RMIT University BUSM4295: Scientific Management Analysis Essay

This essay provides a comprehensive analysis of scientific management, primarily focusing on the contributions of Frederick Taylor and the Gilbreths, within a contemporary multidisciplinary business context. It begins by introducing the foundational theory of management, emphasizing Taylor's concept of efficient workplace management. The essay aims to critically examine Taylor's principles, considering both positive and negative criticisms, and demonstrates the evolution and expansion of scientific management through postmodernism. It discusses the application of scientific management in various settings, including public and private organizations, and explores the core values of scientific management such as efficiency, organization, and the division of labor. Furthermore, the essay examines the impact of Taylor's principles on modern shop-floor practices. The essay also contrasts Taylor's focus on time with the Gilbreths' focus on motion, highlighting how modern organizations have developed the discipline of workers' physical work. Finally, the essay concludes with a discussion on the continuing relevance of scientific management in various industries and organizations, emphasizing the importance of employee well-being and expertise for organizational success.

Running head: COMMUNITY MANAGEMNT AND ORGANIZATION
COMMUNITY MANAGEMNT AND ORGANIZATION
Name of the University
Name of the Student
Author Note

1COMMUNITY MANAGEMNT AND ORGANIZATION
Introduction
This essay is based on the foundational theory of management in respect of modern
multidisciplinary business of Scientific Management that was primary created by Frederick
Taylor during the 20th century. His idea is basically to be able to have more efficient
management in a workplace The aim of the essay is to analyze theories of scholars of
management will develop an exact thought of Taylor on condition they will interpret his
words and not his interpretations. However, there are certain negatives criticisms against him
that have resulted in the negative image in academic circle and as a practitioner. The
objective of this essay is to proof the growth and expansion of scientific management
throughout the aid of postmodernism. This essay discusses on making the use of an inter-
disciplinary outlook to critically scrutinize the significance of Frederick Taylor’s values to up
to date shop-floor practice in the situation of an industrialized organization. However, it is
discussed that the use of private and public associations as examples on how scientific
management can be applied during the ending of the twentieth century. Lastly, the purpose of
this is to article provide a general idea of Classical Management Theories including Scientific
Management, as a part of crucial knowledge for successful organization management and
leadership. It also aims to cover the strengths and weakness of the management theories.
Discussion
According to the study conducted to measure undergraduate students, they give their
feedback and sense of statements that are taken from the original work of Taylor and tested
on the dissimilarity. This study consists of two groups of students studying and analyzing
Taylor's work. One of the groups of students reading Taylor's original work and the other
reading management textbooks that is accessible to the students of management (Simha and
Lemak 2010). The outcome of the study is that the students have a negative impression about
Taylor; however, they tend to favor the impression of statements from the original work of

2COMMUNITY MANAGEMNT AND ORGANIZATION
Taylor. Further, research could be regulated in the future to decide whether the mechanism of
other determining organization theorists must be obtainable in their total situation and straight
basis to offer students with an additional precise and absolute depiction of their thoughts. The
article is distinctive in the sense that it actually examines whether unenthusiastic approach
towards Taylor and scientific management persevere after student are put out to his creative
work.
The four major values of scientific management are investigated through postmodernism.
Present organization put into practice is examined for signs of progress in the field of
scientific management. The primary values of scientific management have been found with
present administration examples such as dimension of production of knowledge, total quality
management, cooperation empowerment and in the teamwork (Kemp 2013). These principles
replicate the scientific will of current occasion, as portrayed in the force for competence, the
faith in reasonableness, the importance on organize and the partition of executive tasks from
those of the employee. The restriction of the learning is a specific description for terms
postmodern and postmodernism management for which to verify any result. A practical
insinuation in the field of organization worker is to relate a principle of postmodernism to
administration that is present are a countless of administrative outlooks that work. For
example, the employees at Mc Donald’s are also encouraged to follow the principles of
Taylor. They are trained to be prepared and increase efficiency and reduce wasted time. Both
Taylor and Frank and Lillian Gilbert were roughly the same the difference is their viewpoint
on employees and work. Taylor focused on time besides Frank and Lillian Gilbert focused on
motion.
It was obvious from the experiment conducted that current administration has urbanized the
discipline for the worker’s physical work, as planned by Taylor. It was also obvious that
conclusion of the procedure on instance was compulsory for them but certainly not as

