Risk Society and Global Challenges: A Discussion on Modern Risks

Verified

Added on  2021/05/25

|5
|977
|51
Discussion Board Post
AI Summary
This discussion post explores Ulrich Beck's concept of the 'Risk Society,' arguing that modern society is characterized by manufactured uncertainties and global risks stemming from advancements in science, technology, and globalization. It uses examples like terrorism and global warming to illustrate how these risks are inherently global, immeasurable, and often unpaid for, leading to societal vulnerabilities. The discussion highlights the paradox that while modern institutions aim to anticipate the unexpected, they also contribute to new forms of risk. It also touches upon the idea that the traditional definitions of risk are no longer adequate due to the pervasive uncertainty and the potential for unintended consequences, emphasizing that accidents are the result of a potential war of almost black power in the country’s domestic politics. Desklib offers a platform to explore more discussions and resources on this topic.
Document Page
Discussion Prompt
Name:
Institutional Affiliation:
Course:
Professor:
Due Date:
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
Discussion Prompt
The society is risky than earlier society because it contains indifference, the vanity of
hope, which significantly improved institutions of the modern society of science, empire,
business, and military efforts for the unexpected. Socrates has left us making the idea of a
confusing sentence: I know I know nothing. As a result of its perfection, the deadly paradox in
which the science-technology community puts us is enormous. We do not know what we do not
know but from these dangers, which threaten humankind. The debate on climate change provides
a complete example here. Society is more irresistible sarcasm, a hopeless emptiness, in which the
most advanced institutions of modern society - science, the world, business, and the military - try
to anticipate the unexpected. Socrates has left us making the idea of a confusing sentence: I
know, that I know nothing. The deadly controversy in which the science-technology community
puts us, as a result of its consummation, is enormous: We do not know what we do not know -
but in this case, it comes from these dangers, which threaten humanity. A good example here is
given by a debate about a CFC cooling agent. It is also identified that the world risk society, its
individual must be in a position of differentiating the between the financial risks and the
ecological dangers, which with time will be conceptualized as the side effects in addition to some
of the threat from terrorist networks which are treated as intentional catastrophes. The principle
of deliberately and intentionally exploiting the vulnerability of the current society from the
earlier society replaces the principle of accident and chance.
Examples of some contemporary risks substantiate the claim that the ′risk society′ is
an inherently global one and that our current progress produces its risks.
Document Page
One of the examples identified is terrorism, and it is included in the latest news.
Terrorism is a human-made disaster/tragedy, born of the ashes of a never-ending war between
two highly different cultures of the mind. We, the “westerners,” have always tried to force our
view of truth on people defined by equal ancient wisdom, in some cases far better than our whole
court - China’s medical and unity of soul and soul concept compared to our scientific knowledge
of the Middle Ages. The short story, our modernization, and the collision of different ways of
thinking (in addition to several wars) cause these plagues. Given the state of terrorism, the worst
thing is the hysteria that surrounds it. However, no terrorists were present, no one was shot, and
no vehicle was passed on the scene. The sound of a firecracker was enough to cause a stumbling
block when his deadly balance did not match the actual terrorist attack.
Another example is the risk associated with global warming. Global warming is
becoming a significant concern due to its adverse changes in climate and weather patterns. The
ecological condition is simply getting worse with the various human and socio diversity
activities. With these increased high rate changes in ecological conditions, global warming
became an ecological and environmental concern and treated as both an economic and social
risk. Global warming affects created adverse effects on the human, animal, and plant population.
Pharmacists Rowland and Molina come up with the idea that CFCs destroy the stratosphere’s
ozone layer and that. As a result, increasing ultraviolet radiation will reach the earth’s surface. A
series of second unexpected side effects could lead to a dramatic increase in cancer rates
worldwide. When the policies were developed, no one knew or suspected that they would cause
such an accident.
According to Beck, the “Enlightenment function of the risk society” means that things
continue to worsen. These modern risks can be defined using three different approaches: locally-
Document Page
based (national, cultural, temporary), immeasurable (their effects are unknown), and unpaid (we
would certainly have the opportunity to compensate for their impact through other actions).
When we see the effects of those factors, we realize that the definition of risk provided by many
experts, institutions, and the media will no longer be considered because they are in the same
situation of uncertainty.
According to Beck, the pandemic we live through is the state and culture of technology
that may be attacked, but it comes back. Global risks are not their enemies, although they are not
entirely reliable alliances in shaping the future. Accidents are the result of a potential war of
almost black power in the country’s domestic politics.
Fear cannot be the source of social solidarity since different strategies in which global
risk opens up the overthrow of power, built on a coalition of central governments. World
freedom empowers countries and civil society organizations as they create new sources of
authorization and options for actor groups; on the other hand, they do not authorize the money
made globally because of the effects of investment. Decisions contribute to global risk, reduce
markets and maximize the potential of the young consumer.
Reference
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
Beck, U. (2006). World risk society. A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology, 495-
499. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444310795.ch88
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 5
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]