Financial Analysis of Bank of Valletta and APS Bank: Report
VerifiedAdded on 2022/08/26
|26
|3929
|17
Report
AI Summary
This report presents a financial analysis of two Maltese banks, Bank of Valletta (BOV) and APS Bank, examining their performance using financial ratios and market indicators from 2017 and 2018. The analysis includes profitability ratios (operating income to total assets, return on equity, and return on total assets) and capital structure ratios (interest coverage ratio, loan to assets ratio, and capital adequacy ratio). The report also incorporates vertical analysis to assess the banks' income statements and balance sheets, along with a discussion of key performance indicators (KPIs) such as customer retention and market performance. The report highlights the risks and opportunities facing these banks, offering insights into their strategic financial management practices. The analysis is based on the data of 2017 and 2018, and it also includes a discussion of the industry's performance in Malta.

Strategic financial
managment
managment
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

Contents
Introduction...........................................................................................................................................3
Interpretation and evaluation.................................................................................................................3
Ratio Analysis.......................................................................................................................................3
Profitability ratios..............................................................................................................................4
Capital structure ratios.......................................................................................................................7
Vertical analysis....................................................................................................................................8
Market performance and KPIs.........................................................................................................10
Risks and opportunities.......................................................................................................................13
Conclusion...........................................................................................................................................16
References...........................................................................................................................................17
Introduction...........................................................................................................................................3
Interpretation and evaluation.................................................................................................................3
Ratio Analysis.......................................................................................................................................3
Profitability ratios..............................................................................................................................4
Capital structure ratios.......................................................................................................................7
Vertical analysis....................................................................................................................................8
Market performance and KPIs.........................................................................................................10
Risks and opportunities.......................................................................................................................13
Conclusion...........................................................................................................................................16
References...........................................................................................................................................17

Introduction
The report brings out a discussion on financial analysis of company registered in Malta Stock
Exchange. Financial analysis is conducted with the help of ratio analysis and commonsize
horizontal analysis with the data of 2017 and 2018. For non-financial analysis, KPIs and
market performance has been examined of Bank of Valletta and APS bank. Ratio analysis is
to examine several aspects of the organisation’s operation and performance. It can improve
the understanding of financial statements and reports. There are several risks and
opportunities in the banking industry.
Bank of Valletta is a Maltese banking service organisation, which is headquartered in Santa
Venera. This bank is one of the oldest and established service provider in the nation. The
organisation has 44 branches, a head office, wealth management, and regional business
centres located near Maltese islands (Bank of Valletta, 2018). The bank was founded in 1974,
which is headquartered in BOV centre, Santa Venera, and Triq il kanun. Products offered
include commercial and retail banking with number of employees (1843). APS is a private
bank, which is founded in 1910 and it was incorporated in 1970 (Bank of Valletta, 2018). It
includes and employs 300 staff members across Gozo and Malta. The products offered
include commercial banking, asset management, and private banking. Number of employees
include 300. The subsidiaries include APS Funds Sicav plc (Bank of Valletta, 2018).
Interpretation and evaluation
Ratio Analysis
Ratio analysis is to examine different aspects of the organisation’s financial situations. While
analysing the bank`s performance, it is seen that measurement indicates capital, assets, and
liabilities with the help of organisation`s balance sheet (Srinivasan, & Thevaranjan, 2016).
The report brings out a discussion on financial analysis of company registered in Malta Stock
Exchange. Financial analysis is conducted with the help of ratio analysis and commonsize
horizontal analysis with the data of 2017 and 2018. For non-financial analysis, KPIs and
market performance has been examined of Bank of Valletta and APS bank. Ratio analysis is
to examine several aspects of the organisation’s operation and performance. It can improve
the understanding of financial statements and reports. There are several risks and
opportunities in the banking industry.
Bank of Valletta is a Maltese banking service organisation, which is headquartered in Santa
Venera. This bank is one of the oldest and established service provider in the nation. The
organisation has 44 branches, a head office, wealth management, and regional business
centres located near Maltese islands (Bank of Valletta, 2018). The bank was founded in 1974,
which is headquartered in BOV centre, Santa Venera, and Triq il kanun. Products offered
include commercial and retail banking with number of employees (1843). APS is a private
bank, which is founded in 1910 and it was incorporated in 1970 (Bank of Valletta, 2018). It
includes and employs 300 staff members across Gozo and Malta. The products offered
include commercial banking, asset management, and private banking. Number of employees
include 300. The subsidiaries include APS Funds Sicav plc (Bank of Valletta, 2018).
Interpretation and evaluation
Ratio Analysis
Ratio analysis is to examine different aspects of the organisation’s financial situations. While
analysing the bank`s performance, it is seen that measurement indicates capital, assets, and
liabilities with the help of organisation`s balance sheet (Srinivasan, & Thevaranjan, 2016).
⊘ This is a preview!⊘
Do you want full access?
Subscribe today to unlock all pages.

