ISO 55000, SAMP and AMP: Water Pump Station Asset Management Plan

This report provides a detailed comparison between Strategic Asset Management Plans (SAMP) and Asset Management Plans (AMP), referencing the ISO 55000 suite of standards. The report begins by defining and differentiating between a SAMP and an AMP, highlighting their objectives, scope, and key components. It then delves into a case study involving a water pump station, outlining the key considerations for developing an AMP for such an asset, including elements from ISO 55000. The report also addresses the importance of aligning asset management with organizational goals, the use of risk-based approaches, and the maturity levels of AMPs. Furthermore, it explores the essential sections to include in an AMP, such as the plan overview, levels of service, future demand, and performance measurement. The report emphasizes the significance of continuous improvement and data-driven decision-making in asset management, providing a comprehensive overview of the subject matter. The document is contributed by a student to be published on the website Desklib. Desklib is a platform which provides all the necessary AI based study tools for students.

The differences between Strategic asset management plan and asset management plan
Review the ISO 55000 suite of Standards and sample SAMP / AMPs.
2.1 What are the key differences between a Strategic Asset Management Plan
and an Asset Management Plan (Word Limit: 500 Words)
Strategic asset management plan (SAMP)
A SAMP is characterized by ISO 55000 as reported "data that indicates how authoritative targets
are to be changed over into resource destination, the methodology for creating resource the board
plans, and the job of the advantage the board framework in supporting accomplishment of the
benefit in the executive’s goals"
The Strategic Asset Management Plan traces the abnormal state, vital activities required so as to
guarantee that the association meets its authoritative destinations. Here are a couple of tips:
The fundamental focal point of the record is the Strategic Initiatives (activities) required to
scaffold holes between current Asset Management execution and the exhibition required so as to
meet Asset Management Objectives
Compose the record in light of its readership. Who is going to peruse the record? What are they
going to utilize it for? What data do they need all together for the archive to be valuable?
Incorporate that, and just that data in the report. Van den Honert, Schoeman, & Vlok, (2013).
Give some setting in the SAMP so as to give legitimization to why the key Asset Management
activities are required. This could include: A layout of the hierarchical setting/technique/outer

condition/aggressive weights and so on. Current and estimate Asset Management Objectives, and
how these are connected to generally Organizational Objectives.
Recognized holes among expected and required execution so as to meet the Asset Management
Objectives. The vital activities ought to have the option to be connected to the distinguished
presentation holes, and the arrangement ought to show how these activities will connect these
holes, just as location the Asset Management Risks and Opportunities.
Not all improvement activities will be considered as "Vital". Limit yourself to including just the
hugest activities inside the SAMP. Activities could be considered "Vital" on the off chance that
they: Will take significant time, exertion as well as subsidizing to finish If not finished, will
significantly affect the capacity to accomplish the Asset Management Objectives
ISO 55000 characterizes an Asset Management Plan as being "recorded data that determines the
exercises, assets and timescales required for an individual resource, or a gathering of benefits, to
accomplish the association's advantage the board destinations" (ISO 55000:2014 p.14).
Asset management plan (AMP)
An AMP is reported "data that determines the advantage level operational exercises, assets and
timescales required for an individual resource, or a gathering of benefits, to accomplish the
association's advantage the board goals." Hastings, (2015).
The Asset Management Strategy diagrams the key methodology for Asset Management inside
the association. Here are a couple of tips:

As a system it is abnormal state. It doesn't contain large amounts of detail, however rather
alludes to (or gives connects to) different archives (procedures and techniques) inside the
association which contain that detail.
It doesn't rehash data that exists in different archives. This would manufacture a pole for your
very own back, on the grounds that when the substance of one of those different archives
changes, at that point you will likewise need to refresh the Asset Management Strategy. Record
upkeep at that point would turn out to be superfluously oppressive.
It does, nonetheless, outline the key degree or potentially motivation behind the procedures and
strategies with the goal that those perusing the Asset Management Strategy can comprehend
which of those procedures and methods might be pertinent for them to allude to.
It shouldn't be called an Asset Management Strategy – actually, at a portion of our customers, it
is known as the Asset Management Framework and can shape some portion of an Asset
Management Manual, which contains the majority of the significant Asset Management related
procedures and techniques.
2.2 A water pump station in a public utility company is close to 10 years in service.
Recorded interruptions to service were caused by pump bearing failures, motor overload
and pipe leakages. The facility is intended to be in service for another 10 years.
What are the key considerations in preparing an Asset Management Plan for an asset
system of this nature? Identify the key elements from ISO 55000 suite of Standards
relevant to the Asset Management Plan (Word Limit: 1,500 Words)

