has proposed that the huge unique parts ratio has been reelected to the quality of higher design.
Mirza, Pourzolfaghar and Shahnazari (2013) shows that different products can be considered
as the distinct system. This framework lies under under the program and project system. However, it
is also witnessed that both the scopes of product and project comprises of various distinct interfaces,
drivers, objectives, stakeholders, different necessities and various aims. As different products are
found to be driven through different types of project scope, there are other drivers also. The scope of
the project deals with the needed tasks for creating deliverables of the project as per Clark (1989).
Suma and LakshmiMadhuri (2013) mentioned that in order to gain the objective of the
project, various activities are often done as distinct task elements or packages and are integrated into
the ultimate product. For delivering the product quality in budget and time meeting the expectations
of customers, receiving back the communication, definition and basics and receive the agreement of
clear vision for the product is needed. For establishing the vision, Mirza, Pourzolfaghar and
Shahnazari (2013) analyzes that spending time at the starting of the project getting and accomplishing
the agreement on complicated activities prior to writing requirements and beginning the product
development is important. Here, the tasks have been clearly defining various elements. This includes
the risk analyses feasibility, interfaces, external, operational concepts, assumptions, constraints,
project drivers, and goals.
It is understood that the main aim of the process of controlling quality is to assure that the
product is free of defect and it is able to fulfill all the requirements. The purpose of scope process on

8QUALITY AND SCOPE IN PROJECT CONTEXT
the other hand helps in getting formal acceptance of the product from customers. Thus the
maintaining of quality process is useful to create the proper end-product initially and validate the
process of scope to receive formal acceptance from client who have accepted the product of
deliverable. Hence, the two elements complements each other’s and delivers an efficient quality of
product.
Apart from this, the research has been attempting to make a relation with the scope of
attainment with the satisfaction of customers. This also includes scrutinizing the documents of a
project for finding the objectives of the project and examine the relationship between perceived
success criteria and objectives of the project.
 At last some of the differences of quality and scope identified are as follows:
 As far as time is concerned quality has never been assuring that the product is good.
Further, it never considers the manpower scheduling into its account.
 Activities of quality control is done as the execution of the project takes place. On the
other hand, scope verification is done. This is performed at the ending level of the
project.
 Further, the most significant aim of the effective process of quality control has been to
give rise to different types of products that are defect-free. On the other hand, the
cause to verify the process of scope verification is to receive the deliverables that is
accepted by the customers.
3. Conclusion:
The above report shows that the process of quality control is to create the high-quality and
defect free product. The verification of the process of scope is helpful to receive the product that is

9QUALITY AND SCOPE IN PROJECT CONTEXT
been accepted from the side of the client. The activities of the quality control is done across the
overall phase of execution. On the other hand, the tasks of scope verification are required as the
deliverables are already in place to get delivered. The training phase of different project management
is helpful in knowing more about its scope. This is simpler in managing the project scope in various
proven methods. Through utilizing the smart efficient client and customer communications across the
process, staying under restrictions of the team. There are documented properly for the vital events in
the process of development under the principles that are provided by huge methods for managing the
scopes efficiently. The management of proper scope has been under use time and budget effectively.
Besides, it is seen that the most vital aspect of the process to come up with ending up the results
satisfying the customers. Thus, in conclusion, it can be said that the lack of suitable quality
management in the project has been giving rise to uncertainty. Further, it has been enhancing the risk
to get failed in the project. Additionally, here the different measures for the management of changes,
issues, problems and events that emerge during the production of outputs. The process of
management of the process has been varying from different projects. The philosophy quality must be
reflected the completed intentions and approaches to applied with irrespective of the quality of
throughout the project.

10QUALITY AND SCOPE IN PROJECT CONTEXT
4. References:
Aga, D. A., Noorderhaven, N., & Vallejo, B. (2016). Transformational leadership and project
success: The mediating role of team-building. International Journal of Project Management,
34(5), 806-818.
Alvarez-Dionisi, L. E., Turner, R., & Mittra, M. (2016). Global project management trends.
International Journal of Information Technology Project Management (IJITPM), 7(3), 54-73.
Clark, K. B. (1989). Project scope and project performance: the effect of parts strategy and supplier
involvement on product development. Management science, 35(10), 1247-1263.
Haq, S. U., Liang, C., Gu, D., Du, J. T., & Zhao, S. (2018). Project Governance, Project Performance,
and the Mediating Role of Project Quality and Project Management Risk: An Agency Theory
Perspective. Engineering Management Journal, 30(4), 274-292.
Hornstein, H. A. (2015). The integration of project management and organizational change
management is now a necessity. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 291-
298.
Khorasani, A., Movahed, S. S., & Alipour, R. (2015). ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF
ORGANIZATIONAL TRAINING ON IMPLEMENTATION OF PROJECT
MANAGEMENT, FOCUSING ON FOUR AREAS (TIME MANAGEMENT, COST
MANAGEMENT, PROJECT QUALITY MANAGEMENT, AND HUMAN RESOURCE
MANAGEMENT). Majallah-i Amuzih-i Muhandisi-i Iran, 17(66), 93.

11QUALITY AND SCOPE IN PROJECT CONTEXT
Kuthyola, K. F., Liu, J. Y. C., & Klein, G. (2017, June). Influence of task interdependence on
teamwork quality and project performance. In International Conference on Business
Information Systems (pp. 135-148). Springer, Cham.
Lampa, I. L., Contessoto, A. D. G., Amorim, A. R., Zafalon, G. F. D., Valêncio, C. R., & de Souza,
R. C. G. (2017). Project Scope Management: A Strategy Oriented to the Requirements
Engineering. In ICEIS (2) (pp. 370-378).
Mirza, M. N., Pourzolfaghar, Z., & Shahnazari, M. (2013). Significance of scope in project success.
Procedia Technology, 9, 722-729.
Newton, P. (2015). Managing Project Scope. Free Management Ebooks, available at: www. free-
management-ebooks. com/dldebk-pdf/fme-project-team. pdf (accessed October 22, 2016).
[Google Scholar].
Pheng, L. S. (2018). Project Scope Management. In Project Management for the Built Environment
(pp. 63-77). Springer, Singapore.
Schwalbe, K. (2015). Information technology project management. Cengage Learning.
Suma, V., & LakshmiMadhuri, K. (2013). Influence of Scope Creep on Project Success:
AComparative Study between Conventional ApproachVerses Agile Approach. In IEEE
International Conference on Advanced research in Engineering and Technology (ICARET).
Sylvester, D. C., Rani, N. S. A., & Shaikh, J. M. (2011). Comparison between oil and gas companies
and contractors against cost, time, quality and scope for project success in Miri, Sarawak,
Malaysia. African Journal of Business Management, 5(11), 4337-4354.