Reforming Australian Refugee Policy: The Role of Advocacy Skills

This report examines Australia's response to the global refugee predicament, focusing on the evolution of its refugee policies, particularly in the context of the 2015 policy changes that significantly impacted asylum seekers. It details the history and rationale behind refugee resettlement in Australia, the challenges posed by international displacement, and the impacts of Australian policies on refugees, including the size and composition of asylum seeker transfers, pressure on Pacific states, social pressures in small island societies, and gender inequality. The report further proposes reforms to the Australian refugee policy, advocating for the permanent end of offshore processing, fair and humane asylum procedures, reformation of immigration detention, and a more significant and sensitive refugee and humanitarian program, outlining specific strategies for change and improvement. Desklib provides students access to this and many other solved assignments.

Australian Response To The Global Predicament 1
AUSTRALIAN RESPONSE TO GLOBAL PREDICAMENT
By (Student’s Name)
Professor’s Name
College
Course
Date

Australian Response To The Global Predicament 2
AUSTRALIAN RESPONSE TO GLOBAL PREDICAMENT
INTRODUCTION
The history of refugee’s resettlement can be traced back 170 years ago. In 1839, the
Lutherans were the first group that settled in the south of Australia to escape the persecutions and
denial of worship in Prussia. Australian continued to receive refugees from other countries, but
the government did not offer any support to the refugees. The unassisted migrants were accepted
in the country if only they met the set restrictions posed by the migration restriction Act 1901
which is the foundation of the White Australian Policy. In 1933 to 1939 more groups from
Germany settled in Australia and the number of refugees rapidly increased until the break out of
World War II (Luke 2018).
HISTORY AND RATIONALE OF REFUGEES IN AUSTRALIA
After the war, Australia launched an immigration program which led to a more
significant number of immigrants. The program was initiated to meet the labor shortages which
increased with the rapidly growing economy. In 1947, Australia agreed with International
Refugee Organization to settle more people in camps from Europe. Australia went ahead of
receiving refugees with many programs formed and reformed as well as signing treaties with
international organizations concerning human rights and refugees.
Recently in 1980 and 1990s changes concerning the refugees were established and
implemented. The delivery of settlement services shifted from the migrant’s hostels to the
modern On Arrival Accommodation. In 1997, Humanitarian Settlement Strategy replaced

Australian Response To The Global Predicament 3
Community Resettlement Settlement Scheme. These and the current changes in the delivery of
settlements vices can be traced in detail in the current Refugee and Humanitarian Program for
the 2008-2009. In the year between 2009 and 2010, Australia has passed a 75,000 mark of the
refugee intake since its attainment of independence (Joly 2016).
THE AUSTRALIAN POLICY ON REFUGEES
Refugees had tragic and traumatic moments in the year 2015 in Australia and globally at
large. These people were displaced because of violence, persecution and human rights violations.
During this year, there was the change in policy which affected a large number of 30,000 people
in the communities in Australia. These changes affected the group adversely for the system was
aimed at removal of government funding assistance, determination of the refugee's status and an
introduction of temporary protection visas to the refugees (Clark, Gilbert, Rao and Kerr 2014).
The significant challenges of international displacement are signified by incredible
images of Syrian children wash lifeless bodies in the Sea and the Germans giving food to the
refugees hanging on the fence at the border. Refugees were detained at Nauru as a result of the
implementation of the Australian asylum policy which affected 30,000 people in Australian's
communities. The changed system was on temporary protection visas, denial of government-
funded assistance and the identification of the refugee's position (Woodland, Burgner, Paxton
and Zwi 2010).
Various issues emerged affecting the refugees. These issues were a delay of citizenship
and denial to those in school for further studies due to the temporary protection visas. Hope to
these people vanished and the idea of uniting with their loved ones, access to stable employment
and education was shuttered. Proper housing and access to enough food were no longer practical
(Reiger 2010).

