Challenges and Solutions for Rural Health Disparity in Alabama

This report investigates the significant health disparities faced by rural populations in Alabama. It highlights critical issues such as limited access to quality healthcare, lower socioeconomic status, and higher rates of chronic diseases, contributing to poorer health outcomes compared to urban areas. The report explores the historical context, identifying factors like declining populations, shortages of healthcare professionals, and the impact of political and economic conditions on healthcare access. It examines the causes and effects of these disparities, including the limitations of the Medicaid program and the impact of low per capita income on health. Furthermore, the report provides data on mortality rates, education levels, and the impact of social and economic factors on health outcomes. The report concludes by emphasizing the need for policy changes, improved access to healthcare services, and targeted interventions to address the complex challenges of rural health disparities in Alabama, underscoring the urgent need for action to ensure equitable healthcare for all residents. The report also references several sources, including the County Health Rankings and the Alabama Rural Health Plan.

Running head: HEALTH DISPARITY IN ALABAMA
Rural Health Disparity in Alabama
Student Name
University Name
Author Note

1
Healthcare
Introduction
Rural Americans are a populace bunch that encounters noteworthy wellbeing
variations. Wellbeing inequalities are contrasts in wellbeing status when contrasted with the
populace by and large, frequently portrayed by indicators, for example, higher rate of disease
and additionally handicap, expanded death rates, lower futures, and higher paces of pain and
languishing. Rural chance causes for differences in well-being include geographical distance,
poorer financial status, and higher paces of dangerous well-being activities, restricted access
to social security consultants and subspecialists, and limited work opportunities (Rural Health
Disparities Introduction, 2019). There are regions in Alabama where the populaces are
encountering lesser access to quality medicinal services where the age-balanced mortality is
recorded at 924.5, the most noteworthy among all the states (Alabama Rural Health Plan,
2008). The age-balanced death rate in Alabama's urban regions is 885.3, while in the country
districts it is 980.9, and operating at a profit Belt provinces, it is 999.6. This disparity is
strengthened as provincial inhabitants are more averse to have manager given health care
coverage inclusion, and on the off chance that they are poor, frequently are not secured by
Medicaid.
Background and Problem Assessment
Background – (context and statement of the problems)
One indication of an undesirable populace is an absence of populace development. Of
the 67 districts in Alabama, 24, which are all rural, had a little populace in 2010 than they had
100 years sooner in 1910. Five had only 33% of the populace in 2010 than they had in 1910.
Alabama is beneath normal among the states in wellbeing status of the populace and has a
higher extent than normal of uninsured individuals (Baffour, 2017). In a positioning of the
general constitution of the populaces in every one of the 50 states, Alabama was 41st in 1996.

2
Healthcare
Alabama has fundamentally higher incidences of low birth weight, newborn child mortality,
and sudden passing than the national normal. The baby death rate, specifically, is very high,
yet it has declined significantly in ongoing years. Furthermore, populace projections for
Alabama foresee that 41 of the state's 67 areas will diminish in populace from 2010 to 2040
(Douthit et al., 2015). Since quite a while ago, the rural people group tried to maintain access
to quality facilities in the healthcare domain. A broad range of writing has collected the issues
addressed by rustic emergency departments and different vendors, and discovered that People
in rural areas often need access to basic healthcare services. A multitude of components
contribute to these problems in rural areas, including declining populations, economical
inflation, shortages of physicians and other specialists in medical services, a lopsided number
of elderly, vulnerable and underinsured people and high incidences of incessant disease
(Graves et al., 2015). According to the Alabama State Data Center's 2006 populace gauges,
the older (age 65 years or more) contained 14.5 percent of Alabama's rural district populace
contrasted with just 12.5 percent in the urban regions. This distinction is anticipated to turn
out to be significantly more prominent (Buettgens, Holahan and Recht, 2015). Somewhere in
the range of 2000 and 2025, the old populace is anticipated to increment by 79.6 percent in
Alabama's country regions contrasted with a 66.0 percent expansion in the urban counties.
This considerable increment in the old populace will truly challenge Alabama's rural
medicinal services industry. It is assessed, utilizing national information on visits to doctor's
workplaces from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, that in excess of 904,000
extra yearly office visits to essential consideration doctors will be required in Alabama by
2025, basically because of the maturing populace (Weech-Maldonado et al., 2015).
Identify the cause and effect of the problem
Alabama is a politically preservationist state in which customary qualities assume a
significant job in molding the policy for public (Nelson, Moniz and Davis, 2018). Alabama

