This report analyzes a business law case involving Royal Group Ltd and its directors, Nate, Brittany, and Sally. The core issue revolves around potential breaches of directors' duties under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). The report examines several key events: the appointment of Sally as a non-executive director, Brittany's failure to disclose a conflict of interest regarding a property purchase from her father-in-law, her receipt of a 'red-packet' donation, her participation in board meetings despite her personal interest, the decision to purchase a property despite knowledge of flight path changes, and the payment of employee bonuses after financial losses. The report applies relevant sections of the Corporations Act, including sections 180-184, and the principles of fiduciary duties, such as acting in good faith, for a proper purpose, avoiding conflicts of interest, and not making secret profits. The analysis concludes that the directors, particularly Brittany, potentially breached their duties, making them liable for legal action. The report references relevant case law, including Cook v Deeks and Furs Ltd v Tomkies, to support its conclusions.
![[object Object]](/_next/static/media/star-bottom.7253800d.svg)