Australian Response To The Global Predicament 4
There has been an opponent of the acts of turning back boats and deportation in Australia
to the refugees. This policy was to stop more refugees from getting into the country. The already
refugees were in fear of deportation to their countries with violence. This policy was referred as
punitive and inhumane. There was a report that the refugees were suddenly detained based on
their behaviors and characters which increased the number of people suffering from mental
health (Koleth 2010). The introduction of refugee identification a process known as fast-tracking
and the removal of government funding affected the refugees adversely. Refugee could no longer
seek legal advice or assistance. There was also delay in the documentation, interviews,
communication as well as information (Weine 2011).
THE IMPACTS OF AUSTRALIAN REFUGEE POLICY
Size and composition of asylum seeker transfer to the Pacific
The size of the population of the refugees has dramatically grown. For Nauru, the
numbers of people have sustained high levels. Manus Island, the number of Asylum seekers, has
rapidly increased and is almost four times than the first phase which has sustained many
detainees. The composition of the asylum seekers has also changed. The manus island
composition is of males only based on the harsh conditions that could only be handled by adult
men. Women and children are not available on the island for they are regarded as the vulnerable
group (Crock and Berg 2011).
Pressure on Pacific states
The help coming from Australia towards the Pacific solution in Pacific countries has
made the PICs to push the conversion of pressure from their primary donor since the needs of
developing countries are proliferating. The needs correspond to those of Nauru whose riches has
turned to rugs. President Nixon responded to the pressure arguing that the main reasons why the

Australian Response To The Global Predicament 5
Americans were offering aid is for their good and not entirely to help other countries since the
pressure was too much. The pressure had become a threat to the Pacific countries (Connell
2013).
Social pressure in small island societies
The damage of the asylum seekers both mentally and physical damage due to detention in
offshore facilities has been well certified. Tensions have emerged among the foreigners, and the
local communities on whether the asylum seekers should wait for their determination or they
should be viewed as refugees and resettled in the community (Legomsky 2012). The local
communities view that these foreigners are as a result of animosity of Australia who mistreated
the transferees. There have been various reports of violence and killings of the asylum seekers
living in Nauru based on the cultural differences between them. The mistreatment of the youth
and discrimination in getting employment as well as the threats of being killed if they will not
shift from the island has led to the refugees to be taken back to detention for their safety. Tension
has also been evident between the locals and the government due to the presence of asylum to
the island. The locals were angered by the fact that the government did not consult them on
reopening of the detention (Wright 2014).
Gender inequality
There was a recognition of the persecution of female which is different to those of males.
Former review tribunal issued gender guidelines since the female asylum seekers were particular
vulnerabilities. The transfer of the group to the processing centers to Nauru exposed the
vulnerable group of women and children to harm of damage that might resemble those they
experienced in their country of origin. There have been reports on the physical and sexual
assaults on women in Nauru. Women are exposed to the risks of being harassed, by men who are

Australian Response To The Global Predicament 6
detainees, police, and local male guards inside and outside Nauru. There was a report that the
refugees were suddenly detained based on their behaviors and characters which increased the
number of people suffering from mental health. The introduction of refugee identification a
process known as fast-tracking and the removal of government funding affected the refugees
adversely especially women and children. Refugee could no longer seek legal advice or
assistance. There was also delay in the documentation, interviews, communication as well as
information (Martinez et al. 2015).
THE REFORMS ON THE AUSTRALIAN POLICY ON REFUGEES
• The permanent end of the offshore processing.
• Fair and humane procedures for claiming asylum.
• A reformation of the immigration detention of the refugee’s system.
A more significant and more sensitive refugee and humanitarian movements.
• Improvement of engagement between Australia and Asia.
STRATEGIES AND THE CHANGE OF THE POLICY
The permanent end to offshore processing
The regimes costly, damaging to the lives of the asylum people as well as it is illegal.
The regime has cost the Australian government over 5 billion on measures of the policy which
have continued to harm those seeking the protection of a state. This policy has led to deaths of
many and assaults to both children and women. In this case, a strategy should be initiated to stop
the regime (Sandvik 2010).
A proposed solution for the policy is to end the offshore processing. Instead, the
government should process people onshore. Australia should also end the turning boats but
instead come up with ways to the rescue of the people. The Australian government in

