Safeguarding Interventions in Practice: Doris Case Study

This essay examines safeguarding interventions, focusing on practices such as safeguarding personal, advocacy, positive risk-taking, and adult family group conferences. It explores these interventions within the context of the Doris case, evaluating their reasons for use, and referencing relevant guidance, evidence, and legislation, including the Care Act 2014 and the Mental Capacity Act 2005. The essay emphasizes the importance of these interventions in protecting individuals from harm, abuse, and neglect, highlighting the roles of professional caregivers and the legislative frameworks that support safeguarding practices. The essay also covers the benefits of positive risk-taking and adult family group conferences, and the principles of empowerment, protection, prevention, proportionality, partnership, and accountability in safeguarding adults. The essay concludes with a discussion of the core principles for strategy and practice and promoting workplace and workforce development.

Safeguarding
in
Practice
1

Table of Contents
Essay topic: “Safeguarding interventions like safeguarding personal, advocacy, positive risk
taking and adult family group conferences......................................................................................3
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................9
2

Essay topic: “Safeguarding interventions like safeguarding personal,
advocacy, positive risk taking and adult family group conferences
Safeguarding is considered as practices which is determined by a person in order to
promote welfare and protecting aspects in order to protect other from different kinds of harm.
There are several types of practices or activities which are conducted by a person in order to
provide practices related to safeguarding (Everley, 2020). It include practices or elements like
advocacy, positive risk taking, making safeguarding personal and adult family group
conferences. In this it is essential to follow different laws, legislation and policies in order to
ensure that all the safeguarding practices are conducted in best manner. The respective project
include information related to different safeguarding interventions like safeguarding personal,
advocacy, positive risk taking and adult family group conferences in the context of Doris
case. Moreover it will also include evaluation of reasons related to using of safeguarding
practices or interventions as well as it also include several guidance, evidences and legislations
related to it. Along with this it also consider assessment of usage of care intervention.
For a care provider it is essential to consider different safeguarding practices or activities
as that will help in resolving issues as well as problems in effective manner. The main role of
safeguarding practices is to assist in ensuring that people are safe from any type of issue, harm or
abuse situation like discrimination or neglect. The different safeguarding practices help a person
in providing safety as well as security practices or activities to their family members, close one,
friends and many other people. There are different kind of neglect or abuse situation which direct
or indirectly impact on the mental as well as physical health of an individual (Johnson and Sloth-
Nielsen, 2020). Here these abuse are related with emotional abuse, physical abuse, financial or
material abuse, cyber abuse, sexual abuse, cyber abuse and many more. In this it is essential to
adopt different safeguarding practices in order to insure that no person experienced issues related
to safety or guidance. There are several kinds of safeguarding interventions which can be
adopted by a care provider such as safeguarding personal, positive risk taking, advocacy and
adult family group conferences. The Care Act (2014), several councils have thresholds
compatible with the Care act ( 2014). Requirements of qualification in their perception about
where their safeguarding obligations lay. The Care Act (2014 ) introduced a duty to make
inquiries or allow them to be created for every adult in most need of support and care (including
those not which conditions meet qualifying thresholds) who may be at risk of violence or
3

