Road Runoff Harvesting and Infiltration Systems Literature Review

This report provides a comprehensive literature review on in-ground infiltration systems, focusing on their application in road runoff harvesting and reuse. It examines various stormwater modeling tools commonly used in Australia, including MUSIC, EPA SWMM, WaterCress, and others, detailing their functionalities and applicability in different stormwater management projects. The review explores the water quantity harvested, infiltration rates, and the issue of clogging in infiltration systems. Additionally, it investigates road runoff water quality, the use of different filter media for treatment, and the life cycle assessment of infiltration systems. The research highlights the use of street tree inlets by local councils in South Australia for harvesting polluted road runoff, emphasizing the need for scientific evidence on their performance in the Australian context. The report also covers the barriers in adoption of these systems, including planning, policy, knowledge, technical, and construction cost barriers, along with the environmental impacts of infiltration systems.

Contents
Introduction.....................................................................................................................................2
Stormwater modelling tool.............................................................................................................3
MUSIC........................................................................................................................................3
Environment Protection Agency Stormwater Management Model (EPA SWMM)..................4
WaterCress - Community Resource Evaluation and Simulation System...................................4
Raintank Analyser......................................................................................................................5
PermPave....................................................................................................................................6
Stormwater Infiltration Techniques: Community Homepage (SWITCH).................................6
Switch2.......................................................................................................................................7
Model (XP-SWMM)...................................................................................................................9
Hydraulic Engineering Centre River Analysis System (HecRas)............................................10
Rainfall Runoff Library............................................................................................................10
DRAINS...................................................................................................................................11
E2..............................................................................................................................................12
Infiltration pits..............................................................................................................................12
In-situ infiltration facilities for Passive Street tree irrigation...................................................12
Infiltration performance and clogging test procedures.............................................................13
Treatment of urban runoff with different infiltration media.........................................................14
Heavy metals..................................................................................................................................3
Filter media: component of green infrastructure............................................................................7
Water treatment solids................................................................................................................7
Methods..........................................................................................................................................8
Street Trees.....................................................................................................................................9
Water and nutrient need to trees.................................................................................................9
Stormwater to street trees...........................................................................................................9
Life Cycle Assessment of green infrastructure.............................................................................10
Barriers in adoption..................................................................................................................10
Planning and Policy Barriers....................................................................................................11
Knowledge and Technical Barriers..........................................................................................11
Construction cost..........................................................................................................................12
Environmental Impact of infiltration systems..............................................................................14
1

Summary of literature...................................................................................................................18
References........................................................................................................................................19
2

1 Literature Review
Introduction
This chapter provides an overview of previous research studies on in ground infiltration systems.
The literature review focuses on:
 street-scale infiltration systems and their relevance for road runoff harvesting and reuse;
 modelling for infiltration systems at street scale;
 the water quantity harvested, infiltration rate and clogging of infiltration systems;
 the road runoff water quality and use of different filter media for treatment;
 life cycle assessment of infiltration systems
Local councils in South Australia are using street tree inlets to harvest polluted road run off by
using number of backend designs and there is no scientific evidence on the how street tree inlets
perform in the Australian context. The literature review focuses on research methodologies, tools
and software studied in previous research.
3

Stormwater modelling tool
There are number of urban stormwater modelling tools available to simulate the urban runoff and
have been selected based on their applicability for various stormwater management projects (ABS,
2017). The stormwater modelling tools that are commonly used in Australia are as follows:
Modelling Tool
Model for Urban Stormwater Improvement Conceptualization (MUSIC)
Environment Protection Agency Stormwater Management Model (EPA SWMM)
WaterCress - Community Resource Evaluation and Simulation System
Stormwater Infiltration Techniques : Community Homepage (SWITCH)
Model(XP-SWMM)
XP Stormwater Management
Hydraulic Engineering Centre River Analysis System (HecRas)
Rainfall Runoff Library
DRAINS
E2
MUSIC
This software was developed by the CRC for Catchment Hydrology in 2003 and has had timely
updates and now v6.3 is available by e-water with enhances features. MUSIC software may be
used to simulate runoff qualitatively as well as quantitatively with more than 100 km2 for small
alongside large scale projects. The rainfall runoff model of MUSIC was tested and calibrated for
4

Australia, Europe as well as Asia based on their geospatial alongside metrological data (Montaseri,
Hesami Afshar & Bozorg-Haddad 2015; MUSIC Development Team 2017).
Environment Protection Agency Stormwater Management Model (EPA SWMM)
Stormwater Management Model (SWMM) is utilized for single occasion or long haul
reenactments of water overflow amount and quality in essentially urban areas– despite the fact that
there are likewise numerous applications that may be utilized for seepage frameworks in non-urban
territories. It is utilized all through the world for arranging, investigation, and configuration
identified with stormwater overflow, joined and cleans sewers, and other waste frameworks.
SWMM was produced to help bolster neighborhood, state, and national stormwater administration
destinations to lessen overflow through penetration and maintenance, and help to diminish releases
that reason debilitation of our Nation's water bodies (Ahmed, Gulliver & Nieber, 2015).
WaterCress - Community Resource Evaluation and Simulation System
This is a water balance based on a computer display for planning and testing preliminary formats
of water frameworks that may get to numerous wellsprings of water, including those by and large
viewed as being less regular. The model is intended to meet the issues of investigating elective
frameworks designs at the possibility stages.
WaterCress is especially valuable in planning water frameworks for:
 Circumstances where the fashioner wishes to investigate a scope of framework formats in
which the monetary estimation of numerous framework benefits is difficult to evaluate.
 Where more intricate streamlining is required, the model because of its basic document
information and yield may be promptly joined into outer improvement schedules. Such
work is right now in progress at Adelaide University and University of SA (Al-Rubaei,
Viklander & Blecken, 2015).
5

 Sub-divisions, where options in contrast to association with existing water supply mains
and sewers might be exorbitant as well as circumstances are tried to use waste water for
convenience upgrade or supply
 Little separated networks in drier zones
 Outline circumstances where ecological effects must be limited
WaterCress enables you to recreate genuine water framework design as a gathering of hubs
joined by seepage joins. The hubs speak to all customary water supplies for example,
catchments, dams, groundwater exhausts, in-house requests, water system zones as well as
pumps, yet in addition incorporate non-traditional supply sources as well as administration
forms engaged with so much procedures as the reusing of treated wastewater at nearby also,
territorial scales as well as catch, treatment as well as capacity of urban stormwater in water
tanks, wetlands as well as aquifers (Alexander & Arblaster, 2017).
WaterCress' wastewater treatment framework portrayal is subjective instead of quantitative.
WaterCress' partition of wastewater streams happens in the town hub. The qualities of
WaterCress lie in its stockpiling as well as water reuse displaying, with its advancement
starting from the necessity to all the more precisely show cultivate dams inside provincial
catchments as well as the need to consolidate custom water reuse designs to parcel or
subdivision scale models.
Raintank Analyser
The Raintank Analyser program may be used to survey the accompanying different parts of
precipitation reaping:
 Yields
 Cost examination; as well as
6

 Tank estimate choice
This product is essentially expected for estimating raintanks for local utilization of water in-house
as well as additionally outside, whenever required. Nonetheless, there is a 20,000 litre breaking
point to capacity volumes in the model. The model may likewise be connected to business/modern
circumstances gave the 20,000 litre cut-off is perceived. In these circumstances where extensive
catchment (rooftop) territories are accessible, at that point an answer for the issue of 'measuring'
may be found by fragmenting the catchment with the goal that each portion requires a water tank
of limit not surpassing 20,000 litres (Amati & Taylor, 2010).
PermPave
PermPave investigations as well as plans pervious asphalt frameworks for stormwater overflow
amount (surge), quality as well as collecting:
Flood relief – utilizing the plan precipitation approach as per Australian Precipitation as well as
Runoff. Yields incorporate inflow as well as outpouring hydrographs, required capacity limit of
asphalt as well as profundity;
Water quality enhancement – a basic water quality enhancement investigation is in view of
hydrological viability, got from nonstop time arrangement demonstrating utilizing 6 minute
authentic precipitation information as well as
Water reaping – yields-stockpiling relationship as well as recommended stockpiling, in view of
unit stockpiling volume advantage as well as negative approach. The program may plan a
framework for every one of capital urban communities (Asleson et al., 2009).
Stormwater Infiltration Techniques: Community Homepage (SWITCH)
SWITCH empowers hydrologic examination and estimating of invasion frameworks to be
attempted.
7

