Critical Issues in Business: Leadership and Performance Analysis

This literature review examines the intricate relationship between leadership and organizational performance, focusing on how different leadership styles influence key aspects of business success. The review delves into transformational and transactional leadership approaches, analyzing their effects on employee motivation, financial outcomes, innovation, and sustainable practices. The study highlights the importance of effective leadership in driving organizational performance, emphasizing the impact on employee engagement and the achievement of company goals. The analysis includes financial and non-financial performance indicators, such as customer and employee satisfaction. The review also explores how leadership impacts innovation, organizational learning, and overall market growth. It synthesizes empirical studies and meta-analyses, providing insights into the positive and negative impacts of leadership on employee performance and the overall success of organizations, with a particular focus on how leadership styles affect employee contributions and market growth.

The relationship between
leadership and organizational
performance
1

ABSTRACT:
The main purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between leadership and
organizational performance by considering organizational performance in innovation, financial,
sustainable and responsible employees. This study had included the negative and positive effect
of leadership on employee performance. This reflects about the importance of leadership and
organizational performance. The first analysis is based on the leadership and organizational
performance at workplace. On the other side, this has reflects about the transformational and
transactional leadership style and its affect on business and organizational performance in
negative and in positive manner. With the help of the study, it had been reflected that leadership
style had important for success of organization and for motivating employee for giving their hard
contribution for achieving goals and objective of company.
2

Table of Contents
ABSTRACT:...................................................................................................................................2
INTRODUCTION...........................................................................................................................4
MAIN BODY..................................................................................................................................4
The relationship between leadership and organizational performance........................................4
CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................8
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................10
3

INTRODUCTION
Leadership is the action of leading group of people at an organization. In simple word, it is
the art of motivating people for act toward achieving common goals. On the other side,
organizational performance means that the actual output or the result of an organization as
measured against its intended outputs. Leadership and organizational performance are
interrelated at organization because with the effective motivation people and employees are
giving hard contribution within the workplace. The present essay is based on the relationship
between leadership and organizational performance. This will reflects its importance and various
effectiveness of that relationship within the organization.
MAIN BODY
The relationship between leadership and organizational performance.
Leadership is the powerful term, which is often weakly conceptualized. As per the view
of Shanker and et.al., (2017), the concept of leadership is eludes us and turns hard working
efforts of employee into the effective result and output. This creates more effectiveness for
people and employees to working within the organization. Leadership is about influencing
process which is intentional influence to employees for giving their hard contribution for
achieving goals and objectives of company in effective manner (Western, 2019). The leadership
is consisting with various leadership styles which are help to employers and leader to motivate
people for achieving goals and objectives of company in effective manner. In contradict manner
Rosenbach (2018) stated that the Democratic leadership style is the commonly effective style. In
this leaders make decision which is based on inputs and result of team members. This very
effective because in this leadership style leaders are allow to their employees and tem members
to take a part of decision making. Through employees are highly motivated at workplace.
According to Herman (2016), autocratic leadership style is adverse from democratic
leadership style because in that leaders are never taking any idea and suggestion from their
subordinates. That is the reason when some time employees are de-motivated at the workplace.
Another side, transactional and transformational leadership style is board concepts of which have
various authors highlighted with other aspects. As per the Grint and et.al. (2016),
transformational leaders offer followers with the purpose and that have aim to motivate
employees by focusing on their moral values, raise their consciousness of the moral issues and
4