negligence or witnessing abuse. The Care Act (2014) differs from preparation stage and data
gathering legislative enquiries known as S42 queries (as pointed out in S42(2) of the Care Act
( 2014), which could lead to replies rather than such statutory queries from S42(2). The system
draws on a variety of tools generated by the software Rendering Safeguarding Personal (MSP). It
encourages best practise in partnering with clients and stakeholders through industries to
collaborate through the consequences, solutions and most effective approaches to achieve the
results that individuals expect. It encourages accountability which will then be clear that the
welfare as well as the well-being of individuals is handled, whether issues are addressed within a
statutory S42(2) investigation or from outside.
Developing practices related to safeguarding personal is considered as an initiatives
aspect led that developed through the aim of creating an outcome that focus on the safeguarding
at the workplace as well as it also include respond of people which is conducted by a person
while any issues. Moreover, it also help in resolving issues of a person through different
safeguarding interventions. In addition to this, approaches of safeguarding considered individual
consents and it also considered aspects related to considering view points of others in order to
accomplish it effectively (Morgan, 2020). Along with this, another approach is of safeguarding
intervention is related with the advocacy which is refers to public support in order to
recommendation relate to specific cause or policies. Moreover, respective intervention include
professional services whose motivate is to provide accurate as well as correct advice to a person.
In addition to this it is also consist of different action in order to speak in tendency of
recommendation or argues in case of support or defend respectively.
Furthermore, positive risk taking is considered as procedure which assist in conducting
evaluation of potential harm or benefits. Through this it cannot be considered that risk is being
eliminated but this will considered different practices in order to maximise selection of a person
and control their life over it. By adopting positive risk taking an individual may attain growth as
well as personal changes. Moreover it will aid in effective management of risk in order to
enhance individual choice or control. The fourth intervention is adult family group conferences
which mainly provide safeguarding practices or activities and it also insure safety of a person in
effective manner. Adult family group conferences is mainly considered as meeting in which
person concerned family and extended member of family or any professional practitioner who
work together in respect of taking most effective as well as reliable decision. It will generally aid
4

in providing most effective as well as efficient solvent to issues which effective resolve for
getting proper outcome (Needham, 2020). Along with this respective approach of safeguarding
mainly provide facilities by the independent coordinate as well as it also work together in order
to generate most appropriate and reliable solution of issues relate to safeguarding.
The respective project is based on a case of Doris who is 83 year women living alone in
two bedroom flat at first floor which she owns. She is widowed 10 years ago and she has a
daughter and a son. Her daughter Jenny works in finance and she as well as her mother both are
very busy with her work and looking young child Henry. As age get increased of Doris she
started forgetting things as well as she also get confused. Doris's ground floor neighbour Jim is
very helpful and do shopping for her. Jenny hire carer Precious for her mother, but Doris become
distraught when Precious visited and at time Doris said Precious to leave by saying she cannot
trust anyone. This incident is reported by Precious to her manager at care centre.
Safeguarding interventions can be defined as those manual physical restraint that are
being used in situation of crisis. There are various benefits of adopting safeguarding intervention
that will protect and individual from harming themselves, harming others or intervention by law
enforcement. In the given case study, Doris is the individual who is in need of safeguarding
intervention (Croft, 2017). There are various methods that can be used for this purpose.
Following are the two major technique in this respect - Making safeguarding personal: This is
one of the most useful and important technique used for safeguarding intervention. Under this
method, there are various laws and guidance passed by Department of Health care and support
statutory and their main motive is to safeguard adults. Main characterizing feature of this method
is that it is person led. In other words, it can be defined as that whole system is oriented from
person point of view and not on the process. This process is whole outcome focused. This means
it is just focusing on reaching to results depending upon different circumstances. This technique
is engaging the suffering person and it is enhancing involvement, choice and control of the
person involved in the whole process. This system focuses on quality of life, well-being and
safety. This intervention is not just in the context of formal safeguarding but throws light in the
whole spectrum of safeguarding activity. According to the care act, there are some integral steps
that needs to be followed in developing making safeguarding personal for health and social care
commissioners and providers. This process starts from collecting strong leadership evidence of
making safeguarding personal, followed by promoting and making the culture shift that is
5

