Research Proposal: Recycled Aggregate Concrete from C&D Waste

This research proposal investigates the utilization of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) derived from construction and demolition (C&D) waste. The introduction highlights the environmental impact of construction waste, emphasizing the need for sustainable solutions. The research poses questions regarding the quality of construction products using RAC, the design of recycled debris mixtures for mortar, and methods to increase RAC usage. Specific objectives include determining the quality of RAC-based construction products and establishing effective mortar mix designs. The literature review examines the properties of recycled concrete, recycling processes, and the benefits of using RAC, such as reduced landfill space and resource conservation. The proposal also discusses global recycling efforts, government regulations, and the importance of market analysis for recycled materials. The research aims to provide insights for contractors and engineers to improve construction practices and meet recycling goals, contributing to a more sustainable construction industry.

Research Proposal 1
USE OF RECYCLED AGGREGATE CONCRETE FROM CONSTRUCTION &
DEMOLITION WASTE
Name of the Student
Name of Class
Name of Professor
Name of School
Name of City/State
Date

Research Proposal 2
Introduction
Construction, as well as demolition waste (C&D), is the most voluminous and heaviest
waste stream in the European Union. As per the European Commission, the measure of C&D
created is estimated at 25 to 30 percent of the absolute waste in the EU. It incorporates
distinctive kinds of waste such as glass, gypsum, metals, wood, plastics, concrete and asbestos
which are frequently mixed. As per the insights from the United Kingdom Department of
Environment and DEFRA, the UK created 55 million tons of non-risky C&D in 2014 excluding
unearthing waste (Ucol-Ganiron 2012).. The environmental effect caused by construction waste
is predominantly related with land occupation and sullying, asset shortage and biodiversity
annihilation, however for the construction business, it is additionally a major issue to tackle as it
should be overseen appropriately with expanding taxes and costs (Ucol-Ganiron 2012, p.725).
In the construction industry, concrete account for 40 percent, ceramic 30 percent, plastic
5 percent, wood 10 percent, metal 5 percent, and 10 percent consist of different components. As
indicated by worldwide knowledge, there is an estimated rise in construction spending of up to
4800 billion throughout the world. These figures demonstrate a huge development in the
construction industry at an average of 1.5 growths in 5 years. For concrete generation, 70 to 75
percent aggregates are needed. Out of this 60 to 67 percent is composed of coarse aggregate and
33 to 40 percent is of the fine aggregate (Bhandari and Kanawade 2019, p.23). According to
ongoing examination by the Fredonia gathering, it is estimated that interest of concrete aggregate
will surpass 26 billion tons by 2012.
Recycling as a major aspect of environmental contemplations has turned into a typical
element in the industry of construction. Construction, as well as demolition waste, is the material
which comes from redesign, demolition of structure such as buildings, bridges, and road. This

Research Proposal 3
debris has of late gained concerns about the environmental effect it has created. One of the things
builders, contractors, and engineers should put into consideration during construction,
demolition, and renovation is waste disposal. Various investigations, studies, and analysis are
being done to find the most proficient method to find a solution where to dispose these
construction wastes and reduce its transfer to landfills. This is as a result of the expanding
environmental issue with respect to the waste transfer to landfills. It is important to consider
conceivable ways on the best way to maintain a strategic distance from these issues and in the
meantime safeguard safety and convenience through recycling.
To completely comprehend the effects of the environment demolition waste, it is critical
to comprehend the extend of the construction and demolition stream of garbage. The quantity of
construction and demolition waste generated in the United State is not defined. Numerous states
in the US do not follow the measure of C&D waste discarded or reused. A few states in the
United States do gather this necessary information from recycling and landfills’ offices;
however, a few offices do not have scales and report that are changed over volume gauges
(Ganiron 2013, p.14). Strategies have been created to gauge the magnitude of demolition and
construction wastes that is produced, applying normal debris age per unit area amounting to the
construction area, demolition and renovation. Scarcely any different kinds of national C&D
garbage estimations have been done to locate a superior technique or differentiate it against the
present estimations. Material stream investigation is frequently utilized to appraise national
Municipal Solid Waste age. However, this strategy ought to be tried on the construction and
demolition debris stream (Ackerman and Gallagher, 2012, p. 283).
Recycling is regularly regarded as the most ideal strategy in the environment that is used
to oversee C&D waste. Getting a business opportunity for the waste that has been recycled is the