Trusted by 1+ million students worldwide

These ratios will ensure the financial stability of banks through profitability ratios, and capital
structural ratios. Financial reporting in banking sector, which is different from other
industries. The main objective of banking organisation is to attract funds at acceptable cost
and finally invest to earn higher returns. For profitability analysis, return on capital
employed, return on equity, return on total assets, and operating income to the total assets.
For capital structure ratios, interest coverage ratio, loan to assets ratio and capital adequacy
ratio (APS bank, 2018).
Profitability ratios
While deriving the profitability, investors and analysts use ratios to examine the current profit
margin.
Operating income to total assets
This ratio determines how effectively the company generates income by employing total
assets.
1 2
0%
1%
2%
3%
2%
3%
2%
3%
Bank of Valletta
APS
operating income to total assets
Axis Title
(Source: Excel, 2020)
structural ratios. Financial reporting in banking sector, which is different from other
industries. The main objective of banking organisation is to attract funds at acceptable cost
and finally invest to earn higher returns. For profitability analysis, return on capital
employed, return on equity, return on total assets, and operating income to the total assets.
For capital structure ratios, interest coverage ratio, loan to assets ratio and capital adequacy
ratio (APS bank, 2018).
Profitability ratios
While deriving the profitability, investors and analysts use ratios to examine the current profit
margin.
Operating income to total assets
This ratio determines how effectively the company generates income by employing total
assets.
1 2
0%
1%
2%
3%
2%
3%
2%
3%
Bank of Valletta
APS
operating income to total assets
Axis Title
(Source: Excel, 2020)
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

From the above graphical representation, it is seen that the performance of both the banks are
same in relation to operating income ratio (Bank of Valletta, 2017). In 2018, bank of Valletta
generates 2 percent on total assets, and APS generates 3 percent in 2017. In 2018, bank of
Valletta generates 2 percent on total assets in 2018 and APS generates 3 percent in 2017
(APS bank, 2018). According to the overall performance of banking industry, it is reported
that as the banks are highly leveraged where 1 to 2 percent of operating income to total assets
ratio has been considered profitable. When evaluating through banks, APS and Bank of
Valletta has been performing well as being leveraged from two to three percent.
2018 2017
0.00%
0.20%
0.40%
0.60%
0.80%
1.00%
1.20%
0.42%
1.01%
1%
1%
Return on total assets
Bank of Valletta
APS
Axis Title
Axis Title
1 2
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
Non-performing loan/Total Gross loans
Bank of Valletta
APS
same in relation to operating income ratio (Bank of Valletta, 2017). In 2018, bank of Valletta
generates 2 percent on total assets, and APS generates 3 percent in 2017. In 2018, bank of
Valletta generates 2 percent on total assets in 2018 and APS generates 3 percent in 2017
(APS bank, 2018). According to the overall performance of banking industry, it is reported
that as the banks are highly leveraged where 1 to 2 percent of operating income to total assets
ratio has been considered profitable. When evaluating through banks, APS and Bank of
Valletta has been performing well as being leveraged from two to three percent.
2018 2017
0.00%
0.20%
0.40%
0.60%
0.80%
1.00%
1.20%
0.42%
1.01%
1%
1%
Return on total assets
Bank of Valletta
APS
Axis Title
Axis Title
1 2
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
Non-performing loan/Total Gross loans
Bank of Valletta
APS