This model was initially created as a plan device to measure stormwater penetration frameworks. It
has since been extended to outline other WSUD segments, for example,
 Rainwater tanks;
 Swales;
 Bioretention frameworks; and
 Sand channels.
SWITCH is an outline storm based model.
The SWITCH configuration show utilizes the CIRIA technique (Butler and Davies 2000) for the
estimating of penetration frameworks. This is an outline storm approach that requires the assurance
of most noticeably bad or basic tempest. To encourage this, SWITCH incorporates a schedule
which may consequently run outline storms from 1 to 100 years ARI and spans from five minutes
to 72 hours for various areas crosswise over Australia (Bartens et al., 2008). The program chooses
the basic tempest and continues to measure the penetration framework. It likewise assesses an
opportunity to exhaust the gadget following the event of basic term configuration storm.
Switch2
Switch2 is an aggregate water balance show that may consider end client requests as well as
register water supply (preservation) as well as stormwater releases at six moment time interims
utilizing consistent recreation demonstrating. Switch2 has a spatial goals running from 50 m2 to 5
ha. The SWITCH demonstrates was initially created as a plan instrument to estimate stormwater
invasion frameworks. The Switch2 program has been extended to empower structure of other
WSUD estimates, for example, water tanks, swales as well as bioretention frameworks. The first
SWITCH programming is a plan storm based model while Switch2 is a constant reproduction
show (CSM) that utilizations watched or disaggregated precipitation down to one moment time
8

interims (Beatty & Heckman, 1981). The Switch2 model may process more than 100 long
stretches of precipitation information at one moment time interims. The two forms as of now
utilize deterministic misfortune displaying as well as water balance computational strategies, in
spite of fact that it is arranged that future adaptations of Switch2 will join both deterministic as
well as stochastic precipitation disaggregation capacities. Water quality as well as life cycle
costing modules is likewise at present being worked on (Beck & Birch, 2012).
The SWITCH as well as Switch2 models has as of late been incorporated into a typical, Windows
based graphical UI, the opening sprinkle screen for which is illustrated in Figure 3 below. A reason
planned program application protest gives network between the two models as well as an
Education as well as Design Guideline bundle. From this site clients may look into plan
information, for example, soil invasion rates or geofabric particulars (Benedict & McMahon,
2002). The plan rules, that are exhibited through an online framework, incorporate subjects, for
example, attainability, site assessment, point by point structure strategies, development what's
more, establishment, task as well as support necessities as well as execution survey. For Switch2,
the information section likewise incorporates an end client model to evaluate both inside
furthermore, outside water utilization.
Figure 3: Open SWITCH Screen
9

When an everyday utilization has been set up, a graphically movable diurnal conveyance is then
connected. The model yields incorporate framework dimensioning, execution insights,
precipitation information furthermore, misfortune estimations at the chose time scales. Misfortune
estimations are sorted as sorrow stockpiling, evapotranspiration, vegetation block attempt as well
as soil penetration. What's more, the Switch2 demonstrate may ascertain both water tank flood
volumes as well as the recharging of provisions utilizing city drinking (consumable) water amid
broadened dry periods. Besting up of framework may be indicated to happen at the point when the
capacity volume falls underneath an ostensible volume (for instance, 20% of tank limit with
regards to frameworks gathering surface water for water system as well as 30% of tank limit with
regards to frameworks reaping water for latrine flushing). Supplementation utilizing city drinking
water may be changed over to a water supply cost. The program may in this way give a gauge of
potential cost funds related with different kinds of WSUD frameworks.
Model (XP-SWMM)
XP-SWMM is a cordial, designs based stormwater and wastewater choice emotionally supportive
network. It is a connection hub display that performs hydrology, water power and quality
examination of stormwater and wastewater seepage frameworks including wastewater treatment
plants, water quality control gadgets as well as best management practices (BMPs). Connections
speak to water driven components for stream and constituent transport through the framework (for
instance: pipe, channel, pump, weir, opening controller, constant control gadget, and so on). There
are in excess of 30 distinct sorts of courses accessible in XPSWMM.
XP-SWMM may be utilized in a wide assortment of water quality investigations. Procedures
which may alternatively be re-enacted inside the product incorporate poison develop, wash off
amid precipitation, transport, and shift in weather conditions, sedimentation as well as biochemical
procedures. Taking all things together cases the client should pick reasonable qualities for the
procedure parameters. XP-SWMM as well as its ancestor US EPA SWMM was made to give an
10

instrument fit for demonstrating the aggregate water cycle from stormwater as well as wastewater
stream, furthermore, toxin age to recreation of water power in any joined arrangement of open as
well as additionally shut conductors with any limit conditions.
A portion of numerous applications for which XP-SWMM is appropriate include:
 Hydrology of urban stormwater;
 Hydrology of rural stormwater;
 Drainage of the subdivision
 Hydraulics of major as well as minor drainage systems
 Hydrodynamics of open channels as well as waterways
 Modelling of stormwater quality
 Generation of Wastewater Wet Weather Flow as well as Dry Weather Flow
 Routing of pollutants
 Analysis of Treatment
 Best management practices analysis for stormwater runoff treatment
Hydraulic Engineering Centre River Analysis System (HecRas)
HecRas performs one dimensional water powered figuring for a full system of regular and built
channels for enduring and temperamental stream situations, dregs exchange/portable bed
calculations and water temperature displaying.
Rainfall Runoff Library
The Rainfall Runoff Library is intended to recreate catchment spillover and is regularly used to fill
holes in information and expand streamflow records.
The Rainfall Runoff Library incorporates the accompanying models:
11

AWBM: The AWBM is a catchment water balance show which may relate spillover to
precipitation with day by day or hourly information, and ascertains misfortunes from precipitation
for surge hydrograph displaying.
Sacramento: The Sacramento display is a consistent precipitation spillover demonstrates used to
create day by day streamflow from precipitation and vanishing records.
SimHyd: SimHyd is a day by day theoretical precipitation overflow show that evaluations every
day stream spill out of day by day precipitation and areal potential evapotranspiration information.
SMAR: The dirt dampness and bookkeeping model (SMAR) is lumped reasonable precipitation
overflow water offset show with soil dampness as a focal subject. The model gives day by day
gauges of surface overflow, groundwater release, evapotranspiration and spillage from the dirt
profile for the catchment all in all. The surface spillover part involves overland stream, immersion
overabundance overflow also, soaked through flow from roosted groundwater conditions with a
fast reaction time.
Tank: The tank show is an extremely basic model, made out of four tanks laid vertically in
arrangement. Precipitation is put into the best tank, and vanishing is subtracted consecutively from
the best tank downwards. As each tank is purged the dissipation shortage is brought from the
following tank down until the point when all tanks are unfilled. The tank show is connected to
break down day by day release from day by day precipitation and dissipation inputs.
DRAINS
A channel is a multi-reason Windows program for planning and breaking down urban stormwater
seepage frameworks and catchments. The program may be utilized to break down pinnacle
streams, volumes and framework insufficiencies. Channels reenact the change of precipitation
examples to stormwater spillover hydrographs and course these through systems of funnels,
channels and streams, coordinating: Design and investigation undertakings;
12

