An Examination of Brexit: Sociological Effects on Society and Economy

This essay provides a sociological analysis of Brexit, examining its origins, impacts, and consequences. It discusses the role of nationalism, economic instability, and the effects of globalization and immigration. The essay explores arguments related to unemployment, wages, and production costs, and how Brexit has affected different regions and social groups. The analysis includes discussions on the UK's de-industrialization, the effects of Chinese imports, and the views of different specialists. The essay concludes by highlighting the sociological effects of Brexit on society and the economy, including both positive and negative impacts. The author also references several academic sources to support their arguments and provide a comprehensive overview of the topic.

SOCIOLOGICAL
PERSPECTIVE

Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION ..........................................................................................................................3
MAIN BODY...................................................................................................................................3
CONCLUSION................................................................................................................................4
SPECIAL NOTES...........................................................................................................................4
REFERENCES................................................................................................................................6

INTRODUCTION
Brexit is the political project which comes from the word “British Exit”. This is made by
the right-wing political party which is also known by conservative party. It is based on
understanding the nationalism which is not only as a product of national tradition or culture.
Decreasing the stability in the EU, the process for leaving the EU formally began in year 2017,
the Article 50 was triggered (Antonucci and et. al., 2017). UK is now officially out of the EU,
and now they are trying to transition period for negotiate the entire trade relationship with EU.
Before this, they were the part of the EU. In this essay it will be discussed about the Brexit,
which is one of the major creating instability in the economy sector and also reflecting the
positive and negative aspects which creates the instability in the country economy as well as the
politics which leads to the creating the sociological effect in the people of the country which are
in favour to it or against it (Danisi and et. al., 2019). There is full discussion over it in further
part. In this, there is also discussion about the unemployment, low wages and high production
cost which can create effect on the society or people.
MAIN BODY
There are many facts about the Brexit that any of the single account will create problem
along with overtaken by events. It is said to not the stable phenomenon. Brexit created lots
conflict where as the strength appear in such a way where people refuse to take product from
other countries which help to create the self economic in-dependency. Brexit is supposed to be a
moment for many of the people which is regarding to get over form the foreign power (Giralt,
R.M., 2020). Due to this, it is not surprising about the sociological arguments about issues such s
politics, power, labour, cosmopolitanism, multiculturalism and migration within many forms
which is about the relationship with the EU. In this new environment, sociology can face the
major crisis and its relevance (Wellings, B., 2020). Also at this time, there are so much to offer
to new progressive politics which might counteract the one of the worst consequences of the
Brexit.
Brexit is an globalisation backlash, which indicate the exist form British. As per the
context with US, the growth of the many Chinese organisation depend on the labour market in
the united state (McGuire, K., 2019). The local labour market vary from the pattern of industrial
specialization. In which due to Chinese company enter in US market create some of the issue

like the local labours market seen the higher unemployment, lower wages growth, and depressed
labour workforce participation. There are some argument based on Brexit that it claims three
parts, first, the imports form china is a structural driver of in economic performance in the UK
areas. Second, worker is removed by the Chinese imports shock which effectively compensated.
They are left behind (Modood, T., 2016). Third, region which is with concentration of the left
behind are more supportive for the Brexit. They use the Chinese import and measure it for local
regions of Britain. This digit of variable match to data gathered in wave 8 and waves 9 of the
British election studies internet panels such as age, education and gender living in a regions that
have seen greater Chinese imports penetration are more likely to give the support to Brexit
(Moloney, N., 2018). The de-industrialisation of the UK and US began long before that, in the
debate of Brexit, the local economic stress that in sometime which is connect to globalisation
with immigration than with offshoring of new industries or existing one. Many of EU
immigrants people who are depressed with the British wages. They work in non trade bale
sector of economy. Which show the weakness point of Brexit (O’Rourke, K.A.C., 2017).
CONCLUSION
From the above discussion, one is able to get the information regarding the Brexit which
is having the sociological effect on the society or the country. There is discussion about the detail
of Brexit, how it started, whom they started. Different specialist have the views on this which
can help in understanding the Brexit more accurately. The effect of this, which is seen by their
people either in positive manner or either in negative manner in the society which is creating
confusion and different argument of the country people about the project Brexit. There is also
discussion about the creating unemployment due to approving it and many problem like the
increasing the product cost, negative change in economy of the country. There is also discussion
on the critical analysis of its advantages and disadvantages which is able to change the whole
country in different manner.
SPECIAL NOTES
Every country have their own resources which they want to use for the growth and
development of their country which can help in improving their life-style. In context to this,
there are many people of the country who thinks that other country duet to having the
international trade they are able to use their resources and make high profit in relation to the host

country where they were not getting enough benefited through this. There are many resources
which the other country are using from this country which is created as the big problem which
has be raised by the political party of the right wing. In this, they have explained about the loss
which are getting to their country. It was also said that due to heavy production a time will come
when they will rule this country which creates a moment in their people. This make the strong
believe and then the Brexit was introduced which was the short name of “British Exit”. It was
introduced in the year 2006 which created the debate which goes for many years. Finally, in year
2020, in month of January 31 at 1PM Brexit took place in which British voted 51%. According
to this UK is not officially is the part of European Union.

REFERENCES
Books and Journals
Antonucci and et. al., 2017. The malaise of the squeezed middle: Challenging the narrative of
the ‘left behind’Brexiter. Competition & Change, 21(3), pp.211-229.
Danisi and et. al., 2019. Queering Brexit: What’s in Brexit for Sexual and Gender Minorities?.
In Gender and Queer Perspectives on Brexit (pp. 239-272). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Giralt, R.M., 2020. The Emotional Geographies of Migration and Brexit: Tales of
Unbelonging. Central and Eastern European Migration Review, 9(1), pp.29-45.
McGuire, K., 2019. Engaging with the Media in a Pre and Post Brexit World: Racism,
Xenophobia and Regulation: A United Kingdom Perspective. Journal of Hate
Studies, 15(1), pp.255-273.
Modood, T., 2016. Multiculturalism can foster a new kind of post-Brexit Englishness. LSE
European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) Blog.
Moloney, N., 2018. Capital Markets Union, Third Countries, and Equivalence: Law, Markets,
and Brexit. In Capital Markets Union in Europe. Oxford University Press.
O’Rourke, K.A.C., 2017. Sovereignty Post-Brexit, The State’s Core Function and EU
Reintegration. European Studies-the Review of European Law, Economics and
Politics, 4(1), pp.140-165.
Wellings, B., 2020. Brexit, nationalism and disintegration in the European Union and the United
Kingdom. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, pp.1-13.