required. Next step is to defining core principles for strategy and practice, further promoting and
supporting workplace and workforce development, last step is to ensuring that staff are aware of
and are also responding to the requirements of the mental capacity act.
Moreover another is Positive risk taking: This refers to the process of encouraging
individuals to take positive risk in their lives (Duell and Steinberg, 2019). This does not mean
that individuals are being encouraged for dangerous task like sky diving or driving fast cars. It is
all about individuals bringing control on their lives and also making good choices. These choices
may be either negative or positive and further learnings received after making these choices can
be on either side, positive or negative. These learnings are then applied to real life to make things
possible. To specify, it is necessary that positive risk taking do not eliminate the need of
safeguarding and also the duty of care that support providers must work on. This process focus
on determining the risk associated with a task and then calculating the ways by which that
activity can be completed. There are some vital features that should be available in the solution
devised in the method above (Redley and et.al., 2015). These features are building confidence in
person involved in the process, developing new skills, teaching responsibility to take initiatives
in life, demonstrating the consequences those can occur on wrong choice of alternative in life,
etc. all these benefits are directed in making the life better and more enjoyable.
There are several reason for adopting safeguarding intervention at a workplace such as
they protect rights of individual as well as it also prevent a person from getting harm, abuse or
neglected. In respect of health and social care it is essential or duty of professional to safeguard
all the patients as well as it is also essential to provide additional practices for patients who are
less capable to protecting themselves from any incident like neglecting, abuse or harm. The
legislation related to safeguarding is developed by CCG, local authority as well as police
according to the requirement or situation (Knudsen, 2020). In addition to this, there are several
aim of safeguarding adults such as stop the abuse as well as neglect where it is possible, prevent
harm as well as reduce risk. Moreover it is also related to safeguarding people in way which
supports them in making choices as well as having control related to how they want to live. In
respect of this there are several legislations such as The care Act which is introduced by local
authority that promote well being of a person as well as it mainly develop link among the
safeguarding and well being. The concept related to well being is essential when responding to
safeguarding. The respective act is comprise of three main aspects such as choice, control and
6

independent. Along with this there are several kinds of abuse are related in it such as domestic,
modern slavery, discrimination, sexual, self neglect, financial scams, organization abuse,
psychological abuse and many more. In addition to this another safeguarding practice or
legislation is mental capacity act 2005 which is developed as well as designed for supporting or
protecting individual who are loosing their mental capacity (Williamson and et.al., 2020). Due to
which these people not able to make effective decision by themselves which leads to reason for
which they required a carer with them always. The respective act is developed in order to protect
mainly those people who are 16 or above.
Furthermore, there are several principles or guiding of safeguarding adults such as
empowerment, protection, prevention, proportionality, partnership and accountability.
Empowerment is related to ensuring individual are being supported as well as confident in
developing its own decisions (Ong, 2020). Moreover it also give information consent related to
respective topic. Empowerment also provide individuals choice as well as it control the decision
in proper manner. Protecting is related to supporting as well as representation related to greatest
need of a person. A company may adopt measures in place in order to stop situation of abuse as
well as it also help in supporting those risk effectively (MCVEIGH and LANG, 2020).
Prevention is related to crucial in order to try as well as take action before harm take place,
prevent the neglect, harm or abuse is main objective. It is also related to practices which are
conducted by a company in order to stop abuse situation happen with any person at workplace.
For which they may adopt different practices such as conduct training, awareness and many
other aspects. Proportionality principles of safeguarding is related to the proportionate taken as
well as least intrusive response to the presented issues. Through this principles it can be ensure
that services will be take every person in the account of dealing with abuse. Another principles
of safeguarding is the partnership that includes forming better relationship or partnership with
local communities with the motive of developing the solution. This will help in detecting the
abuse and preventing it successfully. Partnership principles is significant for giving more
opportunities to work together for enhancing safeguarding practices. Accountability principles is
related to being accountable as well as complete transparency while delivering the safeguarding
practices. It is essential that individual is considering accountability while performing
safeguarding practices as well as make sure the every individual is significantly playing while
safeguarding vulnerable individuals. It is essential that all individual are considering these
7

