ACCT20074 Report: Analyzing Contemporary Accounting Theory and CSR
VerifiedAdded on 2022/10/06
|19
|4598
|16
Report
AI Summary
This report delves into contemporary accounting theory, with a specific focus on corporate social responsibility (CSR) and sustainability reporting. Part A explores the increasing importance of CSR for firms with financial objectives, examining its representation in relation to other reporting concepts and identifying relevant theories like legitimacy and stakeholder theory. Part B presents an overview of Charter Hall Long WALE REIT, including its ownership, history, governance, and financial performance. The report then evaluates the quality of Charter Hall's sustainability reporting against the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) scoring index. The analysis incorporates literature reviews, theoretical frameworks, and practical application to assess the integration of CSR principles and the effectiveness of sustainability reporting practices. The report concludes with a summary of the key findings and implications of the analysis.
Contribute Materials
Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your
documents today.

Running head: CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING THEORY
Contemporary accounting theory
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note
Contemporary accounting theory
Name of the Student
Name of the University
Author Note
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING THEORY
Executive summary:
The paper discussed below outlines the importance of the corporate sustainability reporting
and determining the existence of relationship between corporate sustainability reporting and
sustainability reporting. This whole paper incorporates the discussion on the theoretical
knowledge of sustainability reporting and the practical application of such knowledge in
evaluating the quality of sustainability report prepared by business entities. A holistic view of
corporate social responsibility and the essence of sustainability reporting has been provided
by applying relevant and applicable theories. The evaluation of sustainability report has been
done by referring to the guidelines and framework of Global Reporting Initiative.
Executive summary:
The paper discussed below outlines the importance of the corporate sustainability reporting
and determining the existence of relationship between corporate sustainability reporting and
sustainability reporting. This whole paper incorporates the discussion on the theoretical
knowledge of sustainability reporting and the practical application of such knowledge in
evaluating the quality of sustainability report prepared by business entities. A holistic view of
corporate social responsibility and the essence of sustainability reporting has been provided
by applying relevant and applicable theories. The evaluation of sustainability report has been
done by referring to the guidelines and framework of Global Reporting Initiative.

CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING THEORY
Table of Contents
Introduction:...............................................................................................................................2
Part A:........................................................................................................................................2
i. Evaluating the corporate social responsibility relevance to the firms with financial
objectives:..................................................................................................................................2
ii. Evaluating the representation of holistic view of corporate social responsibility in
relation to other reporting concepts............................................................................................2
iii. Identification of relevant theories for explaining the sustainability reporting essence:..3
Part B:.........................................................................................................................................3
iv. Presenting the overview of ownership, history, governance and financial performance
of Charter hall Long WALE REIT:...........................................................................................3
v. Evaluating the quality of sustainability reporting of the company against the scoring
index of sustainability reporting:...............................................................................................4
Conclusion:................................................................................................................................5
Reference list:.............................................................................................................................6
Table of Contents
Introduction:...............................................................................................................................2
Part A:........................................................................................................................................2
i. Evaluating the corporate social responsibility relevance to the firms with financial
objectives:..................................................................................................................................2
ii. Evaluating the representation of holistic view of corporate social responsibility in
relation to other reporting concepts............................................................................................2
iii. Identification of relevant theories for explaining the sustainability reporting essence:..3
Part B:.........................................................................................................................................3
iv. Presenting the overview of ownership, history, governance and financial performance
of Charter hall Long WALE REIT:...........................................................................................3
v. Evaluating the quality of sustainability reporting of the company against the scoring
index of sustainability reporting:...............................................................................................4
Conclusion:................................................................................................................................5
Reference list:.............................................................................................................................6

CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING THEORY
Introduction:
The paper demonstrate the discussion about the theoretical knowledge of the
corporate social responsibility of the organization and explaining the reporting practices by
the company with the application of theoretical knowledge. The first section outlines the
explanation of the corporate social responsibility for the firms having financial objectives
using the relevant literature review. It also incorporates identification of two theories that is
relevant to the explanation of the sustainability reporting concepts. In the next section, a brief
introduction the ownership, governance and the financial performance of the chosen company
that is Charter Hall is outlined. The sustainability report of Charter Hall is evaluated against
the scoring index of sustainability reporting of GRI (Global reporting Initiative) which helps
in assessing the quality of report by referring tom different aspects of sustainability (Jones et
al., 2016).
Part A:
i. Evaluating the corporate social responsibility relevance to the firms with
financial objectives:
Corporate social responsibility has become a very prominent business practice for
every individual organization. Their major goal is to obtain a good output and a positive
impact on the society. CSR ensures that all the business practices are ethical which, are
practiced within the organization by taking social, economic and environmental practices.
Every individual enterprise or any organization aims to create a maximum share value for the
owners in the company as well as the employees, shareholders and other stakeholders. Today,
almost every business organization are adopting the corporate social responsibility intending
to work for the stakeholders on a much wider scale including the environmental protection,
championing of the women and elimination poverty and unemployment globally (Hummel &
Introduction:
The paper demonstrate the discussion about the theoretical knowledge of the
corporate social responsibility of the organization and explaining the reporting practices by
the company with the application of theoretical knowledge. The first section outlines the
explanation of the corporate social responsibility for the firms having financial objectives
using the relevant literature review. It also incorporates identification of two theories that is
relevant to the explanation of the sustainability reporting concepts. In the next section, a brief
introduction the ownership, governance and the financial performance of the chosen company
that is Charter Hall is outlined. The sustainability report of Charter Hall is evaluated against
the scoring index of sustainability reporting of GRI (Global reporting Initiative) which helps
in assessing the quality of report by referring tom different aspects of sustainability (Jones et
al., 2016).
Part A:
i. Evaluating the corporate social responsibility relevance to the firms with
financial objectives:
Corporate social responsibility has become a very prominent business practice for
every individual organization. Their major goal is to obtain a good output and a positive
impact on the society. CSR ensures that all the business practices are ethical which, are
practiced within the organization by taking social, economic and environmental practices.
Every individual enterprise or any organization aims to create a maximum share value for the
owners in the company as well as the employees, shareholders and other stakeholders. Today,
almost every business organization are adopting the corporate social responsibility intending
to work for the stakeholders on a much wider scale including the environmental protection,
championing of the women and elimination poverty and unemployment globally (Hummel &
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING THEORY
Schlick, 2016). The companies are taking their focus into corporate social responsibility for
the overall growth and development of the organization by enhancing the loyalty towards the
staff by higher productivity in sales and consequently attracting more personnel to the
company. Corporate citizenship may be also termed as corporate social responsibility. CSR is
also practiced in the company with the strategy of implementing ethical practices in the
company so as to attain maximum profitability in order to meet the needs and demands of
today’s changing top talent (Domingues et al., 2017).
CSR has to allocate the resources and do the research and development so as to
integrate socially responsible methods and the materials in production. It can also be said that
the organization which incorporates the corporate social responsibility eventually results in
enhancing the long term social and economic creation. It helps to improve the management of
the risks associated with business and the arising opportunities which will eventually result in
enhancing the long term social and environmental sustainability. Furthermore, a rising
number of it has assured to divide the corporate social responsibilities into strategies and
operations, thereby making and developing robust measurements and reporting frameworks
so as to obtain both the strategic implementation of CSR and measurement and consequently
reporting frameworks in order to implement CSR and respond to the stakeholder’s
accountability requirements (De Villiers & Sharma, 2017).
ii. Evaluating the representation of holistic view of corporate social responsibility in
relation to other reporting concepts
CSR have a made it a strategy that need to implement into the organization that assist to
obtain the maximum profitability from it along with matching the changing needs of today’s
top talent that is innovation. CSR also makes it essential responsibility to allocate the
resources and do the research and development so as to integrate socially responsible
Schlick, 2016). The companies are taking their focus into corporate social responsibility for
the overall growth and development of the organization by enhancing the loyalty towards the
staff by higher productivity in sales and consequently attracting more personnel to the
company. Corporate citizenship may be also termed as corporate social responsibility. CSR is
also practiced in the company with the strategy of implementing ethical practices in the
company so as to attain maximum profitability in order to meet the needs and demands of
today’s changing top talent (Domingues et al., 2017).
CSR has to allocate the resources and do the research and development so as to
integrate socially responsible methods and the materials in production. It can also be said that
the organization which incorporates the corporate social responsibility eventually results in
enhancing the long term social and economic creation. It helps to improve the management of
the risks associated with business and the arising opportunities which will eventually result in
enhancing the long term social and environmental sustainability. Furthermore, a rising
number of it has assured to divide the corporate social responsibilities into strategies and
operations, thereby making and developing robust measurements and reporting frameworks
so as to obtain both the strategic implementation of CSR and measurement and consequently
reporting frameworks in order to implement CSR and respond to the stakeholder’s
accountability requirements (De Villiers & Sharma, 2017).
ii. Evaluating the representation of holistic view of corporate social responsibility in
relation to other reporting concepts
CSR have a made it a strategy that need to implement into the organization that assist to
obtain the maximum profitability from it along with matching the changing needs of today’s
top talent that is innovation. CSR also makes it essential responsibility to allocate the
resources and do the research and development so as to integrate socially responsible

CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING THEORY
methods and the materials in production. Corporate social responsibility and corporate social
sustainability can be used by the enterprises to incorporate social, environmental as well as
the economic creation. It is very essential to manage the organization by focusing on making
and maximizing the economic, social and the environmental value on a large term basis.
Talking about sustainability , it can be said that it is a comprehensive approach in order to
manage and to maintain the organization by focusing on maximizing the overall value
including the social, economic and the environmental values and ethics (Grushina, 2017).
Corporate social responsibility can also be described as a broad concept that can take
many forms depending on the company and industry. Through it can said that CSR programs,
philanthropy, and volunteer efforts, businesses can be useful to the entire society while
boosting their own brands. As important as CSR is for the community, it is also equally
valuable for a company. CSR activities can also be used to forge a stronger bond in between
employee and corporation, consequently it can be said that it can boost morale and can help
both employees and employers feel more connected with the world around them (Tschopp &
Huefner, 2015).
For any company to be socially responsible at first the most essential requisite to be
responsible to itself and to its shareholders. It is known that companies that adopt CSR
programs have grown their business to the extent where they can give back to society.
Thereby, it can considered that CSR is primarily a strategy of large corporations. Moreover,
the more visible and successful a corporation is, the more responsibility it has to set standards
of ethical behavior for its peers, competition, and industry (Rupley et al., 2017). Therefore,
this is one of the primary factors effecting having the incorporation of CSR in any
organization.
methods and the materials in production. Corporate social responsibility and corporate social
sustainability can be used by the enterprises to incorporate social, environmental as well as
the economic creation. It is very essential to manage the organization by focusing on making
and maximizing the economic, social and the environmental value on a large term basis.
Talking about sustainability , it can be said that it is a comprehensive approach in order to
manage and to maintain the organization by focusing on maximizing the overall value
including the social, economic and the environmental values and ethics (Grushina, 2017).
Corporate social responsibility can also be described as a broad concept that can take
many forms depending on the company and industry. Through it can said that CSR programs,
philanthropy, and volunteer efforts, businesses can be useful to the entire society while
boosting their own brands. As important as CSR is for the community, it is also equally
valuable for a company. CSR activities can also be used to forge a stronger bond in between
employee and corporation, consequently it can be said that it can boost morale and can help
both employees and employers feel more connected with the world around them (Tschopp &
Huefner, 2015).
For any company to be socially responsible at first the most essential requisite to be
responsible to itself and to its shareholders. It is known that companies that adopt CSR
programs have grown their business to the extent where they can give back to society.
Thereby, it can considered that CSR is primarily a strategy of large corporations. Moreover,
the more visible and successful a corporation is, the more responsibility it has to set standards
of ethical behavior for its peers, competition, and industry (Rupley et al., 2017). Therefore,
this is one of the primary factors effecting having the incorporation of CSR in any
organization.

CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING THEORY
iii. Identification of relevant theories for explaining the sustainability reporting
essence:
Legitimacy theory can be referred to the mechanism that assist the organization in the
development and implementation of voluntary environmental and social disclosures that let
them fulfilment of the social contract of recognizing the objectives in the ever changing
environment. When it comes to disclose the environmental information, the role of justifiable
factor is played by the legitimacy theory. Hence, in order to legitimate their legitimacy, it is
essential for the organization to disclose the performance of environmental and social
information. It is posited by the legitimacy theory that it is continuously ensured by the
organization that they operate in the norms and boundaries of their respective societies (Rossi
& Tarquinio, 2017). There is voluntarily reporting on the activities which is perceived to be
important enough to be reported and are expected by the communities in the event of
adoption of perspective of legitimacy theory. A number of studies have found a direct or
indirect impact on the disclosure of CSR activities by the companies. In the event of some
organizations having poor environmental performance, adoption of legitimacy theory helps
them in curbing the legitimacy threat as there is a voluntary disclosure of social,
environmental of governance performance.
In recent years, there is increasing attention of the role of corporations and enterprise
in encouraging the sustainability in the context of growing environmental and social
concerns. The development pf sustainability concepts was attribute to the demand created by
stakeholders and there has been increased application of the sustainability theory and
managing the stakeholder relations concerning sustainability is faced with some challenges. It
is argued by stakeholder theory that the organization should treat all the stakeholders fairly
iii. Identification of relevant theories for explaining the sustainability reporting
essence:
Legitimacy theory can be referred to the mechanism that assist the organization in the
development and implementation of voluntary environmental and social disclosures that let
them fulfilment of the social contract of recognizing the objectives in the ever changing
environment. When it comes to disclose the environmental information, the role of justifiable
factor is played by the legitimacy theory. Hence, in order to legitimate their legitimacy, it is
essential for the organization to disclose the performance of environmental and social
information. It is posited by the legitimacy theory that it is continuously ensured by the
organization that they operate in the norms and boundaries of their respective societies (Rossi
& Tarquinio, 2017). There is voluntarily reporting on the activities which is perceived to be
important enough to be reported and are expected by the communities in the event of
adoption of perspective of legitimacy theory. A number of studies have found a direct or
indirect impact on the disclosure of CSR activities by the companies. In the event of some
organizations having poor environmental performance, adoption of legitimacy theory helps
them in curbing the legitimacy threat as there is a voluntary disclosure of social,
environmental of governance performance.
In recent years, there is increasing attention of the role of corporations and enterprise
in encouraging the sustainability in the context of growing environmental and social
concerns. The development pf sustainability concepts was attribute to the demand created by
stakeholders and there has been increased application of the sustainability theory and
managing the stakeholder relations concerning sustainability is faced with some challenges. It
is argued by stakeholder theory that the organization should treat all the stakeholders fairly
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING THEORY
irrespective of the fact that they contribute to the improved financial performance. The
stakeholder reengaged strategy of the company is associated with the characteristics such as
clarity of what is being reported, communication directness, broadness of inclusiveness of
stakeholders and collecting the feedback (Evans et al., 2017).
Part B:
iv. Presenting the overview of ownership, history, governance and financial
performance of Charter hall Long WALE REIT:
Charter Hall Long WALE REIT is one of the leading fully integrated property groups
of Australia and is managed by Charter group. The focus of the group is to manage and invest
in the qualified, high quality and portfolio of diversified real estate that is leased to the
government and corporate tenants on the long term. Charter hall has experience of twenty
seven years in managing high quality real estate on behalf of wholesale, institutional and
retail clients. The group manages 330 properties across the industrial, office and retail
sectors. Providing investors with the secure and stable income is the ultimate objective of the
group as it has the potentiality of exposure to the ling WALE projects for both capital and
income growth (Grushina, 2017).
The strong financial performance of the company reflects the ability of the company
to grow and manage the REIT through long WALE acquisitions, strategic and active
management of portfolio. Value of portfolio in the financial year 2018 through acquisition
grew to $ 1.53 billion along with increase in the valuation of property that resulted in the
annual growth of net tangible asset of 2.9%. There has been secured capital and income
growth and delivering amount of EPS and DPS of 26.4 cents per security. This indicated an
annual increase in the growth of 3.9% and value of NTA per security of $ 4.5 and this implies
irrespective of the fact that they contribute to the improved financial performance. The
stakeholder reengaged strategy of the company is associated with the characteristics such as
clarity of what is being reported, communication directness, broadness of inclusiveness of
stakeholders and collecting the feedback (Evans et al., 2017).
Part B:
iv. Presenting the overview of ownership, history, governance and financial
performance of Charter hall Long WALE REIT:
Charter Hall Long WALE REIT is one of the leading fully integrated property groups
of Australia and is managed by Charter group. The focus of the group is to manage and invest
in the qualified, high quality and portfolio of diversified real estate that is leased to the
government and corporate tenants on the long term. Charter hall has experience of twenty
seven years in managing high quality real estate on behalf of wholesale, institutional and
retail clients. The group manages 330 properties across the industrial, office and retail
sectors. Providing investors with the secure and stable income is the ultimate objective of the
group as it has the potentiality of exposure to the ling WALE projects for both capital and
income growth (Grushina, 2017).
The strong financial performance of the company reflects the ability of the company
to grow and manage the REIT through long WALE acquisitions, strategic and active
management of portfolio. Value of portfolio in the financial year 2018 through acquisition
grew to $ 1.53 billion along with increase in the valuation of property that resulted in the
annual growth of net tangible asset of 2.9%. There has been secured capital and income
growth and delivering amount of EPS and DPS of 26.4 cents per security. This indicated an
annual increase in the growth of 3.9% and value of NTA per security of $ 4.5 and this implies

CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING THEORY
an increase of 2.9% since financial year 2017. Some of the capital management initiatives
under taken by Charter include extension of hedging maturity to 5.2 years, expansion of debt
facility in the balance sheet to $ 470 million and completion of non-renounceable entitlement
offer of amount $ 94.1 million. The comprehensive income of the company has increased
significantly from $ 34.6 million in year 2017 to $ 83.3 million in year 2018
(charterhall.com.au 2019). Therefore, it is demonstrated by this financial year that the
portfolio can be optimized through divestments, acquisition and extensions of lease and these
helps in ensuring secured income for long term.
The governance framework of Charter assist the organization in monitoring and
assessing the business risks and achieving and setting up the business objectives along with
balancing the needs of stakeholders, business, regulators and market. Charter strive to imbibe
the best practice when it comes to governance by adhering to the principles and
recommendation of the corporate governance council of ASX. It complies with all the eight
principles that is laid down by the ASX principles of governance and thereby and there is
adequate disclosure of any departure from such principles in the corporate governance
statement. The board of directors of the group is engaged in setting the tone concerning the
governance that is regarded critical for achieving the objectives of REIT. The framework of
governance helps in ensuring that the there is an effective management of REIT by
reinforcing the culture of integrity and meeting the statutory regulations (Hussain et al.,
2018).
vii) Preparation of sustainability reporting scoring index according to the guidelines of
GRI:
The sustainability metrics is computed by accounting for ranking and transparent
ratings of several companies and also comprising of other sources of data such as publication,
an increase of 2.9% since financial year 2017. Some of the capital management initiatives
under taken by Charter include extension of hedging maturity to 5.2 years, expansion of debt
facility in the balance sheet to $ 470 million and completion of non-renounceable entitlement
offer of amount $ 94.1 million. The comprehensive income of the company has increased
significantly from $ 34.6 million in year 2017 to $ 83.3 million in year 2018
(charterhall.com.au 2019). Therefore, it is demonstrated by this financial year that the
portfolio can be optimized through divestments, acquisition and extensions of lease and these
helps in ensuring secured income for long term.
The governance framework of Charter assist the organization in monitoring and
assessing the business risks and achieving and setting up the business objectives along with
balancing the needs of stakeholders, business, regulators and market. Charter strive to imbibe
the best practice when it comes to governance by adhering to the principles and
recommendation of the corporate governance council of ASX. It complies with all the eight
principles that is laid down by the ASX principles of governance and thereby and there is
adequate disclosure of any departure from such principles in the corporate governance
statement. The board of directors of the group is engaged in setting the tone concerning the
governance that is regarded critical for achieving the objectives of REIT. The framework of
governance helps in ensuring that the there is an effective management of REIT by
reinforcing the culture of integrity and meeting the statutory regulations (Hussain et al.,
2018).
vii) Preparation of sustainability reporting scoring index according to the guidelines of
GRI:
The sustainability metrics is computed by accounting for ranking and transparent
ratings of several companies and also comprising of other sources of data such as publication,

CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING THEORY
government, crowd, not profit data and ESG analysts. The consensus ratings are generated
using the algorithm of big data. The perceived performance is rated on an absolute scale of 0-
100 using the CSR ratings. In addition to this, the company is ranked ordered against the
other ratings by providing perspective on CSR rankings (csrhub.com 2019). There are three
sub categories on which the ratings of each category is based. Moreover, there are other
categories of each of them on which the rating is done and is listed in the table below.
The scores for each of the information from various companies is computed
individually based on the analysis of contents. As per the guidelines defined by GRI,
aggregation of the indicators is done on the upper level and the computation of scores in each
of the aspects is done by arithmetic mean. Furthermore, the dimensions is used for
aggregating the aspects and the arithmetic mean of the respective aspects is used for
composing the scores. As suggested by GRI guidelines, for the social dimension, there is an
exceptional. Using the arithmetic mean, scores in each and every aspect of the dimension is
computed by arithmetic mean. For the statistical analysis, a quantitative approach is
employed after the scores are calculated. The ranking summarizes the ranking level and
which is indicative of the fact that the company adheres to the indicators of GRI (csrhub.com
2019).
General standard
disclosure
Maximum score
Environment 51%
Employees
Community
Governance 49%
government, crowd, not profit data and ESG analysts. The consensus ratings are generated
using the algorithm of big data. The perceived performance is rated on an absolute scale of 0-
100 using the CSR ratings. In addition to this, the company is ranked ordered against the
other ratings by providing perspective on CSR rankings (csrhub.com 2019). There are three
sub categories on which the ratings of each category is based. Moreover, there are other
categories of each of them on which the rating is done and is listed in the table below.
The scores for each of the information from various companies is computed
individually based on the analysis of contents. As per the guidelines defined by GRI,
aggregation of the indicators is done on the upper level and the computation of scores in each
of the aspects is done by arithmetic mean. Furthermore, the dimensions is used for
aggregating the aspects and the arithmetic mean of the respective aspects is used for
composing the scores. As suggested by GRI guidelines, for the social dimension, there is an
exceptional. Using the arithmetic mean, scores in each and every aspect of the dimension is
computed by arithmetic mean. For the statistical analysis, a quantitative approach is
employed after the scores are calculated. The ranking summarizes the ranking level and
which is indicative of the fact that the company adheres to the indicators of GRI (csrhub.com
2019).
General standard
disclosure
Maximum score
Environment 51%
Employees
Community
Governance 49%
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING THEORY
Product
Climatic change and energy 51%
Transparency and reporting
Leadership and ethics 49%
Health, safety and training 51%
Resource management 51%
Supply chain and human
rights
49%
Benefits and compensation 49%
Philanthropy and
community development
Supporting family 80%
Environmental reporting and
policy
51%
Volunteering and Education 80%
Sustainable technology 90%
Development and
engagement
+ 20
Employee safety < 0.25%
v. Evaluating the quality of sustainability reporting of the company against the
scoring index of sustainability reporting:
The sustainability report of Charter Hall incorporates standard disclosures from the
G4 sustainability reporting guidelines of GRI. It refers to all the general standard disclosures
Product
Climatic change and energy 51%
Transparency and reporting
Leadership and ethics 49%
Health, safety and training 51%
Resource management 51%
Supply chain and human
rights
49%
Benefits and compensation 49%
Philanthropy and
community development
Supporting family 80%
Environmental reporting and
policy
51%
Volunteering and Education 80%
Sustainable technology 90%
Development and
engagement
+ 20
Employee safety < 0.25%
v. Evaluating the quality of sustainability reporting of the company against the
scoring index of sustainability reporting:
The sustainability report of Charter Hall incorporates standard disclosures from the
G4 sustainability reporting guidelines of GRI. It refers to all the general standard disclosures

CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING THEORY
of G4 for disclosing its sustainability improvement and the related areas. Hence, the
sustainability reporting framework of the company has been prepared according to the
principles and requirements of GRI. It is also ensured that the organization is complying with
the applicable regulations and the environmental standards. The sustainability policy of the
group is designed to carry out the operations in an ethical manner and it cover all the aspects
of sustainable design, environmental management, safety, occupational health, and
community engagement and supplier relationship. Assessment of the risks associated with the
social, environmental and governance ate done at both the asset and company level. In
addition to this, the sustainable development goals of UN is also recognized by the group and
focusing on the creation of three themes such as place creation, eco innovation and wellbeing.
The group makes quantitative disclosure of the impact created by its operation of
environment and people, certifications and rating of assets (Bellantuono et al., 2016).
At Charter Hall, community and sustainability is embedded in everything ranging
from development of large scale commercial property, decisions that is made across the
business using sustainable lens to volunteering of local community.
The sustainability performance data is published by Charter Hall in their sustainability
report for assisting their stakeholders to gain an insight into the social, environmental and
economic challenges faced by the business and how the group responds to such challenges to
deliver and maintain long term sustainable growth. The Global reporting initiative statement
prepared by the group provides a detailed information on the performance against different
indicators incorporating the complete disclosure and whether or not such information has
been verified or assured (Ehnert et al., 2016).
General standard disclosure Maximum score
of G4 for disclosing its sustainability improvement and the related areas. Hence, the
sustainability reporting framework of the company has been prepared according to the
principles and requirements of GRI. It is also ensured that the organization is complying with
the applicable regulations and the environmental standards. The sustainability policy of the
group is designed to carry out the operations in an ethical manner and it cover all the aspects
of sustainable design, environmental management, safety, occupational health, and
community engagement and supplier relationship. Assessment of the risks associated with the
social, environmental and governance ate done at both the asset and company level. In
addition to this, the sustainable development goals of UN is also recognized by the group and
focusing on the creation of three themes such as place creation, eco innovation and wellbeing.
The group makes quantitative disclosure of the impact created by its operation of
environment and people, certifications and rating of assets (Bellantuono et al., 2016).
At Charter Hall, community and sustainability is embedded in everything ranging
from development of large scale commercial property, decisions that is made across the
business using sustainable lens to volunteering of local community.
The sustainability performance data is published by Charter Hall in their sustainability
report for assisting their stakeholders to gain an insight into the social, environmental and
economic challenges faced by the business and how the group responds to such challenges to
deliver and maintain long term sustainable growth. The Global reporting initiative statement
prepared by the group provides a detailed information on the performance against different
indicators incorporating the complete disclosure and whether or not such information has
been verified or assured (Ehnert et al., 2016).
General standard disclosure Maximum score

CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING THEORY
Diversity Participation of female in board- 40%
Participation of female in position of
senior executive-21.2%
Participation of female in workplace-
52.5%
Community Contribution of $ 500K to the
community partnerships
Water consumption 79%
Greenhouse gas emission 53.11
Waste disposal by landfill 59%
Electricity 66.5%
Training and development 100%
Well being 90% of time
Eco innovation 4 stars NABERS energy
People 100 hours within the community is
volunteered by 26% of employees.
Charter hall is the first property company of Australia that makes positive
contribution towards the communities by utilizing the place, people and partnerships. It is
demonstrated by the pledge 1% that there would be an approach of investing 1:1:1 in the
community development. People of Charter is engaged in volunteering and there are 161
volunteer and personal team days along with 34% of the people engaged in volunteering their
time. Throughout the Australia, the group provides space to the community enterprises and
organization. They have made a contribution by activating the vacant space of 177982 square
meter and contribution of $ 1.4 million. In addition to this, the culture of Charter is
Diversity Participation of female in board- 40%
Participation of female in position of
senior executive-21.2%
Participation of female in workplace-
52.5%
Community Contribution of $ 500K to the
community partnerships
Water consumption 79%
Greenhouse gas emission 53.11
Waste disposal by landfill 59%
Electricity 66.5%
Training and development 100%
Well being 90% of time
Eco innovation 4 stars NABERS energy
People 100 hours within the community is
volunteered by 26% of employees.
Charter hall is the first property company of Australia that makes positive
contribution towards the communities by utilizing the place, people and partnerships. It is
demonstrated by the pledge 1% that there would be an approach of investing 1:1:1 in the
community development. People of Charter is engaged in volunteering and there are 161
volunteer and personal team days along with 34% of the people engaged in volunteering their
time. Throughout the Australia, the group provides space to the community enterprises and
organization. They have made a contribution by activating the vacant space of 177982 square
meter and contribution of $ 1.4 million. In addition to this, the culture of Charter is
Paraphrase This Document
Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser

CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING THEORY
collaborative and inclusive that respect and values background, experiences and perspective
collectively. Some of the programs of encouraging the growth of people is learning and
development, employee engagement, wellness program, school holiday program and
domestic violence policy. The board of CHC contains 40% of women representatives and this
is intended to promote inclusiveness and equality amongst the employees of the group
(charterhall.com.au 2019).
Stakeholder engagement is other aspect of sustainability and the group engages in the
meaningful interaction with the customers, tenants, employees, suppliers and media. The
group builds the trust partnership for delivering the win-win outcomes and shared success
with the tenant customers (Lewellyn & Logsdon, 2017). The platform of tenant customer
lifecycle journey is used for seeking the feedback from the tenants throughout the year.
Furthermore, the adoption of shared value framework by the group has enabled the
integration of community outcome and sustainability in the business practices. Such
framework also helps in deploying and creating the opportunities for people, management of
assets and new development and addressing the environmental issues that is crucial to the
stakeholders. The approach of “Culture of innovation and Fit for future” intends to address
the issue associated with the change in real estate technology and nature of workplace trends
and innovation in the existing management of assets (charterhall.com.au 2019). The
sustainability report prepared by Charter hall discloses adequate quantitative data on their
environmental and people performance and the impact created by the changing technology in
the workplace. Moreover, there is segregated representation and disclosure of the factors such
as consumption of water, emission of greenhouse gas, electricity consumption and waste
disposal. The commitments toward sustainability is considered to be the responsibility of the
business and is guided by specific governance policy and the sustainability policy of the
group (Alon & Vidovic, 2015).
collaborative and inclusive that respect and values background, experiences and perspective
collectively. Some of the programs of encouraging the growth of people is learning and
development, employee engagement, wellness program, school holiday program and
domestic violence policy. The board of CHC contains 40% of women representatives and this
is intended to promote inclusiveness and equality amongst the employees of the group
(charterhall.com.au 2019).
Stakeholder engagement is other aspect of sustainability and the group engages in the
meaningful interaction with the customers, tenants, employees, suppliers and media. The
group builds the trust partnership for delivering the win-win outcomes and shared success
with the tenant customers (Lewellyn & Logsdon, 2017). The platform of tenant customer
lifecycle journey is used for seeking the feedback from the tenants throughout the year.
Furthermore, the adoption of shared value framework by the group has enabled the
integration of community outcome and sustainability in the business practices. Such
framework also helps in deploying and creating the opportunities for people, management of
assets and new development and addressing the environmental issues that is crucial to the
stakeholders. The approach of “Culture of innovation and Fit for future” intends to address
the issue associated with the change in real estate technology and nature of workplace trends
and innovation in the existing management of assets (charterhall.com.au 2019). The
sustainability report prepared by Charter hall discloses adequate quantitative data on their
environmental and people performance and the impact created by the changing technology in
the workplace. Moreover, there is segregated representation and disclosure of the factors such
as consumption of water, emission of greenhouse gas, electricity consumption and waste
disposal. The commitments toward sustainability is considered to be the responsibility of the
business and is guided by specific governance policy and the sustainability policy of the
group (Alon & Vidovic, 2015).

CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING THEORY
Conclusion:
After undertaking a thorough review of the literature concerning the corporate social
responsibility, it is inferred that the business entities having financial objectives places
considerable importance to the sustainability concepts because of growing and increasing
awareness of the stakeholders towards the impact of their activities on the environment. The
application of the two theories that is legitimacy and stakeholder theory have been able to
explain the sustainability reporting concepts by providing a proper justification with the facts.
In addition to this, from the discussion, it can also be concluded that the sustainability
reporting forms the part of the corporate social responsibility of the firms. Furthermore, the
sustainability report of Charter Hall Long WALE REIT has been prepared by complying with
the G4 sustainability reporting guidelines of GRI. A detailed discussion on each of the
economic, environment and social aspects of the sustainability has been adequately
explained. Each of the aspects has been explained by referring to the sustainability scoring
index. Therefore, the extent of sustainability report of the company adheres to the relevant
and applicable general and specific related disclosures of GRI.
Conclusion:
After undertaking a thorough review of the literature concerning the corporate social
responsibility, it is inferred that the business entities having financial objectives places
considerable importance to the sustainability concepts because of growing and increasing
awareness of the stakeholders towards the impact of their activities on the environment. The
application of the two theories that is legitimacy and stakeholder theory have been able to
explain the sustainability reporting concepts by providing a proper justification with the facts.
In addition to this, from the discussion, it can also be concluded that the sustainability
reporting forms the part of the corporate social responsibility of the firms. Furthermore, the
sustainability report of Charter Hall Long WALE REIT has been prepared by complying with
the G4 sustainability reporting guidelines of GRI. A detailed discussion on each of the
economic, environment and social aspects of the sustainability has been adequately
explained. Each of the aspects has been explained by referring to the sustainability scoring
index. Therefore, the extent of sustainability report of the company adheres to the relevant
and applicable general and specific related disclosures of GRI.

CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING THEORY
References list:
Adams, C. (2017). Understanding integrated reporting: the concise guide to integrated
thinking and the future of corporate reporting. Routledge.
Alon, A., & Vidovic, M. (2015). Sustainability performance and assurance: Influence on
reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 18(4), 337-352.
Bellantuono, N., Pontrandolfo, P., & Scozzi, B. (2016). Capturing the stakeholders’ view in
sustainability reporting: a novel approach. Sustainability, 8(4), 379.
Charter Hall Long WALE REIT. (2019). Corporate. Retrieved 3 October 2019, from
https://www.charterhall.com.au/investments/funds/clw
CSR information for Charter Hall Group. (2019). CSRHub - Sustainability and Corporate
Social Responsiblity (CSR) ratings on over 32,098 of the world’s largest public and
private companies.. Retrieved 3 October 2019, from
https://www.csrhub.com/CSR_and_sustainability_information/Charter-Hall-Group
De Villiers, C., & Sharma, U. (2017). A critical reflection on the future of financial,
intellectual capital, sustainability and integrated reporting. Critical Perspectives on
Accounting.
Domingues, A. R., Lozano, R., Ceulemans, K., & Ramos, T. B. (2017). Sustainability
reporting in public sector organisations: Exploring the relation between the reporting
References list:
Adams, C. (2017). Understanding integrated reporting: the concise guide to integrated
thinking and the future of corporate reporting. Routledge.
Alon, A., & Vidovic, M. (2015). Sustainability performance and assurance: Influence on
reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, 18(4), 337-352.
Bellantuono, N., Pontrandolfo, P., & Scozzi, B. (2016). Capturing the stakeholders’ view in
sustainability reporting: a novel approach. Sustainability, 8(4), 379.
Charter Hall Long WALE REIT. (2019). Corporate. Retrieved 3 October 2019, from
https://www.charterhall.com.au/investments/funds/clw
CSR information for Charter Hall Group. (2019). CSRHub - Sustainability and Corporate
Social Responsiblity (CSR) ratings on over 32,098 of the world’s largest public and
private companies.. Retrieved 3 October 2019, from
https://www.csrhub.com/CSR_and_sustainability_information/Charter-Hall-Group
De Villiers, C., & Sharma, U. (2017). A critical reflection on the future of financial,
intellectual capital, sustainability and integrated reporting. Critical Perspectives on
Accounting.
Domingues, A. R., Lozano, R., Ceulemans, K., & Ramos, T. B. (2017). Sustainability
reporting in public sector organisations: Exploring the relation between the reporting
Secure Best Marks with AI Grader
Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.

CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING THEORY
process and organisational change management for sustainability. Journal of
environmental management, 192, 292-301.
Ehnert, I., Parsa, S., Roper, I., Wagner, M., & Muller-Camen, M. (2016). Reporting on
sustainability and HRM: A comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by
the world's largest companies. The International Journal of Human Resource
Management, 27(1), 88-108.
Elving, W. J., Golob, U., Podnar, K., Ellerup-Nielsen, A., Thomson, C., Knebel, S., & Seele,
P. (2015). Quo vadis GRI? A (critical) assessment of GRI 3.1 A+ non-financial
reports and implications for credibility and standardization. Corporate
Communications: An International Journal.
Evans, S., Vladimirova, D., Holgado, M., Van Fossen, K., Yang, M., Silva, E. A., & Barlow,
C. Y. (2017). Business model innovation for sustainability: Towards a unified
perspective for creation of sustainable business models. Business Strategy and the
Environment, 26(5), 597-608.
Grushina, S. V. (2017). Collaboration by design: Stakeholder engagement in GRI
sustainability reporting guidelines. Organization & Environment, 30(4), 366-385.
Higgins, C., Milne, M. J., & Van Gramberg, B. (2015). The uptake of sustainability reporting
in Australia. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(2), 445-468.
Hummel, K., & Schlick, C. (2016). The relationship between sustainability performance and
sustainability disclosure–Reconciling voluntary disclosure theory and legitimacy
theory. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35(5), 455-476.
process and organisational change management for sustainability. Journal of
environmental management, 192, 292-301.
Ehnert, I., Parsa, S., Roper, I., Wagner, M., & Muller-Camen, M. (2016). Reporting on
sustainability and HRM: A comparative study of sustainability reporting practices by
the world's largest companies. The International Journal of Human Resource
Management, 27(1), 88-108.
Elving, W. J., Golob, U., Podnar, K., Ellerup-Nielsen, A., Thomson, C., Knebel, S., & Seele,
P. (2015). Quo vadis GRI? A (critical) assessment of GRI 3.1 A+ non-financial
reports and implications for credibility and standardization. Corporate
Communications: An International Journal.
Evans, S., Vladimirova, D., Holgado, M., Van Fossen, K., Yang, M., Silva, E. A., & Barlow,
C. Y. (2017). Business model innovation for sustainability: Towards a unified
perspective for creation of sustainable business models. Business Strategy and the
Environment, 26(5), 597-608.
Grushina, S. V. (2017). Collaboration by design: Stakeholder engagement in GRI
sustainability reporting guidelines. Organization & Environment, 30(4), 366-385.
Higgins, C., Milne, M. J., & Van Gramberg, B. (2015). The uptake of sustainability reporting
in Australia. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(2), 445-468.
Hummel, K., & Schlick, C. (2016). The relationship between sustainability performance and
sustainability disclosure–Reconciling voluntary disclosure theory and legitimacy
theory. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 35(5), 455-476.

CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING THEORY
Hussain, N., Rigoni, U., & Orij, R. P. (2018). Corporate governance and sustainability
performance: Analysis of triple bottom line performance. Journal of Business
Ethics, 149(2), 411-432.
Idowu, S. O., Dragu, I. M., Tiron-Tudor, A., & Farcas, T. V. (2016). From CSR and
sustainability to integrated reporting. International Journal of Social
Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 4(2), 134-151.
Jones, P., Comfort, D., & Hillier, D. (2016). Managing materiality: a preliminary
examination of the adoption of the new GRI G4 guidelines on materiality within the
business community. Journal of Public Affairs, 16(3), 222-230.’
Lewellyn, P. G., & Logsdon, J. M. (2017, July). Global Reporting Initiative G4 Sustainability
Reporting Guidelines: Do They Deliver?. In Proceedings of the International
Association for Business and Society (Vol. 28, pp. 161-172).
Manetti, G., & Bellucci, M. (2016). The use of social media for engaging stakeholders in
sustainability reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(6), 985-
1011.
Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of
disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical perspectives on accounting, 33, 59-78.
Rossi, A., & Tarquinio, L. (2017). An analysis of sustainability report assurance statements:
Evidence from Italian listed companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(6), 578-
602.
Rupley, K. H., Brown, D., & Marshall, S. (2017). Evolution of corporate reporting: From
stand-alone corporate social responsibility reporting to integrated reporting. Research
in accounting regulation, 29(2), 172-176.
Hussain, N., Rigoni, U., & Orij, R. P. (2018). Corporate governance and sustainability
performance: Analysis of triple bottom line performance. Journal of Business
Ethics, 149(2), 411-432.
Idowu, S. O., Dragu, I. M., Tiron-Tudor, A., & Farcas, T. V. (2016). From CSR and
sustainability to integrated reporting. International Journal of Social
Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 4(2), 134-151.
Jones, P., Comfort, D., & Hillier, D. (2016). Managing materiality: a preliminary
examination of the adoption of the new GRI G4 guidelines on materiality within the
business community. Journal of Public Affairs, 16(3), 222-230.’
Lewellyn, P. G., & Logsdon, J. M. (2017, July). Global Reporting Initiative G4 Sustainability
Reporting Guidelines: Do They Deliver?. In Proceedings of the International
Association for Business and Society (Vol. 28, pp. 161-172).
Manetti, G., & Bellucci, M. (2016). The use of social media for engaging stakeholders in
sustainability reporting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(6), 985-
1011.
Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of
disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical perspectives on accounting, 33, 59-78.
Rossi, A., & Tarquinio, L. (2017). An analysis of sustainability report assurance statements:
Evidence from Italian listed companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(6), 578-
602.
Rupley, K. H., Brown, D., & Marshall, S. (2017). Evolution of corporate reporting: From
stand-alone corporate social responsibility reporting to integrated reporting. Research
in accounting regulation, 29(2), 172-176.

CONTEMPORARY ACCOUNTING THEORY
Sustainability Governance | Charter Hall Shared Value and Sustainability Report 2017.
(2019). Charterhall2017.sustainability-report.com.au. Retrieved 3 October 2019,
from http://charterhall2017.sustainability-report.com.au/our-approach/sustainability-
governance
Tschopp, D., & Huefner, R. J. (2015). Comparing the evolution of CSR reporting to that of
financial reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 565-577.
Yadava, R. N., & Sinha, B. (2016). Scoring sustainability reports using GRI 2011 guidelines
for assessing environmental, economic, and social dimensions of leading public and
private Indian companies. Journal of business ethics, 138(3), 549-558.
Sustainability Governance | Charter Hall Shared Value and Sustainability Report 2017.
(2019). Charterhall2017.sustainability-report.com.au. Retrieved 3 October 2019,
from http://charterhall2017.sustainability-report.com.au/our-approach/sustainability-
governance
Tschopp, D., & Huefner, R. J. (2015). Comparing the evolution of CSR reporting to that of
financial reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(3), 565-577.
Yadava, R. N., & Sinha, B. (2016). Scoring sustainability reports using GRI 2011 guidelines
for assessing environmental, economic, and social dimensions of leading public and
private Indian companies. Journal of business ethics, 138(3), 549-558.
1 out of 19
Related Documents

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.
+13062052269
info@desklib.com
Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email
Unlock your academic potential
© 2024 | Zucol Services PVT LTD | All rights reserved.