change the current situation. In contrast, transactional leaders have aim to motivate followers by
offering an exchange appealing to their narrow self interest such as providing jobs and effective
subsidies (Shanker and et.al., 2017). All the leadership styles are effective and valuable for
motivating people at workplace in order to giving their hard contribution for achieving goals and
objectives of company in effective manner.
Like the leadership, performance is also the board concept. Overall organizational
performance is depends upon leadership behaviours and motivation factor this is generally
described as the whole people and a group of people adjust and object does a piece of work and
activity (Shin and Konrad, 2017). In the organisational research, performance can by analysis
and measure with various level like team level, organizational level and individual level. As per
the view of Muterera and et.al. (2018), organization is defined as the instruments of purpose
which is talk about the purpose of an organization as well as evaluate the success of organization
in reaching the goals and the success point. This success can be measures with firm profit, size
and market growth.
The leadership and organizational performance sets the effective and valuable result for
firm in successive manner. Leaders have main responsibility to motivate employees for giving
hard contribution (Miller, 2016). This contribution is creating effective organizational
performance in respective manner. This help to create effectiveness market growth of
organization. On the other hand, top level manager have their sufficient discretion to influence
performance which is depend on strategic choices (Harms and et.al., 2017). Most of the time
leadership style has affect to employees and their working goals in negative or in positive
manner. Proper and effective relationship between leadership and organizational performance is
help to get effective success at market place. Through that employees are more beneficial
because through that employer provide rewards to them of success.
According to Jing and Avery (2016), The relationship between leadership and
organizational performance has been important for managing employees at every level like
financial, innovation and sustainable and for making responsible to employee in effective
manner. As per the view of Ceri-Booms, Curşeu and Oerlemans (2017), financial criteria of
performance covers only the one part of organizational performance. This completed supported
by recognising with non financial measures like customer satisfaction and employee satisfaction.
This included the payment, technology and innovation. The financial performance is completely
5

depends on the valuable efforts of employees and determined by financial efficiency and
performance within the proper management of organization. in this approach is ignore the role
and involvement of employees for achieving beneficial satisfaction with the program and
services.
On the other side Obeidat and Tarhini (2016) stated that the non financial indicators are
includes the effective and quality of services, suppliers satisfaction and another effects. This help
to measures proper effectiveness of working ability to perform task as per customer requirement
by motivating people. As per the study, it is been proved that sustainable organizational
performance is rooted in the exploitation of existing capital and examination for the new
opportunity (Knies, Jacobsen and Tummers, 2016). This has created effective performance of
employees at the workplace in effective manner. The leadership and organizational performance
is effectively interrelated within the organization. This has highly contributed for gathered
effective success of organization at working place by motivating people. The motivation is very
important and effective part of employee life as well as employer life.
Organizational performance is the ability to acquires and process effective human,
financial and physical resources in the proper manner for achieving goals and objectives of
organization in effective manner (Para-González, Jiménez-Jiménez and Martínez-Lorente, 2018).
Effective organizational performance is based on the outcomes of an organization with its goals
and objectives in respective manner. In the present scenarios competition is highly increased in
that case organizations have need to make complete focus on leadership and organization
performance for enhance effective performance of employees as well as boots them to working
in proper manner.
On the other side Singh and et.al., (2016), innovation is the effective aspect for
organization because that is help to covers effective success for organization. Innovation is help
to attract more customers towards company for using product and services at market place.
Innovation is referred the organizational learning, technological innovation and organizational
adoption issues (Gong, 2017). Innovative work and decision requires proper and effective focus
on working ability of employees. Organizations are paying attention to innovation in existing
knowledge resources, product and services in effective manner and within the current market
place. In respect of that Yahaya and Ebrahim (2016), stated that the relationship between
innovation and performance is suggested the relationship in moderate type of innovation. This
6