3
Healthcare
residents are generally kind for a little job from the government, and the political culture,
joined with a tight monetary condition, leaving policymakers with minimal decision yet to
give negligible degrees of wellbeing and welfare benefits. Alabama is a little, southern state
with an enormous low-salary populace. In 1994–95 the populace was 4.3 million, comprising
of basically non-Hispanic blacks and whites. Non-Hispanic dark people represented almost
29 percent of the populace, contrasted and around 13 percent for the nation all in all (Tajeu et
al., 2015). Generally, Alabama has been an exceptionally poor state, particularly in rural
territories, which contain more than 33% of the state's population. There is a solid connection
between close to wealth in home and wellbeing status.
Alabama's Medicaid program is restricted in its qualification and advantages, for the
most part observing least government norms (Keohane, Rahman and Mor, 2016). Since state
coordinating resources are typically not accessible, Alabama has not endeavored to amplify
the measure of government dollars streaming into the state by expanding its own spending
and exploiting its high bureaucratic coordinating rate (almost 70 percent). Rather,
government reserves have been utilized to settle state spending for Medicaid and other social
projects by financing the consumption development. It is because of these imperatives, the
state is in every case near budgetary emergency and is especially helpless against changes in
government decides that require extra spending. Medicaid has been referred to as "Rural
Alabama's Health Insurance." This statement provides solid support because 23.3 percent, or
about one in every four country residents, are eligible for Medicaid coverage. It analyzes
metropolitan area residents to 19.4 per cent. However, 42.4 percent of every single country
youth under the age of 21 is eligible for Medicaid coverage, compared to 35.2 percent for
urban youngsters. Tragically, more primary care physicians in Alabama are opting not to
offer support to Medicaid patients for various reasons. This significantly builds the
significance of rural security net suppliers (Mantel, 2016). Per capita individual salary is the

4
Healthcare
pay that is accessible to be spent for every individual. As indicated by 2007 for each capita
individual salary figures as of late discharged by the U. S. Department of Economic Analysis,
the salary per individual for rural Alabama inhabitants is $26,646 which is more than 28
percent lower than the per capita pay of $34,182 for urban residents and almost 38 percent
underneath the figure of $36,714 for the country. The 31 provinces in Alabama with the
lowest per capita salaries are mostly rural. Three country areas of Alabama (Wilcox, Bullock,
and Macon) are among the nation's 250 most unfortunate regions. As shown by the 2000
Population Census, approximately 33 percent (30.3 percent) of all rural Alabama residents
aged 25 years or older did not have an accurate secondary education-far above 20.2 percent
of urban tenants with no accurate secondary education right now. The legislature of Alabama
is presently concentrating on attempted estimates like knowledgeable rural occupants to
improve the wellbeing status of the inhabitants and thus improving the financial state of the
individuals. Furthermore, it is likewise critical for the youth in the state to be furnished with
equivalent chances of instruction than their urban partners to such an extent that their insight
is expanded and their financial condition is improved.
At the point when the circumstance in Alabama is contrasted with different states in
United States, it could be seen with the assistance of County Health Rankings that few
variables like social and monetary components impact the wellbeing and wellbeing value
(Leath et al., 2018). Associated and steady networks, great schools, stable employments and
safe neighborhoods, are central in accomplishing solid and long lives. These social and
financial factors additionally interface with other significant drivers of wellbeing and
wellbeing equity (2019 Alabama Report, 2020). It has been found according to the County
Health Rankings that Alabama houses in excess of 260,000 kids who have been living in
destitution where larger part of the kids lived in family units that had spent the greater part of
their salary on their lodging costs. Thus, it is therefore that they have little pay left for