safeguarding principles as this is effective for providing correct information and guidance to
successfully perform practices.
In the case of Doris, making safeguarding person and positive risk taking are accurate
intervention that will help in supporting her. Doris is a old age women and it is crucial to
consider different factors as well as analyse its positive and negative impact while performing
safeguarding practices. It is important for carer to consider different elements which could harm
or negatively affect Doris in order to effectively and significant perform care practices. While
considering safeguarding practices better and accurate services could be providing to Doris. She
is leaving along and by make safeguarding person intervention she will be able to get personalise
support. This will help in reducing issues or harms as well as maintaining safety of her. Making
safeguarding person intervention is outcome based practices that will assist in carrying out
practices which is accurate and appropriate as per the need and required of the Doris. Through
this intervention she will be able to overcome various issues significantly. Through safeguarding
person needs and demand of Doris can be successfully attain as well as better and accurate
services could be provided which is appropriate as per the need of her (Luo, 2020). Another
intervention that is consider in the case of Doris includes positive risk taking. This is effective
intervention that is significant for determining the potential benefits and harms while exercising
the safeguarding intervention. Through this approaches carer will be able to analyse the pros and
cons regarding their choice of action. This will help in developing better strategies or action plan
in order to successfully and effectively carry out safeguarding practices in the case of Doris.
By conducting evaluation of above mentioned topic it can be summarised that for every
person it is essential to follow safeguarding practices as that will help in protecting themselves as
well as others from any disaster situation. It is essential that better as well as appropriate
practices are conducted as that will help in managing issues of an individual in best manner.
There are numbers of interventions which can be utilised by a health care provider in order to
insure that best treatment are provided to people as well as effectively such as safeguarding
personal, advocacy, positive risk taking and adult family group conferences. These will mainly
assist a person in promoting welfare practices so that every individual feel protected at the
workplace or health care centre effectively. In addition to this, it will also help in ensuring that
all the health care practices are conducted in proper manner as well as every member at
workplace are feel safe as well as secure.
8

9

REFERENCES
Books and Journals
Everley, S., 2020. The Child Protection in Sport Unit–Supporting national governing bodies in
hearing the voices of children: An evaluation of current practice. Child abuse
review. 29(2). pp.114-129.
Johnson, A. K. and Sloth-Nielsen, J., 2020. Safeguarding Children in the Developing World—
Beyond Intra-Organisational Policy and Self-Regulation. Critical Debates and
Developments in Child Protection. 9. p.127.
Knudsen, L.V., 2020. Ways of relating: museum–municipality collaborations for safeguarding
built heritage. Museum Management and Curatorship. 35(3). pp.247-263.
Luo, Y., 2020. Safeguarding intangible heritage through edutainment in China’s creative urban
environments. International Journal of Heritage Studies. pp.1-16.
MCVEIGH, J. and LANG, M., 2020. The politics of safeguarding and protecting children in
sport in England: A history of the present. In The Palgrave Handbook of Sport, Politics
and Harm. PalgraveMacmillan.
Morgan, L. D., 2020. Using IPA as a Methodology for Research About Child Protection
Practice With Children’s Nurses. SAGE Publications Ltd.
Needham, M., 2020. ‘Managing doubts’ to take safeguarding action. Working with Children,
Families and Young People: Professional Dilemmas, Perspectives and Solutions.
Ong, T.W.S., 2020. Safeguarding Penang Hokkien in Malaysia: Attitudes and community-driven
efforts. Linguistics Journal. 14(1).
Williamson, A.E. and et.al., 2020. General practice recording of adverse childhood experiences:
a retrospective cohort study of GP records. BJGP open. 4(1).
Croft, J., 2017. Enabling positive risk-taking for older people in the care home. Nursing and
Residential Care. 19(9). pp.515-519.
Duell, N. and Steinberg, L., 2019. Positive risk taking in adolescence. Child development
perspectives. 13(1). pp.48-52.
Redley, M. and et.al., 2015. Making adult safeguarding personal.
Romeo, L. and et.al., 2017. Safeguarding Adults under the Care Act 2014: Understanding Good
Practice. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
10