Hydrology (four elective models) and power through pressure (two elective techniques);
 Closed conductor and open channel frameworks;
 Headwalls, ducts and different structures;
 Stormwater confinement frameworks; and
 Large scale urban and country catchments
Channels may complete hydrological demonstrating utilizing ILSAX, normal technique and
capacity directing models, together with semi shaky and precarious pressure driven demonstrating
of frameworks of funnels, open channels and surface flood courses. It incorporates two
programmed plan techniques for funneled waste frameworks, associations with CAD what's more,
GIS programs, and an in-constructed Help framework. The overflow directing displaying offices in
DRAINS may be designed to copy the RORB, RAFTS and WBNM displaying structures.
E2
E2 is a product item for entire of-catchment displaying. It is intended to permit modelers and
analysts to develop models by choosing and connecting segment models from a scope of
accessible decisions. E2 empowers an adaptable displaying approach, permitting the traits and
detail of model to change as per demonstrating destinations. In E2, the model structure and
calculations are not settled. They are characterized by the client, who may browse a suite of
accessible choices. Show choice requires the client to be acquainted with the detail, materialness
and information prerequisites of part models, also, the ramifications of joining segment models. E2
is consequently planned to be an apparatus for experienced catchment modelers.
13

Infiltration pits
Traditional stormwater facilities collect and transfer stormwater from urban area as a result the soil
and sub soil gets dry over the period. However, infiltration facilities (permeable pavements,
infiltration pits) have the potential to restore soil moisture as well as improve water quality.
In-situ infiltration facilities for Passive Street tree irrigation
In- Some infiltration systems are designed for retention and detention of stormwater at large or
small scale. The infiltration facilities are typically based on storage and treatment facilities with
harvested water storage, on ground storage, infiltration in surrounding soil or in combination
depending on the flow of stormwater. Figure 4 shows simple onsite retention of stormwater device
may effective percolate water in surrounding soil.
Figure 1 “Leaky well” water retention trench (Argue 2013)
These systems built to reduce peak flow, avoid downstream flooding and improve water quality
(Pezzaniti & Argue 2006). Some systems may also design to harvest stormwater and convey to
water bodies such as sea, river or pond (Hatt, BE, Deletic & Fletcher 2006). The infiltration
systems with stormwater detention and retention facilities have potential to irrigate trees to develop
resilient cities (Berland et al. 2017; Breen et al. 2004; Coutts et al. 2012; Denman, L. 2006;
Johnson, Lawry & Sapdhare 2016).
14

Infiltration performance and clogging test procedures
In literature, the hydraulic performance and clogging tests has been testing in laboratory and in
field using variety of methods. In United states, best management practices infiltration rate testing
protocol developed by Michigan (2000) described the methods based on standard infiltration rate
of soils in field Using Double Ring Infiltrometer” (ASTM 3385) 2003). In double ring method the
two concentric rings are fixed into the ground and filled with water. The standard Double ring
method was adopted to test the infiltration rate of bioretention garden by Asleson et al. (2009)
using modified Philip –Dumme (MPD) infiltrometer developed at laboratory. This MPD
infiltrometer required less water for infiltration rate testing. The difference between diameter of
inner ring should be 50 -70 percent of outer ring. Measurement of water level in the center ring
should be made from a fixed reference point. Visual inspection and synthetic drawdown testing
was also applied with Double Ring Infiltration test (Asleson et al. 2009). Double ring infiltrometer
were used by Al-Rubaei, Viklander and Blecken (2015) to test hydraulic performance of
infiltration systems, Ahmed, Gulliver and Nieber (2015) to test infiltration rate of road side grass
swales. In USA, Xiang et al. (1997) performed constant-head borehole test to estimate saturated
hydraulic conductivity of soil at different depth. To determine the hydraulic conductivity at
different depth, by monitoring water level at constant flow rate.
In Australia, Hatt, B and Le Coustumer (2008) published practice note to monitor the hydraulic
conductivity in field condition using single ring infiltrometer under constant head based on
Standard Test Method for Permeability of granular Soils (Constant Head) ASTM D2434-68
(2006). The 100 mm diameter steel ring with minimum 220 mm height gently taps into soil up to
50mm. The time noted to infiltrate and then again refill the water at same height. This procedure
was repeated until the infiltration water remains steady for 20 minutes. Fletcher, Deletic and
Barraud (2007) performed same techniques to determine the hydraulic performance of bio filters in
15

filed and laboratory condition additionally they performed deep ring infiltration test based on same
standards. (Verbist et al. 2013)
Treatment of urban runoff with different infiltration media
Due to urbanization stormwater pick flow volume from urban roads has been increasing due to
increased impervious land cover on natural soil. The urban water quality is another major issue
that has been identified in literature. The typical urban stormwater contains contaminates like
heavy metals (As, Al, Fe, Cd, Cr, Zn, Pb, Ni, Mn), nutrients and poly cyclic aromatic compounds
and suspended solids. These toxic compounds may potentially contaminate the water bodies
(rivers, creeks, ponds, and lakes), soil environment and ground water. The toxicity level of road
runoff varies and depends on the local environment and land use pattern.
According the Adelaide Costal Water Quality Improvement Plans ( ACWQIP) developed by
Environment Protection Authority (EPA) (2013), to harvest 60 GL of stormwater by 2050. The
EPA target water quality objectives to reduce 60% load of carbon foot print
Taylor et al. (2005) investigated road runoff from urban areas in Melbourne and found that the
total dissolved nitrogen (TDN) is higher on Melbourne roads when compared to the international
findings. Total nitrogen (Davis, MD et al. 2010), Oxidised Nitrogen (NOX) and Ammonia
(NH4 )levels were not raised. Similarly, Taebi and Droste (2004) studied the quality of urban first
flush in a semi-arid region in Iran and monitored 10 storm events. In terms of concentrations, they
found that the TSS > TS> COD>TN>Pb>Zn. Overall it may be summarized that stormwater
contains harmful chemicals such as lead, copper, zinc, total Nitrogen, phosphorous and harmful
bacteria in urban runoff. These pollutants reduce the environmental values of aquatic ecosystem
(Beck & Birch 2012; Chong et al. 2011). In Australia, Birch, Matthai and Fazeli (2006) assessed
stormwater pollutant removal efficiency of dry detention and retention ponds and concluded that
the urban stormwater was higher contaminated with heavy metals (Cu, Pb, Zn, TKN and TN) and
16

exceed the ANZECC (2000)guideline levels. The level of toxic heavy metals, nutrients and
suspended solids in Australian road runoff was noted higher if compared with world water quality
data as shown in Table 1.
Table 1 Comparison of Australian and world stormwater quality: Modified from
(Jayasuriya et al. 2007)
Parameters Australian
stormwater quality
(mg/L)
World stormwater
quality (mg/L)
Mean Range Mean Range
Total nitrogen 2.63 1.29-5.37 2.51 1.12-5.62
Total
Phosphorous
0.24 0.08-0.72 0.32 0.12-0.82
Cadmium 0.007 0.003-
0.018
0.003 0.0007-0.01
Chromium 0.03 0.01-0.11 0.02 0.005-0.08
Copper 0.06 0.012-
0.18
0.05 0.02-0.17
Lead 0.1 0.01-0.74 0.12 0.03-0.5
Nickel 0.02 0.01-0.04 0.03 0.02-0.07
Zinc 0.63 0.23-1.7 0.25 0.08-0.78
Suspended solids 141 42-7-478 148 45-490
Heavy metals
Arsenic- Arsenic concentrations, a metalloid, regularly surpass the New Jersey Surface Water
Quality Standard (SWQS) of 0.017 μg/L for freshwater (New Jersey Department of Environmental
Insurance, 2009) in the waters of streams that deplete to the Delaware River in the Inner Coastal
Plain of New Jersey. In spite of fact that the streams commonly ascend among the quartz rich
sands of Miocene Cohansey and Kirkwood Formations, beneath their headwaters these streams are
underlain by, and chiseled into, glauconitic residue of primarily marine source, which go in age
17