Australian Response To The Global Predicament 7
collaboration with other nongovernmental organizations should come up with initiatives for
refugee’s protection during the period of their settlement in the country (Koleth 2010). These
initiatives are a warm welcoming of the genuine refugees. To avoid those fake refugees, the
government ought to come up with methods of registering actual immigrants. The idea of turning
back those people who need help is not human. Rather than putting restrictions on the borders,
security should be enhanced but allow refugees in the country (McDonald 2011). Ways on
curbing illegal business on the open borders should be focused on other than total restrictions of
the immigrants. Australian government ought to enact policies of registering the refugees and
their identification to distinguish the genuine refugees from other people with ill intentions
(Carney and Boucher 2010)
Fair and humane procedures for claiming asylum
A proposed solution is aiming at people seeking asylum should be treated more humanely
and have the protection they lack from their home countries. The fast-tracking system should be
replaced by a single statutory refugee’s status determination procedure. The process should have
access to individual review by the administrative Appeals Tribunals. A process of appointing and
reappointing of members should be provided which should be independent and merit-based for a
minimum of five years to avoid political interference and influence. The government should
restore the funding for competent legal assistance and legal advice to the people seeking the
asylum. Efforts on child care during the early development stage is essential to avoid trauma and
stress and enhance flexibility in adjusting and also adapting to the new environment (Fozdar and
Hartley 2013)
A reformation of the immigration detention of the refugee’s system

Australian Response To The Global Predicament 8
The proposed solution in the process is for the people seeking asylum in Australia should
be treated fairly and more humanely with their rights respected and upheld. The mandatory
immigration detention should end. People seeking protection and security should be let free to
live in Australia communities with their needs and claims to be considered (Jensen and
Sonnemann 2014)
The immigration detention legislation of the state should be reformed in the following
ways; Repealing of the mandatory detention in the migration act. The law should be codified in
the prohibition of children detention. There should be a regulation on immigrating detention.
There should be some limitations put in place concerning the extent of detention. The state
should also ensure that all people have access to judicial review of negative security
performance.
A more significant and more sensitive refugee and humanitarian movements
The Australian refugee and humanitarian program should increase in size to have the
ability to give long-lasting solutions to the challenges facing Australia concerning the refugees.
The increased program should offer protection fo the unsettled people. In the migration program,
the inclusion of humanitarian family reunion to enable the refugees to reunite with their families.
To curb the problem of terrorists attacking hospitals, the government should come up with
programs of building underground hospitals out of reach of the terrorists (Gushulak, Pottie,
Roberts, Torres and DesMeules 2011).
The government should come up with strategies on how to help the victims of war and
other natural calamities from trauma. Nearly all the survivors are wounded emotionally, and the
results can be depression or mental related problem. Yoga classes need to be implemented in the
camps. Yoga classes are meant to help that individual in trauma to accept the situation and

Australian Response To The Global Predicament 9
calculate ideas of bettering their conditions. Those refugees who succumbed permanent damage
such as disabilities should get counselors who will help them acquire the value of acceptance that
will boost their self-esteem (Paxton et al. 2012).
To help those women with a heavy burden of the family responsibility, the government
ought to implement policies that will help refugee women to become entrepreneurs. The
initiative implemented should focus on developing personal and community advocacy skills,
employability skills, business skills, conflict management skills. These skills will enable women
in becoming well positioned in accessing economic resources and services independently, and
with this, child support in basic needs and education will be served right (Neumann and Tavan
2013)
In the case of discrimination, the entire public ought to respect the human rights being in
their home origin or not. Awareness needs to be initiated especially to those people who find it
challenging to appreciate people from other cultures. Laws on the rights of the refugees should
be enforced, and those who are assaulted or discriminated should seek justice. Those who violate
the rights of others should face the arms law of the government (Wille 2011). By enforcing rules
and regulations by the government, discrimination against color, race, dressing code and culture
will reduce. A framework of culture should be developed by the anti-discrimination law and
validated to guide the implementation and development of settlement aspects (Mutch et al.
2011).
The Australian government should implement a cross-portfolio approach to enhance
security and protection of the refugees. Initiatives of making peace and reconciliation processes
in countries of origin of the refugees are needed. The government should also work with the

