The report analyzes the case of R v Firns [2001] NSWCCA 191, focusing on the breach of director duties, specifically insider trading. The case involves directors of Carpenter Pacific Resources NL who were accused of insider trading based on information regarding a mining license in Papua New Guinea. The report examines the legal arguments, including the definition of "generally available information" under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), and the court's judgment. It discusses the relevance of the decision in the context of Australian corporations law, emphasizing the importance of director duties regarding care, diligence, and good faith, as well as the consequences of violating these duties. The report concludes that while the court initially found the director not guilty of insider trading, the current legal standards, post-amendments to the Corporations Act, would likely lead to a different outcome, with the director potentially being held liable for violating their duties.
![[object Object]](/_next/static/media/star-bottom.7253800d.svg)