from Early Tertiary through Late Cretaceous periods. The glauconite (a dark to green mineral with
mud or mica-like structure) and soils created on these dregs have been appeared to be rich in as
and other follow components (Huber, Welker & Helmreich, 2016).
Aluminum - Concentration of aluminum in stormwater was noted …mg.L in Australia. The use of
Al sheets and Al based fencing material is the potential sources. Mangani et al. (2005) studied first
flush runoff samples from highway in Central Italy and found level of Al was higher than other
heavy metals followed by zinc , iron and copper. The toxicity of Al to Amphibians were
significantly influenced by pH and hardness level (Freda 1991).
Cadmium- is one of toxic element with high human and environment concern, although the
concentration of Cd are very low but found in urban runoff (Pitt et al. 1995). Commercial
industries has been using various cadmium compounds, for example zinc galvanized fittings,
solders and brasses (NHMRC 2011) for production and operation process and unknowingly the use
of cadmium is causing environmental pollution (Moore, Ramamoorthy & Desanto 1984). The
concentration of cadmium in in high traffic road runoff was significantly low (< 0.005 mg/L) in
French and this concentration was standard in drinking water. In contrast Pitt et al. (1995) found
significantly high (0.220 mg/L) concentration on high traffic area in USA.
Chromium- Little is thought about the nearness of component Cr in its harmful hexavalent shape
Cr (VI) in stormwater spillover from urban regions. Most investigations report just aggregate Cr
fixation, i.e., including likewise the nontoxic Cr (III) sub-atomic frame. Obviously Cr (III) frames
buildings with broke down natural issue, enabling it to sidestep the cartridge, bringing about
deficient Cr (III) maintenance and subsequently inadequate speciation. The buildings are framed
quickly in the wake of spiking, along these lines changes in the Cr-species circulation are probably
going to happen inside a couple of hours when crisp examples are put away. Cr (III) at unbiased
pH in unadulterated arrangement or complexes with broke down natural C may sorb irreversibly to
18

polyethylene and polypropylene compartments. According to NHMRC (2011), chromium standard
drinking level should be < 0.005, further reported that corrosion of water supply pipes and
industrial such as leather tanning, paint, ceramic and glass manufacturing or agriculture use of
fungicide.
Copper- is an important element extensively used for plumbing, construction, bearing and brake
pads (Moore, Ramamoorthy & Desanto 1984). The Australian drinking water guidelines set copper
value of 2 mg/L (NHMRC 2011). Copper concentration in urban runoff was commonly studied by
previous research studies (Davis, AP, Shokouhian & Ni 2001; Huber, Welker & Helmreich 2016;
Kemp & Kumar 2005; Lee & Bang 2000; Myers, Beecham & van Leeuwen 2011; Phillips et al.
2004; Reddy, Xie & Dastgheibi 2014). Jayasuriya et al. (2007) reported that the copper
concentration in Australian runoff ranged between 0.012 to 0.18 mg/L.
Lead in stormwater decreased the water quality and is major source of contamination. Wall and
roof paint is the major of lead (Davis, AP & Burns 1999; Gottesfeld, Pokhrel & Pokhrel 2014;
Turner & Sogo 2012) and related to the level of traffic. The leaching concentration level depends
on the age of that paint. It was investigated that the older paint (for example more than 10 year)
contributed 77 mg/L) however new paint (0 to 5 year) leached 8.4 mg/L (Davis, AP & Burns
1999).
Zinc- The concentration of Zn on South Australian road was significantly high and variation in
concentration is depend on spatial and temporal variations (Kemp & Kumar 2005). Zinc has been
potential contaminant and concentrations ranges from 0.128 to 3.47 mg/L with significant increase
in snow fall events (Helmreich et al. 2010). Huber, Welker and Helmreich (2016) reviewed Zn
concentration was considerably high in heavy traffic area as use of galvanized material and car
rubber tires (Huber, Welker & Helmreich, 2016).
19

Nutrients
Nitrogen- Inorganic N as smelling salts, nitrite, and nitrate has been accounted for in Cincinnati,
Ohio, overflow at a normal grouping of around 1.0 mg N/L for the entirety of three N forms. This
fixation was around three times the basic level of 0.3 mg N/L of inorganic N, which was proposed
by Sawyer for algal development issues in lakes. The equivalent Cincinnati overflow conveyed a
normal aggregate N centralization of 3.1 mg N/L, which incorporated the natural and in addition
the inorganic N frames. Therefore, around 65 per cent of aggregate N in the spill over was present
as natural N (Huber, Welker & Helmreich, 2016). So also, Kluesener and Lee found that natural N
frames were in charge of around 77 per cent of aggregate N contribution to Lake Wingra,
Madison, Wis., from urban overflow. Since inorganic N structures, for example, alkali, nitrite, and
nitrate are promptly accessible for algal development in lake waters, the accessibility of aggregate
N in a spill over stream will rely upon the relative measure of natural N in the overflow and on the
accessibility of natural N to green growth
Phosphorous- Wellsprings of phosphorus in urban spill over incorporate plant and leaf litter, soil
particles, pet waste, street salt, manure, and air testimony of particles. Gardens and streets
represent the best stacking. For instance, it was established that yards and streets contributed
around 80 per cent of aggregate and broke up phosphorus stacking. Land utilization influences the
commitment from various sources, with gardens and leaf litter being more vital in local locations
and streets being more imperative in business and mechanical territories. Air wellsprings of
particles may get from outside of stream bowl (Jakob & Walland, 2016).
Broken up phosphorus ordinarily represents around 45 per cent of aggregate phosphorus, however
this part shifts with the wellspring of phosphorus disintegrated portion might be as high as 50 per
cent when the source is plant litter and gardens, while the broke down part might be as low as 25
per cent when the source is transcendently streets. Groupings of phosphorus in urban stormwater
20

spill over are very factor. Focuses are comparable crosswise over various land employments. Total
phosphorus (TP) send out fluctuates with the measure of overflow and is computed by duplicating
the TP focus by the volume of spill over. The Simple Method may be utilized to appraise TP
stacking as a component of various land employments. Fare coefficients are exhibited in the
writing for various land employments. The information is very factor because of distinctions in
impenetrable surface, even inside particular land employments
Filter media: component of green infrastructure
Filter media plays an important role for pollutant and nutrient removal from road runoff. The
onsite detention and retention systems such as infiltration systems, permeable pavements:
Gravel: Gravel filters have been observed to be extremely compelling for expulsion of silt and
overwhelming metals under all water level administrations, even as the framework obstructed after
some time (Jakob & Walland, 2016). In spite of silt molecule measure appropriation being
substantially littler than the channel media pore size, dregs and its related poisons were
successfully caught in the highest point of rock channel, notwithstanding when the water level was
permitted to differ. A media profundity of 0.5 m was found to accomplish sufficient contamination
expulsion. Achievement of poisons may not be of worry, since physical obstructing happened first
(along these lines deciding the life expectancy of channel media). In any case, rock channels were
less viable at supplement expulsion, especially for broke up supplements.
Water treatment solids
Nagar et al. (2014) conducted greenhouse based study using soil and residual waste from drinking
water (WTR) plant to evaluate the bioaccessibility, geochemical separation and immobilized As
(V) in contaminated soils. In this long term study, Fe and Al based WTR at 5%, 10% and 0% (by
weight) were added for treatment in soil. The in vitro and water extracted samples were collected
and analyzed for as bioaccessibility in soil. Water soluble as concentration in both Fe and Al based
21

WTR was significantly decreased and controlled the mobility of as in soil. Further, investigated
that WTR have the potential to immobilize as in soil and reduce the contamination risk. However,
the ratio of soil to WTR required calculating to increase the plant growth and reduce phyto-
availability (Jakob & Walland, 2016).
Methods
Batch study: Sorption instruments rely upon the sorbate-sorbent connection and the framework
conditions; hence the sorption limit and required contact time were two of imperative parameters
to decide. The jug point isotherm method (Rivas et al. 2006) was utilized to decide the balance
limit of NC and HC for hardness evacuation in the SHW arrangement. Group sorption tests were
directed to decide the connection among adsorbent and adsorbate by shifting the measures of
adsorbate, both at balance and as an element of time.
There are three isotherm models that have been broadly used to speak to the reaction bends: to be
specific linear, Langmuir as well as Freundlich models. The choice to choose the best model
depends on the example of sorption bends. Adsorption isotherms portray the connection between
the measure of adsorbed particle on adsorbent and the final particle fixation in the arrangement.
The parameters for FR and LG isotherms are exceptionally valuable for foreseeing adsorption
limits and furthermore to join into mass move connections in the plan of reaching hardware (Jakob
& Walland, 2016).
Column study: Despite the fact that batch laboratory adsorption research give valuable
information and parameters on the utilization of adsorbents for hardness expulsion, the information
got from bunch adsorptive framework are not pertinent to ceaseless adsorptive system, thus
consistent sorption thinks about are required. Settled bed section tests were additionally important
to give pragmatic operational data regard to the adsorption of constituents with the utilization of
clinoptilolite as inorganic particle exchangers. Column contemplates are led utilizing a Plexiglass
22