Australian Response To The Global Predicament 10
regional administrations and other states to initiate a regional strategy for enhancing resettlement
and coming with other long-lasting solution.
Improvement of engagement between Australia and Asia
Australia should finally acknowledge that the wellbeing and the interests of people and
the states in the Asia Pacific regions are well achieved if the nation collaborates with others in
finding possible and long-lasting solutions to the challenges facing them. Answers should be
found on the displaced people due to violence and persecution from their countries using
diplomacy (Robinson 2013). The Australian government should focus on the promotion of ways
to stop detention for the refugees and using diplomacy activities resettle the people. There should
be an identification of the causes of displacement in Asia. There should be an engagement, with
the civil society in communities, influencing the state to collaborate with NGOs, working with
the refugee’s community’s networks, partnering with local leaders and business leaders all to get
solutions of the refugees, host nations as well as the returnees. Continuing engagement with the
aim of protecting the most vulnerable groups of women and children who have minimal options
for long-lasting solutions (Jones and Cherian 2014).
RECOMMENDATION
The Australian government should drop the idea of temporary protection as well as
converting all temporary visas into permanent visa. In case the temporary visas are retained then
there should be clear information given to those applying for the permit (Correa-Velez, Gifford
and Barnett 2010).
 There should be enough funding and support to the refugees and ways to stabilize
their lives should be the principal objective.

Australian Response To The Global Predicament 11
 To curb the problem of terrorists attacking hospitals, the government should come
up with programs of building underground hospitals out of reach of the terrorists.
 The public should come up with strategies on how to help the victims of war and
other natural calamities from trauma (Bellamy 2010).
 For the refugees with disabilities, the government should ensure the information
given to the agencies is correct concerning the limitations and health issues of the
refugees.
 The government should improve on citizenship delays and also give reasons
behind the delay. Citizenship application should be handled as a matter of
urgency.
 The Australian government in collaboration with other nongovernmental
organizations should come up with initiatives for refugee's protection during the
period of their settlement in the country.
 To help those women with a heavy burden of the family responsibility, the
government ought to implement policies that will help refugee women to become
entrepreneurs.
 A framework of culture should be developed by the anti-discrimination law and
validated to guide the implementation and development of settlement aspects.
CONCLUSION
Refugees had tragic and traumatic moments in the year 2015 in Australia and globally at
large. These people were displaced because of violence, persecution and human rights violations.

Australian Response To The Global Predicament 12
During this year, there was the change in policy which affected a large number of 30,000 people
in the communities in Australia. These changes affected the group adversely for the system was
aimed at removal of government funding assistance, determination of the refugee's status and an
introduction of temporary protection visas to the refugees. Impacts of this policy are, the size of
the population of the refugees has dramatically grown. For Nauru, the numbers of people have
sustained high levels, Pressure on Pacific states and persecution of female which is different to
those of males (Neumann, Gifford, Lems and Scherr 2014). This policy by the Australian
government needed reforms like the permanent end of the offshore processing; fair and humane
procedures for claiming asylum, a reformation on the immigration detention of the refugee’s
system, a more significant and more sensitive refugee and humanitarian movements and
improvement of engagement between Australia and Asia. The reforms are aimed to achieve
various visions like, people seeking asylum should be treated more humanely and have the
protection they lack from their home countries. The fast-tracking system should be replaced by a
single statutory refugee’s status determination procedure. The process should have access to
individual review by the administrative Appeals Tribunals. Instead of turning back boats and
processing of people offshore, the government should process people onshore. Australia should
also end the turning boats but instead come up with ways to the rescue of the people. Australia
should finally acknowledge that the wellbeing and the interests of people and the states in the
Asia Pacific regions are well achieved if the nation collaborates with others in finding possible
and long-lasting solutions to the challenges facing them. Answers should be found on the
displaced people due to violence and persecution from their countries using diplomacy. The
Australian government should focus on the promotion of ways to stop detention for the refugees
and using diplomacy activities resettle the people (Koser 2010).

