Spectio Case Study: Analyzing the Transition of a Lighting Company

Verified

Added on  2020/04/21

|4
|512
|186
Case Study
AI Summary
The assignment is a case study analysis of Spectio, a company transitioning from a lighting business to the Internet of Things (IoT) industry. The study analyzes Spectio's challenges and opportunities, focusing on the application of Porter's Five Forces to assess the competitive landscape in both the lighting and IoT sectors. The analysis examines the threat of new entry, buyer power, threat of substitution, supplier power, and competitive rivalry to determine the optimal strategic direction for Spectio. The conclusion suggests a gradual transition to the IoT industry due to its lower competitive rivalry and potential for high-value contracts and revenue growth. The assignment includes references to academic sources that support the analysis.
Document Page
Running Head: INFORMATION SYSTEM
Information System
Name of the Student
Name of the University
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
1INFORMATION SYSTEM
Spectio: A Digital Lighting Company Case Analysis
The main dilemma Sean Marshall, CEO of Spectio, is facing is to decide whether the company should be
further managed as a lighting company or an IoT company. The company first started as a lighting company and
looked to exploit the growing popularity of LED lights as the main source of revenue for the company. At that time,
LED was deemed as an efficient power saving lighting system but on the other hand, the manufacturing cost was
high and the efficiency was not gained as expected. Hence, Spectio decided to combine wireless technology with the
LED lighting system in order to release a new LED lighting system that could be wirelessly controlled. In order to
analyze the situation, Porter’s Five Forces is used as follows1.
Threat of New Entry – Threat is in both lighting industry and IoT, although in IoT, threat is relatively less.
As a result, Spectio can expect for competitive rivalry in the lighting sector in near future.
Buyer Power – Buyer power is significantly high in lighting industry while in IoT, it is slightly less.
However, with future high profile clients in IoT, Spectio can expect high buyer power in future.
Threat of Substitution – Threat of substitution is much less in IoT whereas in the lighting industry, there
are many alternatives and competition.
Supplier Power – The supplier power is more in lighting industry that IoT. This is because, IoT is a
relatively new industry and not many suppliers are available for IoT yet.
Competitive Rivalry – There is less competitive rivalry in the IoT sector. This is because, IoT is a relatively
new industry and very few companies have entered this industry.
Based on the analysis, it can be said that the best possible option for Spectio is to slowly make transition
towards the IoT industry as it the most promising for Spectio and moreover, it has low competitive rivalry2.
Furthermore, with transition towards IoT, Spectio can get hold on some big money contracts and hence, will be able
to gather high revenue easily.
1 E. Dobbs, M., 2014. Guidelines for applying Porter's five forces framework: a set of industry analysis templates. Competitiveness
Review, 24(1), pp.32-45.
2 Mazhelis, O., Warma, H., Leminen, S., Ahokangas, P., Pussinen, P., Rajahonka, M., Siuruainen, R., Okkonen, H., Shveykovskiy, A.
and Myllykoski, J., 2013. Internet-of-things market, value networks, and business models: State of the art report. University of Jyvaskyla,
Department of Computer Science and Information systems, Technical Reports TR-39.
Document Page
2INFORMATION SYSTEM
Document Page
3INFORMATION SYSTEM
Bibliography
E. Dobbs, M., 2014. Guidelines for applying Porter's five forces framework: a set of industry
analysis templates. Competitiveness Review, 24(1), pp.32-45.
Mazhelis, O., Warma, H., Leminen, S., Ahokangas, P., Pussinen, P., Rajahonka, M., Siuruainen,
R., Okkonen, H., Shveykovskiy, A. and Myllykoski, J., 2013. Internet-of-things market, value
networks, and business models: State of the art report. University of Jyvaskyla, Department of
Computer Science and Information systems, Technical Reports TR-39.
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 4
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
[object Object]