Research Proposal 4
most significant advance in setting up a program of recycling. In various regions in the United
States, C&D debris is not recycled because of different reasons. One purpose behind recycling
absence could be that the market for the material that is recycled is not available. A market limit
examination is expected to decide whether there is adequate interest for the material that is
recycled to warrant construction and demolition waste recycling programs. C&D flotsam and
jetsam is commonly discarded, reused, or burned (Ganiron 2014, p. 31). Since the states
fundamentally control the waste that come in and has its distinctive laws, in lined and unlined
landfills are discarded relying upon where it is arranged.
. Construction and demolition waste might be reused at a recycling office, where it stands
in the characteristic asset or other focused material in another market. Construction and
demolition flotsam and jetsam can be straightforwardly reused from the building site (Shahidan
et al 2017, p.1029). Because of the expanding interest for the cutting design structures cost, as
well as the issue of securing landfill spaces, this examination has made ready to recognize the
utilization of pounded concrete as a substitute to the fine total of mortar blend.
Research Questions
Tam, Wang and Tam (2018, p. 712) view research questions as instrumental tool used for
providing a guideline for the entire research process with less interruption when carrying out the
research. The research questions makes it easy for the researcher to concentrate on the problem
and objectives under investigation. The research questions in this study that need to be answered
include;
 Can recycled concrete produce good quality construction products?

Research Proposal 5
 How does a recycled debris design mixture make mortar mix?
 How to reduce barriers of RAC and increase its use in the industry?
Specific Objectives
 To determine if recycled concrete aggregate can produce good quality construction
products.
 To establish recycled debris design structure can make mortar mix.
Research purpose
The outcome of this investigation will give the researchers and learners extra information and the
will to continue learning and finding better approaches to make solutions for issues particularly
in the construction on the most proficient method to oversee solid waste. This will likewise give
information to the contractual workers and engineers on the most proficient method to improve
the systems of the construction industry and organizations by using reused concrete waste in a
mortar mix where they can accomplish great item execution and meet recycling objectives.
Literature Review
The recycled concrete particles have impact resistance, less smashing quality, explicit
gravity and have more absorption value when contrasted with new aggregates. huge amounts of
waste cement are produced each year around the globe because of the accompanying reasons that
include demolition of the old structure, destruction of structures and structures amid tremors and
wars, elimination of futile cement from structures, structures, street asphalt, waste cement
created because of solid shape and barrel testing, ruinous techniques for testing of existing

Research Proposal 6
structures(Kumar 2017, p.253). Products are fantastic total, handled in time and exertion
associated with crushing, pre-estimating, arranging, screening and contaminant products. The
most important thing is to begin with clean, quality rubble that meets the design criteria
effectively and further yield a quality item that will proceed to end use.
Crushing as well as screening frameworks begin with essential cones or potentially vast
impactors taken rubble from 30 crawls to 4 feet (Mueller, Schnell and Rübner 2015, p 379). An
optional cone or impactor could conceivably be run, and the essential as well as auxiliary screens
might be utilized depending on the task, hardware utilized and the end product needed. The
blend will at that point be paased through a scalping screen to wipe out soil and different
particles (Silva, De Brito and Dhir 2014, p.216). It is imperative to completely clean to guarantee
that the reused solid items if free from wood, soil, plastic and other characteristic materials. This
should be possible by water floatation, hand picking, air separators, and electromagnetic
separators. In some cases dark top overlay or fix is found. A blend of dim top and bond isn't
proposed, regardless, little fixes are not seriously structured. The more spotlight on quality, the
better the outcomes (Behera et al. 2014, p.509).
By and large crushed concrete was moved to landfills for transfer. In any case, in view of
increasingly critical mindfulness in nature, the strong is being reused for use in strong works.
There are assortments of good conditions in reusing concrete as opposed to dumping it or
covering it in a landfill. Keeping strong waste out of landfills saves space in landfills. Different
points of interest of reusing of bond are nearby thing – neighborhood sources, limits truck traffic,
alternative to a non-reasonable resources, spares expenses and better trucking use (diminished
costs).