3COMMUNITY MANAGEMNT AND ORGANIZATION
significant as the sum of woks achieved throughout the period (Vijai et al. 2017). These
experimental findings painted the elevated application Taylor’s philosophy to modernized
floor of the stores practices. The learning propose that measuring the performance of the
operator in condition of supply consumption is required but not enough to assess and get
better on efficiency because worker appraise their production in terms of the total figure of
works finished during the period of the change. However, Google do not use Taylor’s theory
in their organization. Therefore, Google lets their employees to have the liberty to work at
preferred time and the surroundings are tradition intended by the employees. Overall
scientific management appear to be incomplete, which managers are trying to complete by
integrating some theories and elements. However, the modern world people are still using
Frederick Taylor’s way for example in car industry, computer manufacturing and some
hospitals. His personal experience at the Midvale Steel Company generated the theory of
scientific management. He recognized that the work output was mainly incompetent because
of a labor force that gathered by rules of thumb. He conducted his test to swap by truthful
scientific information. The spine of this action was Time And Motion Study where he used to
work on the reduction of numeral of actions in doing a job in to enlarge efficiency.
In the context to armed organization, traditional management theorists have found many of
the essential values later. It is found that the philosophy elaborated by the great Frederick
Taylor of organization, who initiated currently known as scientific management (Richardson
1995). Taylor experimented business mainly as financial result generators. People in the
inferior rank of an association would not understand their organization’s fiscal potential.
Methodical preparation, organizing and controlling by organization were desirable. Taylor
knew that the solution to enhanced efficiency placed in the idea of ratios and in the skill of
organization to calculate managerial cost equations and to plan and apply strategies to
progress them. His development to operational methods for example, beginning of unusual

4COMMUNITY MANAGEMNT AND ORGANIZATION
sized shovel to decrease the time taken for the employees to do work and enlarged quantity of
labor finished during each shift to an degree that plant production improved by 200 per cent.
Therefore, from the above essay it can be stated that the findings provides regulatory assist
for those theorists or strategists who look for improvement in their occupation or function and
carry out production method benchmarking and re‐engineering.
Based on Taylor and Frank and Lillian Gilbert ideas to progress the efficiency of work is
basically sinking movements, then people are expected to learn rather than wasting time. The
instance is McDonalds where people were given tasks in exact area and precise spot if they
were to make a burger in that area then all the ingredients needed to make a burger then move
right, left, and this method will save some time and will be more efficient in the work place.
Planning, organizing, directing, controlling and coordinating are the major roles of the
management and the mangers who execute these jobs has official power in the office whereas
stimulation and motivation is the main job of a leader and a formal influence is not
compulsory for a leader (Mahmood, Basharat and Bashir 2012). Therefore, it depends that the
manager can or cannot be a good leader. Different method should be tried to find out the
excellent technique. New technique must be selected and employee should be trained
systematically according to the best manner of doing that work. Therefore, different
employee should be preferred for dissimilar jobs and guidance must be prearranged to them
according to their place in the business so that each of the employees becomes an expert in
his or her field and can perform better.
Conclusion
Therefore, it can be accomplished from the above essay that experiment conducted has a
positive feedback from the group of management students about the original work of Taylor.
The principles of scientific management are still been used to in modern times by some of the

5COMMUNITY MANAGEMNT AND ORGANIZATION
organizations. The demonstration Taylor’s theory of scientific management was the main get
through in conventional approach to organization process. It has been argued that whether
scientific management still exists. It is not difficult to find instances of Scientific
Management nowadays in the modern world. Examples given above for the automobile
industry, fast food restaurants that uses this theory and some hospitals, approximately all of
them act more professionally due to the relevance of Scientific Management. In present
industries, it has been recognized that efficiency and achievement is not just acquired by
capital and control of the labor force but by providing to the communal well-being and
growth of each employee. Every worker in the organization is there to struggle and be
promoted on the basis of their skill and expertise. It is still used by the managers in their
organizations in its purest form depending on the structure and the type of product in the
organization. Therefore, from the above paper it can be concluded that the theories of
management are able to increase the overall efficiency of the workers and able to predict and
control their behavior for successful organizational leadership.
References

6COMMUNITY MANAGEMNT AND ORGANIZATION
Kemp, L.J., 2013. Modern to postmodern management: developments in scientific
management. Journal of Management History, 19(3), pp.345-361.
Mahmood, Z., Basharat, M. and Bashir, Z., 2012. Review of Classical Management
Theories. International Journal of Social Sciences & Education, 2(1).
Richardson, B., 1995. How to manage your organization scientifically. The TQM
Magazine, 7(4), pp.42-56.
Simha, A. and Lemak, D.J., 2010. The value of original source readings in management
education: the case of Frederick Winslow Taylor. Journal of Management History, 16(2),
pp.233-252.
Vijai, J.P., Somayaji, G.S.R., Swamy, R.J.R. and Aital, P., 2017. Relevance of FW Taylor’s
principles to modern shop-floor practices: A benchmarking work study. Benchmarking: An
International Journal, 24(2), pp.445-466.