Slavery in the Southern States: Historical Context and Analysis

This report delves into the historical context of slavery in the Southern States, examining the economic and social factors that shaped the institution. It highlights the differences between the Northern and Southern states, emphasizing the Southern states' reliance on agriculture and the subsequent reluctance to abolish slavery due to its economic implications. The report analyzes the impact of slavery on the Southern economy, the role of white masters and black slaves, and the overall implications for the society. The report also discusses the industrialization in the Northern states and how it impacted the slavery system. The report provides a comprehensive overview of the subject.

Running head: SLAVERY IN THE SOUTHERN STATES
SLAVERY IN THE SOUTHERN STATES
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note

1SLAVERY IN THE SOUTHERN STATES
It is true that the system of slavery had existed both in the Southern and the Northern
states of the New World which is referred to as the United States of America, however the
prevalence of the system of slavery had been more acute and deep rooted in the southern states
of the United States of America than in the northern states. There are several reasons for it and
they shall be discussed in this particular answer.
The northern states were also dependent on pastoral economy like the southern states, but
the dependence of the southern states on agriculture was much more than what prevailed in the
former. The southern economy was largely based on agriculture with very little or no economic
diversification in form of industrialization that had been witnessed in the northern states. The
northern states had gradually moved to industrial production from agricultural economy while
the southern states were conservative and they preferred to maintain the agricultural economy.
Naturally, the northern states had witnessed more economic growth and development and the
emancipatory ideal of doing away with slavery had prevailed there while in the southern states
the willingness to do away with slavery met with reluctance as that would have jeopardized the
prospect of maintaining the superiority of the white lords and thee inferiority of the blacks who
were mainly involved in the indulgence of menial jobs in the farms to sustain the economy. Thus
disturbing the black slave and white master would have disrupted the agriculture which was the
backbone of the southern economy.