NUR131 Assessment 2: Research Critique of PIVC Cannulation Study

This document presents a detailed research critique of the study by Cooke et al. (2018) on consumer perspectives of peripheral intravenous cannulation (PIVC). The critique systematically addresses the study's purpose, research question formulated using the PICO format, and the cross-sectional survey design employed. It analyzes the sampling and recruitment procedures, highlighting the use of non-purposive sampling and online platforms for data collection, while also discussing potential limitations related to sampling errors. The critique further examines the data collection methods, including ethical considerations and survey development, and the statistical analysis techniques, such as descriptive analyses, Chi-square tests, and thematic analysis. The results of the study, including the distress experienced by consumers and the need for improved practices, are summarized. Finally, the critique discusses the relevance of the findings for health professionals, emphasizing the implications for patient handling, nursing education, and adherence to best practice guidelines, including the need for improved PIVC management, training, and the implementation of evidence-based bundles.