can affect to the transactional and transformational leadership on the innovation at the
organization.
However, the most of believe that the leadership is the process is affect to people either it
is in positive and negative manner (Xiao, Zhang and de Pablos, 2017). Leadership style is highly
affected the popularity among the organizational research with the unique method. Leaders are
motivate people which is help to enhance creativity and unique of employees towards working
style. The leadership style is gives the positive impact on the organizational performance (Ceri-
Booms, Curşeu and Oerlemans, 2017). On another side, organization learning has the positive
effect on organizational performance through the organizational performance. The proper
relationship between leadership and innovation is creating an effective organizational
performance for managing success at working place in effective manner. As per that, the positive
relationship between leadership and organizational performance in respect of the innovation is
applies into the manufacturing companies. Through that manufacturing organization get
effectiveness and able to enhance their sales of product and services in effective manner.
The relationship between leadership and performance has been effective for success
which is completely research with empirical studies. According to the Harms and et.al., (2017),
the five Meta analysis has represent the complete analysis of leaders and it relations with
employee performance. The first analysis is focused on charismatic leadership on the basis son
some outcomes such as satisfaction with leaders, effective guideline provided with leaders and
performance (Hashim and et.al., 2018). Overall performance of organization is depends on
leadership style because this indicate the different aspects of effectiveness. That is found single
source which is tend to inflate relationship between leadership and performance. This shows the
relationship between leadership and organizational performance is not only reflect about
performance but also create strong relations between employee and organization.
In contradict Chiniara and Bentein, (2016), stated that the Meta analysis include that the
charismatic leadership is in depended variable. This includes various kinds of outcomes like
effectiveness of leadership, performance management, subordinate satisfaction, efforts and
commitment. But in the another ways, study find that the leadership and organizational
performance is the in depended sources which is avoid common sources and apply measures of
leadership and performance (Hsieh and Liou, 2018). That is noted by the complete study and its
measurement priority segments in proper and effective manner. This provides complete chances
7

to getting success at market place. Through that employees are give hard and effective
performance with specific services and product analysis.
On the other side Rice (2018) reflect about the different leadership style within the meta
analysis like transformational, transactional and another one leadership style as in dependent
variable and performance effectiveness and satisfaction as dependent variable. As per the
research, result shown and reflect that the transformational and transactional leadership are both
affect in positively and negatively or significant related to the effectiveness and satisfaction
(Madanchian and et.al., 2016). This has created effective leader satisfaction, job satisfaction,
motivation to followers and organization performance. As per the view of Shanker and et.al.,
(2017), both the leadership style like transactional and transformational leadership show positive
relationship with the group or the organizational performance.
The most recent study is reflecting about the working ability for performing effectiveness
at workplace in effective and valuable manner. According to the Muterera and et.al., (2018) the
dependent variable is performance on the three level of analysis like individual, team and
organization. This performance can be measures on the basis of task performance, contextual
performance and creative performance. The leadership style had been creating an effective and
strongest relationship with team level performance. Overall the five Meta analyses are being
effective and present the above very creative and specific result (Nazarian, Soares and
Lottermoser, 2017). Without any expectation result shows the positive relationship between
leadership and performance. This is effectively understood by author viewpoints. This reflect
that the leadership and organizational performance is being effective and help to find effective
result of employee performance at work place, leaders are give hard efforts for motivating people
in order to give their hard contribution for getting effective success.
CONCLUSION
From the above study, it had been concluded that the leadership and organizational
performance has the effective relationship within the organization. This essay has included the
effectiveness and importance of leadership style for organization. On the other side, importance
of effective organizational performance. This relationship had been effective for getting proper
success of organization in effective manner. In report included different aspects and viewpoint of
various authors. Through that complete research and finds reflect that the relationship between
leadership and organizational performance important for organization in terms of getting
8

successive result in financial, innovation, sustainable and responsibility performance by
employees. This has created complete effectiveness for organization. As that study, has reflected
many of positive relationship between leadership and performance, although effect is very
considerable. In this research include various systematic approaches and style of leadership
which had been helped to give more effective organizational performance. Organizational
performance has been more important and effective for the business to get effective success at
market place. This has been more important and effective for organization o make strong
relationship between leadership and organizational performance.
9