Research Proposal 7
Using reused material as rock diminishes the necessity for rock mining. There are in like
manner fiscal points of interest related with this procedure. Reused concrete is a development
material that the general population don't have to pay for; the general population who conveyed
the strong waste pay an expense to have it reused (Hoffmann et al. 2012, p.704). The nature of
reused all out concrete is around 10 to 15 percent less as contrasted and bond with new totals. In
any case fitting blend plans may be made and trustworthy outcomes procured.
In 2000, about 63 percent of materials were recycled and the remaining 37 percent were
discarded in landfill as well as exempt sites in Scotland. The government is working around the
clock to develop recycling specifications as well as code of practice (Gupta 2009, p.17).
Numerous attempts are being made to build a connection with the planning framework to
computerize the transfer note system to foster data analysis as well as foster dialogue between
agencies to adopt secondary aggregates by contractors and consultants. In 2003, 30 percent of
the absolute waste created by the construction and demolition waste was produced in Turkey
(Poon et al 2014, p.33).
According to DEPA, around 70 to 75 percent of waste is produced from obliteration
activity, 20 to 25 percent from remodel and the rest of the 5 to 10 percent from new structure
improvements. Because of the limitations of limited space at different landfill, recycling has
become is a paramount issue in Turkey. Statutory requests, voluntary agreements and activity
plan have been done, for instance, recycling of black-top (1985), arranging of Construction and
Demolition squander (1995). In Netherland, an estimate of 40 million tons of construction has
been created and 80 percent of this waste comprises of bricks and concrete. Since 1993, various
activities have taken around recycling material such as avoidance of waste, animate reusing,
advancing structure materials that have a more extended life (Tojo and Fischer 2011, p.56). In

Research Proposal 8
the USA, construction and destruction squander represents an estimate of 22 percent of the total
waste produced in the USA.
Recycle and reusing of demolition and construction is one the sector that encompasses
green building practice. The green building practice may incorporate utilizing recovered
aggregates from squashed solid, pounding drywall scraps and use of soil alteration at the site. In
Japan, much of the construction and demolition is centered on materials which can withstand
earthquake and construction. In this case, an estimate of 85 million tons of waste has been
created since 2000 (Levy and Helene 1997, p.12). Out of this waste, 95 percent of concrete is
pounded and recycled as roadbed and inlaying material, 98 percent of black-top and concrete and
35 percent of sludge is recycled. Construction and decimation squander are independently
gathered and recycled. A privately owned business has assembled a mechanized office with 3,
00,000 ton for every annum limit.
The Solid Waste Management Act of 1989 enacted in North Carolina necessitates that
development and demolition garbage is isolated from the waste spurt and isolated at sterile
landfills, and (Tam, Wang and Tam 2018, p. 712). To empower recycling and reuse, the Act
guidelines the partition of the waste stream into four classes that include land-clearing wastes,
construction or decimation wastes, yard trash and inert wastes. To begin with, the C&D garbage
ought to be isolated into recyclable and non-recyclable material followed by recycling and
reusing inert flotsam and jetsam characterized by the state as solid, block, Solid Square,
uncontaminated soil, shake, and rock as perfect fill material and finally reducing yard waste and
land-clearing as mulch or manure (Lawson et al. 2011, p.150).

Research Proposal 9
Research methodology
The design of this examination will incorporates accumulation of concrete waste,
pounding, reviewing, blending, relieving, testing, and evaluation. The accumulated bits of solid
rubbish will be smashed and restored by the ASTM required size of sand for block work mortar
with 100 percent passing the number four strainer and 10 percent passing the number 200
strainer (Rao, Jha and Misra 2007, p.77 and ASTM 2009, p.135)
.
Research Approach
Qualitative or Quantitative Approach
According to Kumar (20017), a quantitative research focuses on structured data
collection and interpretation of results despite dealing with numeric figures. Qualitative research
is appropriate when investigating qualitative aspects. The most preferred approach in this study
is qualitative approach with respect to social factors and interpretation of results. The advantage
of using qualitative data is that information can be depicted by deciphering last outcomes. The
outcome may include how the acquiring conduct of clients is influenced by showcasing
correspondence blends which makes subjective information reasonable for this investigation.
Data collection techniques
There are two types of data collection method that are used in many research. They
include primary data collection and secondary data collection. Primary data collection method is
used to collect raw materials while secondary data collection method collects prearranged data.
The primary data collection has not been used because it is costly and time consuming.
Secondary data of this research were obtained from website articles, newspaper articles,
literatures and magazines. The data will then analyzed by qualitative discussions. The findings