According the banking industry of Malta, standard non-performing loan to total gross loan is
estimated at 4.099 percent in 2017 and 5 percent in 2018. Reduced non-performing loan ratio
means more secure loans to customers. APS Bank`s has 3.8 and 4.2 percent, which indicates
that it performs well in regards to the industry. Bank of Valletta is able to maintain much
lower ratio, which is a good indication of recovery the loans.
Increasing net interest income ratio is quite helpful. Bank of Valletta generates 7 percent in
2017, and 8 percent interest income in 2018. There is a need to improve interest income ratio
by enhancing and increasing net operating income, decreasing operating expense, pay off
existing debt, and decreasing the borrowing amount. Expense to income ratio has been one of
the important criteria through which banks can evaluate how much expense it has occurred to
have operating income. Bank of Valletta generates 43 percent in 2017 and 55 percent in
2018. On the other hand, decreasing expense to income ratio indicates that the company has
been incurring less and generating more, which signifies that resources are being used in an
efficient way.
Return on equity
2018 2017
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
5%
12%
9% 10%
Return on equity
Bank of Valletta
APS
estimated at 4.099 percent in 2017 and 5 percent in 2018. Reduced non-performing loan ratio
means more secure loans to customers. APS Bank`s has 3.8 and 4.2 percent, which indicates
that it performs well in regards to the industry. Bank of Valletta is able to maintain much
lower ratio, which is a good indication of recovery the loans.
Increasing net interest income ratio is quite helpful. Bank of Valletta generates 7 percent in
2017, and 8 percent interest income in 2018. There is a need to improve interest income ratio
by enhancing and increasing net operating income, decreasing operating expense, pay off
existing debt, and decreasing the borrowing amount. Expense to income ratio has been one of
the important criteria through which banks can evaluate how much expense it has occurred to
have operating income. Bank of Valletta generates 43 percent in 2017 and 55 percent in
2018. On the other hand, decreasing expense to income ratio indicates that the company has
been incurring less and generating more, which signifies that resources are being used in an
efficient way.
Return on equity
2018 2017
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
5%
12%
9% 10%
Return on equity
Bank of Valletta
APS
⊘ This is a preview!⊘
Do you want full access?
Subscribe today to unlock all pages.

Trusted by 1+ million students worldwide

This indicates the response of net profit in relation to equity. APS is consistent for both the
years 2017 and 2018. On the other hand, Bank of Valletta earns 5 percent in 2017 and 12
percent in 2018.
Return on total assets
2018 2017
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
3%
8%
1% 1%
Bank of Valletta
APS
This ratio depicts profitability of the company, which indicates per dollar profit that the
company earns on total assets. This ratio is seen as important profitability ratio, which
indicates per unit profit dollar that organisation earns on assets. Most importantly, banks are
highly leveraged then low ROA of 1 to 2 percent will indicate substantial revenues and
profits (APS bank, 2018). Bank of Valletta generates 8 percent in 2017 and in 2018; it
generates 3 percent of net profits. On the other hand, APS generates 1 percent of return in
2017 and it has 1 percent in 2018.
years 2017 and 2018. On the other hand, Bank of Valletta earns 5 percent in 2017 and 12
percent in 2018.
Return on total assets
2018 2017
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
3%
8%
1% 1%
Bank of Valletta
APS
This ratio depicts profitability of the company, which indicates per dollar profit that the
company earns on total assets. This ratio is seen as important profitability ratio, which
indicates per unit profit dollar that organisation earns on assets. Most importantly, banks are
highly leveraged then low ROA of 1 to 2 percent will indicate substantial revenues and
profits (APS bank, 2018). Bank of Valletta generates 8 percent in 2017 and in 2018; it
generates 3 percent of net profits. On the other hand, APS generates 1 percent of return in
2017 and it has 1 percent in 2018.
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

Capital structure ratios
2018 2017
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
4.49
3.94
3.68
4.46
Interest Coverage
Bank of Valletta
APS
This ratio depicts the efficiency/times of the company to pay off interest on loans in a year. In
2017, bank of Valletta has 3.94 times and APS has 4.46 times. In 2018, bank of Valetta has
4.49 times to pay off interests whereas; APS has 3.68 times of paying interests (Noor, &
Rosyid, 2018). Low ICR indicates that the company has lower profits to meet interest
expense on debt. Both the companies are able to pay off their interest expense on time such as
from 2017. APS and BOV improves the ICR times.
2018 2017
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
21% 19%
14% 16%
Capital adequacy ratio
2018 2017
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
4.50
5.00
4.49
3.94
3.68
4.46
Interest Coverage
Bank of Valletta
APS
This ratio depicts the efficiency/times of the company to pay off interest on loans in a year. In
2017, bank of Valletta has 3.94 times and APS has 4.46 times. In 2018, bank of Valetta has
4.49 times to pay off interests whereas; APS has 3.68 times of paying interests (Noor, &
Rosyid, 2018). Low ICR indicates that the company has lower profits to meet interest
expense on debt. Both the companies are able to pay off their interest expense on time such as
from 2017. APS and BOV improves the ICR times.
2018 2017
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
21% 19%
14% 16%
Capital adequacy ratio

