PPMP 20011 - Project Negotiation: Queensland Health & Channel Tunnel

This presentation provides an overview of commercial project negotiation, focusing on two case studies: the Queensland Health payroll system and the Channel Tunnel project. It examines the project backgrounds, stakeholder agendas, and negotiation processes involved in each case. For Queensland Health, the presentation highlights the complexities of the system, inexperienced leadership, and the importance of stakeholder considerations and conflict resolution. Similarly, for the Channel Tunnel project, it discusses the project's scope, target costs, and the impact of management styles on project success. The presentation concludes with recommendations for project managers, emphasizing the need for separating issues from people, confronting conflicts, and sometimes withdrawing to allow issues to resolve themselves. Desklib offers a range of study tools, including past papers and solved assignments, to help students further explore these topics.

1
Commercial project negotiation
(Queensland Health payroll system,
Channel Tunnel)

PPMP 20011
Assessment 03: Practical & Written Presentation
Tutor: Vidyesh Alve
Group Members:
Sai Krishna Narra 12075167
Saikrishna Neelagiri 12075166
Viswa Sai Ravi 12086807
Nimma Nikhil Kumar reddy 12070845
1

Introduction to Queensland
Health payroll system:
 Queensland Health System is a
supplier of a healthcare system in
Australia.
 For understanding the commercial
negotiations for the project, a
discussion is made on their contractual
arrangements.
3

Understanding the project
backgrounds:
Queensland’s health payroll system:
 Range of managed system:
 Complexity is high.
 ICT: There is various inexperienced
leadership.
 Build agreements: This is useful to
reject various adages.
Della Spina, L., Scrivo, R., Ventura, C. and Viglianisi, A., 2015, June. Urban renewal: negotiation procedures and evaluation
models. In International Conference on Computational Science and Its Applications (pp. 88-103). Springer, Cham.
4

Factors of stakeholder agenda:
 Main challenge for project managers is
to take into consideration of various
project needs.
 It also includes destining requirements
and stakeholders with respect to those
projects.
5

Processes of project negotiations:
 In the case of QHS, the process to
communicate has included necessities and
ideas. The process through which
individuals have been persuading people
has delivered the exchange of many
things.
 Reasons of conflicts:
Here marketing stakeholders has been
advocating for complicated predicts allowing
huge customization by various customers.
6

7
Conclusion and
recommendations:
This is seen across the globe, and stakeholders and
contractors are been also facing various notable
complexities for negotiating important projects.
 Recommendations:
Project negotiations to be undertaken by project
managers
 Separating:
It conflicts down issues and people.
 Confronting:
Project managers have needed the ultimate
authorities as it comes to conflict and resolutions.

8
Introduction to Channel
Tunnel project:
 Channel Tunnel project is involved in
connecting the United Kingdom and
France.
 In the following slides commercial
negotiations for the projects is done.

Understanding Channel
tunnel project:
 Range of managed system:
The project intends to link various
cities in France and Britain.
 ICT:
There is a specific target cost for
tunneling
 Build arrangements:
Here, the team consists of quality.
Elsig, M., 2017. Revival: The EU's Common Commercial Policy (2002): Institutions, Interests and Ideas. Routledge.
9

Factors of stakeholder agenda:
 Here the main issue is to tackle the
project requirements. It includes
gratification and considerations of
different stakeholders. There are
customers, maintenance teams,
contractors and designers.
Ballatore, A. and Mooney, P., 2015. Conceptualising the geographic world: the dimensions of negotiation in crowdsourced
cartography. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 29(12), pp.2310-2327.
10

 Reasons of conflicts:
Here, depending on the way in
which style of management is
communicated, unproductive, it can
threaten the success of project.
Burke, R. and Barron, S., 2014. Project management leadership: building creative teams. John Wiley & Sons.
11

12
Conclusion and recommendation
for Channel Tunnel:
 The present study effectively illustrates
the project negotiation context for
Channel Tunnel.
 However, the project managers must
follow the following recommendations.
 Withdrawing from various conflicts:
 Project managers should be letting
things to work out on their own.

13