This assignment analyzes the ethical dimensions of Edward Snowden's actions, focusing on the conflicts between legality and confidentiality. The student explores the harms and benefits of Snowden's whistleblowing, examining whether his actions were ethically justified even if legally prohibited. The analysis delves into the student's hypothetical actions if they were in Snowden's position, considering the ethical implications of potential consequences, such as loss of life. The assignment also defines circumstances where whistleblowing is ethically ideal and prohibited, referencing relevant social contexts. The student's response considers the conflict between public interest, privacy, and the ethical responsibilities of individuals within organizations. The work references several academic sources to support the arguments presented.
![[object Object]](/_next/static/media/star-bottom.7253800d.svg)
