PSY 101 Lab Report Plan: Exploring Self-Concept in Different Cultures

This lab report plan for PSY 101 investigates the relationship between self-concept and cultural dimensions, specifically exploring the concepts of individualism and collectivism. The study aims to determine if there is a correlation between individualistic cultures and self-concept expressions, including allocentric, idiocentric, and group-oriented responses. The plan outlines the statement of the topic, which is self-concept, and how it is influenced by cultural contexts. It includes a review of relevant peer-reviewed articles that examine cultural differences in individualism and collectivism, self-concept, and group behavior. A clear hypothesis is presented, and the materials and procedure for the study are described, including the use of an "I am" trial to assess self-concept. The plan details how participants will be recruited and how their responses will be categorized as allocentric, idiocentric, or group-oriented. The report also includes references to key academic sources and outlines the method section, including participants, materials, and procedure for replication, aiming to understand how cultural values shape individual identity and self-perception.

PSY 101 lab report Plan 1
PSY 101 Lab report plan
Name
Course

PSY 101 lab report Plan 2
Statement of topic
Self-concept stands as the psychological and concrete indulgent. It stands a determined esteem
that is sentimental being embraced for our personal reality. In other terms, it stands as the total
amount of actuality awareness and understanding of his and herself. The self-concept stands
diverse from self- awareness. (Kempf, 2005).
In addition, self-awareness remains consciousness or pre- occupation with one’s personality
while, self-concept exists as the automobile of our figurative conduct about what we reason,
comprehend, aim and evaluate up to which a boundless amount for example, it is measured by
our personal conceptions. Harré, & Moghaddam 2013).
It remains therefore, considered as the greatest energetic instrument of our opinions and
expressions. In some cultures, particularly more industrialized ones, people understand
themselves as self-governing individuals though in other cultures people have confidence in
everyone depends on everyone and all selections are group selections rather than individual.
(Bond, 1988).
Statement of aims of study
The purpose of this study is towards exploring how culture stands conveyed on the individual
step, extents of character may be interpreted which resemble towards scopes of culture. This is
because the character dimension of idiocentrism-allocentrism has remained suggested as an
individual step towards building a consistent to individualism-collectivism on the cultural level.

PSY 101 lab report Plan 3
This measurement of character discusses the amount to which an individual stands self-oriented
or cluster-oriented. (Berry, Poortinga & Pandey 1997).
Titles of 5 peer reviewed articles and a statement about how they are relevant
Hui, C. H., & Triandis, H. C. (1986). Individualism-collectivism: A study of cross-cultural
researchers. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 17, 225-248.
This journal studies cultural and ethnic changes in individuality and collectivism.
Witkin, H. A., & Berry, J. W. (1975). Psychological differentiation in cross-cultural perspective.
Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 6, 4-87.
This journal looks at changes in individuality and collectivism in philosophies and how it effects
standards and self-concept
Parkes, L. P., Schneider, S. K. and Bochner, S. (1999), Individualism-collectivism and self-
concept: Social or contextual? Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 2: 367–383.
Doi: 10.1111/1467-839X.00046
This journal investigates the level to social and background self-concepts are connected to
Individuality and collectivism.
Becker, M., Vignoles, V. L., Owe, E., Brown, R., Smith, P. B., Easterbrook, M., & ...
Yamakoğlu, N. (2012). Culture and the distinctiveness motive: Constructing identity in
individualistic and collectivistic contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4),
833-855. doi:10.1037/a0026853

PSY 101 lab report Plan 4
This journal investigates the control of group standards of individuality and collectivism to lead
self-definition and collection behaviour for people with high and low levels of collection
identification.
Moorman, R. H., & Blakely, G. L. (1995). Individualism–collectivism as an individual
difference predictor of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior,
16, 127–142.
This journal examines reasonable psychological effects of individualism and socialism, cross-
national individuality and socialism differences, and appraisal evidence for effects of
individuality and socialism on self-concept
Clearly stated hypothesis
 There will not be a correspondence among the national individualism
assessment and allocentric responses.
 Therefore there will be no hesitation that idiocentrism and allocentrism
will have an influence on the worth that is devoted to the dissimilar
features their nationalities.
 Idiocentric people are high on self-related intentions such as self-esteem,
self-actualization since Success and contingent on one’s self-abilities and
expertise are significant motivations for an individual who is great on self-
esteem
 The added idiocentric nationalities are, the tougher will be the association
between the individuals and their cultural groups.

PSY 101 lab report Plan 5
 There will be a negative correlation between high national individualism
ratings and a high number of group answers
 There will not be a correlation between the national individualism rating and
allocentric answers.
Materials
 1 page of dual sided paper
 The initial side had 6 lines which underway with “I am”
 The extra side had a spot to place your nation’s individuality assessment and space to
mark your reports as either allocentric or idiocentric of cluster reports.
 A ball-point
Participants
 X men
 X women
 Age sort
 Nationalities
Method
 The “I am trial”
 Realistic statistics. This looks the respondent’s masculinity, age, ethnic group, belief,
zone of background, and paternal learning was composed.
 Transformed from 15 queries towards 7

PSY 101 lab report Plan 6
 Initial report value 7 points, next value 6, third value 5
Procedure
 We marked down 7 reports which we fingered well-defined us
 We then marked our ethnic group and our nationalities individuality assessment
 Then we distributed our reports into three distinct classes, Allocentric, Idiocentric and
Group reports
 Then we recorded our reports with the initial tally value 7 points, next 6 points and third
5 points etc.

PSY 101 lab report Plan 7
Reference
Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., & Pandey, J. (1997). Handbook of cross-cultural psychology.
Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bond, M. H. (1988). The Cross-cultural challenge to social psychology. Newbury Park, Calif:
Sage.
Harré, R., & Moghaddam, F. M. (2013). The psychology of friendship and enmity:
Relationships in love, work, politics, and war.
Kempf, L. K. (2005). Encyclopedia of social measurement.
Triandis, H. C. (2018). Individualism & collectivism.
Triandis, H. C., & University Publications of America (Firm). (1983). Allocentric vs. idiocentric
social behavior: A major cultural difference between Hispanics and the mainstream.
Urbana-Champaign, IL: University of Illinois.