5
Healthcare
nourishment, transportation and therapeutic consideration. As per the ongoing wellbeing
positioning of the nation, Alabama had positioned as one of the most noticeably awful state
for human services at number 46 in the rankings. The emergency clinics in Alabama are
accepting millions less in Medicare installments consistently when contrasted with different
states. Numerous uninsured people rely upon the crisis office for care which at last drives up
the expense of social insurance for everybody. It has been accounted for that six of the
medical clinics in country Alabama have shut since 2011 for which the middle working edge
is negative 12.2 percent. National wellbeing advocates state Alabama is ground zero for
everything that is the issue with provincial human services. Concentrates rank Alabama most
exceedingly terrible in the country for newborn child mortality. The state additionally has the
most diabetics. In 2016, the city of Gadsden, east of Birmingham, had the most reduced
future in the United States. Regardless of this, provincial wellbeing advocates gripe clinics in
Alabama get the least repayment national from Medicare for which 80% of emergency clinics
in the state are losing money. It is thus that individuals in country regions are compelled to
head out to the urban territories for medical clinics and proper consideration. This, in turn,
builds the uncompensated consideration costs while the crisis divisions are overwhelmed
with more patients and have expanded sit tight occasions for care.
Conclusion
Taking everything into account, it could be seen that the rural individuals have been
encountering disparity in accessing health services for a considerate measure of time due to
which their death rates have been influenced. It has been found according to the County
Health Rankings that Alabama houses in excess of 260,000 youngsters who have been living
in extreme poor conditions where dominant part of the kids lived in families that had spent
the greater part of their pay on their lodging costs. Thus, it is therefore that they have little

6
Healthcare
salary left for nourishment, transportation and therapeutic consideration. As per 2007 for
every capita individual pay figures as of late discharged by the U. S. Authority of Economic
Analysis, the pay per individual for rural Alabama inhabitants is $26,646 which is more than
28 percent lower than the per capita salary of $34,182 for urban occupants and almost 38
percent beneath the figure of $36,714 for the country. The administration of Alabama has
been thinking about to change their approaches with respect to the Medicaid program to such
an extent that the individuals get suitable access to mind in the state, both monetarily and
similarly.
Final statement of the problem
The rural people are unable to access the healthcare services in the state of Alabama
because of certain factors like social and economic factors.

7
Healthcare
References
2019 Alabama Report. Countyhealthrankings.org. (2020). Retrieved 18
February 2020, from
https://www.countyhealthrankings.org/reports/state-reports/2019-
alabama-report.
Alabama Rural Health Plan. Adph.org. (2008). Retrieved 18 February 2020, from
http://adph.org/ruralhealth/assets/2008RuralHealthPlan.pdf.
Baffour, T. D. (2017). Addressing the Social Determinants of Behavioral Health for Racial
and Ethnic Minorities: Recommendations for Improving Rural Health Care Delivery
and Workforce Development. Journal of Best Practices in Health Professions
Diversity: Education, Research & Policy, 10(2).
Buettgens, M., Holahan, J., & Recht, H. (2015). Medicaid expansion, health coverage, and
spending: an update for the 21 states that have not expanded eligibility. Policy Brief.
Washington, DC: Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation.
Douthit, N., Kiv, S., Dwolatzky, T., & Biswas, S. (2015). Exposing some important barriers
to health care access in the rural USA. Public health, 129(6), 611-620.
Graves, B. A., Hamner, K., Sarah, N., & Wells, H. (2015). Community-based participatory
research: Toward eliminating rural health disparities. Online Journal of Rural Nursing
and Health Care, 15(2).
Keohane, L. M., Rahman, M., & Mor, V. (2016). Reforming access: trends in Medicaid
enrollment for new Medicare beneficiaries, 2008–2011. Health services
research, 51(2), 550-569.

8
Healthcare
Leath, B. A., Dunn, L. W., Alsobrook, A., & Darden, M. L. (2018). Enhancing rural
population health care access and outcomes through the Telehealth EcoSystem™
model. Online Journal of Public Health Informatics, 10(2).
Mantel, J. (2016). Tackling the social determinants of health: a central role for providers. Ga.
St. UL Rev., 33, 217.
Nelson, D. B., Moniz, M. H., & Davis, M. M. (2018). Population-level factors associated
with maternal mortality in the United States, 1997–2012. BMC public health, 18(1),
1007.
Rural Health Disparities Introduction. Ruralhealthinfo.org. (2019). Retrieved 18 February
2020, from https://www.ruralhealthinfo.org/topics/rural-health-disparities.
Tajeu, G. S., Cherrington, A. L., Andreae, L., Prince, C., Holt, C. L., & Halanych, J. H.
(2015). “We’ll get to you when we get to you”: Exploring potential contributions of
health care staff behaviors to patient perceptions of discrimination and
satisfaction. American journal of public health, 105(10), 2076-2082.
Weech‐Maldonado, R., Elliott, M. N., Adams, J. L., Haviland, A. M., Klein, D. J.,
Hambarsoomian, K., ... & Gaillot, S. (2015). Do racial/ethnic disparities in quality
and patient experience within Medicare plans generalize across measures and
racial/ethnic groups?. Health services research, 50(6), 1829-1849.