segment with an inward width of 5 cm and a length of 50 cm. Schematic subtle elements of
segment test mechanical assembly and exploratory section set-up is shown in Fig. 1,including
outside segments to gauge water softening procedure
Pilot study: The Small Pilot Infiltration Test (PIT) may be utilized to evaluate a Design
Infiltration Rate dependent on in‐situ field estimations of penetration rates (Kambites & Owen,
2006). The testing strategy and information investigation prerequisites for the Small PIT are given
beneath. The report for this test will incorporate documentation of testing strategy, investigation,
and results to set up the estimated invasion rate and a clarification of amendment factor used to
decide the Design Penetration Rate. The Small PIT report will be set up by a Licensed
Professional. The test strategy might be changed due to site conditions whenever suggested by the
Licensed Professional and the legitimization is archived in the report.
Street Trees
Water and nutrient need to trees
Stormwater to street trees
Trees and green vegetation play an important role in the urban hydrological cycle (Stovin,
Jorgensen & Clayden 2008) by improving the infiltration rates of soil, recharging groundwater
(Bartens et al. 2008) as well as reducing runoff (Ely and Pitman 2014). All these ecosystem
functions are directly dependent on the healthy growth of trees (Fig.6). Generally, councils irrigate
the street trees for the first three years from planting and after that they become totally dependent
on rainwater, available soil water and moisture for their growth.
23

Figure 2 Trees and vegetation uptakes nutrients from urban runoff
Tree roots grow in the direction of water to meet their water demand. Evidence has shown that
nitrogen and phosphorous are essential nutrients for healthy tree growth. Denman, Liz (2003)
conducted an experiment that showed that stormwater application is beneficial for healthy tree
growth in all types of media. In her experiments, both tap water and artificial stormwater were
applied to four different tree species. Collection and analysis of leachate demonstrated the
absorption of nitrogen and phosphorous by trees and soil systems (Kearns, 2011). The results
showed that there is a positive correlation between leachate (NOx Concentration) and the
biofiltration system with trees showed significant reduction in both nitrogen and phosphorous.
Beatty and Heckman (1981) reported that restricted watering, nutrient deficiency, poor soil,
vandalism and physical injury are the common reasons for destruction and deterioration of urban
trees growth.
Life Cycle Assessment of green infrastructure
Barriers in adoption
Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) and Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) are the important assessment when
considered Water sensitive Urban design
24

Planning and Policy Barriers
 A policy paradox – while the state government controls the arranging directions also,
instruments, there is an absence of strategy authority proves by no formal approach,
restricted rules, directions and managerial methods.
 Lack of consistency between nearby governments on the strategy arrangements and use of
WSUD
 Poor managerial joining among offices and chambers, and in addition between offices
inside neighborhood committees, to actualize WSUD
 Limited councilor and ranking staff responsibility to WSUD
Knowledge and Technical Barriers Cost issues for building, keeping up and supplanting WSUD-related foundation by private
industry and government that are framed inside the 'moderate lodging' perspective (Kemp
& Kumar, 2005)
 Lack of mindfulness by partners and the network about the advantages and items of
common sense of water touchy urban outline, and absence of reasonable preparing projects
and access to applicable data
 Lack of customer interest for water touchy outline improvements, and absence of suitable
advertising about their costs, advantages and rewards
 Limited measurement of advantages of WSUD as far as beginning expenses and upkeep
 Little local and neighborhood information on water quality parameters for MUSIC and
other demonstrating instruments to plan WSUD frameworks
25

Construction cost
Different LCA software
SimaPro: SimaPro 7.2 is a procedure stream demonstrating program, by PRé Consultants,
intended to help clients with ISO agreeable LCA. This product apparatus is utilized to stock and
model the development and decommissioning stages for green foundation hones inspected in this
examination. Utilizing the product, particular process stream models are made for the development
period of each green foundation rehearse. The product is additionally used to demonstrate task
stage support exercises and operational advantages of practices when suitable. Notwithstanding the
capacity to make process stream models, this product contains far reaching LCI databases (Lee &
Bang, 2000).
These inherent databases incorporate information from the U.S. LCI Database, the Ecoinvent
database, and the European Life Cycle Database (ELCD). On account of constrained LCA
information accessible identified with green foundation works on, displaying BMPs requires an
assortment of presumptions with the end goal to make utilization of set up and endorsed life cycle
stock databases. SimaPro 7.2 is likewise utilized as a device for the bookkeeping of vitality and
materials streams, the count of stock outcomes, what's more, to characterize and look at effect
classes (McPherson, 2007)
GaBi: GaBi has a standard arrangement of highlights, so paying little mind to which database you
pick, the full scope of functionalities is available. GaBi's representation approach empowers you to
develop your items and framework models in GaBi similarly as would draw them on paper. An
instinctive UI, intuitive component, various leveled database administrator and propelled seek
work enable you to adaptably enhance your model outline with your very own information or with
information from your database. Furthermore, you're prepared to break down your outcomes! The
objective of GaBi Modeling Principles is to straightforwardly report the earth, foundation,
26

essential angles and points of interest of GaBi databases, and in addition the premise of models. It
contains:
 Portrayal of database administration which is a critical part of expert databases by and by
 Database update and support techniques and systems
 General and area or master particular methodological viewpoints
OpenLCA: The accessibility of various hotspots forever cycle stock databases and Life Cycle
Impact Appraisal (LCIA) techniques ought to be an advantage for better performs life cycle
evaluation examines. Be that as it may, the inconstancy of terminology utilized in each hotspot for
e.g. the mixes and compartments of rudimentary trades hinders a clear mix of diverse information.
In this way, a serious work has been led for openLCA with the end goal to adjust and fit the
streams from various databases and LCIA strategies. The Nexus site contains presently more than
30,000 informational indexes, from distinctive sources, which can be utilized freely or
consolidated in a solitary framework in openLCA. What's more, we are upbeat to have the capacity
to give now a complete pack of Life Cycle Impact Evaluation (LCIA) strategies appropriate for
every one of informational collections in Nexus. This pack is intended to supplant the past "affect
techniques" file that was sympathetically given by ecoinvent, which was chiefly tending to
ecoinvent streams (Moore, Ramamoorthy & Desanto, 1984). Moreover, a pack containing a social
LCIA strategy is additionally furnished with the end goal to utilize it with the Social Hotspots
Database, or, in other words at Nexus. OpenLCA is the open source programming for Life Cycle
Assessment (LCA) and Sustainability Evaluation, created since 2006 by GreenDelta
Environmental Impact of infiltration systems
Enhancement of Recreation: Green foundation may make new areas for recreational exercises as
well as enhance the recreational benefit of existing areas. This incorporates both river side
27

recreational openings from stream rebuilding alongside riparian cushion enhancements, alongside
non-spring side recreational open doors from expanded vegetated and treed real estate in urban
regions. Long haul changes in downstream water quality may likewise result in increments of
instream exercises recreational exercises, for example, sailing and angling.
Promotion of Community Aesthetics: Green framework, particularly vegetated frameworks,
enhances urban feel a alongside network bearableness. The experience of nature in urban
communities is fundamental to human wellbeing, prosperity in addition to, personal satisfaction
(Wolf, 2003). Decrease of impenetrable zones, increments in vegetation, and some penetrable
asphalt aid to diminish sound transmission that may lessen nearby commotion contamination.
Expanded pervious regions and vegetation, particularly local vegetation, advance untamed life
environment. A few observational investigations indicate property estimations are higher when
trees alongside other vegetation are present in urban neighborhoods
Reduction of carbon footprint and saving of energy: As examined in past areas, green
framework may bring down surrounding temperatures. Trees and other vegetation likewise
encourage shade and protect structures, square winter winds, what's more, make an evaporative
cooling impact. Green framework practices may diminish substantial temperature swings of
structures, consequently diminishing vitality utilized for warming alongside cooling. Green
rooftops for instance give protection alongside shade that diminishing warming alongside cooling
needs. Research has demonstrated that green rooftops in Philadelphia may generate yearly
investment funds of 0.39 kWh per square foot of rooftop for cooling, alongside reserve funds of
123 MM BTUs per square foot of petroleum gas per working for warming. Green Infrastructure
attempts to diminish the general carbon impression of a network (Nagar, et al., 2014). Emergency
investment funds from the lessened warming alongside cooling of structures decreases CO2
outflows, other ozone harming substance (GHG) discharges, alongside toxin outflows at power
plants. In consolidated sewer regions, expelling stormwater with green framework through
28