Australian Response To The Global Predicament 13
REFERENCES
Bellamy, A.J., 2010. The responsibility to protect and Australian foreign policy. Australian
Journal of International Affairs, 64(4), pp.432-448.
Bleiker, R., Campbell, D., Hutchison, E. and Nicholson, X., 2013. The visual dehumanisation of
refugees. Australian Journal of Political Science, 48(4), pp.398-416.
Carney, A.O. and Boucher, A., 2010. Social Security and Immigration: An Agenda for Future
Research?.
Clark, A., Gilbert, A., Rao, D. and Kerr, L., 2014. ‘Excuse me, do any of you ladies speak
English?’Perspectives of refugee women living in South Australia: barriers to accessing primary
health care and achieving the Quality Use of Medicines. Australian Journal of Primary
Health, 20(1), pp.92-97.
Connell, R., 2013. Why do market ‘reforms’ persistently increase inequality?. Discourse: Studies
in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(2), pp.279-285.
Crock, M. and Berg, L.A., 2011. Immigration, refugees and forced migration: law, policy and
practice in Australia. Federation Press.
Fozdar, F. and Hartley, L., 2013. Civic and ethno belonging among recent refugees to
Australia. Journal of refugee studies, 27(1), pp.126-144.
Jensen, B. and Sonnemann, J., 2014. Turning around schools: it can be done. Melbourne:
Grattan Institute.
Joly, D., 2016. Haven or hell?: asylum policies and refugees in Europe. Springer.

Australian Response To The Global Predicament 14
Koleth, E., 2010. Multiculturalism: a review of Australian policy statements and recent debates
in Australia and overseas. Canberra, ACT: Department of Parliamentary Services.
Koleth, E., 2010. Multiculturalism: a review of Australian policy statements and recent debates
in Australia and overseas. Canberra, ACT: Department of Parliamentary Services.
Koser, K., 2010. Responding to boat arrivals in Australia: time for a reality check. ANALYSIS.
Legomsky, S.H., 2012. Immigration Policy from Scratch: The Universal and the Unique. Wm. &
Mary Bill Rts. J., 21, p.339.
Luke, A., 2018. Literacy and the other: A sociological approach to literacy research and policy in
multilingual societies. In Critical Literacy, Schooling, and Social Justice(pp. 243-261).
Routledge.
Martinez, O., Wu, E., Sandfort, T., Dodge, B., Carballo-Dieguez, A., Pinto, R., Rhodes, S.,
Moya, E. and Chavez-Baray, S., 2015. Evaluating the impact of immigration policies on health
status among undocumented immigrants: a systematic review. Journal of Immigrant and
Minority Health, 17(3), pp.947-970.
McDonald, J., 2011. The role of law in adapting to climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary
Reviews: Climate Change, 2(2), pp.283-295.
Neumann, K. and Tavan, G., 2013. Does History Matter?: Making and debating citizenship,
immigration and refugee policy in Australia and New Zealand (p. 153). ANU Press.
Neumann, K., Gifford, S.M., Lems, A. and Scherr, S., 2014. Refugee settlement in Australia:
policy, scholarship and the production of knowledge, 1952− 2013. Journal of Intercultural
Studies, 35(1), pp.1-17.
Reiger, K.M., 2010. “Knights” or “Knaves”? Public policy, professional power, and reforming
maternity services. Health care for women international, 32(1), pp.2-22.

Australian Response To The Global Predicament 15
Robinson, K., 2013. Voices from the front line: Social work with refugees and asylum seekers in
Australia and the UK. British Journal of social work, 44(6), pp.1602-1620.
Sandvik, K.B., 2010. A Legal History: the Emergence of the African Resettlement Candidate in
International Refugee Management. International Journal of Refugee Law, 22(1), pp.20-47.
Singer, P. and Singer, R., 2010. The ethics of refugee policy'. Population and Political Theory,
pp.285-304.
Wille, J., 2011. Agency and belonging: Southern Sudanese Former Refugees' reflections on life
in Australia. Australasian Review of African Studies, The, 32(2), p.80.
Wright, C.F., 2014. How do states implement liberal immigration policies? Control signals and
skilled immigration reform in Australia. Governance, 27(3), pp.397-421.