Syngenta Amistar Project: Business Decision Making and Market Analysis

Verified

Added on  2023/04/22

|8
|367
|312
Presentation
AI Summary
Read More
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Contribute Materials

Your contribution can guide someone’s learning journey. Share your documents today.
Document Page
BUSINESS DECISION MAKING
TASK 3
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
Q.3 Preparing the presentation by using software
Document Page
Continued....
Document Page
Continued....
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Secure Best Marks with AI Grader

Need help grading? Try our AI Grader for instant feedback on your assignments.
Document Page
Continued....
Graphical presentation clearly states sales and profit
figures of Amistar project of Syngenta in relation to the
Japanese market. Both column and bar chart represents the
figure from 2005 to 2014.
It provides assistance to the line manager of firm in making
analysis of their sales and net profitability aspect. Usually,
visual presentation develops clear understanding in the
mind of manager about their performance and aid in the
decision making aspect of the firm.
Document Page
Continued....
This trend line clearly reflects that sales and profit of Amistar
project Syngenta is continuously fluctuating in the Japanese
market.
Nevertheless, at the end of the year, sales and gross margin of
the firm increases. Therefore, trend line of the firm shows
growing trend for the future market.
Trend line depicts that sales and gross profit of the firm will rise in
the near future. In order to overcome the fluctuations that took
place in revenue and net profit. Syngenta requires to undertake
promotional campaign that will help them in developing
awareness among the customers of Fungicides.
According to the trend of gross sales and income, company will
also attain success in the Indian market by introducing the
Amistar project.
Document Page
REFERENCES
Raju, P.S., Lonial, S.C. and Mangold, W.G., 2015. Subjective, Objective,
and Experience-Based Knowledge: A Comparison in the Decision-
Making Context. In Proceedings of the 1993 Academy of Marketing
Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Springer International Publishing.
Rodrigues, T.P. And et.al., 2016. Quality index method (QIM) and
quantitative descriptive analysis (QDA) of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis
niloticus) quality indices. African Journal of Agricultural Research.
11(3). pp.209-216.
Tamir, M. and et.al., 2015. An expectancy-value model of emotion
regulation: Implications for motivation, emotional experience, and
decision making. Emotion. 15(1). pp.90.
tabler-icon-diamond-filled.svg

Paraphrase This Document

Need a fresh take? Get an instant paraphrase of this document with our AI Paraphraser
Document Page
Thank You
chevron_up_icon
1 out of 8
circle_padding
hide_on_mobile
zoom_out_icon
logo.png

Your All-in-One AI-Powered Toolkit for Academic Success.

Available 24*7 on WhatsApp / Email

[object Object]