invasion alongside vapotranspiration redirects water from wastewater gathering; diminishes
vitality needed to pump as well as treat stormwater that will diminish CO2 emanations at power
plants. Water reaping may lessen consumable water utilize as well as along these lines decrease
vitality utilize related with treatment alongside transport. Carbon impression is likewise
diminished however carbon stockpiling as well as by vegetated green foundation rehearses.
Improvement in the Air Quality: Vegetation as a piece of green framework rehearses may
enhance urban air quality. Urban territories, for example, Philadelphia are arranged by the EPA as
surpassing the current National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for both ozone (O3) as
well as PM2.5 (particulate issue down to 2.5 micrometers in distance across). Plant breath from
vegetated green framework hones acts locally to expel air contaminations, for example, particulate
issue, ozone, CO, SO2, alongside NOx. On a bigger scale, decrease of warmth island impact
moderates the response rates of nitrogen oxides alongside unpredictable natural mixes (CNT
what's more, American Rivers, 2010) (Pezzaniti & Argue, 2006). As depicted in the past area of
this section, carbon sequestration diminishes barometrical CO2 as well as lessened vitality
utilization diminishes outflows of CO2, SO2, NOx, alongside other air toxins. Enhanced air quality
advantages human wellbeing through decrease of rate alongside seriousness of respiratory
sicknesses alongside cardiovascular conditions.
Most ecological stream issues emerge from water being removed for human utilize: the test for
natural stream analysts as well as specialists in such circumstances is the manner by which to
disperse the rest of greatest ecological advantage. This attention on extraction of water from
oceanic biological communities, aggravated with the inclination for water asset administrators to
lean toward incorporated frameworks, prompts a propensity of urban water supervisors to initially
consider extraction from urban waterways as well as channels while recognizing urban stormwater
gathering ventures. Such an origination of stormwater collecting has prompted a misguided
judgment that urban stormwater spill over has some ecological stream advantage (Taebi & Droste,
29

2004). Studies demonstrating reliable debasement even with expanding urban stormwater seepage
show that the turnaround is valid. Urban stormwater overflow, conveyed through regular seepage
frameworks, is a complex natural stream issue which may, in expansive part, be explained by
gathering stormwater before it achieves sea-going biological systems.
An ongoing survey of extensive scale urban stormwater gathering ventures financed in Australia
demonstrated that all undertakings removed water from conduits or substantial
channels. Such plans may, best case scenario gather a little extent of harming stormwater streams
(their capacity to redirect and store streams is little contrasted with the vast stream rates that amass
with catchment territory), do nothing to re-establish lost dry-climate streams as well as neglect to
secure upstream waters. Of more prominent worry, about a fourth of activities distinguished
collected dry-climate streams from channels or conduits (Stovin, Jorgensen & Clayden, 2008).
An issue with penetration of stormwater spill over is the potential transport of toxins in stormwater
through soil and into groundwater, where they may affect drinking water supplies or surface water
when released to lakes, waterways or wetlands. Numerous contaminations are constricted in
stormwater control hones (BMPs), in soil or the vadose zone, or in groundwater. A few poisons are
inadequately constricted; in any case as well as such speak to a potential hazard.
When all is said in done, particulate poisons, (for example, add up to suspended solids (TSS)) as
well as those toxins that basically tie to particulates, (for example, metals) are effectively expelled
by the filtration procedure inside the penetration BMPs. Solvent contaminants then again, for
example, chloride, may possibly be conveyed for some separation and may in the end come to the
groundwater table. Protozoa and bigger microorganisms are more effectively expelled from the
framework than littler microbes as well as infections (Wallbridge & Gilbert Counsulting Engineers
2009). Of most prominent concern are versatile harmful organics (gas, solvents), nitrates,
infections as well as chloride. In the event that it is conceivable to do as such, these contaminants
30

ought to be expelled from the stormwater before penetration. To achieve this, a proper pre-
treatment strategy is required. Any overflow containing dangerous material that won't tie to soils,
be effectively expelled, or abundance volume that can't invade, ought to be occupied far from the
penetration BMP to another treatment gadget.
The protection as well as restoration of urban streams has thus been hampered by a lack of
understanding of the unique nature of urban stormwater runoff as an environmental flow problem
that could be solved by using stormwater as a water resource. Stormwater harvesting defies the
dominant conception of water resource management that extraction of water from ecosystems must
result in a monotonic decline in the ecological condition of that ecosystem (Water and Climate
Change Branch 2014).
By failing to harvesting stormwater to keep an appropriate proportion of it out of receiving waters,
we not only forego the benefits to society of this large water resource, but also contribute to the
degradation of waterways, resulting in a loss of biodiversity as well as ecological function
provided by healthy streams. In addition, the use of stormwater for landscape irrigation may
mitigate against the urban heat island effect. The wider use of urban stormwater would reduce
demand on potable water supplies, potentially freeing water to provide environmental flows below
water supply storages. In growing cities, urban stormwater harvesting could allow water managers
to avoid or delay the augmentation of other potable water supply options that have negative
environmental impacts (Xiang et al., 2009). Retention as well as use of stormwater also contributes
to mitigation of urban flooding, thus potentially reducing costs for flood protection
Summary of literature
The hydraulic performance measurement has been important consideration and should consider
before as well as after application of any GI facilities that permit to decide clogging of media
alongside after installation of GI facilities.
31

References
ABS 2017, Australian Demographic Statistics, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra, 29
December 2017.
Ahmed, F, Gulliver, JS & Nieber, JL 2015, 'Field infiltration measurements in grassed roadside
drainage ditches: Spatial and temporal variability', Journal of Hydrology, vol. 530, 2015/11/01/,
pp. 604-611.
Al-Rubaei, AM, Viklander, M & Blecken, G-T 2015, 'Long-term hydraulic performance of
stormwater infiltration systems', Urban Water Journal, vol. 12, no. 8, 2015/11/17, pp. 660-671.
Alexander, LV & Arblaster, JM 2017, 'Historical and projected trends in temperature and
precipitation extremes in Australia in observations and CMIP5', Weather and Climate Extremes,
vol. 15, no. Supplement C, 2017/03/01/, pp. 34-56.
32

Amati, M & Taylor, L 2010, 'From Green Belts to Green Infrastructure', Planning Practice &
Research, vol. 25, no. 2, 2010/04/01, pp. 143-155.
ANZECC 2000, Australian and New Zealand Guidlines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality,
Australia and New Zealand, Australia and New Zealand.
Argue, JR 2013, Water Sensitive Urban Design: Basic Procedures for 'Source Control' of
Stormwater - A handbook for Australian practices, Seventh edn, Urban Water Resource
Centre ,University of South Australia, Adelaide.
Asleson, BC, Nestingen, RS, Gulliver, JS, Hozalski, RM & Nieber, JL 2009, 'PERFORMANCE
ASSESSMENT OF RAIN GARDENS', Journal of the American Water Resources Association,
vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 1019-1031.
Bartens, J, Day, SD, Harris, JR, Dove, JE & Wynn, TM 2008, 'Can Urban Tree Roots Improve
Infiltration through Compacted Subsoils for Stormwater Management?', Journal Environmnetal
Quality, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 2048-2057.
Beatty, RA & Heckman, CT 1981, 'Survey of urbantree programs in United States', Urban
Ecology, vol. 5, pp. 81-102.
Beck, HJ & Birch, GF 2012, 'Metals, nutrients and total suspended solids discharged during
different flow conditions in highly urbanised catchments', Environmental Monitoring and
Assessment, vol. 184, no. 2, pp. 637-653.
Benedict, MA & McMahon, ET 2002, 'Green infrastructure: smart conservation for the 21st
century', Renewable Resources Journal, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 12-17.
Benedict, MA, Mcmahon, ET & Fund, MAtC 2006, Green Infrastructure : Linking Landscapes
and Communities,
33