Research Proposal 10
are compared and evaluated to conclude on how to reduce barriers of recycled aggregate
concrete and promote its use in the construction industry.
Analysis
According to the various literature reviews, it has been noted recycled concrete
aggregates can be made of use in numerous concrete mixes as much as its compression reduces
with time. In this case, there is need to test samples that have less recycled concrete aggregates
replacement (de Oliveira, and Vazquez 2016, p. 116). The quantities more than 50 percent ought
to be tested although other scholars suggest that these standards should not exceed 20 percent.
The dispersion of the concrete need to be investigated to determine the range of results that occur
in recycled aggregate properties. Numerous samples need to be taken to get a better correlation
of the results. Zakaria, M. and Cabrera (2015, p. 149) also claim that important properties of the
recycled concrete such as absorption, composition, fines content, porosity, chlorides content,
density, clay content, abrasion and sulphates content.
RCA are isolated to different sizes during the process of pulverizing and sieving. The
measure of fine particles is below 4.75 mm after recycling is in the order of 20 to 44 percent
relying upon the initial nature of obliterated concrete.
Figure 3 showing Particle size distribution of RCA specimens after crushing.

Research Proposal 11
Source (Hansen, 2014)
In light of the various observation made by different scholars, it has been concluded that
the extents of the squashed solid squanders impact cement and water such that it retains by far
most of the water in the blend. Additionally, the solid mix got a high hang and low compressive
quality on its seventh day of restoring and the extent of water in the blend impacts the
consistency of the mortar blend. The strong waste mix with 1:3 degree of cling to squashed
strong rubbish with wide hang and entry has palatable transportability as the standard mortar mix
of a comparable cement to sand extent (Etxeberria et al.2007, p.746 and Concrete Block
Association 2013).
The concrete waste having 1:2¾ bond to pounded solid trash proportion of 2-in shapes is
as smaller as the standard mortar blend of similar cement to sand proportion and its mixture
extent influences the consistency or functionality of a mortar blend having 1:2¾ bond to
smashed solid garbage proportion. Recycled total quality of concrete can be expanded. Taking a
gander at real arrangement, first procedure of contaminant detachment ought to be built up, that

Research Proposal 12
is to dispose of the amount of gypsum, glass, wood and black-top, or possibly diminish it to not
exceed one percent. Pounding and sieving would help get proper degree for cement decrease. At
last, a wash procedure would help dispense the amount of dirt and fines in the recycled totals or
decrease it to least. Substitution of concrete totals is fitting, despite the fact that it is not the main
probability. Different examinations are being created working about the substitution of sand by
fine recycled totals on account of mortar and self-compacting concrete.
Conclusion
The shortage and demand for construction material is drastically expanding on the planet.
The rapid advancement of the development and demolition practices makes more C&D waste,
for example, cement or stonework rubble. The low employments of C&D waste demonstrates
that the waste material has a motivating force in the neighborhood showcase. The reuse of solid
rubble into the productive structure is required. By looking into the pounded totals showed that
the totals can be used for the age of the auxiliary solid part. The nonstop research is analyzing
the opportunity to reuse the smashed total from development and devastation structures to
convey the store bearing squares for structure improvement for handy advancement and standard
resource protection. Concrete is the principal material that does not confront a potential test from
other reused materials. It is vital opponent is smashed stone, which is sufficient. Thusly, there is
a satisfactory capacity to reuse most of the solid created. Ecologically, recycling concrete is the
favored techniques for the board in many parts of the world.

