EAT216: Reynolds Number and Flow Simulation Analysis

This assignment focuses on the Reynolds number, a crucial dimensionless group in fluid mechanics, and its application in flow simulations using SolidWorks. The document begins with an explanation of the Reynolds number, its significance in determining laminar versus turbulent flow, and its definition for flow in a circular tube and around a sphere. The assignment then details a practical exercise using SolidWorks Flow Simulation to determine the drag coefficient of a sphere. It guides the user through modeling the sphere, setting up the simulation, and visualizing the results, including velocity plots. The assignment also touches upon the limitations of the SolidWorks Flow Simulation. The solution provides a comprehensive understanding of fluid dynamics concepts and practical application of computational tools in engineering design and analysis, offering insights into fluid behavior and design optimization.

1
Reynolds Number
R. Shankar Subramanian
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering
Clarkson University
We encountered some interesting dimensionless groups when performing dimensional analysis
of fluid mechanical problems. The most prominent dimensionless group that emerges from these
analyses is the Reynolds number, named after Osborne Reynolds who made several important
contributions to fluid mechanics. One problem Reynolds investigated experimentally is the
transition of flow from the orderly kind that we call “laminar flow” to the more chaotic type of
flow termed “turbulent flow.” Reynolds published the results of his study in 1883 in an article
(1) that is regarded as one of the most important contributions in the field of fluid mechanics.
This study changed the way in which knowledge about the transition between the two types of
flows, namely, laminar and turbulent, is organized. It was known from earlier studies that
turbulent flow occurs in conduits of large cross-sectional dimensions and flows at high
velocities, whereas laminar flow occurs in slow flows in conduits of relatively small cross-
sectional dimensions. The role of viscosity and density in affecting the type of motion was not as
well-characterized. In laminar flow, the pressure drop for flow is linear in the average velocity
of the fluid, as we learned earlier, whereas in turbulent flow Reynolds observed that it was
approximately proportional to 1.72
V , where V is the average velocity, in his experiments. The
actual dependence of the pressure drop on the velocity for turbulent flow in circular tubes is
more complicated. For instance the roughness of the interior pipe wall in contact with the fluid
profoundly affects the pressure drop, even if it is so minute as not to be visible to the naked eye.
We shall learn more about this topic soon in this course.
Through careful experimentation, Reynolds established that the change in the nature of the flow
occurs when a certain combination of the parameters in the flow crosses a threshold. Later, this
combination was named the “Reynolds number.” For flow in a circular tube of diameter D at an
average velocity V , the Reynolds number Re is defined as follows.
Re DV DVρ
μ ν
= =
Here, μ is the dynamic viscosity of the fluid, and ρ is the density of the fluid. The ratio
ν μ ρ= is termed the kinematic viscosity. For circular tubes, the transition from laminar to
turbulent flow occurs over a range of Reynolds numbers from approximately 2,300 to 4,000,
regardless of the nature of the fluid or the dimensions of the pipe or the average velocity. All that
matters is that this specific combination of the parameters, known as the Reynolds number, fall
in the range indicated. So, when the Reynolds number is below 2,300, we can expect the flow to
be laminar, and when it is above approximately 4,000, the flow will be turbulent. In between
these two limits, the flow is termed “transition flow.”

2
We can ascribe a certain physical significance to the Reynolds number. This is most
conveniently seen by recasting this group after multiplying both the numerator and the
denominator by the average velocity V .
( )
2
Re /
V
V D
ρ
μ
=
In this form, we see that the denominator represents a characteristic shear stress in the flow,
because it is the product of the viscosity of the fluid and a characteristic velocity gradient
obtained by dividing the average velocity by the diameter of the tube. The numerator, in
contrast, describes an inertial stress; recall that the larger the density, the more massive a
material is, and mass is a measure of inertia. This is the reason for calling the product 2
Vρ a
characteristic inertial stress. Thus, we can think of the Reynolds number as the ratio of two
characteristic stresses in the flow.
Inertial Stress
Re Viscous Stress
=
Stress is force per unit area. Therefore, it is common to express the physical significance of the
Reynolds number as follows.
Inertia Force
Re Viscous fore
=
We see now that the nature of the flow in a tube, whether laminar or turbulent, depends on the
relative importance of the inertia force in comparison with the viscous force. At relatively low
values of the Reynolds number, the viscous force is relatively more important, and disturbances
in the flow are damped out by viscosity. Thus, it is difficult for disturbances to grow and sustain
themselves. On the other hand, at relatively large values of the Reynolds number, the damping
of disturbances by viscosity is less effective, and inertia is more important, so that disturbances
can perpetuate themselves. This is the basic reason why the Reynolds number serves as a
measure for determining whether the flow is laminar or turbulent. Notice that the use of the
diameter in the definition of the Reynolds number is an arbitrary choice. It is perfectly
legitimate to use the radius of the tube instead of the diameter when performing dimensional
analysis, so that the resulting Reynolds number would have been defined using the radius of the
tube instead of its diameter, but the value at which transition would occur would have to be
altered appropriately. It is for this reason that everyone has agreed on a single convention to
avoid confusion. You might wonder why we did not use the length of the tube in defining the
Reynolds number. This is because the typical velocity variation in this flow is across the cross-
section of the tube, not along its length. Thus, if we had used the length L , the entity ( )/V Lμ
would not be representative of the shear stress in this flow.

3
Reynolds number for the steady motion of a sphere through a fluid
When we performed dimensional analysis on the drag experienced by a sphere of diameter pd
moving at a velocity V through a fluid with viscosity μ and density ρ, we encountered a
Reynolds number in that problem as well. It is defined as
Re pd V ρ
μ
=
We found that the drag coefficient, which is a dimensionless drag, depends on this Reynolds
number. The flow past a sphere is more involved than that in a tube. At high Reynolds number,
a boundary layer, in which viscous effects are important, forms on the sphere, and outside of this
boundary layer, viscous effects are relatively unimportant, and the flow is dominated by inertia.
We shall learn a little more about this topic later in the course when we discuss boundary layers.
Reference
1. O. Reynolds, An Experimental Investigation of the Circumstances Which Determine Whether
the Motion of Water Shall be Direct or Sinuous, and the Law of Resistance in Parallel Channels,
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 174, 935-982 (1883).