Berland, A, Shiflett, SA, Shuster, WD, Garmestani, AS, Goddard, HC, Herrmann, DL & Hopton,
ME 2017, 'The role of trees in urban stormwater management', Landscape and Urban Planning,
vol. 162, 6//, pp. 167-177.
Birch, GF, Matthai, C & Fazeli, MS 2006, 'Efficiency of a retention/detention basin to
removecontaminants from urban stormwater', Urban Water Journal, vol. 3, no. 2, 2006/06/01, pp.
69-77.
Bolund, P & Hunhammar, S 1999, 'Ecosystem services in urban areas', Ecological economics, vol.
29, no. 2, pp. 293-301.
Boyd, MJ, Bufill, MC & Knee, RM 1993, 'Pervious and impervious runoff in urban catchments',
Hydrological Sciences Journal, vol. 38, no. 6, 1993/12/01, pp. 463-478.
Breen, P, Denman, L, May, P & Leinster, S 2004, Street Trees as Stormwater Treatment
Measures. International Conference on Water Sensitive Urban Design, Adelaide, Australia,
Chong, MN, Aryal, R, Sidhu, J, Tang, J, Toze, S & Gardner, T 2011, 'Urban stormwater quality
monitoring: From sampling to water quality analysis', 2011 7th International Conference on
Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing., IEEE Computer Society, pp.
174-179.
Chowdhury, RK, Beecham, S, Boland, J & Piantadosi, J 2015, 'Understanding South Australian
rainfall trends and step changes', International Journal of Climatology, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 348-360.
CIA 2017, The World Factbook, Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), January 2017 edn, updated 29
December 2017, Central Intelligence Agency, viewed 29 December 2017,
<https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/as.html>.
34

Cooper, CM & Gillespie, WB 2001, 'Arsenic and mercury concentrations in major landscape
components of an intensively cultivated watershed', Environmental Pollution, vol. 111, no. 1,
2001/01/01/, pp. 67-74.
Coutts, AM, Tapper, NJ, Beringer, J, Loughnan, M & Demuzere, M 2012, 'Watering our cities: the
capacity for water sensitive urban design to support urban cooling and improve human thermal
comfort in the Australian context', Progress in Physical Geography, p. 0309133312461032.
D2434-68, A 2006, Standard Test Method for Permeability of Granular Soils (Constant Head),
ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
Davis, AP & Burns, M 1999, 'Evaluation of lead concentration in runoff from painted structures',
Water Research, vol. 33, no. 13, 1999/09/01/, pp. 2949-2958.
Davis, AP, Shokouhian, M & Ni, S 2001, 'Loading estimates of lead, copper, cadmium, and zinc in
urban runoff from specific sources', Chemosphere, vol. 44, no. 5, 2001/08/01/, pp. 997-1009.
Davis, MD, Jayaratne, R, Ansen, J-A & Timperley, M 2010, 'Characterisation of urban stormwater
quality in the Auckland region (New Zealand)', World Environmental and Water Resources
Congress 2010, American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 3485-3501.
Deletic, A 1998, 'The first flush load of urban surface runoff', Water Research, vol. 32, no. 8, pp.
2462-2470.
Denman, L 2003, 'An Investigation of the potential to use Street trees and Designed Soils to Treat
Urban Stormwater', The 4th National Street Tree Symposium, Treenet Organisation.
Denman, L 2006, 'Are Street trees and their soils an effective stormwater tratment measure?', The
7th National Street Tree Symposium Treenet Organization.
35

Dijk, AIJM, Beck, HE, Crosbie, RS, Jeu, RAM, Liu, YY, Podger, GM, Timbal, B & Viney, NR
2013, 'The Millennium Drought in southeast Australia (2001-2009): Natural and human causes and
implications for water resources, ecosystems, economy, and society', Water Resources Research,
vol. 49, no. 2, Feb 2013
2015-01-06, pp. 1040-1057.
Environment Protection Authority (EPA) 2013, Adelaide Coastal Water Quality Improvement,
Environment Protection Authority, South Australia, South Australia.
Environment Protection Authority (EPA) 2017, Water Quality Environment Protection Authority,
South Australia, viewed viewed 3 January 2018,
<http://www.epa.sa.gov.au/environmental_info/water_quality>.
Fletcher, T, Deletic, A & Barraud, S 2007, 'Hydraulic performance of biofilters for stormwater
management: first lessons from both laboratory and field studies', Water Science and Technology,
vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 93-100.
Freda, J 1991, 'The effects of aluminum and other metals on amphibians', Environmental
Pollution, vol. 71, no. 2, 1991/01/01/, pp. 305-328.
Gill, SE, Handley, JF, Ennos, AR & Pauleit, S 2007, 'Adapting Cities for Climate Change: The
Role of the Green Infrastructure', Built Environment, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 115-133.
Gong, C & Donahoe, R 1996, 'An experimental study of heavy metal attenuation and mobility in
sandy liam soils', Applied Geochemistry, vol. 12, pp. 243-254.
Gottesfeld, P, Pokhrel, D & Pokhrel, AK 2014, 'Lead in new paints in Nepal', Environmental
Research, vol. 132, 2014/07/01/, pp. 70-75.
36

Government of South Australia 2010, Water for Good - A plan to ensure our water future to 2050,
South Australia.
Government of South Australia 2017, The 30-Year Plan for Greater Adelaide, Government of
Souith Australia, South Australia.
<http://livingadelaide.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/319809/The_30-
Year_Plan_for_Greater_Adelaide.pdf>.
Hatt, B & Le Coustumer, S 2008, In situ Measurment of Hydraulic Conductivity, Facility for
Asvancing Water Bioretention (FAWB), Monash University, Victoria.
Hatt, BE, Deletic, A & Fletcher, TD 2006, 'Integrated treatment and recycling of stormwater: a
review of Australian practice', Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 79, no. 1, 4//, pp. 102-
113.
Helmreich, B, Hilliges, R, Schriewer, A & Horn, H 2010, 'Runoff pollutants of a highly trafficked
urban road – Correlation analysis and seasonal influences', Chemosphere, vol. 80, no. 9,
2010/08/01/, pp. 991-997.
Herngren, L, Goonetilleke, A & Ayoko, GA 2005, 'Understanding heavy metal and suspended
solids relationships in urban stormwater using simulated rainfall', Journal of Environmental
Management, vol. 76, no. 2, 2005/07/01/, pp. 149-158.
Huber, M, Welker, A & Helmreich, B 2016, 'Critical review of heavy metal pollution of traffic
area runoff: Occurrence, influencing factors, and partitioning', Science of The Total Environment,
vol. 541, 2016/01/15/, pp. 895-919.
Jakob, D & Walland, D 2016, 'Variability and long-term change in Australian temperature and
precipitation extremes', Weather and Climate Extremes, vol. 14, no. Supplement C, 2016/12/01/,
pp. 36-55.
37