Great resource the board is turning into a normal ordinary practice in develop associations
around the globe. This report is a concise clarification of the present status and improvements in
models for resource the executives. It plots, specifically, the PAS 55 and ISO 55000
arrangements of necessity determination and clarifies the likenesses and contrasts between them.
The record additionally abridges the progress suggestions for inspecting and accreditation.
A water pump station works a vertically incorporated power age, pumping and dispersion
business and gives distribute to over 3 million families. The water Systems Business Group
(WSBG), which handles the transmission and appropriation systems, has been following an
organized arrangement of facilitated upgrades in resource the board for a long time,
accomplishing PAS55 accreditation in 2007 and 2010. It has additionally as of late estimated the
effect of this coordinated, persistent improvement approach, announcing over 90% decrease in
Customer Minutes Lost (CMLs), while reacting to a 20% burden development, growing its
advantage base by 25% and at the same time lessening charging levies.
An advantage the board plan characterizes the exercises that will be actualized and the assets that
will be connected to meet the benefit the executives destinations and thusly the hierarchical
objectives.
[i]A resource the board plan gives the bearing to and the desires for and singular resource or for a
portfolio, gathering or class of assets.
[ii] Resource the executive plans ought to be created to suitable time skylines for the
organization.
[iii]The time skylines should address the association's issues and assess the association's time of
duty and the life of its assets.

[iv] In view of this, an advantage the executives plan layout will enable you to characterize the
particular exercises, assets and booking required for an individual resource or a gathering of
resources for accomplish the association's benefit the board targets.
Consistence versus Certification
Despite the fact that ISO 55000 has set up a large number of the criteria for making AMPs, it
isn't important to approach this from a standard affirmation point of view. Numerous
associations are choosing to improve how they oversee resources so as to accomplish
complinance to the standard and execution gains while delaying the accreditation choice.
Numerous organizations as of now keep up other ISO confirmations and completely perceive the
degree of responsibility important to look for accreditation. This choice may affect the general
way to deal with making AMPs and ought to be viewed as right off the bat.
Resource Definition and Selection
Characterizing resources that would then be able to be separated through a determination
procedure may not be as clear as it appears. From an extended perspective on resource the board,
there are various levels at which a benefit can be overseen. At a basic level resources are seen
exclusively. This is the least complex and most effectively got methodology. Resources can
likewise be characterized and saw as far as frameworks. Instances of advantage frameworks can
incorporate systems, creation lines or offices frameworks (HVAC, squander water, compacted
air). Lastly a third extended view can characterize resource portfolios. Models incorporate
classes of oil rigs, specialty units, land, and city framework.
In light of how you characterize resources, they would then be able to be chosen for plan
advancement. A characterized choice procedure is the most disparaging of all ideas in resource

the executives. Resources ought to be chosen dependent on their criticality and their
characterized hazard to the worth stream. A Risk Based Asset Management (RBAM®) approach
ought to be used that incorporates a characterized procedure for grouping, breaking down,
controlling and estimating the adequacy of the working and hardware support systems.
From an unadulterated procedure point of view, resource definition and determination is
probably a result of the vital resource the board plan and the foundation of advantage the board
destinations. The fact of the matter is to keep up the linkage for accomplishing authoritative
goals inside the AMPs.
Understanding AMP Maturity Levels
Another significant "beginning" action includes deciding the way to deal with information
accumulation and investigation. As appeared in Figure 1, the duty to building up an advantage
the executives framework equipped for giving the essential data to develop propelled AMPs is
frequently described as a genuine constant improvement venture.
The easiest method to start is to assemble every current datum and examinations and begin
developing the arrangement. Where information is required yet does not exist, it is enhanced by
authoritative experience and judgment. Information holes are filled by reported suppositions.
This methodology empowers AMPs to be built rapidly..
A substitute methodology requires the association to play out a whole examination against their
current capacities and build up a strategic usage plan for shutting those holes preceding starting
the readiness of the AMPs. This methodology requires extra time and assets, yet the information
and investigation are progressively finished and the nature of the basic leadership is improved.

There can be benefits in building up the main AMP as an interval plan as fast as conceivable
utilizing existing data. It encourages the association to comprehend the qualities and
shortcomings of current resource the executives rehearses and to recognize needs for creating
tentative arrangements. It can likewise abstain from dispensing over the top assets for
information gathering before the requirements are completely comprehended.
Despite how an association chooses to continue, it is sure that the development level of the AMP
will advance and improve extra time. The AMP advancement procedure will distinguish ability
holes and open doors for development that must be methodically tended to by means of a
constant improvement circle. As the advancement of the benefit the board framework advances
so will the development level of the AMPs.
Building the Plan
A bit of leeway the officials plan portrays the activities that will be realized and the advantages
that will be associated with meet the advantage the board targets and accordingly the legitimate
destinations.
[i]A asset the officials plan gives the making a beeline for and the wants for and particular asset
or for a portfolio, assembling or class of advantages.
[ii]Resource the official plans should be made to appropriate time horizons for the association.
[iii]The time horizons should address the affiliation's issues and evaluate the affiliation's season
of commitment and the life of its advantages.
[iv] Considering this, a bit of leeway the board plan design will empower you to describe the
specific activities, resources and booking required for an individual asset or a social event of
assets for achieve the affiliation's advantage the official goals. The improvement level of the