CAR is the ratio of the bank`s capital to the risks. This ensures how one absorbs reasonable
amount of losses. This ratio determines the capability to accomplish liabilities and other more
risks such as operational risks and credit risks (Bank of Valletta, 2017). Higher capital
adequacy ratio has been considered as safe. Moreover, banks are less likely to become
insolvents when unexpected losses being occurred. According to the industry, it is mandatory
to maintain 8 to 12 percent of the CAR to maintain proportion of assets and liabilities. Both
the companies have been maintaining considerable CAR in relation to the industry.
1 2
61.00
62.00
63.00
64.00
65.00
66.00
67.00
68.00
69.00
70.00
65.93
64.24
68.96 68.94
Total loan/Total assets
Bank of Valletta
APS
Loan to Assets ratio derive more income from loan. Banks with the lower level of loan-to-
assets derive larger portion of total income from asset management, and non-interest earning
source. The industrial data reveals that ratio of 40 percent is considered as good debt ratio
and 60 percent is considered as poor. It is seen that bank of Valletta and APS are more
leveraged, which is not a good sign.
Vertical analysis
Vertical analysis is a popular tool of financial analysis, which shows that every element in
statement is the percentage of base figure. For analysing vertical analysis of income
statement, figure (sales) is used as base. Other element of the income statement such as
amount of losses. This ratio determines the capability to accomplish liabilities and other more
risks such as operational risks and credit risks (Bank of Valletta, 2017). Higher capital
adequacy ratio has been considered as safe. Moreover, banks are less likely to become
insolvents when unexpected losses being occurred. According to the industry, it is mandatory
to maintain 8 to 12 percent of the CAR to maintain proportion of assets and liabilities. Both
the companies have been maintaining considerable CAR in relation to the industry.
1 2
61.00
62.00
63.00
64.00
65.00
66.00
67.00
68.00
69.00
70.00
65.93
64.24
68.96 68.94
Total loan/Total assets
Bank of Valletta
APS
Loan to Assets ratio derive more income from loan. Banks with the lower level of loan-to-
assets derive larger portion of total income from asset management, and non-interest earning
source. The industrial data reveals that ratio of 40 percent is considered as good debt ratio
and 60 percent is considered as poor. It is seen that bank of Valletta and APS are more
leveraged, which is not a good sign.
Vertical analysis
Vertical analysis is a popular tool of financial analysis, which shows that every element in
statement is the percentage of base figure. For analysing vertical analysis of income
statement, figure (sales) is used as base. Other element of the income statement such as
⊘ This is a preview!⊘
Do you want full access?
Subscribe today to unlock all pages.