Jayasuriya, LNN, Kadurupokune, N, Othman, M & Jesse, K 2007, 'Managing Stormwater
Productivity using pervious pavments', NOVATECH-2007 Sixth International Conference on
Sustaiable Techniques and Strategies in Urban Water Management NOVATECH
Johnson, T, Lawry, D & Sapdhare, H 2016, 'The Council verge as the next wetland:TREENET and
the cities of Mitcham and Salisbury investigate', XXIX International Horticultural Congress on
Horticultural : Sustaining Lives,Livelihoods and Landscapes, vol. 1, no. 1108, pp. 63-69.
Kambites, C & Owen, S 2006, 'Renewed prospects for green infrastructure planning in the UK',
Planning Practice & Research, vol. 21, no. 4, 2006/11/01, pp. 483-496.
Kamruzzaman, M, Beecham, S & Metcalfe, A 2017, 'Changing patterns in rainfall extremes in
South Australia', Theoretical and Applied Climatology, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 793-813.
Kearns, A 2011, 'Climate adaptation engineering: a new direction for environmental science,
engineering and technology in urban environments', International Journal of Sustainable
Development & World Ecology, vol. 18, no. 3, 2011/06/01, pp. 201-209.
Kemp, D & Kumar, A 2005, 'Toxicity of arterial road runoff: investigations in South Australia
using an artificial rainfall event', Australasian Journal of Water Resources, vol. 8, no. 2,
2005/01/01, pp. 179-188.
Kiem, AS 2013, 'Drought and water policy in Australia: Challenges for the future illustrated by the
issues associated with water trading and climate change adaptation in the Murray–Darling Basin',
Global Environmental Change, vol. 23, no. 6, 2013/12/01/, pp. 1615-1626.
Kirono, DGC, Kent, DM, Hennessy, KJ & Mpelasoka, F 2011, 'Characteristics of Australian
droughts under enhanced greenhouse conditions: Results from 14 global climate models', Journal
of Arid Environments, vol. 75, no. 6, 2011/06/01/, pp. 566-575.
38

Lee, JH & Bang, KW 2000, 'Characterization of urban stormwater runoff', Water Research, vol.
34, no. 6, pp. 1773-1780.
Local Government Association (LGA) South Australia 2007, The Stormwater Management
Authority Local Government (Stormwater Management) Amendment act 2007, Local Government
Association, South Australia, viewed Viewed 3 January 2018, <https://www.lga.sa.gov.au/sma>.
Mangani, G, Berloni, A, Bellucci, F, Tatàno, F & Maione, M 2005, 'Evaluation of the Pollutant
Content in Road Runoff First Flush Waters', Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, vol. 160, no. 1,
January 01, pp. 213-228.
McPherson, EG 2007, 'Benefits based tree valuation', Arbouriculture and Urban Forestry, vol. 33,
no. 1, pp. 1-11.
Michigan, LMf 2000, Soil Infiltration testing Protocol, Michigan.
Mishra, AK & Singh, VP 2010, 'A review of drought concepts', Journal of Hydrology, vol. 391,
no. 1, 2010/09/14/, pp. 202-216.
Montaseri, M, Hesami Afshar, M & Bozorg-Haddad, O 2015, 'Development of Simulation-
Optimization Model (MUSIC-GA) for Urban Stormwater Management', Water Resources
Management, vol. 29, no. 13, 2015/10/01, pp. 4649-4665.
Moore, JW, Ramamoorthy, S & Desanto, RS 1984, Heavy Metals in Natural Waters : Applied
Monitoring and Impact Assessment, 1st edn, Springer-Verlag New York Inc. ,
MUSIC Development Team 2017, MUSIC by e-Water- market leading stormwater mangemnet
software, e-Water, viewed 2 January 2018, <http://www.ewater.org.au/products/music/>.
Myers, B, Beecham, S & van Leeuwen, J 2011, 'Water quality with storage in permeable pavement
basecourse', Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, vol. 164, no. 7, Jul 2011
39

2011-07-30, pp. 361-372.
Myers, B, Chacko, P, Tjandraatmadja, G, Cook, S, Umapathi, S, Pezzinaiti, D & Sharma, AK
2013, The staus of Water Sensitive Urban Design in South Australia, Goyder Institute for Water
Research Technical Report Series No.13/11, South Australia.
<http://www.goyderinstitute.org/_r100/media/system/attrib/file/91/WSUD_Task
%201_Report_WSUD%20Inventory_final%20for%20web.pdf>.
Nagar, R, Sarkar, D, Makris, KC & Datta, R 2014, 'Arsenic bioaccessibility and speciation in the
soils amended with organoarsenicals and drinking-water treatment residuals based on a long-term
greenhouse study', Journal of Hydrology, vol. 518, Part C, 10/10/, pp. 477-485.
NHMRC 2011, Australian Drinking Water Guidlines National Water Quality Management
Strategy, National Resource Management Ministerial Council, Commonwealth of Australia,
Canberra.
Niemczynowicz, J 1999, 'Urban hydrology and water management – present and future
challenges', Urban Water, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1-14.
Nowak, DJ, Crane, DE, Stevens, JC, Hoehn, RE, Walton, JT & Bond, J 2008, 'A ground-based
method of assessing urban forest structure and ecosystem services', Arboriculture and Urban
Forestry, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 347-358.
Pezzaniti, D & Argue, JR 2006, Infiltration Systems, EA Books, Australia.
Phillips, IR, Lamb, DT, Hawker, DW & Burton, ED 2004, 'Effects of pH and Salinity on Copper,
Lead, and Zinc Sorption Rates in Sediments from Moreton Bay, Australia', Bulletin of
Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 73, no. 6, December 01, pp. 1041-1048.
40

Pitt, R, Field, R, Lalor, M & Brown, M 1995, 'Urban Stormwater Toxic Pollutants: Assessment,
Sources, and Treatability', Water Environment Research, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 260-275.
Reddy, KR, Xie, T & Dastgheibi, S 2014, 'Removal of heavy metals from urban stormwater runoff
using different filter materials', Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, vol. 2, no. 1, 3//,
pp. 282-292.
Revitt, DM, Lundy, L, Coulon, F & Fairley, M 2014, 'The sources, impact and management of car
park runoff pollution: A review', Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 146, 2014/12/15/,
pp. 552-567.
Stovin, VR, Jorgensen, A & Clayden, A 2008, 'Street Trees and Stormwater Management',
Arboricultural Journal, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 297-310.
Taebi, A & Droste, RL 2004, 'First flush pollution load of urban stormwater runoff', Journal of
Environmental Engineering and Science, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 301-309.
Taylor, GD, Fletcher, TD, Wong, THF, Breen, PF & Duncan, HP 2005, 'Nitrogen composition in
urban runoff-implications for stormwater management', Water Research, vol. 39, no. 10, pp. 1982-
1989.
The Policy and Urban Water Division 2011, Stromwater Strategy - The Future of Stormwater
Management, Department of Water Government of South Australia, South Australia.
Turner, A & Sogo, YSK 2012, 'Concentrations and bioaccessibilities of metals in exterior urban
paints', Chemosphere, vol. 86, no. 6, 2012/02/01/, pp. 614-618.
US EPA 2012, Barrier Buster fact Sheet#2:Terminology of Low Impact Development
Distinguishing LID from other Techniques that Address Community Growth Issues, PDF, US EPA,
USA, viewed 2 Jan 2018, <https://www.epa.gov/nps/urban-runoff-low-impact-development>.
41

Verbist, KMJ, Cornelis, WM, Torfs, S & Gabriels, D 2013, 'Comparing Methods to Determine
Hydraulic Conductivities on Stony Soils', Soil Science Society of America Journal, vol. 77, no. 1,
Jan/Feb
Jan/Feb 2013
2013-05-24, pp. 25-42.
Wallbridge & Gilbert Counsulting Engineers 2009, Urban Stormwater Harvesting Option Study,
cat.no. C081266, Government of South Australia, South Australia.
Water and Climate Change Branch 2014, Transitioning Adelaide to a water sensitive city-
Towards an Urban Water Plan for Greater Adelaide, Department of EnvironmentWater and
Natural Resources, South Australia.
<http://www.watersensitivesa.com/wp-content/uploads/urban-water-plan-for-greater-adelaide-
issues-paper-gen.pdf>.
World Bank 2017, World Bank Development Indiactors- Urban Population (% of total), World
Bank, viewed 29 December 2017, <https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.URB.TOTL.IN.ZS>.
Xiang, J, Scanlon, BR, Mullican, WF, Chen, L & Goldsmith, RS 1997, 'A multistep constant-head
borehole test to determine field saturated hydraulic conductivity of layered soils', Advances in
Water Resources, vol. 20, no. 1, 1997/02/01/, pp. 45-57.
42