MITS5501: Software Quality, Change Management and Testing Presentation

This presentation analyzes the article on software quality models, change management, and testing. It explores various software quality models such as the Triangle of Quality, FURPS, and Dromey’s Quality Model, highlighting their application phases and relevant metrics. The presentation discusses research methods, including interviews, surveys, observation, and experimentation, used to assess software quality. It emphasizes the importance of change management and addresses issues in achieving software metrics, such as poor system requirements analysis and unmeasurable system metrics. The presentation concludes by stressing the need for proper models and the relevance of the article to the course, focusing on best practices for developing quality and reliable software.

Software Quality, Change Management and Testing
Name
Institution
Professor
Course
Date

Introduction
The article outlines basis on which software quality metrics can be evaluated.
The goal of the presentation is to address software quality models and metrics
behind them.
The phases at which these models and metrics are applicable would be
analyzed.

Introduction cont.…
Software quality metrics would be analyzed in regard to;
The overview of the content presented by the authors in the article.
The change management in software development process.
The importance of change management in the context of software
development.
Software testing and quality parameters which should be considered in order to
ascertain quality of the software.

The content of the article
Different software quality models would be presented in order to determine which
best suites specific software.
To develop a quality product, the software should conform to given specifications.
All future aspects of the users should be translated into measurable characteristics if
software metrics has to be met adequately.
The article focuses on software quality metrics that system developers and
designers should address.

The content of the article cont.…
Some software metrics are unmeasurable, and this makes it difficult to control an
unmeasurable aspect.
Unmeasurable parameters are brought about by attributes which are un-tangible
in software development process.
Software quality is an aspect that should be monitored from the initial stages of
the project implementation.

Software quality models
Triangle of quality model is based on three aspects; operation of the product,
continuous revision of the subjected product and transition of the product.
FURPS which discusses characteristics such as functionality, usability,
reliability, performance among other software quality attributes.
Dromey’s Quality Model focuses on evaluating system design, determination
requirements and software implementation phases.

Research methods
Interviews and survey were used to pose some questions to respondents to
determine which software quality metrics are most important
Observation was a significant method of data collection as it involved visiting
software developers and testers while working on some projects.
Experimentation was used in assessing project quality by taking part in project
development and testing.

Research findings
Software quality cannot be attributed to the specific system development phase
but entire process.
All models analyzed advocates adherence to software design principles such as
security, performance, simplicity, functionality and usability.
Models did not factor out change management which affects software quality
processes as well as metrics.

Issues in achieving software metrics
Poor system requirements analysis and specification at in initial phases of
software development.
Unmeasurable system metrics have been a significant challenge in achieving all
desired quality metrics.

Conclusion
Software development fraternity has been facing quality issues due to lack of
proper models to implement required metrics.
It has been very challenging to ascertain if a specific software meets all
requirements.
Change management remains an important aspect that should be considered in
system development like any other project.
The article is relevant to the semester’s courses because it focuses on best
practices which can be used to develop quality and reliable software.

Bibliography
Ahmad, S.F., Beg, M.R. and Haleem, M., 2013. A comparative study of software quality
models. International Journal of Science, Engineering and Technology Research, 2(1),
p.172.
Suman, M.W. and Rohtak, M.D.U., 2014. A comparative study of software quality
models. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, 5(4),
pp.5634-5638.
Tomar, A.B. and Thakare, V.M., 2011. A systematic study of software quality models.
International Journal of Software Engineering & Applications, 2(4), p.61-65.
Yan, M., Xia, X., Zhang, X., Xu, L. and Yang, D., 2017. A Systematic Mapping Study
of Quality Assessment Models for Software Products. In 2017 International Conference
on Software Analysis, Testing and Evolution (SATE) (pp. 63-71).