Research Proposal 13
References
Ackerman, F. and Gallagher, K., 2012. Mixed signals: market incentives, recycling, and the price
spike of 2013. Resources, Conservation and recycling, 35(4), pp.275-295.
ASTM C 136 – 95a., 2009. Standard Test Method for Sieve Analysis of Fine and Coarse
Aggregate, Annual Book of ASTM, International Standard Worldwide.
Behera, M., Bhattacharyya, S.K., Minocha, A.K., Deoliya, R. and Maiti, S., 2014. Recycled
aggregate from C&D waste & its use in concrete–A breakthrough towards sustainability
in construction sector: A review. Construction and building materials, 68, pp.501-516.
British Standard Institution. 2016. BS 8500-2:2015+A1:2016 Concrete – Complementary British
Standard to BS EN 206. Part 2: Specification for constituent materials and concrete, BSI
Standards Ltd.
Concrete Block Association, 2013. Aggregate Concrete Blocks. Aggregate Block Sustinability,
CBA, UK, February.
de Oliveira, M.B. and Vazquez, E., 2016. The influence of retained moisture in aggregates from
recycling on the properties of new hardened concrete. Waste management, 16(1-3),
pp.113-117.
Etxeberria, M., Vázquez, E. and Mari, A., 2006. Microstructure analysis of hardened recycled
aggregate concrete. Magazine of Concrete Research, 58(10), pp.683-690.
Etxeberria, M., Vázquez, E., Marí, A. and Barra, M., 2007. Influence of amount of recycled
coarse aggregates and production process on properties of recycled aggregate
concrete. Cement and concrete research, 37(5), pp.735-742.

Research Proposal 14
Ganiron Jr, T.U., 2013. Investigation on the use of coco coir polypropylene as thermal
insulator. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 59, pp.13-26.
Ganiron Jr, T.U., 2014. Investigation on the use of pleko ceiling board for heat insulator and
sound proofing material applications. International Journal of Advanced Science and
Technology, 65, pp.23-32.
Hansen, T.C., 2014. Recycling of demolished concrete and masonry. CRC Press.
Hoffmann, C., Schubert, S., Leemann, A. and Motavalli, M., 2012. Recycled concrete and mixed
rubble as aggregates: Influence of variations in composition on the concrete properties
and their use as structural material. Construction and Building Materials, 35, pp.701-709.
Jin, W., Meyer, C. and Baxter, S., 2010. " Glascrete"-Concrete with Glass Aggregate. ACI
Materials Journal, 97(2), pp.208-213.
Khaloo, A.R., 2004. Properties of concrete using crushed clinker brick as coarse
aggregate. Materials Journal, 91(4), pp.401-407.
Khalaf, F.M. and DeVenny, A.S., 2014. Recycling of demolished masonry rubble as coarse
aggregate in concrete. Journal of materials in civil engineering, 16(4), pp.331-340.
Kumar, R., 2017. Influence of recycled coarse aggregate derived from construction and
demolition waste (CDW) on abrasion resistance of pavement concrete. Construction and
Building Materials, 142, pp.248-255.
Lawson, N., Douglas, I., Garvin, S., McGrath, C., Manning, D. and Vetterlein, J., 2011.
Recycling construction and demolition wastes–a UK perspective. Environmental
Management and Health, 12(2), pp.146-157.

Research Proposal 15
Mueller, A., Schnell, A. and Rübner, K., 2015. The manufacture of lightweight aggregates from
recycled masonry rubble. Construction and Building Materials, 98, pp.376-387.
Rao, A., Jha, K.N. and Misra, S., 2007. Use of aggregates from recycled construction and
demolition waste in concrete. Resources, conservation and Recycling, 50(1), pp.71-81.
Shahidan, S., Azmi, M.A.M., Kupusamy, K., Zuki, S.S.M. and Ali, N., 2017. Utilizing
construction and demolition (C&D) waste as recycled aggregates (RA) in
concrete. Procedia engineering, 174, pp.1028-1035.
Silva, R.V., De Brito, J. and Dhir, R.K., 2014. Properties and composition of recycled aggregates
from construction and demolition waste suitable for concrete production. Construction
and Building Materials, 65, pp.201-217.
Solo-Gabriele, H. and Townsend, T., 2008. Disposal practices and management alternatives for
CCA-treated wood waste. Waste Management & Research, 17(5), pp.378-389.
Tam, V.W., Wang, K. and Tam, C.M., 2018. Assessing relationships among properties of
demolished concrete, recycled aggregate and recycled aggregate concrete using
regression analysis. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 152(2), pp.703-714.
Ucol-Ganiron Jr, T., 2012. Recycled window glass for non-load bearing walls. International
Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 3(6), p.725.
Zakaria, M. and Cabrera, J.G., 2015. Performance and durability of concrete made with
demolition waste and artificial fly ash-clay aggregates. Waste Management, 16(1-3),
pp.151-158.