Business Literature Review: Systematic Review and Analysis of Research

This assignment presents a comprehensive systematic review of business literature, focusing on the methodology and analysis of research. It begins by highlighting the advantages of systematic reviews, including their contribution to debates on replication. The review differentiates between various types of literature reviews, aiding in the selection of the most appropriate method. Key stages for conducting a systematic review are detailed, along with core principles and standards. The assignment addresses real-world challenges faced by reviewers and provides solutions. Finally, it outlines standards for presenting systematic reviews, ensuring the written context meets the criteria for submission to leading journals and practical applicability. The review references Siddaway, Wood, and Hedges (2019) for a detailed guide on conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses.

Running head: BUSINESS LITERATUR REVIEW
BUSINESS LITERATUR REVIEW
Name of the Student:
Name of the University:
Author Note:

1BUSINESS LITERATUR REVIEW
Systematic Review
As per the authors Siddaway, Wood and Hedges, systematic reviews could be
characterized by replicable and methodical presentation and methodology. They involve
comprehensive search for locating every relevant published as well as unpublished work on
subject, search results’ systematic integration and critique of nature, quality of the evidence and
extent in relation with specific research questions. Studies are synthesized by best reviews for
drawing wide theoretical conclusions of what literature review is, linking theory with evidence as
well as evidence with theory. The guide describes the process for planning, conducting,
presenting as well as organizing quantitative information’s systematic review, covering every
aspect of review except for results section. Readers could be referred to the core texts within
every specialty for the information (Siddaway, Wood & Hedges, 2019). The section is avoided
and not discussed where how data could be used which make up systematic review’s products as
there are specialized, different methods and customs for doing it with quantitative and qualitative
information.
The paper begins with discussion of literature review’s advantages, especially systematic
reviews and confer, which includes potential of systematic reviews for contributing to debate on
replication crisis. Literature reviews’ different types are described in this article for helping
readers choose tool which fits research context as well as their context. Bulk of the article details
key stags to conduct systematic review. Core principles and standards are discussed in this article
which should be adhered as well as problems of real world which systematic reviewer would
likely encounter along with means to avoid or overcome these problems. In final section of the

2BUSINESS LITERATUR REVIEW
article, core standards and principles are described to present systematic reviews for ensuring the
written context is proper for submission of journals of field-leading and practically useful.

3BUSINESS LITERATUR REVIEW
Reference
Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: a best
practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-
syntheses. Annual review of psychology, 70, 747-770.