Stakeholder Strategy Development and Portfolio Analysis for D&H Foods

This presentation analyzes stakeholder strategy development and portfolio analysis for a business case study. The first part focuses on Facebook, identifying stakeholders (users, advertisers, employees, CEO) and recommending strategic options for each, including improving web layout, assisting advertiser visibility, and enhancing performance management. The second part involves a portfolio analysis of D&H Foods, utilizing BCG, GE-McKinsey, and Synergy matrices to categorize business units (Munchy Biscuits, Pure Juice, Funville Chocolate, Burgers R Us, and Home Fresh) and provide strategic recommendations for each. The presentation concludes with a framework for strategy implementation and overall conclusions on stakeholder management and portfolio optimization.

Slide 1
Facebook
[Student Name] – [Student Number]

Slide 2
 The stakeholders form an integral part of the organization and it
is in relation to this, the firm must undertake considerable
initiatives to meet the needs of these stakeholders.
 The presentation will discuss the overall importance of the
stakeholders in an organization and discuss the manner in which
these stakeholder needs can be met with (Bonsón, Royo &
Ratkai, 2017).
 Additionally, the strategic implementation plan to meet the
needs of each of the stakeholder groups will also be provided.
The given slide provides a brief overview of the concept of the stakeholders and the manner in
which they are required to be managed within the organization. It also highlights the overall
aims and objectives of the study.

Slide 3
 The organization has a large number of stakeholders.
 These stakeholders can be understood to be as follows:
Users Advertisers Shareholders Employees Government Communities
The different stakeholders of an organization can be taken to be the users, Government, the
employees, the various suppliers, the competitors, the advertisers and other such stakeholders.

Slide 4
 However, priority matters in an organization
 The various stakeholders have bee prioritized in the following
manner :
• Offensive• Hold
• Defensive• Swing
Facebook
Users Advertisers
EmployeesCEO
The stakeholders which have been selected for the purpose of the study can be taken to be as
follows:
Government
Employees
Advertisers
Facebook active users

Slide 5
 The Swing stakeholders have been identified as the Facebook
users.
 The various strategic options which are available for the
Facebook users can be stated to be as follows:
 Increasing transparency in the operations
 Improving the web layout (Facebook.com ,2019)
 Increasing customized options
The various strategic options available for this group can be understood to be as follows:
Increasing transparency in the operations
Improving the web layout
Increasing customized options

Slide 6
 After analysing the different strategic options which are
available for the different users, it can be recommended that the
following strategy would be appropriate for the different firms
to carryout can be stated to be as follows:
 Improving the web layout
 When the firm will be able to improve the web layout, then it
will be able to attract the different users to access the websites in
a better manner.
The strategy which has been selected for the implementation can be understood to be
improving the overall web layout of the Facebook.

Slide 7
 The defensive stakeholders have been chosen as the Advertisers.
The Advertisers form a crucial part of the organization and
hence, the various strategic options which are available with
respect to the stakeholders are as follows:
 Providing better rate options
 Engaging in crucial transparency (Facebook.com, 2019)
 Helping them to be more visible.
The various strategic options which are available for the different Advertisers can be understood
to be as follows:
Providing better rate options
Engaging in crucial transparency
Helping them to be more visible

Slide 8
 From the various strategic options which are available for the
firm, the different strategic recommendations which can be
soundly adopted by the organization can be understood to be as
follows:
 Assisting the advertisers to be visible in the better manner
 Using this strategy, Facebook would be able to assist the various
stakeholders in ensuring that they are successfully able to be
better placed in the website and be displayed in a better manner
(Haigh & Wigley, 2015).
The defensive stakeholder strategy which has been chosen to be implemented can be
understood to be related to assisting the advertisers in making their advertisements visible in a
better manner and improving the operations of the firm.

Slide 9
 The offensive stakeholders have been chosen as the employees.
The various strategic options which are available for the
employees can be taken to be as follows:
 Better pay options
 Better performance appraisal systems
 Better involvement in the firm.
For the offensive stakeholders who have been chosen as the employees, the various strategic
options which are available can be taken to be as follows:
Better pay options
Better performance appraisal systems
Better involvement in the firm

Slide 10
 Out of the different recommended options, it can be stated that
the strategic recommendation which can be undertaken by the
firm can be stated to be as follows:
 Better performance management systems
 In line of this, it can be rightfully mentioned that the firm would
benefit in a better manner, it the performance management
systems of the firm can be improved considerably (StatCounter
Global Stats., 2019).
The strategy which has been selected for the offensive stakeholders can be taken to be the
strategy relating to the better performance management systems.

Slide 11
 The Hold stakeholder has been taken as the CEO.
 The CEO is the owner of the organization and with respect to
this, it is integral that the firm is able to serve the stakeholder in
the right manner.
 The various strategic options which are available for the firm can
be stated to be as follows: Engage in better CEO management Increase their incentives Assist them in engaging in active participation (Cho, Furey & Mohr,
2017).
For the CEO of the firm, the different ways in which the strategic options can be evaluated is as
follows:
Engage in better CEO management
Increase their incentives
Assist them in engaging in active participation.

Slide 12
 Out of the recommended options, the best strategy which can be
adopted by the firm can be understood to be as follows:
 Providing better incentives for the CEO
 If better incentives will be provided for the CEO, then they will
be inclined towards working in a better manner for the
organization and additionally they will be required to see to it
that, the CEO is supported in every step (Ruehl and Ingenhoff,
2015).
The strategy which has been adopted can be understood to be providing better incentives for
the CEO. This will enable the firm to ensure that, it is able to manage the key owner of the firm
in the right manner (Morschett, Schramm-Klein & Zentes, 2015).