Trusted by 1+ million students worldwide

income tax, gross profit, and cost of goods sold and net income shown as percentage of sales
(Srinivasan, & Thevaranjan, 2016). To analyse the balance sheet, total asset is used as base
figure. All current assets, fixed assets and current liabilities, total liabilities, stockholder`s
equity, and long term debt are shown as percentage of total assets.
Particulars 2018 2017 %Difference
€ '000 € '000
Operating Profit/(Loss) 257766.0 300473.0 -0.142132571
Net interest income 1,56,546 1,82,947 -0.144309554
operating expense 1,41,048 1,30,600 -0.08
Finance cost 57350.0 76247.0 -0.247839259
Net profit 51410.0 119498 -0.569783595
Loans and advances to banks 3644933 3431393 0.062231286
Loans and advances to customers 4362983 4162032 0.048281945
Total Assets 12146988.0 1,18,20,630 0.027609188
Average assets 6073494.0 18057303 -0.663654423
Amount owned to Banks 146021 192196 -0.240249537
Amount owned to customers 10414908 10100625 0.031115203
Gross loan 460000 446200 -0.030927835
Non-performing loan 10800 15,600 0.307692308
Asset earning assets 1892570.5 2072811.75 0.086954954
Total risk weighted assets 4673540.0 4802010.0 -0.02675338
Total capital 986405.0 9,31,485 0.058959618
Shareholders' Equity 994133.0 962087 -0.033308838
Bank of Valletta
This segment shed reasonable light on vertical analysis of Bank of Valletta. It is seen that the
operating profit has reduced by 14 percent from 2017 to 2018. It is reasonable that the
company has reduced its interest liability. The company has reduced its net profit, which was
119498 in 2017 and 51410 in 2018. Most important transactions of banks cover from loan,
and loan advances to customers, which has increased by 4 to 6 percent by 2018. The capital
proportions has increased by 5 percent in 2018 (APS bank, 2017).
Particulars 2018 2017 %Difference
€ '000 € '000
Operating Profit/(Loss) 44719.0 42750.0 0.04605848
Finance cost 12149.0 9592.0 0.266576314
Net profit 12584.0 13,108 -0.039975587
Total capital 127659.0 121571.0 0.050077732
Loans and advances to banks 50384.0 33246.0 0.515490585
Loans and advances to customers 1253883.0 998377.0 0.25592136
Average assets 945615.0 1693837.5 -0.441732161
Total assets 1891230.0 1496445.0 0.263815242
Amount owned to Customers 1650308.0 12,25,576 0.346557047
Amount owned to Banks 74473.0 1,11,132 -0.329868985
Total risk weighted assets 939074.0 760207.0 0.235287231
Shareholders' Equity 142244.0 136403 0.042821639
APS
(Srinivasan, & Thevaranjan, 2016). To analyse the balance sheet, total asset is used as base
figure. All current assets, fixed assets and current liabilities, total liabilities, stockholder`s
equity, and long term debt are shown as percentage of total assets.
Particulars 2018 2017 %Difference
€ '000 € '000
Operating Profit/(Loss) 257766.0 300473.0 -0.142132571
Net interest income 1,56,546 1,82,947 -0.144309554
operating expense 1,41,048 1,30,600 -0.08
Finance cost 57350.0 76247.0 -0.247839259
Net profit 51410.0 119498 -0.569783595
Loans and advances to banks 3644933 3431393 0.062231286
Loans and advances to customers 4362983 4162032 0.048281945
Total Assets 12146988.0 1,18,20,630 0.027609188
Average assets 6073494.0 18057303 -0.663654423
Amount owned to Banks 146021 192196 -0.240249537
Amount owned to customers 10414908 10100625 0.031115203
Gross loan 460000 446200 -0.030927835
Non-performing loan 10800 15,600 0.307692308
Asset earning assets 1892570.5 2072811.75 0.086954954
Total risk weighted assets 4673540.0 4802010.0 -0.02675338
Total capital 986405.0 9,31,485 0.058959618
Shareholders' Equity 994133.0 962087 -0.033308838
Bank of Valletta
This segment shed reasonable light on vertical analysis of Bank of Valletta. It is seen that the
operating profit has reduced by 14 percent from 2017 to 2018. It is reasonable that the
company has reduced its interest liability. The company has reduced its net profit, which was
119498 in 2017 and 51410 in 2018. Most important transactions of banks cover from loan,
and loan advances to customers, which has increased by 4 to 6 percent by 2018. The capital
proportions has increased by 5 percent in 2018 (APS bank, 2017).
Particulars 2018 2017 %Difference
€ '000 € '000
Operating Profit/(Loss) 44719.0 42750.0 0.04605848
Finance cost 12149.0 9592.0 0.266576314
Net profit 12584.0 13,108 -0.039975587
Total capital 127659.0 121571.0 0.050077732
Loans and advances to banks 50384.0 33246.0 0.515490585
Loans and advances to customers 1253883.0 998377.0 0.25592136
Average assets 945615.0 1693837.5 -0.441732161
Total assets 1891230.0 1496445.0 0.263815242
Amount owned to Customers 1650308.0 12,25,576 0.346557047
Amount owned to Banks 74473.0 1,11,132 -0.329868985
Total risk weighted assets 939074.0 760207.0 0.235287231
Shareholders' Equity 142244.0 136403 0.042821639
APS
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