advantage the board plan and the progression of the bit of leeway the official structure may
influence which regions of the course of action are composed over others. Here are the
recommended sections your AMP format should include:
Resource Management Plan Overview
The review segment recognizes the benefits inside the arrangement, how execution of the
advantages associates with authoritative goals, the partners, and network to different plans or
models. A short synopsis of secured resources is likewise suggested.
Levels of Service
A key part of benefit the executives arranging is to coordinate the degree of administration that
advantages give to client desires. It gives the harmony between the expense to convey and the
level required. Explicit degrees of administration incorporate cost, effectiveness, quality,
amount, unwavering quality, wellbeing and responsiveness. Cunningham, & Mathie, (2012).
The degree of administration segment may incorporate a portrayal of how authoritative
objectives and administrative necessities effect administration levels. Current degrees of
administration and focused on levels of administration are important to distinguish holes that
must be tended to in different segments of the AMP.
Future Demand
Future interest gives subtleties of determined development and resource use. This area likewise
depicts request drivers, how request changes may affect resources, request possibility arranging,
and venture arranging important to satisfy the need conjecture.
Resource Lifecycle Management

This area ought to abridge how resources will be overseen and worked at the settled upon
administration level while upgrading all out expense of possession at a fitting degree of hazard.
This segment is the most significant piece of the AMP and incorporates these subsections:
Woodhouse, (2014).
I. Foundation Information – Provides essential resource data including age, size, limit, execution,
current condition, and current worth and resource data management summaries.
II. Hazard Management Plan – Identifies dangers that may influence administration conveyance.
Incorporates what corporate objective or target is affected by the hazard, how the dangers are
recognized, how the dangers are assessed (Consequences, Probability, Detectability), and what
hazard moderation plans are set up.
III. Working Plan – Includes patterns; basic leadership process; characterized working
techniques and strategies to meet required administration levels; how working assignments are
organized and dangers related with elective procedures; and estimates of arranged working
expenses.
IV. Gear Maintenance Plans - Includes patterns; basic leadership process, characterized support
systems and techniques to meet required administration levels; how upkeep undertakings are
organized and dangers related with elective methodologies; and conjectures of arranged support
costs.
V. Recapitalization Plans and Strategies – Outlines recharging consumptions – real work which
does not build the benefit's structure limit but rather reestablishes, replaces or restores a current
advantage for its unique limit.

VI. Capital Planning and Strategies – Describes new venture, which makes another advantage
that did not exist already or which updates or improves a current resource past its current limit.
VII. Transfer Plan – Identifies exercises related with the transfer of a decommissioned resource
including deal, destruction or movement. Contains future figure of transfer assets including
timing and expenses, and income gauge of salary/uses from resource transfer.
Budgetary Summary
This area ought to incorporate and outline all the budgetary necessities coming about because of
the exercises in the past areas. The budgetary outline speaks to a significant connect to different
pieces of the association and sets up the estimation of advantage the board to the association by
coordinating the money related effect of the exercises into the organization's monetary and vital
plans..
Ceaseless Improvement
This area ought to outline the present and future resource the board practices and give subtleties
on the arranging and checking of the benefit the board plans and any enhancements for the
advantage the executive frameworks. It ought to give an exhibited connection back to the
inadequacies noted in developing different areas of the AMP.
References
Woodhouse, J. (2014). Briefing: Standards in asset management: PAS 55 to ISO 55000.
Infrastructure Asset Management, 1(3), 57-59.
Hastings, N. A. J. (2015). Physical asset management: With an introduction to ISO55000.
Springer.

Van den Honert, A. F., Schoeman, J. S., & Vlok, P. J. (2013). Correlating the content and
context of PAS 55 with the ISO 55000 series. South African Journal of Industrial
Engineering, 24(2), 24-32.
Fisher, K., Geenen, J., Jurcevic, M., McClintock, K., & Davis, G. (2009). Applying asset‐based
community development as a strategy for CSR: a Canadian perspective on a win–win for
stakeholders and SMEs. Business ethics: A European review, 18(1), 66-82.
Cunningham, G., & Mathie, A. (2012). Asset-based community development: An overview. Coady
International Institute. Retrieved February, 4, 2009.

Final Report Opal Towers
1.1 Describe the identified root causes of damage to the Opal Tower as on date?
(Word Limit : 1,000 words)
Causes of the damage of the Opal Towers
This report explains the main causes of the damage of the Opal Towers. During the investigation
which was carried out, a number of factors which were found to have cause the damage were
classified into;
• Environmental factors
• Poor quality of the construction materials
• Foundation issues
• The quality of skilled personnel was poor
• There were errors in the structural design
Structural design
The Opal Tower last report, made open on March 1, 2019 following a two-month examination,
found that basic hob shafts in the private pinnacle were inclined to breaking because of their
auxiliary plan, just as the utilization of a lower-quality cement. The choice to just mostly grout
between the pillars and boards was additionally featured as "adding to the issue".
The 36-story Sydney loft building was emptied on Christmas Eve 2018 subsequent to breaking in
precast solid boards was found on level 10, starting apprehensions that the pinnacle could
crumple.