REFERENCES
Books and Journals
Ceri-Booms, M., Curşeu, P. L. and Oerlemans, L. A., 2017. Task and person-focused leadership
behaviors and team performance: A meta-analysis. Human Resource Management
Review. 27(1). pp.178-192.
Chiniara, M. and Bentein, K., 2016. Linking servant leadership to individual performance:
Differentiating the mediating role of autonomy, competence and relatedness need
satisfaction. The Leadership Quarterly. 27(1). pp.124-141.
Covin, J. G. and Slevin, D. P., 2017. The entrepreneurial imperatives of strategic
leadership. Strategic entrepreneurship: Creating a new mindset, pp.307-327.
Gong, Z., 2017. The roles of risk management culture and management control systems in the
relationship between leadership and organizational performance: a study of the
Australian school sector.
Grint, k. and et.al., 2016. What is leadership. The Routledge Companion to Leadership, p.3.
Harms, P.D. and et.al., 2017. Leadership and stress: A meta-analytic review. The Leadership
Quarterly. 28(1). pp.178-194.
Hashim, A. and et.al., 2018. Leadership Behaviour, Entrepreneurial Orientation and
Organisational Performance in Malaysian Small and Medium Enterprises. International
Business Research. 11(9). pp.37-50.
Herman, R. D., 2016. Executive leadership. The Jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership
and management, pp.167-187.
Hsieh, J. Y. and Liou, K. T., 2018. Collaborative leadership and organizational performance:
Assessing the structural relation in a public service agency. Review of Public Personnel
Administration. 38(1). pp.83-109.
Jing, F. F. and Avery, G. C., 2016. Missing links in understanding the relationship between
leadership and organizational performance. International Business & Economics
Research Journal (IBER). 15(3). pp.107-118.
Knies, E., Jacobsen, C. and Tummers, L., 2016. Leadership and Organizational
Performance. The Routledge Companion to Leadership, p.404.
Madanchian, M. and et.al., 2016. Effects of leadership on organizational
performance. Economics and Education.
10

Miller, B. A., 2016. Assessing organizational performance in higher education. John Wiley &
Sons.
Muterera, J. and et.al., 2018. The leader–follower dyad: The link between leader and follower
perceptions of transformational leadership and its impact on job satisfaction and
organizational performance. International Public Management Journal. 21(1). pp.131-
162.
Nazarian, A., Soares, A. and Lottermoser, B., 2017. Inherited organizational performance? The
perceptions of generation Y on the influence of leadership styles. Leadership &
Organization Development Journal.
Obeidat, B. Y. and Tarhini, A., 2016. A Jordanian empirical study of the associations among
transformational leadership, transactional leadership, knowledge sharing, job
performance, and firm performance. Journal of Management Development.
Para-González, L., Jiménez-Jiménez, D. and Martínez-Lorente, A. R., 2018. Exploring the
mediating effects between transformational leadership and organizational
performance. Employee Relations.
Rice, A. K., 2018. Learning for leadership: Interpersonal and intergroup relations. Routledge.
Rosenbach, W. E., 2018. Contemporary issues in leadership. Routledge.
Shanker, R. and et.al., 2017. Organizational climate for innovation and organizational
performance: The mediating effect of innovative work behavior. Journal of vocational
behaviour. 100. pp.67-77.
Shanker, R. and et.al., 2017. Organizational climate for innovation and organizational
performance: The mediating effect of innovative work behavior. Journal of vocational
behaviour. 100. pp.67-77.
Shin, D. and Konrad, A.M., 2017. Causality between high-performance work systems and
organizational performance. Journal of management. 43(4). pp.973-997.
Singh, S. K. and et.al., 2016. Determinants of organizational performance: a proposed
framework. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management.
Western, S., 2019. Leadership: A critical text. SAGE Publications Limited.
Xiao, Y., Zhang, X. and de Pablos, P.O., 2017. How does individuals’ exchange orientation
moderate the relationship between transformational leadership and knowledge
sharing?. Journal of Knowledge Management.
11

Yahaya, R. and Ebrahim, F., 2016. Leadership styles and organizational commitment: literature
review. Journal of Management Development.
12