Operating profit has increased by 4 percent in 2018. Finance cost has increased by 26 percent
in 2018. Total capital has increased by 5 percent in 2018. The important element and
transaction include loans and advances to banks and customers by 51 percent and 25 percent.
Total asset has increased by 26 percent in 2018. Net profit has been decreased by 3 percent
by 2018. Total risk weighted assets has increased by 26 percent in 2018 (Srinivasan, &
Thevaranjan, 2016).
Market performance and KPIs
KPIs
Customer retention
Certain KPIs listed for the banking industry include asset quality, customer penetration,
assets under management, and customer retention. Bank of Valletta pertains to perform the
esteemed customers coming over the last few months by updating the documentation by
ensuring all customer data is complete and up to date (Blanchard et al., 2018). Bank has been
requesting the customer for kind cooperation in respect to deadlines and provisions of
complete data, which they have received from banks. Bank will understand certain
inconvenience and striving in making the procedure simple and concise (APS bank, 2017).
As far as employee retention is concerned, APS has been working on small scale while
comparing it to the bank of Valletta.
in 2018. Total capital has increased by 5 percent in 2018. The important element and
transaction include loans and advances to banks and customers by 51 percent and 25 percent.
Total asset has increased by 26 percent in 2018. Net profit has been decreased by 3 percent
by 2018. Total risk weighted assets has increased by 26 percent in 2018 (Srinivasan, &
Thevaranjan, 2016).
Market performance and KPIs
KPIs
Customer retention
Certain KPIs listed for the banking industry include asset quality, customer penetration,
assets under management, and customer retention. Bank of Valletta pertains to perform the
esteemed customers coming over the last few months by updating the documentation by
ensuring all customer data is complete and up to date (Blanchard et al., 2018). Bank has been
requesting the customer for kind cooperation in respect to deadlines and provisions of
complete data, which they have received from banks. Bank will understand certain
inconvenience and striving in making the procedure simple and concise (APS bank, 2017).
As far as employee retention is concerned, APS has been working on small scale while
comparing it to the bank of Valletta.

With total of employee count, it is seen that employees have decreased by 0.8 percent.
Further, in the first year, it has increased by 6.9 percent and then it has increased 16.9 percent
in last two years. Opening of new branch of APS is marked new standard in local retail
banking. Branch has traditional retail point, which connects with customers. New
technologies include “bricks and mortar” is under the pressure from the digital technologies.
Real estate has been expensive with cost of technology, which has been decreasing. Rate of
adoption and new technologies by the customers leading the banks to look at tow
segmentation strategies. Convention branch remain vital for the business in helping customer
retention.
Customer penetration
The bank is able to attract shareholders, which has approached 1 billion Euros in 2017. While
handling and delegating BOV complaints, it is seen that bank strives to create long-term
relationship with customers by supporting and feeling special. Banks avail professional,
caring and customer experience. Complimenting customers and encouraging for being honest
and genuine and submitting their documents on time.
Market performance
Bank of Valletta has been providing financial, investment and banking services in Malta.
Currently, the company has been trading 59.4 percent below fair value. The earnings have
been growing by 25.1 percent for the last few years (Aidoo, & Mensah, 2018). Bank of
Valletta has forecasted annual growth of 7.6 percent in 1 to 3 years where projection is based
on consensus estimations of professional analysts helping the investors to understand the
organisational ability to generate profits. There have been criteria for risk checks-
Further, in the first year, it has increased by 6.9 percent and then it has increased 16.9 percent
in last two years. Opening of new branch of APS is marked new standard in local retail
banking. Branch has traditional retail point, which connects with customers. New
technologies include “bricks and mortar” is under the pressure from the digital technologies.
Real estate has been expensive with cost of technology, which has been decreasing. Rate of
adoption and new technologies by the customers leading the banks to look at tow
segmentation strategies. Convention branch remain vital for the business in helping customer
retention.
Customer penetration
The bank is able to attract shareholders, which has approached 1 billion Euros in 2017. While
handling and delegating BOV complaints, it is seen that bank strives to create long-term
relationship with customers by supporting and feeling special. Banks avail professional,
caring and customer experience. Complimenting customers and encouraging for being honest
and genuine and submitting their documents on time.
Market performance
Bank of Valletta has been providing financial, investment and banking services in Malta.
Currently, the company has been trading 59.4 percent below fair value. The earnings have
been growing by 25.1 percent for the last few years (Aidoo, & Mensah, 2018). Bank of
Valletta has forecasted annual growth of 7.6 percent in 1 to 3 years where projection is based
on consensus estimations of professional analysts helping the investors to understand the
organisational ability to generate profits. There have been criteria for risk checks-
⊘ This is a preview!⊘
Do you want full access?
Subscribe today to unlock all pages.

Trusted by 1+ million students worldwide
1 out of 26
Related Documents
Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
+13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
Copyright © 2020–2025 A2Z Services. All Rights Reserved. Developed and managed by ZUCOL.





